2005-2022 Yılları Arasında Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Üzerine Yapılan Lisansüstü Tezlerin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 136 - 150, 30.06.2023

Emre İmamoğlu

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel özdeşleşme alanında yazılmış olan lisansüstü tezlerin çeşitli parametreler ışığında bibliyometrik analiz ile değerlendirilmesidir. Araştırmada, örgütsel özdeşleşme konusunda 2005-2022 yılları arasında yazılmış olan 224 lisansüstü tez incelenmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, çalışmaların ağırlıklı olarak yüksek lisans alanında ve Türkçe dilinde yazıldığı görülürken, konu ile ilgili en fazla tezin 2019 yılında yazıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Cinsiyet açısından değerlendirildiğinde, kadın yazarların baskın olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca, örgütsel özdeşleşme konusunda yapılan araştırmaların %61,61’inin işletme anabilim dalında gerçekleştirildiği ve konunun en çok iş tatmini ile birlikte çalışıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, örgütsel bağlamda önemi giderek artan örgütsel özdeşleşme kavramı ile ilgili araştırmaların belli dönemlerde ivme kazandığı ancak global düzeyde karşılaştırıldığında bu ilginin hâlen istenilen düzeyde olmadığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışma ile örgütsel özdeşleşme konusunda çalışma yapacak bilim insanlarına yol gösterici olması hedeflenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Özdeşleşme, Sosyal Kimlik Teorisi, Lisansüstü Tezler, Bibliyometrik Analiz

