Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE RELATIONSHIP AMONGST ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE CAPACITY, GREEN INNOVATION, PERCEIVED GREEN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDY OF ICI 500

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 49, 399 - 432, 31.07.2023

Şerife Kuzgun , Ebru Gözükara

https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1230408
Cited By: 1

Öz

Rapid change and transformation on a global scale, increasing environmental uncertainties, climate crisis, deterioration in ecological balance negatively affect the sustainability performance of organizations. In this new order of environmental uncertainties, it is important for companies to engage in green innovation activities, engage in environmentalist behaviors and be resilient in order to ensure sustainability. The main purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between organizational resilience capacity, green innovation, perceived green organizational behavior, environmental uncertainty and sustainability performance. The research is has been carried out with the participation of the managers working in the companies in the list of ICI Turkey’s Top 500 Industrial Enterprises (ICI 500 and Second ICI 500) - 2020 using survey method. The final sample includes 430 managers. SPSS 26 and AMOS 24 software programs have been used in the analysis of the data. With the research organizational resilience capacity positively affects green innovation, perceived green organizational behavior positively affects green innovation, green innovation positively affects sustainability performance, organizational resilience capacity affects sustainability performance positively, perceived green organizational behavior positively affects sustainability performance, in the relationship between green innovation and sustainability performance, environmental uncertainty acts as moderating variable and in the relationship between organizational resilience capacity and green innovation, environmental uncertainty not acts as moderating variable. Considering the results of the research, organization resilience, sustainability and having green-oriented policies play a key role in their survival as well as overcoming macro-level problems of the planet and a livable world for future generations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Resilience Capacity Green Innovation Perceived Green Organizational Behavior Environmental Uncertainty Sustainability Performance

