Genotoxicity of plant mediated synthesis of copper nanoparticles evaluated using in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test

Year 2021, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 65 - 73, 31.03.2021

Margi Patel , Karishma Vashi , Dr. Farida Minocheherhomji , Rajendra Nagane

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.665837

Abstract

Objective: Nanotechnology is an emerging technology which has wide applications in many fields. Prime concern of research in nanotechnology is the synthesis of nano-material with the controlled size and shape. Recently, biosynthesis of metallic nano-particles has gained popularity owing to its eco-friendliness. The increasing use of Copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) in medicine and industry demands an understanding of their potential toxicities.

Methods: Genotoxicity of Copper nanoparticles was assessed using the in vitro micronucleus assay which is standard genotoxicity assay. In this study, Copper nanoparticle was tested in the absence and presence of the metabolic activation (2% v/v S9 mix). Human peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures were exposed to Copper nanoparticle, at 5 dose-levels between 0.125 to 2 µL/mL of culture medium in absence and presence of the metabolic activation system.

Results: Required level of cytotoxicity (55 ± 5% reduction in replicative index, i.e., cytostasis) was observed in absence of the metabolic activation at the test concentration of 2 µL/mL. Therefore dose levels selected for scoring of binucleated cells containing micronuclei were: 0.5, 1, and 2 µL/mL. From the obtained data of MNBN cells (Binucleated cells with micronuclei) for all three selected test concentration was found in the range of negative and vehicle control.

Conclusion: Our results concluded that, Copper nanoparticle did not induce statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in number of binucleated cells with micronuclei in absence and presence of the metabolic activation.

Keywords

micronucleus test, genotoxicity, lymphocyte, netal naanoparticles

Supporting Institution

Jai Research Foundation

Project Number

RES-1-06-21041

Thanks

The authors would like to thank the Authorities of Jai Research Foundation, Vapi, Gujarat, India for providing all assistance and support for the timely completion of this research work.

References

• 1. Courbiere B, Auffan M, Rollais R, Tassistro V, Bonnefoy A, Botta A, Rose J, Orsière T and Perrin J. Ultrastructural Interactions and Genotoxicity Assay of Cerium 20 Dioxide Nanoparticles on Mouse Oocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci, 2013; 14(2): 1613–21628. doi:10.3390/ijms141121613.
• 2. Dhawan A and Sharma V. Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: methods and challenges. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2010; 398(2): 589-605. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-3996-x.
• 3. Shruti R, Albert D and Andreas L. Interaction of nanoparticles with proteins: relation to bio-reactivity of the nanoparticle. J. Nanobiotechnology, 2013; 11: 26. doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-11-26.
• 4. Gonzalez L, Lison D and Kirsch-Volders M. Genotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials: a critical review. Nanotoxicology, 2008; 2: 252–273. doi: 10.1080/17435390802464986.
• 5. Balasubramanyam A, Sailaja N, Mahboob M, Rahman M, Hussain S and Grover P. In vitro mutagenicity assessment of aluminium oxide nanomaterials using the Salmonella/microsome assay. Toxicol In Vitro, 2010; 24:1871–1876. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.07.004.
• 6. Battal D, Elik A and Guler G, et al. SiO2 nanoparticle induced size-dependent genotoxicity- an in vitro study using sister chromatid exchange, micronucleus and comet assay. Drug Chem Toxicol, 2015; 38: 196–204. doi: 10.3109/01480545.2014.928721.
• 7. Asharani P, Hande M and Valiyaveettil S. Anti-proliferative activity of silver nanoparticles. BMC Cell Biol, 2009; 10(1): 1-14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-10-65.
• 8. Ghosh M. et al. In vitro and in vivo genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles. Mutat. Res, 2012; 749: 60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.08.007.
• 9. Kumari M, Mukherjee A and Chandrasekaran N. Genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in Allium cepa. Sci. Total Environ, 2009; 407: 5243–5246. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.024.
• 10. Shukla R, Sharma V, Pandey A, Singh S, Sultana S and Dhawan A. ROS-mediated genotoxicity induced by titanium dioxide nanoparticles in human epidermal cells. Toxicol In Vitro, 2011; 25(1): 231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.11.008. 11. Gad S.C. and Weil C.S. Statistics for Toxicologists In: Principles and Methods of Toxicology, 3rd Edition, Hayes A.W. [ed.] Raven Press Ltd., New York, 1994; 221-274.
• 12. Fenech M. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay, Nat Protoc, 2007; 2(5): 1084-1104. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.77