Kaynakça

• Abrams, D. (1992). Processes of Social Identification, s. 57-99, (Ed.) Breakwell, G. M., Social Psychology of Identity and the Self-Concept, Surrey University Press, London.
• Abrams, D., ve Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. Harvester Wheatsheaf and Springer, London and New York.
• Albert, S. ve Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational Identity, Research in Organizational Behavior, 7:263-295.
• Bergami, M. ve Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-Categorization, Affective Commitment and Group Self-Esteem As Distinct Aspects of Social Identity in the Organization, British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4): 555-577.
• Blader, S. L., Patil, S. ve Packer, D. J. (2017). Organizational Identification and Workplace Behavior: More Than Meets The Eye, Research in Organizational Behavior, 37: 19-34.
• Brown, M. E. (1969). Identification and Some Conditions of Organizational Involvement, Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(3): 346-355.
• Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M. ve Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational Images and Member Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2): 239-263.
• Edwards, M. R. ve Peccei, R. (2007). Organizational Identification: Development and Testing of A Conceptually Grounded Measure, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(1): 25-57.
• Edwards, M. R. (2005). Organizational Identification: A Conceptual and Operational Review, International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4): 207-230.
• Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D. ve Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating Individuals and Groups at Work: A Social Identity Perspective on Leadership and Group Performance, Academy of Management Review, 29(3): 459-478.
• Ellemers, N., Kortekaas P. ve Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-Categorization, Commitment to the Group and Group Self-Esteem As Related But Distinct Aspects of Social Identity, European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(23): 371-389.
• Elsbach, K. D. (1999). An Expanded Model of Organizational Identification. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21: 163-200.
• Foote, N. N. (1951). Identification As the Basis for A Theory of Motivation, American Sociological Review, 16(1): 14-21.
• Fuller, J. B., Hester, K., Barnett, T., Beu, D., Frey, L. ve Relyea, C. (2009). Extending the Group Engagement Model: An Examination of the Interactive Effects of Prestige, Respect, and Employee Role Identity, Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(1): 119-139.
• Gouldnler, A. W. (1957). Cosmopolitans and Locals: Toward An Analysis of Latent Social Roles-I, Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(3), 281-306.
• Gutierrez, B., Howard-Grenville, J. ve Scully, M. A. (2010). The Faithful Rise Up: Split Identification and An Unlikely Change Effort, Academy of Management Journal, 53(4): 673-699.
• Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach, Sage: London.
• He, H. ve Brown, A. D. (2013). Organizational Identity and Organizational Identification: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Group & Organization Management, 38(1): 3-35.
• Hogg, M. A. ve Terry, D. J. (2000). Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts, The Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 121.
• İnceoğlu, Ç. (2014). Türkiye'de Akademik Sinema Yazınının On Yılı (2002-2011): Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz, Selçuk İletişim, 8(3): 182-200.
• İşcan, Ö. F. (2006). Dönüştürücü/Etkileşimci Liderlik Algısı ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme İlişkisinde Bireysel Farklılıkların Rolü, Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(11): 160-177.
• Johnson, W. L., Johnson, A. M. ve Heimberg, F. (1999). A Primaryand Second-Order Component Analysis of the Organizational Identification Questionnaire, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1): 159.
• Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, Nobel Yayınları.
• Knight, R. P. (1940). Introjection, Projection and Identification, Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 9(3): 334-341.
• Kramer, R. M. (1993). Cooperation and Organizational Identification, s. 244-268, (Ed.) Muminghan, J. K., Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.
• Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup Relations and Organizational Dilemmas: The Role of Categorization Processes, s. 191-228, (Ed.) Cummings, L. L. ve Staw, B. M., Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press: Greenwich, CT:
• Kreiner, G. E. ve Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence Toward An Expanded Model of Organizational Identification, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1): 1-27.
• Lee, S. M. (1971). An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Identification, Academy of Management Journal, 14(2): 213-226.
• Likert, R. (1967). The Human Organization, McGraw-Hill.
• Mael, F. A. ve Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal From Day One: Biodata, Organizational Identification, and Turnover Among Newcomers, Personnel Psychology, 48(2): 309-333.
• Mael, F. ve Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of The Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2): 103-123.
• Mael, F., ve Ashforth, B. E. (1989). Social Identity Theory and The Organizations, Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 20-39.
• McGregor, D. (1967). The Professional Manager, McGraw-Hill.
• Pratt, M. G. (1998). To Be or Not to Be? Central Questions in Organizational Identification, s. 171-208, (Ed.) D. A. Whetten, D. A. ve Godfrey, P. C., Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversations, Sage Publications.
• Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational Identification: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2): 358-384.
• Rotondi, T. (1975). Organizational Identification: Issues and Implications, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1): 95-109.
• Sanford, N. (1955). The Dynamics of Identification, Psychological Review, 62(2): 106-118.
• Scott, S. G. ve Lane, V. R. (2000). A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational Identity, Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 43-62.
• Smith, J. ve Gardner, D. (2007). Factors Affecting Employee Use of Work-Life Balance Initiatives. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 36(1): 3-12.
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1): 1-39.
• Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. C. (1985). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior, s. 7-24, (Ed.) Worchel, S. ve Austin, W. G., The Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Nelson-Hall: Chicago, IL.
• Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict, s.33-37, (Ed) Austin, W. G. ve Worchel, S, The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Brooks/Cole.
• Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Academic Press.
• Tak, B. ve Aydemir, B. A. (2004). Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Üzerine İki Görgül Çalışma, 12. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa.
• Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards A Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group, s. 15-40, (Ed.) Tajfel, H., Social Identity and Intergroup RelationsCambridge University Press: Cambridge.
• Turner, J. C. ve Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-Categorization Theory and Social Influence, s. 233-275, (Ed.) Paulus P. B., Psychology of Group Influence, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Tyler, T. R. ve Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity and Behavioral Engagement, Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
• Van Dick, R., Ulrich, W., Stellmacher, J. ve Christ, O. (2004). The Utility of A Broader Conceptualization of Organizational Identification: Which Aspects Really Matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(2): 171-191.
• Van Leeuwen, E., Van Knippenberg, D. ve Ellemers, N. (2003). Continuing and Changing Group Identities: The Effects of Merging on Social Identification and Ingroup Bias, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6): 679-690.
• Watson, T. J. (1963). A Business and Its Beliefs, McGraw-Hill.
• Witting, M. (2006). Relations Between Organizational Identity, Identification and Organizational Objectives: An Empirical Study in Municipalities, Afstudeerartikel Voor De Opleiding Toegepaste Communicatiewetenschap Universiteit Twente.