Kaynakça

  • Afsar, B., Badir, Y. ve Kiani, U. S. (2016). Linking Spiritual Leadership and Employee Pro-environmental Behavior: The Influence of Workplace Spirituality, Intrinsic Motivation, and Environmental Passion. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 45, 79-88.
  • Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Aksoy, Z., Samil Fidan, S. ve Yigital, S. (2022). The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capability and Resilience in the Error Management Culture-Service Innovation Link and the Contingent Effect of Error Frequency. The Service Industries Journal. 1-30.
  • Akgün, A.E. ve Keskin, H. (2014). Organisational Resilience Capacity and Firm Product Innovativeness and Performance, International Journal of Production Research, 52(23), 6918-6937.
  • Aksoy, Y. (2019). “İşletme ve Sürdürülebilirlik”. E. Ayrancı (Ed.). 21. Yüzyıl’da Sürdürülebilirlik: Sosyal Bilimlere Dayalı Perspektifler içinde. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş., 51-107.
  • Almeida, F. ve Wasim, J. (2022). Eco-innovation And Sustainable Business Performance: Perspectives of SMEs in Portugal and the UK. Society and Business Review.
  • Antunes, P. (2011). BPM and Exception Handling: Focus on Organizational Resilience. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). 41(3), 383-392.
  • Anwar, N., Mahmood, N. H. N., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., Faezah, J. N. ve Khalid, W. (2020). Green Human Resource Management for Organisational Citizenship Behaviour Towards the Environment and Environmental Performance on a University Campus. Journal of Cleaner Production. 256, 120401.
  • Arfi, W. B., Hikkerova, L. ve Sahut, J. M. (2018). External Knowledge Sources, Green Innovation and Performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 129, 210-220.
  • Balugani, E., Butturi, M. A., Chevers, D., Parker, D. ve Rimini, B. (2020). Empirical Evaluation of the Impact of Resilience and Sustainability on Firms’ Performance. Sustainability, 12(5), 1-18.
  • Bhamra, R., Dani, S. ve Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The Concept, a Literature Review and Future Directions. International Journal of Production Research. 49(18), 5375-5393.
  • Bleischwitz, R., Bahn-Walkowiak, B., Irrek, W., Schepelmann, P., Schmidt-Bleek, F., Giljum, S., ... ve Pratt, N. (2009). Eco-Innovation-Putting the EU on the Path to a Resource and Energy Efficient Economy. Wuppertal Spezial. 38.
  • Boiral, O. (2009). Greening the Corporation through Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 221-236.
  • Boiral, O. ve Paillé, P. (2012). Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for the Environment: Measurement and Validation. Journal of Business Ethics. 109, 431-445.
  • Boiral, O., Talbot, D. ve Paillé, P. (2015). Leading by Example: A model of Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment. Business Strategy and the Environment. 24(6), 532-550.
  • Burnard K ve Bhamra R. (2011). Organisational Resilience: Development of a Conceptual Framework for Organisational Responses. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5581-5599.
  • Cai, W., Yang, C., Bossink, B.A.G. ve Fu, J. (2020). Linking Leaders’ Voluntary Workplace Green Behavior and Team Green Innovation: The the Mediation Role of Team Green Efficacy. Sustainability. 12(8), 3404.
  • Cavaco, N. M., Machado, V. C. (2015). Sustainable Competitiveness Based on Resilience and Innovation-an Alternative Ap-proach. International journal of project management. 10, 155-164.
  • Ch’ng, P. C., Cheah, J. ve Amran, A. (2021). Eco-innovation Practices and Sustainable Business Performance: The Moderating Effect of Market Turbulence in the Malaysian Technology Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 283, 124556, 1-11.
  • Chan, E. S. ve Hsu, C. H. (2016). Environmental Management Research in Hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 28 (5), 886-923.
  • Chen, Y.S., Lai, S. B. ve Wen, C. T. (2006). The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics. 67(4), 331-339.
  • Cheng, C. C. ve Shiu, E. C. (2012). Validation of a Proposed Instrument for Measuring Eco-Innovation: An Implementation Perspective. Technovation. 32(6), 329-344.
  • Cheng, C. C., Yang, C. L. ve Sheu, C. (2014). The Link Between Eco-Innovation and Business Performance: a Taiwanese Industry Context. Journal of Cleaner Production. 64, 81-90.
  • Cotta, D., Klink, L., Alten, T., ve Al Madhoon, B. (2022). How do Supply Chain Managers Perceive the Relationship Between Resilience and Sustainability Practices? An Exploratory Study. Business Strategy and the Environment.
  • Çankaya, S. Y. (2015). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimine Sürdürülebilirlik Perspektifinden Bakış ve Yeşil Uygulamalar. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gebze: Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi SBE.
  • Çankaya, S. Y. ve Sezen, B. (2015). Ekolojik Yenilik ile Sürdürülebilirlik Performansı Arasındaki İlişkide Çevresel Belirsizliğin Moderatör Etkisi, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi. 11(24), 111-134.
  • Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W. ve Govindarajulu, N. (2009). A Conceptual Model for Organizational Citizenship Behavior Directed Toward the Environment. Business and Society. 48(2), 243-256.
  • Dong, Y., Wang, X., Jin, J., Qiao, Y. ve Shi, L. (2014). Effects of Eco-Innovation Typology on Its Performance: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Enterprises. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 34, 78-98.
  • Dyllick, T. ve Hockerts, T. (2002). Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business, Strategy and Environment. 11(1), 130-141.
  • Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
  • Gözükara, E. (2014). Liderlik Tipleri, Yenilikçi Kültür, Örgütsel Yaratıcılık ve Firma Performansı Arasındaki İlişki. Yayımlanmamış Doktora tezi. İstanbul: Arel Üniversitesi SBE.
  • Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics. 4. Baskı. McGraw-Hill. New York.
  • Gunasekaran, A., Rai, B. K. ve Griffin, M. (2011). Resilience and Competitiveness of Small and Medium Size Enterprises: An Empirical Research. International Journal of Production Research. 49(18), 5489-5509.
  • Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 271.
  • Hajishirzi, R., Costa, C. J. ve Aparicio, M. (2022). Boosting Sustainability through Digital Transformation’s Domains and Resilience. Sustainability. 14(3), 1822.
  • Hillmann, J. ve Guenther, E. (2020). Organizational Resilience: A Valuable Construct for Management Research?. International Journal of Management Reviews. 23(1), 7-44.
  • Horbach, J., Rammer, C. ve Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of Eco-Innovations by Type of Environmental Impact-The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market Pull. Ecological Economics. 78, 112-122.
  • İstanbul Sanayi Odası (İSO). Türkiye’nin 500 Büyük Sanayi Kuruluşu, https://www.iso500.org.tr/500-buyuk-sanayi-kurulusu?yil=2020. (Erişim tarihi: 20 Temmuz 2021).
  • Jaworski, B. ve Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing. 57, 53-70.
  • Jo, J. H., Roh, T. W., Kim, S., Youn, Y. C., Park, M. S., Han, K. J., ve Jang, E. K. (2015). Eco-Innovation for Sustainability: Evidence from 49 Countries in Asia and Europe. Sustainability. 7(12), 16820-16835.
  • Kantur, D. ve Say, A. I. (2015). Measuring organizational resilience: A scale development. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 4(3).
  • Karaköse, M. A. (2019). Liderlik Tarzları, Örgütsel Dayanıklılık, Örgütsel Özümseme Kapasitesi ve Firma Yenilikçiliği İlişkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gebze: Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi SBE.
  • Karaköse, M. A., İmamoğlu, S. Z. ve İnce, H. (2020). Dönüşümcü ve Adaptif Liderlik Tarzlarının Örgütsel Dayanıklılık Kapasitesinin Geliştirilmesindeki Rolü: Kavramsal Bir Model Önerisi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 21(1), 153-169.
  • Kemp, R. ve Foxon, T. (2007). Eco-Innovation from an Innovation Dynamics Perspective. Proyecto Measuring Eco-innovation (MEI).
  • Ketokivi, M. ve Schroeder, R. (2004). Manufacturing Practices, Strategic Fit and Performance: a Routine‐Based View. International Journal of Operations and Production Management.
  • Khan, N. U., Irshad, A. R., Ahmed, A. ve Khattak, A. (2021a). Do Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment Predict Triple Bottom Line Performance in Manufacturing Firms?. Business Process Management Journal. 27(4).
  • Khan, N. U., Wu, W., Saufi, R. B. A., Sabri, N. A. A. ve Shah, A. A. (2021b). Antecedents of Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Organizations: a Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Sustainability. 13(2), 897, 1-23.
  • Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S. E. ve Ployhart, R. E. (2017). Multilevel Influences on Voluntary Workplace Green Behavior: Individual Differences, Leader Behavior, and Coworker Advocacy. Journal of Management. 43(5), 1335-1358.
  • Klein, R. J., Nicholls, R. J. ve Thomalla, F. (2003). Resilience to Natural Hazards: How Useful is This Concept?. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards. 5(1), 35-45.
  • Kpphgn, M., Arulrajah, A. A. ve Senthilnathan, S. (2020). Mediating role of Employee Green Behaviour Towards Sustainability Performance of Banks. Journal of Governance and Regulation. 9(2), 92-102.
  • Larbi-Siaw, O., Xuhua, H., Owusu, E., Owusu-Agyeman, A., Fulgence, B. E. ve Frimpong, S. A. (2022). Eco-Innovation, Sustainable Business Performance and Market Turbulence Moderation in Emerging Economies. Technology in Society. 68, 1-15.
  • Lee, A. V., Vargo, J. ve Seville, E. (2013). Developing a Tool to Measure and Compare Organizations’ Resilience. Natural Hazards Review. 14(1), 29-41.
  • Lengnick-Hall, C. A. ve Beck, T. E. (2005). Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How Organizations Respond to Environmental Change. Journal of Management. 31(5), 738-757.
  • Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E. ve Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a Capacity for Organizational Resilience Through Strategic Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management Review. 21(3), 243-255.
  • Liao, J. ve Gartner W. (2006). The Effects of Pre-venture Plan Timing and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty on the Persistence of Emerging Firms. Small Business Economics. 27(1), 23-40.
  • Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017). Resilience in Business and Management Research: A Review of Influential Publications and a Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. 19(1), 4-30.
  • Ma, B. ve Zhang, J. (2022). Tie Strength, Organizational Resilience and Enterprise Crisis Management: An Empirical Study in Pandemic Time. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 81, 103240, 1-16.
  • Mafabi, S., Munene, J. ve Ntayi, J. (2012). Knowledge Management and Organisational Resilience: Organisational Innovation As a Mediator in Uganda Parastatals. Journal of Strategy and Management. 5(1), 57-80.
  • Malik, S. Y., Hayat Mughal, Y., Azam, T., Cao, Y., Wan, Z., Zhu, H. ve Thurasamy, R. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Human Resources Management, and Sustainable Performance: is Organizational Citizenship Behavior Towards Environment the Missing Link?. Sustainability. 13(3), 1044.
  • Mallak, L. A. (1998). Measuring Resilience in Health Care Provider Organizations. Health Manpower Management. 24(4), 148-152.
  • Melkonyan, A., Gottschalk, D. ve Kamath VP. (2017). Sustainability Assessments and Their Implementation Possibilities Within the Business Models of Companies. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 12, 1-15.
  • Mesmer-Magnus, J., Viswesvaran, C. ve Wiernik, B.M. (2012). The Role of Commitment in Bridging the Gap Between Organizational Sustainability and Environmental Sustainability. S.E. Jackson, D.S. Ones ve S. Dilchert (Eds.). Managing HR for Environmental Sustainability içinde. San Francisco: JosseyBass/Wiley, 155-186.
  • Mulaik, S. A. ve Millsap, R. E. (2000). Doing the Four-Step Right. Structural Equation Modeling. 7(1), 36-73.
  • Norton, T. A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H. ve Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). Employee Green Behavior: A Theoretical Framework, Multilevel Review and Future Research Agenda. Organization and Environment. 28, 103-125.
