Some Reconsideration on the Reasons for and Results of the Battle of Carrhae (53 B.C.)

Yıl 2018, , 233 - 248, 29.06.2018

Muzaffer Demir

https://doi.org/10.13113/CEDRUS.201811

Öz

It has been generally accepted in both ancient and modern sources that after the establishment of the First Triumvirate in 60 B.C., one of the most powerful men of Rome, Crassus had the idea that he had to win a great battle in order to promote his authority and popularity in Rome over his rivals, Pompeius and Caesar, who had already gained renown for their victories. To realize this thought, he is assumed to have decided to make an expedition against the Parthians in the East before they were strong enough to invade Syria. Some Roman writers, especially Florus, pointed out that the political ambitions of Crassus led to his end. Crassus, having set out on his expedition from Antiochia, reached Carrhae (Harran) near Edessa (Urfa). At the western vicinity of this place, he was surprised by the army of Surenas, the Parthian general. Ro-man banners and standards were captured and Crassus was also killed in turmoil while trying to make a truce with the Parthians. The number of casualties was more than twenty thousand. The interesting point is that the Parthians also took ten thousand Roman soldiers as prisoners and kept them in the East for a period of thirty-three years. This defeat also ended the dreams of those Romans who wished to extend their territories beyond the Euphrates as far as India, just as Alexander the Great did. Trajan and Septimius Severus, the strong emperors of Rome, also fol-lowed these same dreams, making expeditions against the Parthians in the early and late IInd century A.D. In this study, apart from Florus, by striving to analyze the works of Cicero, Plutarch, Velleius Paterculus, Appian and Cassius Dio, we comment on the reasons, tactics and results of the battle of Carrhae. In particular, we concentrate on the reasons why the Parthian war strategies prevailed upon the Roman ones. Further, we also concentrate attention on the thesis that the main reason for the loss of the battle was the character and the decisions of Crassus, and find both reasons, the importance of Crassus’s character and his decisions, have been exaggerated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Crassus, Parthians, Carrhae, Harran, Rome

Carrhae Savaşı’nın (MÖ 53) Sebepleri ve Sonuçları Üzerine Bazı Yeni Değerlendirmeler

Öz

I. Triumvirliğin MÖ 60 yılında kurulmasından sonra Roma’nın en güçlü üç lideri arasında yerini alan Crassus’un Pompeius ve Caesar’ın askeri zaferlerine denk gelebilecek bir zafer kazanırsa, belki kendisinin de Roma’nın meşhur ve sayılan liderlerinden biri olabileceği düşüncesine kendisini kaptırdığı tezi genelde antik ve modern kay-naklarda kabul görmektedir. Bu sebeple onun Doğu’da Parthlara karşı bir sefer düzenlemeye ve onları egemenlik altına almaya karar verdiği öngörülmektedir. Özellikle Florus gibi bazı Roma yazarları Crassus’un bu siyasi hırsının kendi sonunu getirdiği konusunda hemfikirdirler. Crass-us, Antiokheia’dan yola çıkarak Urfa yakınlarında bugünkü Harran, yani Carrhae’ye ulaşmıştır. Buranın batısına düşen bir yerde Parth generali Surena’nın yaptığı ani bir baskınla yenilgiye uğramış, Parthlara bayrak ve sancakla-rını kaptırmış, kendisi de barış görüşmeleri sırasında tuzağa düşürülerek öldürülmüştür. Roma savaş alanında yirmi binden fazla askerini kaybetmiştir; Carrhae yenilgisinin kendine özgü sonuçlarından birisi de on bin Romalı askerin esir alınması ve nihayetinde bunların otuz üç yıl boyunca Uzak Doğu’da kalmalarıdır. Bu yenilgi aynı zamanda Roma’nın Doğu’da Fırat’ın ötesinde Büyük İskender gibi Hindistan’a kadar topraklarını genişletme hayallerinin sonu olması açısından önemlidir. Roma’nın güçlü impara-torları Traianus ve Septimius Severus, MS II. yüzyıl başları ve sonlarında Parthlara karşı düzenledikleri seferlerle benzer hayaller peşinde koşmuşlardır. Biz bu çalışmamızda Florus dışında, Cicero, Plutarkhos, Velleius Paterculus, Appianus ve Cassius Dio gibi antik yazarların me-tinlerini analiz ederek, Carrhae Savaşı’nın sebepleri, yeri, taktikleri ve sonuçları hakkında değerlendirmelerde bulunacağız. Özellikle Parth savaş taktiklerinin bu savaşta Roma’ya nasıl üstün geldiğinin sebeplerini araştıracağız. Ayrıca antik kaynakların genelinde savaşın kaybedilmesinin ana sebebi olarak Crassus’un gösterilmesinin abartılı olabileceği tezi üzerinde duracağız.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Crassus, • Parthlar, Carrhae, Harran, Roma

Kaynakça

• App. Bell. Civ. (= Appianus, Bellum Civile)
• The Civil Wars. Trans. H. White. London 1899.
• Cass. Dio (= Cassius Dio, Rhomaika)
• Roman History. Trans. E. Carry, vols. I-IX. London 1914-1927 (The Loeb Classical Library).
• Cic. Att. (= Cicero, Epistulae ad Atticum)
• Kullamılan Metin ve Çeviri: Letters to Atticus. Ed. & Trans. D. R. S. Bailey, vol. I-IV. Cambridge, Mass.-London 1999 (The Loeb Classical Library).
• Cic. div. (= Cicero, De Divinatione)
• Cicero. De Senectute De Amicitia De Divinatione. With an English translation by W. A. Falconer. Cambridge, Mass.,-London 1923 (The Loeb Classical Library).
• Cic. Fam. (= Cicero, Epistulae ad Familiares) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: Letters to Friends. Ed. & Trans. D. R. S. Bailey, vol. I-III. Cambridge, Mass.-London 2001 (The Loeb Classical Library).
• Eutr. (= Eutropius, Breviarium ab Urbe Condita)
• The Breviarium ab Orbe Condita of Eut ropius. Translated with an introduction and commentary by H. W. Bird. Liverpool 1993.
• Fest. Brev. (= Rufius Festus, Breviarium)
• The Breviarium of Festus. A Critical Edition with Historical Commentary by Cf. J. W. Eadie. London 1967.
• Flor. epit. (= Annius Florus, L. Annaei Flori Epitoma De Tito Livio Bellorum Omnium Annorum DCC Libri II) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: Lucius Annaeus Florus. The Two Books of the Epitome, Extracted from Titus Livius, of All the Wars of Seven Hundred Years. Trans. E. S. Foster. London/New York 1929 (The Loeb Classical Library).
• Frontin. strat. (= Sextus Iulius Frontinus, Strategematon) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: The Strategems and the Aqueducts of Rome. With an English translation by C. E. Bennett. Ed. M. B. McElwain. London/New York 1980. (The Loeb Classical Library)
• Heg. (=Hegesippus)
• Hegesippus.Trans.W.Blocker. [e-mail]. 2005.
• Ioseph. Ant. Iud. (= Flavius Iosephus Historicus, Antiquitates Iudaicae) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: The Jewish Antiquities. Trans. H. St. J. Thackeray, vols. IV-IX. London/ New York 1930-1939 (The Loeb Classical Library).
• Ioseph. Bell. Iud. (= Flavius Iosephus Historicus, Bellum Iudaium) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: The Jewish War. Trans. H. St. J. Thackeray, vols. II-III. London/New York 1927-1928 (The Loeb Classical Library).
• Iust. (= Marcus Iulianus Iustinus, M. Iuliani Iustini Epitoma Historiarum Philippicarum Pompei Trogi)
• Epitome of the Philippic History of Pompeius Trogus. Trans. J. C. Yardley. With introduction and explanatory notes by R. Develin. Atlanta, GA 1994.
• Liv. (Livius, Ab Urbe Condita)
• Per. (= Ab urbe condita Librorum periochae) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: Livy, From the founding of the city. Trans. A. C. Schlesinger, vols. I-XIV. London/New York 1967 (The Loeb Classical Library)
• Lucan. Phar. (= M. Annaeus Lucanus, Pharsalia)
• Lucanus. Trans. E. Ridley. London 1905.
• Oros. hist. (= Orosius, Historiarum adversus paganos libri VII)
• Seven Books of History Against the Pagans. Translated with introduction and notes by I. W. Raymond. New York 1936.
• Plin. nat. (= G. Plinius Secundus, Naturalis Historia)
• Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: Pliny the Elder. The Natural History. Trans. J. Bostock, London 1855.
• Plut. (= Plutarkhos)
• Cras. (= Crassus) Pomp. (=Pompeius)
• Nic. /Crass. Bioi Paralleloi (Nicias/Crassus) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: Plutarch. Plutarch’s Lives. Trans. B. Perrin, vols. I-II: 1914, vols. VII: 1919. Cambridge, Mass.- London (The Loeb Classical Library).
• Polyain. strat. (= Polyainos, Strategemata) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: The Strategems of War. Trans. R. Shepherd. Chicago 1974².
• Strab. (= Strabon, Geographika) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: The Geography of Strabo. Ed. H. L. Jones, vols. I-VIII. Cambridge, Mass.- London 1924.
• Vell. (= Velleius Paterculus, Historia Romana) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: Velleius Paterculus. Roman History. Trans. F. Shipley. Cambridge, Mass.- London 1924 (The Loeb Classical Library).
• Zon. epit. hist. (= Ioannes Zonaras, Epitome Historiarium) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviri: The History of Zonaras: From Alexander Severus to the Death of Theodosius the Great. Trans. E. Lane. London 2009.
• Modern Literatür Adcock 1966 F. E. Adcock, Marcus Crassus, Millionaire. Cambridge 1966.
• Akkermans 1989 P. M. M. G. Akkermans, “The Neolithic of the Balikh Valley Northern Syria: A First Assessment”. Paléorient 15/1 (1989) 122-134.
• Arslan 2007 M. Arslan, Mithradates VI Eupator: Roma’nın Büyük Düşmanı. İstanbul 2007.
• Campbell 2001 B. Campbell, “Diplomacy in the Roman World (c.500 BC-AD 235)”. Diplomacy&Statecraft 12/1 (2001) 1-22.
• Dubs 1941 H. H. Dubs, “An Ancient Military Contact between Romans and Chinese”. The American Journal of Philology 62/3 (1941) 322-330.
• Dubs 1957 H. H. Dubs, “A Roman City in China”. Greece&Rome 4/2 (1957) 139-148.
• Edwell 2008 P. M. Edwell, Between Rome and Persia: The Middle Euphrates, Mesopotamia and Palmyra Under Roman Control. New York 2008.
• Gruen 1974 E. S. Gruen, The Last Generation of Roman Republic. Berkeley 1974.
• Hill 1916 G. F. Hill, “The Mints of Roman Arabia and Mesopotamia”. Journal of Roman Studies 6 (1916) 135-169.
• Isaac 2004 B. Isaac, The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity. Princeton 2004.
• Marshall 1976 B. A. Marshall, Marcus Crassus: A Political Biography. Amsterdam 1976.
• Mattern-Parkes 2003 S. P. Mattern-Parkes, “The Defeat of Crassus and the Just War”. The Classical World 96/4 (2003) 387-396.
• Sampson 2008 G. C. Sampson, The Defeat of Rome: Crassus, Carrhae, and the Invasion of the East. Barnsley Military 2008. 2. Edisyonu sanırım bu sene çıktı.
• Simpson 1938 A. D. Simpson, “The Departure of Crassus for Parthia”. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 69 (1938) 532-541.
• Sherwin-White 1984 A. N. Sherwin-White, Roman Foreign Policy in the East, 168 B.C. to A.D. 1. London 1984.
• Sullivan 1990 R. D. Sullivan, Near Eastern Royalty and Rome 100-30 BC. Toronto 1990.
• Syme 1980 R. Syme, “The Sons of Crassus”, Latomus 39.2 (1980) 403-408.
• Ward 1977 A. M. Ward, Marcus Crassus and the Late Roman Republic. Columbia 1977.
• Yarshater 1983 E. Yarshater, “Political History”. Ed. E. Yarshater, The Cambridge History of Iran Vol. 3 (I): The Seleucid, Parthian and Sasanian Periods.Cambridge (1983) 3-263.