Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Does Idiosyncratic Risk Have a Significant Impact on Return Probability? A Case Study of Borsa Istanbul 100 Stocks

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 451 - 466, 30.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.1364613

Öz

Most asset pricing models ignore idiosyncratic risk, or firm-specific risk, while it is one of the most critical determinants of asset pricing and stock returns. In this paper, we investigate the impact of idiosyncratic risk on the returns of stocks traded on the Borsa Istanbul using six different fixed effect panel tobit and four different fixed effect panel logit regression models. The results of logit models suggest that as idiosyncratic risk increases, probability of positive stock returns also increases. Furthermore, an increase in a stock's market sensitivity has a negative effect on the probability of positive returns, while an increase in the market-to-book ratio, firm size, and market return has positive effects on returns. In all models, the explanatory variables, including idiosyncratic risk, market-to-book ratio, firm size, and market return, have a positive effect on returns, except for the model where negative values of dependent variable are censored at zero.

Kaynakça

  • Ali, F., Y. Jiang, and A. Sensoy. (2021). Downside risk in Dow Jones Islamic equity indices: Precious metals and portfolio diversification before and after the COVID-19 bear market. Research in International Business and Finance 58, 101502.
  • Ang, A., R. J. Hodrick, Y. Xing, and X. Zhang. (2009). High idiosyncratic volatility and low returns: International and further US evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 91,1–23. Baker, M., J. Wurgler. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680.
  • Bali, T. G., N. Cakici. (2008). Idiosyncratic volatility and the cross section of expected returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(1), 29-58.
  • Baltagi, B. H. (1995). Econometric analysis of panel data. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
  • Bozhkov, S., H. Lee, U. Sivarajah, S. Despoudi, and M. Nandy. (2020). Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of stock returns: The role of mean-reverting idiosyncratic volatility. Annals of Operations Research, 294(1), 419-452.
  • Bradfield, D., B. Munro. (2017). The number of stocks required for effective portfolio diversification, The South African case. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 31(1), 44-59.
  • Büberkökü, Ö. (2021). Risk-getiri ilişkisinin analizi, Türkiye örneği. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 14-38.
  • Chua, C. T., J. Goh, and Z. Zhang. (2010). Expected volatility, unexpected volatility, and the cross‐section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Research, 33(2), 103-123.
  • Chung, K. H., J. Wang, and C. Wu. (2019). Volatility and the cross-section of corporate bond returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 133(2), 397-417.
  • De Santis, G. and S. Imrohoğlu. (1997). Stock returns and volatility in emerging financial markets. Journal of International Money and finance, 16(4), 561-579.
  • Fabozzi, F. J., S. M. Focardi, P. N. Kolm, and D. A. Pachamanova. (2007). Robust portfolio optimization and management. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Fu, F. (2009). Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(1), 24-37.
  • Huang, W., Q. Liu, S. G. Rhee, and L. Zhang. (2010). Return reversals, idiosyncratic risk, and expected returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 147-168.
  • Hyung, N., C. G. De Vries. (2005). Portfolio diversification effects of downside risk. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 3(1), 107-125.
  • Koluku, R. F., S. S. Pangemanan, and F. Tumewu. (2015). Analysis of market risk, financial leverage, and firm size toward stock return on non-banking companies listed in LQ45 index of IDX. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 3(2), 528-536.
  • León, A., J. M. Nave, G. Rubio. (2007). The relationship between risk and expected return in Europe. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(2), 495-512.
  • Levy, H. (1978). Equilibrium in an imperfect market, a constraint on the number of securities in the portfolio. The American Economic Review, 68(4), 643-658.
  • Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37.
  • Liu, Y. 2022. The short-run and long-run components of idiosyncratic volatility and stock returns. Management Science, 68(2), 1573-1589.
  • Malkiel, B. G., and Y. Xu. (2002). Idiosyncratic risk and security returns. Last modified january 24, 2001. Accessed December 16, 2022. https,//papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=255303
  • Merton, R. C. (1987). Presidential address, a simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 42,483–510
  • Qadan, M., D. Kliger, and N. Chen. (2019). Idiosyncratic volatility, the VIX and stock returns. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 431-441.
  • Shahzad, F., Z. Fareed, Z. Wang, and S. G. M. Shah. (2020). Do idiosyncratic risk, market risk, and total risk matter during different firm life cycle stages?. Physica A, Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 537, 122550.
  • Sharpe, W. (1964). Capital asset prices, a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of Risk. Journal of Finance, 33(1), 885-901.
  • Statman, M. (1987). How many stocks make a diversified portfolio?. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22(3), 353-363.
  • Umutlu, M. (2015). Idiosyncratic volatility and expected returns at the global level. Financial Analysts Journal, 71(6), 58-71.
  • Umutlu, M. (2019). Does idiosyncratic volatility matter at the global level?. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 252-268.
  • Yılmaz, K., S. Kale. (2022). Risk ve finansal göstergeler arasindaki asimetrik ilişki, BIST imalat sektöründe bir uygulama. Ekonometri ve Istatistik Dergisi, 36, 1-20.

Firmaya Riskinin Getiri Olasılıkları Üzerinde Bir Etkisi Var Mı? Borsa İstanbul 100 Hisse Senetleri Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 451 - 466, 30.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.1364613

Öz

Çoğu finansal varlık fiyatlama modeli varlık fiyatlamasındaki en önemli belirleyicilerinden biri olmasına rağmen firmaya özgü riski göz ardı etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Sermaye Varlıkları Fiyatlama Modeli kullanılarak elde edilen firmaya özgü riskin İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası'nda işlem hisse senetlerinin getirileri üzerindeki etkisi altı farklı sabit etkiler tobit regresyon modeli ve dört farklı sabit etkiler logit regresyon modeli kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Logit modellerden elde edilen sonuçlar firmaya özgü risk arttıkça pozitif hisse senedi getirisi olasılığının da arttığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, bir hisse senedinin piyasa duyarlılığındaki bir artış pozitif getiri olasılığı üzerinde negatif bir etkiye sahipken, piyasa-defter değeri oranı, firma büyüklüğü ve piyasa getirisindeki artış getiriler üzerinde pozitif etkilere sahiptir. Sıfırda sansürlenen model hariç, tahmin edilen tobit modellerinin tümünde firmaya özgü risk, piyasa-defter değeri oranı, firma büyüklüğü ve piyasa getirisi hisse senedi getirileri üzerinde pozitif bir etkiye sahiptir.

Kaynakça

  • Ali, F., Y. Jiang, and A. Sensoy. (2021). Downside risk in Dow Jones Islamic equity indices: Precious metals and portfolio diversification before and after the COVID-19 bear market. Research in International Business and Finance 58, 101502.
  • Ang, A., R. J. Hodrick, Y. Xing, and X. Zhang. (2009). High idiosyncratic volatility and low returns: International and further US evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 91,1–23. Baker, M., J. Wurgler. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680.
  • Bali, T. G., N. Cakici. (2008). Idiosyncratic volatility and the cross section of expected returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(1), 29-58.
  • Baltagi, B. H. (1995). Econometric analysis of panel data. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
  • Bozhkov, S., H. Lee, U. Sivarajah, S. Despoudi, and M. Nandy. (2020). Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of stock returns: The role of mean-reverting idiosyncratic volatility. Annals of Operations Research, 294(1), 419-452.
  • Bradfield, D., B. Munro. (2017). The number of stocks required for effective portfolio diversification, The South African case. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 31(1), 44-59.
  • Büberkökü, Ö. (2021). Risk-getiri ilişkisinin analizi, Türkiye örneği. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 14-38.
  • Chua, C. T., J. Goh, and Z. Zhang. (2010). Expected volatility, unexpected volatility, and the cross‐section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Research, 33(2), 103-123.
  • Chung, K. H., J. Wang, and C. Wu. (2019). Volatility and the cross-section of corporate bond returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 133(2), 397-417.
  • De Santis, G. and S. Imrohoğlu. (1997). Stock returns and volatility in emerging financial markets. Journal of International Money and finance, 16(4), 561-579.
  • Fabozzi, F. J., S. M. Focardi, P. N. Kolm, and D. A. Pachamanova. (2007). Robust portfolio optimization and management. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Fu, F. (2009). Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(1), 24-37.
  • Huang, W., Q. Liu, S. G. Rhee, and L. Zhang. (2010). Return reversals, idiosyncratic risk, and expected returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 147-168.
  • Hyung, N., C. G. De Vries. (2005). Portfolio diversification effects of downside risk. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 3(1), 107-125.
  • Koluku, R. F., S. S. Pangemanan, and F. Tumewu. (2015). Analysis of market risk, financial leverage, and firm size toward stock return on non-banking companies listed in LQ45 index of IDX. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 3(2), 528-536.
  • León, A., J. M. Nave, G. Rubio. (2007). The relationship between risk and expected return in Europe. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(2), 495-512.
  • Levy, H. (1978). Equilibrium in an imperfect market, a constraint on the number of securities in the portfolio. The American Economic Review, 68(4), 643-658.
  • Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37.
  • Liu, Y. 2022. The short-run and long-run components of idiosyncratic volatility and stock returns. Management Science, 68(2), 1573-1589.
  • Malkiel, B. G., and Y. Xu. (2002). Idiosyncratic risk and security returns. Last modified january 24, 2001. Accessed December 16, 2022. https,//papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=255303
  • Merton, R. C. (1987). Presidential address, a simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 42,483–510
  • Qadan, M., D. Kliger, and N. Chen. (2019). Idiosyncratic volatility, the VIX and stock returns. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 431-441.
  • Shahzad, F., Z. Fareed, Z. Wang, and S. G. M. Shah. (2020). Do idiosyncratic risk, market risk, and total risk matter during different firm life cycle stages?. Physica A, Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 537, 122550.
  • Sharpe, W. (1964). Capital asset prices, a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of Risk. Journal of Finance, 33(1), 885-901.
  • Statman, M. (1987). How many stocks make a diversified portfolio?. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22(3), 353-363.
  • Umutlu, M. (2015). Idiosyncratic volatility and expected returns at the global level. Financial Analysts Journal, 71(6), 58-71.
  • Umutlu, M. (2019). Does idiosyncratic volatility matter at the global level?. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 252-268.
  • Yılmaz, K., S. Kale. (2022). Risk ve finansal göstergeler arasindaki asimetrik ilişki, BIST imalat sektöründe bir uygulama. Ekonometri ve Istatistik Dergisi, 36, 1-20.
Toplam 28 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ekonometrik ve İstatistiksel Yöntemler, Finans
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Salih Çam 0000-0002-3521-5728

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 27 Haziran 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Çam, S. (2024). Does Idiosyncratic Risk Have a Significant Impact on Return Probability? A Case Study of Borsa Istanbul 100 Stocks. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 451-466. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.1364613
AMA Çam S. Does Idiosyncratic Risk Have a Significant Impact on Return Probability? A Case Study of Borsa Istanbul 100 Stocks. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Haziran 2024;14(2):451-466. doi:10.18074/ckuiibfd.1364613
Chicago Çam, Salih. “Does Idiosyncratic Risk Have a Significant Impact on Return Probability? A Case Study of Borsa Istanbul 100 Stocks”. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 14, sy. 2 (Haziran 2024): 451-66. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.1364613.
EndNote Çam S (01 Haziran 2024) Does Idiosyncratic Risk Have a Significant Impact on Return Probability? A Case Study of Borsa Istanbul 100 Stocks. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 14 2 451–466.
IEEE S. Çam, “Does Idiosyncratic Risk Have a Significant Impact on Return Probability? A Case Study of Borsa Istanbul 100 Stocks”, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 14, sy. 2, ss. 451–466, 2024, doi: 10.18074/ckuiibfd.1364613.
ISNAD Çam, Salih. “Does Idiosyncratic Risk Have a Significant Impact on Return Probability? A Case Study of Borsa Istanbul 100 Stocks”. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 14/2 (Haziran 2024), 451-466. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.1364613.
JAMA Çam S. Does Idiosyncratic Risk Have a Significant Impact on Return Probability? A Case Study of Borsa Istanbul 100 Stocks. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2024;14:451–466.
MLA Çam, Salih. “Does Idiosyncratic Risk Have a Significant Impact on Return Probability? A Case Study of Borsa Istanbul 100 Stocks”. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 14, sy. 2, 2024, ss. 451-66, doi:10.18074/ckuiibfd.1364613.
Vancouver Çam S. Does Idiosyncratic Risk Have a Significant Impact on Return Probability? A Case Study of Borsa Istanbul 100 Stocks. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2024;14(2):451-66.