  • Ogbeibu, S., Emelifeonwu, J., Senadjki, A., Gaskin, J. ve Kaivo-oja, J. (2020). Technological Turbulence and Greening of Team Creativity, Product Innovation, and Human Resource Management: Implications for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 244, 1-15.
  • Ones, D.S. ve Dilchert, S. (2012). “Employee Green Behaviors”. Jackson, S. E., Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S. ve Kraiger, K. (Eds.), Managing Human Resources for Environmental Sustainability içinde. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 85-116.
  • Özgül, B. (2020). Yeşil İnovasyon, Öncülleri ve Firma Performansı Arasındaki İlişki: Rekabet Stratejisinin Moderatör Rolü. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi SBE.
  • Paillé, P. ve Boiral, O. (2013). Pro-environmental Behavior at Work: Construct Validity and Determinants. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 36, 118-128.
  • Paillé, P. ve Mejía-Morelos, J. H. (2014). Antecedents of Pro-Environmental Behaviours at Work: The Moderating Influence of Psychological Contract Breach. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 38, 124-131.
  • Paraschiv, D. M., Nemoianu, E. L., Langă, C. A. ve Szabó, T. (2012). Eco-Innovation, Responsible Leadership and Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability. Amfiteatru Economic Journal. 14(32), 404-419.
  • Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the Relationship Between Internal Resources and Capabilities, Sustainable Supply Management, and Organizational Sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 47(1), 19-37.
  • Podsakoff, P. M. ve Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects, Journal of Management. 12(4), 531-544.
  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York, USA: Free Press.
  • Porter, M. E. ve Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and Competitive-Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review. Eylül-Ekim, 120-134.
  • Rai, S. S., Rai, S. ve Singh, N. K. (2021). Organizational Resilience and Social-Economic Sustainability: COVID-19 Perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 23(8), 12006-12023.
  • Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining Innovation Eco-Innovation Research and The Contribution From Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics. 32, 319-332.
  • Robertson, J. L. ve Barling, J. (2013). Greening Organizations Through Leaders’ Influence on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 34(2), 176-194.
  • Ruiz-Martin, C., López-Paredes, A. ve Wainer, G. (2018). What We Know and do not Know About Organizational Resilience. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering. 6(1), 11-28.
  • Sezen-Gültekin, G. ve Argon, T. (2020). Examination of the Relationship Between Organizational Resilience and Organizational Sustainability at Higher Education Institution. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction. 12, 329-343.
  • Shashwat, K, (2019). SMEs : Key Drivers of Green and Inclusive Growth. OECD Green Growth Papers. 3-56.
  • Sobaih, A. E, Elshaer, İ., Hasanein, A. M. B ve Abdelaziz, A. S. (2021). Responses to COVID-19: The Role of Performance in the Relationship Between Small Hospitality Enterprises’ Resilience and Sustainable Tourism Development. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 102824. 1-11.
  • Song, M., Fisher, R. ve Kwoh, Y. (2019). Technological Challenges of Green Innovation and Sustainable Resource Management with Large Scale Data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 144, 36-368.
  • Souza, A. A. A., Alves, M. F. R., Macini, N., Cezarino, L. O. ve Liboni, L. B. (2017). Resilience for Sustainability as an Eco-Capability. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. 581-599.
  • Süßbauer, E. ve Schäfer, M. (2019). Corporate Strategies for Greening the Workplace: Findings from Sustainability-Oriented Companies in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production. 226, 564-577.
  • Syafri, W., Prabowo, H., Nur, S. A. ve Muafi, M. (2021). The Impact of Workplace Green Behavior and Green Innovation on Green Performance of SMEs: A Case Study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 8(5), 365-374.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Takalo, S. K. ve Tooranloo, H. S. (2021). Green Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 279, 122474.
  • Tatlıdil, H. ve Ortunç, B. (2011). Kredi Temerrüt Swaplarının Fiyatlama Yöntemleri ve Fiyatlamayı Etkileyen Finansal Göstergelerin Regresyon ve Panel Veri Analizleri İle Belirlenmesi. Bankacılar Dergisi. 77, 25-43.
  • Teixeira, E. D. O. ve Werther, W. B. (2013). Resilience: Continuous Renewal of Competitive Advantages. Business Horizons. 56(3), 333-342.
  • Tsai, K.H. ve Liao, Y.C. (2017b). Sustainability Strategy and Eco-Innovation: a Moderation Model, Business Strategy Environment. 26(4), 426-437.
  • Tseng. M., Wang. R., Chiu. A., Geng. Y. ve Li. Y. (2013). Improving Performance of Green Innovation Practices Under Uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production. 40, 71-82.
  • Unsworth, K. L., Dmitrieva, A. ve Adriasola, E. (2013). Changing Behaviour: Increasing the Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions in Creating Pro‐Environmental Behaviour Change. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 34(2), 211-229.
  • Wang, J., Xue, Y. ve Yang, J. (2022). Can Proactive Boundary‐Spanning Search Enhance Green Innovation? The Mediating Role of Organizational Resilience. Business Strategy and the Environment. 1-15.
  • Wong, C. Y., Boon-itt S. ve Wong C. W. Y. (2011). The Contingency Effects of Environmental Uncertainty on the Relationship Between Supply Chain Integration and Operational Performance. Journal of Operations Management. 29, 604-615.
  • Yurdakul, M. ve Kazan, H. (2020). Effects of Eco-Innovation on Economic and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Turkey’s Manufacturing Companies. Sustainability. 12, 3167.
  • Zavala-Alcivar, A. Verdecho, M. J. ve Alfaro-Saiz, J. J. (2020). A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain. Sustainability. 12(16), 6300.

ÖRGÜTSEL DAYANIKLILIK KAPASİTESİ, YEŞİL YENİLİK, ALGILANAN YEŞİL ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK PERFORMANSI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER: İSO 500 UYGULAMASI

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 49, 399 - 432, 31.07.2023

Şerife Kuzgun , Ebru Gözükara

https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1230408
Cited By: 1

Öz

Küresel ölçekli hızlı değişim ve dönüşüm, artan çevresel belirsizlikler, iklim krizi, ekolojik dengede meydana gelen bozulmalar, örgütlerin sürdürülebilirlik performansını olumsuz yönde etkilemektedir. Çevresel belirsizliklerin olduğu bu yeni düzende firmaların sürdürülebilirliği sağlayabilmelerinde; yeşil yenilik faaliyetlerinde bulunmaları, çevreci davranışlar göstermeleri ve dayanıklı olmaları önem kazanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, örgütsel dayanıklılık kapasitesi, yeşil yenilik, algılanan yeşil örgütsel davranış, çevresel belirsizlik ve sürdürülebilirlik performansı arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesidir. Araştırma 2020 yılı Türkiye’nin 500 Büyük Sanayi Kuruluşu (İSO 500 ve İSO İkinci 500) listesinde yer alan firmalarda çalışan yöneticilerin katılımıyla ve anket yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Nihai örneklem 430 yöneticiyi içermektedir. Verilerin analizinde SPSS 26 ve AMOS 24 yazılım programları kullanılmıştır. Araştırma ile örgütsel dayanıklılık kapasitesinin yeşil yeniliği, algılanan yeşil örgütsel davranışın yeşil yeniliği, yeşil yeniliğin sürdürülebilirlik performansını, örgütsel dayanıklılık kapasitesinin sürdürülebilirlik performansını ve algılanan yeşil örgütsel davranışın sürdürülebilirlik performansını pozitif etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Çevresel belirsizliğin, yeşil yenilik ile sürdürülebilirlik performansı arasındaki ilişkide moderatör etkisinin bulunduğu, örgütsel dayanıklılık kapasitesi ile yeşil yenilik arasındaki ilişkide ise moderatör etkisinin bulunmadığı saptanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları dikkate alındığında, örgütlerin dayanıklılıkları, sürdürülebilirlik ve yeşil odaklı politikalara sahip olmaları onların varlıklarını devam ettirebilmelerinin yanı sıra gezegenin makro boyuttaki sorunları aşabilmesi ve gelecek kuşaklara yaşanabilir bir dünya için de kilit bir rol oynamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Dayanıklılık Kapasitesi Yeşil Yenilik Algılanan Yeşil Örgütsel Davranış Çevresel Belirsizlik Sürdürülebilirlik Performansı Organizational Resilience Capacity Green Innovation Perceived Green Organizational Behavior Environmental Uncertainty Sustainability Performance

Kaynakça

  • Afsar, B., Badir, Y. ve Kiani, U. S. (2016). Linking Spiritual Leadership and Employee Pro-environmental Behavior: The Influence of Workplace Spirituality, Intrinsic Motivation, and Environmental Passion. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 45, 79-88.
  • Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Aksoy, Z., Samil Fidan, S. ve Yigital, S. (2022). The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capability and Resilience in the Error Management Culture-Service Innovation Link and the Contingent Effect of Error Frequency. The Service Industries Journal. 1-30.
  • Akgün, A.E. ve Keskin, H. (2014). Organisational Resilience Capacity and Firm Product Innovativeness and Performance, International Journal of Production Research, 52(23), 6918-6937.
  • Aksoy, Y. (2019). “İşletme ve Sürdürülebilirlik”. E. Ayrancı (Ed.). 21. Yüzyıl’da Sürdürülebilirlik: Sosyal Bilimlere Dayalı Perspektifler içinde. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş., 51-107.
  • Almeida, F. ve Wasim, J. (2022). Eco-innovation And Sustainable Business Performance: Perspectives of SMEs in Portugal and the UK. Society and Business Review.
  • Antunes, P. (2011). BPM and Exception Handling: Focus on Organizational Resilience. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). 41(3), 383-392.
  • Anwar, N., Mahmood, N. H. N., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., Faezah, J. N. ve Khalid, W. (2020). Green Human Resource Management for Organisational Citizenship Behaviour Towards the Environment and Environmental Performance on a University Campus. Journal of Cleaner Production. 256, 120401.
  • Arfi, W. B., Hikkerova, L. ve Sahut, J. M. (2018). External Knowledge Sources, Green Innovation and Performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 129, 210-220.
  • Balugani, E., Butturi, M. A., Chevers, D., Parker, D. ve Rimini, B. (2020). Empirical Evaluation of the Impact of Resilience and Sustainability on Firms’ Performance. Sustainability, 12(5), 1-18.
  • Bhamra, R., Dani, S. ve Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The Concept, a Literature Review and Future Directions. International Journal of Production Research. 49(18), 5375-5393.
  • Bleischwitz, R., Bahn-Walkowiak, B., Irrek, W., Schepelmann, P., Schmidt-Bleek, F., Giljum, S., ... ve Pratt, N. (2009). Eco-Innovation-Putting the EU on the Path to a Resource and Energy Efficient Economy. Wuppertal Spezial. 38.
  • Boiral, O. (2009). Greening the Corporation through Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 221-236.
  • Boiral, O. ve Paillé, P. (2012). Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for the Environment: Measurement and Validation. Journal of Business Ethics. 109, 431-445.
  • Boiral, O., Talbot, D. ve Paillé, P. (2015). Leading by Example: A model of Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment. Business Strategy and the Environment. 24(6), 532-550.
  • Burnard K ve Bhamra R. (2011). Organisational Resilience: Development of a Conceptual Framework for Organisational Responses. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5581-5599.
  • Cai, W., Yang, C., Bossink, B.A.G. ve Fu, J. (2020). Linking Leaders’ Voluntary Workplace Green Behavior and Team Green Innovation: The the Mediation Role of Team Green Efficacy. Sustainability. 12(8), 3404.
  • Cavaco, N. M., Machado, V. C. (2015). Sustainable Competitiveness Based on Resilience and Innovation-an Alternative Ap-proach. International journal of project management. 10, 155-164.
  • Ch’ng, P. C., Cheah, J. ve Amran, A. (2021). Eco-innovation Practices and Sustainable Business Performance: The Moderating Effect of Market Turbulence in the Malaysian Technology Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 283, 124556, 1-11.
  • Chan, E. S. ve Hsu, C. H. (2016). Environmental Management Research in Hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 28 (5), 886-923.
  • Chen, Y.S., Lai, S. B. ve Wen, C. T. (2006). The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics. 67(4), 331-339.
  • Cheng, C. C. ve Shiu, E. C. (2012). Validation of a Proposed Instrument for Measuring Eco-Innovation: An Implementation Perspective. Technovation. 32(6), 329-344.
  • Cheng, C. C., Yang, C. L. ve Sheu, C. (2014). The Link Between Eco-Innovation and Business Performance: a Taiwanese Industry Context. Journal of Cleaner Production. 64, 81-90.
  • Cotta, D., Klink, L., Alten, T., ve Al Madhoon, B. (2022). How do Supply Chain Managers Perceive the Relationship Between Resilience and Sustainability Practices? An Exploratory Study. Business Strategy and the Environment.
  • Çankaya, S. Y. (2015). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimine Sürdürülebilirlik Perspektifinden Bakış ve Yeşil Uygulamalar. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gebze: Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi SBE.
  • Çankaya, S. Y. ve Sezen, B. (2015). Ekolojik Yenilik ile Sürdürülebilirlik Performansı Arasındaki İlişkide Çevresel Belirsizliğin Moderatör Etkisi, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi. 11(24), 111-134.
  • Daily, B. F., Bishop, J. W. ve Govindarajulu, N. (2009). A Conceptual Model for Organizational Citizenship Behavior Directed Toward the Environment. Business and Society. 48(2), 243-256.
  • Dong, Y., Wang, X., Jin, J., Qiao, Y. ve Shi, L. (2014). Effects of Eco-Innovation Typology on Its Performance: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Enterprises. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 34, 78-98.
  • Dyllick, T. ve Hockerts, T. (2002). Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business, Strategy and Environment. 11(1), 130-141.
  • Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
  • Gözükara, E. (2014). Liderlik Tipleri, Yenilikçi Kültür, Örgütsel Yaratıcılık ve Firma Performansı Arasındaki İlişki. Yayımlanmamış Doktora tezi. İstanbul: Arel Üniversitesi SBE.
  • Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics. 4. Baskı. McGraw-Hill. New York.
  • Gunasekaran, A., Rai, B. K. ve Griffin, M. (2011). Resilience and Competitiveness of Small and Medium Size Enterprises: An Empirical Research. International Journal of Production Research. 49(18), 5489-5509.
  • Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 271.
  • Hajishirzi, R., Costa, C. J. ve Aparicio, M. (2022). Boosting Sustainability through Digital Transformation’s Domains and Resilience. Sustainability. 14(3), 1822.
  • Hillmann, J. ve Guenther, E. (2020). Organizational Resilience: A Valuable Construct for Management Research?. International Journal of Management Reviews. 23(1), 7-44.
  • Horbach, J., Rammer, C. ve Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of Eco-Innovations by Type of Environmental Impact-The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market Pull. Ecological Economics. 78, 112-122.
  • İstanbul Sanayi Odası (İSO). Türkiye’nin 500 Büyük Sanayi Kuruluşu, https://www.iso500.org.tr/500-buyuk-sanayi-kurulusu?yil=2020. (Erişim tarihi: 20 Temmuz 2021).
  • Jaworski, B. ve Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing. 57, 53-70.
  • Jo, J. H., Roh, T. W., Kim, S., Youn, Y. C., Park, M. S., Han, K. J., ve Jang, E. K. (2015). Eco-Innovation for Sustainability: Evidence from 49 Countries in Asia and Europe. Sustainability. 7(12), 16820-16835.
  • Kantur, D. ve Say, A. I. (2015). Measuring organizational resilience: A scale development. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 4(3).
  • Karaköse, M. A. (2019). Liderlik Tarzları, Örgütsel Dayanıklılık, Örgütsel Özümseme Kapasitesi ve Firma Yenilikçiliği İlişkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gebze: Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi SBE.
  • Karaköse, M. A., İmamoğlu, S. Z. ve İnce, H. (2020). Dönüşümcü ve Adaptif Liderlik Tarzlarının Örgütsel Dayanıklılık Kapasitesinin Geliştirilmesindeki Rolü: Kavramsal Bir Model Önerisi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 21(1), 153-169.
  • Kemp, R. ve Foxon, T. (2007). Eco-Innovation from an Innovation Dynamics Perspective. Proyecto Measuring Eco-innovation (MEI).
  • Ketokivi, M. ve Schroeder, R. (2004). Manufacturing Practices, Strategic Fit and Performance: a Routine‐Based View. International Journal of Operations and Production Management.
  • Khan, N. U., Irshad, A. R., Ahmed, A. ve Khattak, A. (2021a). Do Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment Predict Triple Bottom Line Performance in Manufacturing Firms?. Business Process Management Journal. 27(4).
  • Khan, N. U., Wu, W., Saufi, R. B. A., Sabri, N. A. A. ve Shah, A. A. (2021b). Antecedents of Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Organizations: a Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Sustainability. 13(2), 897, 1-23.
  • Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S. E. ve Ployhart, R. E. (2017). Multilevel Influences on Voluntary Workplace Green Behavior: Individual Differences, Leader Behavior, and Coworker Advocacy. Journal of Management. 43(5), 1335-1358.
  • Klein, R. J., Nicholls, R. J. ve Thomalla, F. (2003). Resilience to Natural Hazards: How Useful is This Concept?. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards. 5(1), 35-45.
  • Kpphgn, M., Arulrajah, A. A. ve Senthilnathan, S. (2020). Mediating role of Employee Green Behaviour Towards Sustainability Performance of Banks. Journal of Governance and Regulation. 9(2), 92-102.
  • Larbi-Siaw, O., Xuhua, H., Owusu, E., Owusu-Agyeman, A., Fulgence, B. E. ve Frimpong, S. A. (2022). Eco-Innovation, Sustainable Business Performance and Market Turbulence Moderation in Emerging Economies. Technology in Society. 68, 1-15.
  • Lee, A. V., Vargo, J. ve Seville, E. (2013). Developing a Tool to Measure and Compare Organizations’ Resilience. Natural Hazards Review. 14(1), 29-41.
  • Lengnick-Hall, C. A. ve Beck, T. E. (2005). Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How Organizations Respond to Environmental Change. Journal of Management. 31(5), 738-757.
  • Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E. ve Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a Capacity for Organizational Resilience Through Strategic Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management Review. 21(3), 243-255.
  • Liao, J. ve Gartner W. (2006). The Effects of Pre-venture Plan Timing and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty on the Persistence of Emerging Firms. Small Business Economics. 27(1), 23-40.
  • Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017). Resilience in Business and Management Research: A Review of Influential Publications and a Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. 19(1), 4-30.
  • Ma, B. ve Zhang, J. (2022). Tie Strength, Organizational Resilience and Enterprise Crisis Management: An Empirical Study in Pandemic Time. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 81, 103240, 1-16.
  • Mafabi, S., Munene, J. ve Ntayi, J. (2012). Knowledge Management and Organisational Resilience: Organisational Innovation As a Mediator in Uganda Parastatals. Journal of Strategy and Management. 5(1), 57-80.
  • Malik, S. Y., Hayat Mughal, Y., Azam, T., Cao, Y., Wan, Z., Zhu, H. ve Thurasamy, R. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Human Resources Management, and Sustainable Performance: is Organizational Citizenship Behavior Towards Environment the Missing Link?. Sustainability. 13(3), 1044.
  • Mallak, L. A. (1998). Measuring Resilience in Health Care Provider Organizations. Health Manpower Management. 24(4), 148-152.
  • Melkonyan, A., Gottschalk, D. ve Kamath VP. (2017). Sustainability Assessments and Their Implementation Possibilities Within the Business Models of Companies. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 12, 1-15.
  • Mesmer-Magnus, J., Viswesvaran, C. ve Wiernik, B.M. (2012). The Role of Commitment in Bridging the Gap Between Organizational Sustainability and Environmental Sustainability. S.E. Jackson, D.S. Ones ve S. Dilchert (Eds.). Managing HR for Environmental Sustainability içinde. San Francisco: JosseyBass/Wiley, 155-186.
  • Mulaik, S. A. ve Millsap, R. E. (2000). Doing the Four-Step Right. Structural Equation Modeling. 7(1), 36-73.
  • Norton, T. A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H. ve Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). Employee Green Behavior: A Theoretical Framework, Multilevel Review and Future Research Agenda. Organization and Environment. 28, 103-125.
  • Ogbeibu, S., Emelifeonwu, J., Senadjki, A., Gaskin, J. ve Kaivo-oja, J. (2020). Technological Turbulence and Greening of Team Creativity, Product Innovation, and Human Resource Management: Implications for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 244, 1-15.
  • Ones, D.S. ve Dilchert, S. (2012). “Employee Green Behaviors”. Jackson, S. E., Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S. ve Kraiger, K. (Eds.), Managing Human Resources for Environmental Sustainability içinde. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 85-116.
  • Özgül, B. (2020). Yeşil İnovasyon, Öncülleri ve Firma Performansı Arasındaki İlişki: Rekabet Stratejisinin Moderatör Rolü. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi SBE.
  • Paillé, P. ve Boiral, O. (2013). Pro-environmental Behavior at Work: Construct Validity and Determinants. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 36, 118-128.
  • Paillé, P. ve Mejía-Morelos, J. H. (2014). Antecedents of Pro-Environmental Behaviours at Work: The Moderating Influence of Psychological Contract Breach. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 38, 124-131.
  • Paraschiv, D. M., Nemoianu, E. L., Langă, C. A. ve Szabó, T. (2012). Eco-Innovation, Responsible Leadership and Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability. Amfiteatru Economic Journal. 14(32), 404-419.
  • Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the Relationship Between Internal Resources and Capabilities, Sustainable Supply Management, and Organizational Sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 47(1), 19-37.
  • Podsakoff, P. M. ve Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects, Journal of Management. 12(4), 531-544.
  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York, USA: Free Press.
  • Porter, M. E. ve Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and Competitive-Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review. Eylül-Ekim, 120-134.
  • Rai, S. S., Rai, S. ve Singh, N. K. (2021). Organizational Resilience and Social-Economic Sustainability: COVID-19 Perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 23(8), 12006-12023.
  • Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining Innovation Eco-Innovation Research and The Contribution From Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics. 32, 319-332.
  • Robertson, J. L. ve Barling, J. (2013). Greening Organizations Through Leaders’ Influence on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 34(2), 176-194.
  • Ruiz-Martin, C., López-Paredes, A. ve Wainer, G. (2018). What We Know and do not Know About Organizational Resilience. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering. 6(1), 11-28.
  • Sezen-Gültekin, G. ve Argon, T. (2020). Examination of the Relationship Between Organizational Resilience and Organizational Sustainability at Higher Education Institution. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction. 12, 329-343.
  • Shashwat, K, (2019). SMEs : Key Drivers of Green and Inclusive Growth. OECD Green Growth Papers. 3-56.
  • Sobaih, A. E, Elshaer, İ., Hasanein, A. M. B ve Abdelaziz, A. S. (2021). Responses to COVID-19: The Role of Performance in the Relationship Between Small Hospitality Enterprises’ Resilience and Sustainable Tourism Development. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 102824. 1-11.
  • Song, M., Fisher, R. ve Kwoh, Y. (2019). Technological Challenges of Green Innovation and Sustainable Resource Management with Large Scale Data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 144, 36-368.
  • Souza, A. A. A., Alves, M. F. R., Macini, N., Cezarino, L. O. ve Liboni, L. B. (2017). Resilience for Sustainability as an Eco-Capability. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. 581-599.
  • Süßbauer, E. ve Schäfer, M. (2019). Corporate Strategies for Greening the Workplace: Findings from Sustainability-Oriented Companies in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production. 226, 564-577.
  • Syafri, W., Prabowo, H., Nur, S. A. ve Muafi, M. (2021). The Impact of Workplace Green Behavior and Green Innovation on Green Performance of SMEs: A Case Study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 8(5), 365-374.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Takalo, S. K. ve Tooranloo, H. S. (2021). Green Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 279, 122474.
  • Tatlıdil, H. ve Ortunç, B. (2011). Kredi Temerrüt Swaplarının Fiyatlama Yöntemleri ve Fiyatlamayı Etkileyen Finansal Göstergelerin Regresyon ve Panel Veri Analizleri İle Belirlenmesi. Bankacılar Dergisi. 77, 25-43.
  • Teixeira, E. D. O. ve Werther, W. B. (2013). Resilience: Continuous Renewal of Competitive Advantages. Business Horizons. 56(3), 333-342.
  • Tsai, K.H. ve Liao, Y.C. (2017b). Sustainability Strategy and Eco-Innovation: a Moderation Model, Business Strategy Environment. 26(4), 426-437.
  • Tseng. M., Wang. R., Chiu. A., Geng. Y. ve Li. Y. (2013). Improving Performance of Green Innovation Practices Under Uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production. 40, 71-82.
  • Unsworth, K. L., Dmitrieva, A. ve Adriasola, E. (2013). Changing Behaviour: Increasing the Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions in Creating Pro‐Environmental Behaviour Change. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 34(2), 211-229.
  • Wang, J., Xue, Y. ve Yang, J. (2022). Can Proactive Boundary‐Spanning Search Enhance Green Innovation? The Mediating Role of Organizational Resilience. Business Strategy and the Environment. 1-15.
  • Wong, C. Y., Boon-itt S. ve Wong C. W. Y. (2011). The Contingency Effects of Environmental Uncertainty on the Relationship Between Supply Chain Integration and Operational Performance. