A Critical Analysis of Mark Ravenhill’s The Cane: Hegemonic Subjects’ Revolt against Authority

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 153 - 166, 29.12.2023

Cüneyt Özata

https://doi.org/10.47777/cankujhss.1290195

Öz

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the hegemonic approach taken toward students in the British education system in the past from the perspectives of both the students and the teachers within the framework of structure and superstructure and to search for the erroneous disciplinary beliefs prevalent then. Mark Ravenhill chooses The Cane for the title of his play ironically, a choice which draws attention to the cane as a punishment tool employed by the authority to exercise its hegemony, and to the deficiencies of the previous educational system. Turning into a display of hegemonic power and authority, this punishment act will be analysed through the term hegemony, believed to have been given its final meaning by Antonio Gramsci, a Marxist theorist. To Gramsci, this term is defined as the sovereign demonstrating its supremacy through ideological devices/techniques in institutions such as schools and churches, where large numbers of members present in civil society. The Cane (2019) by Mark Ravenhill, a pioneer of In-yer-face movement in British theatre, is the product of a flawed discipline-based hegemonic practice England used in the past when ideologies produced theses and antitheses, based on a chain of events revolving around a chain of mistakes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

hegemony, education, Cane, punishment, power

MARK RAVENHILL’İN SOPA ADLI OYUNUNUN ELEŞTİREL ANALİZİ: HEGEMONİK ÖZNELERİN OTORİTEYE BAŞKALDIRISI

Öz

Bu makalenin amacı, geçmiş yıllarda İngiltere’nin eğitim sisteminde öğrenciler üzerinde gerçekleştirilen hegemonik yaklaşımı öğrenci-öğretmen açısından yapı–üst yapı bağlamında ele almak ve o dönemin disiplin anlayışındaki yanlışlıkları irdelemektir. Oyununun başlığını ironik şekilde Sopa (The Cane) olarak seçen Mark Ravenhill, iktidarın hegemonyasını uygulama aracı olarak kullandığı bir cezalandırma aracı olan sopa üzerinden geçmiş dönem eğitim sistemindeki yanlışlıklara dikkat çeker. Bir hegemonik güç ve otorite gösterisine dönüşen bu cezalandırma eylemi, Marksist düşünür Antonio Gramsci’nin nihai anlamını kazandırdığı hegemonya terimi üzerinden değerlendirilecektir. Bu terim, Gramsci’ye göre, egemen olanın, güç göstergesi olarak kendi üstünlüğünü ideolojik aygıtlar/yaklaşımlar kullanarak, sivil toplumun kitleler halinde bulunduğu okul, kilise gibi kurumlarda uygulamaya koyması olarak tanımlanabilir. İngiliz tiyatrosunda In-yer-face akımının da öncülerinden biri olan oyun yazarı Ravenhill’in Sopa (2019) oyunu, ideolojilerin kendi içerisinde tez ve antitezler ürettiği bir zaman aralığında İngiltere’nin geçmiş zaman diliminde uygulamaya konulan disiplin temelli yanlış bir hegemonya pratiğinin sonucunda meydana gelen bir dizi hatanın merkeze alındığı olaylar dizisini temel alır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

hegemonya, eğitim, Sopa, ceza, güç

Kaynakça

• Althusser, L. (2014). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. Verso.
• Bates, T. R. (1975). Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony, Journal of the History of Ideas, University of Pennsylvania Press, April-June, Vol. 36, No. 2.
• Billingham, P. (2007). At the Sharp End: Uncovering the work of Five Contemporary Dramatists. Methuen.
• Billington, M. (2018). The Cane review – Mark Ravenhill’s provocative look at power abuse. The Guardian, December 13. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2018/dec/13/the-cane-review-mark-ravenhill-royal-court-london-nicola-walker-alun-armstrong
• Borg C. Buttigieg J. A. and Mayo P. (2002). Gramsci and Education. Rowman & Littlefield.
• Çelik, Y. (2010). Edward Bond’s “The War Plays”; Projecting the Doomed Future of Mankind, Romanian Journal of English Studies, No: 7, pp. 156-167.
• Clapp, S. (2018). The week in theatre: The Cane; The Tell-Tale Heart; Uncle Vanya – review. The Guardian, December 16. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2018/dec/16/ cane-mark-ravenhill-royal-court-review-tell-tale-heart-national-uncle-vanya-hampstead.
• Femia, J. V. (1981). Gramsci’s Political Thought Hegemony, Conscious and the Revolutionary Process. Clarendon Press.
• Fontana, B. (1993). Hegemony and Power on the Relation between Gramsci and Machiavelli. University of Minnesota Press.
• Gramsci, A. (2000). Intellectuals and Education, The Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings, 1916-1935. David Forgacs (Ed.). pp: 300-323. NYU Press.
• Hartl, A. (2020). Mark Ravenhill’s Dialectical Emotions: In-Yer-Face as Post-Brechtian Theatre. In Boles, W. C. Boles (ed.) After In-Yer-Face Theatre. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39427-1_5
• hegemony. (2023). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/hegemony
• Howson, R. and Smith, K. (ed.). (2008). Hegemony Studies in Consensus and Coercion. Routledge.
• Kervegan, J. F. (2018). The Actual and the Rational: Hegel and Objective Spirit. The University of Chicago Press.
• Kiely, R. (2005). Empire in the Age of Globalisation US Hegemony and Neoliberal Disorder. Pluto Press.
• Kumar, K. (2001). 1989: Revolutionary Ideas and Ideals. Minneapolis. University of Minnesota Press.
• Levin, D. M. (1993). Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision. University of California Press.
• Manokha, I. (2008). The Political Economy of Human Rights Enforcement. Global Ethics Series. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1998). The German Ideology. Prometheus Books.
• Morton, A. D. (2007). Unravelling Gramsci Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy. Pluto Press.
• Ravenhill, M. (2001). Plays: 1 – Shopping and Fucking, Faust is Dead, Handbag, Some Explicit Polaroids. Methuen Drama.
• Ravenhill, M. (2003). A Touch of Evil. The Guardian, March 22. https://www.theguardian.com/ stage/2003/mar/22/theatre.artsfeatures
• Ravenhill, M. (2004). A Tear in the Fabric: The James Bulger Murder and New Theatre Writing in the Nineties, New Theatre Quarterly, No. 26, Winter-Spring, pp. 305-314.
• Ravenhill, M. (2013). Plays 3: Shoot/Get Treasure/Repeat, Over There, A Life in Three Acts, Ten Plagues, Ghost Story, The Experiment. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Ravenhill, M. (2019). The Cane. (Modern Plays). Methuen Drama. Saunders, G. (2012). Mark Ravenhill. In Sierz, A. Modern British Playwriting: The 1990s. Methuen Drama, pp. 160-183.
• Schiff, L. R. (2003). Informed Consent Information Production and Ideology. Scarecrow Press, Inc.
• Sierz, A. (2001). In-Yer-Face Theatre: British Drama Today. Faber.
• Svich, C. (2003). Commerce and Morality in the Theatre of Mark Ravenhill, Contemporary Theatre Review, 13(1), pp. 81-95.
• Wolfreys, J., Robbins, R. and Womack, K. (2001). Key Concepts in Literary Theory. Second Edition. Fitzroy Dearborn.
• Zizek, S. (2008). Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. (Big Ideas/Small Books). Picador.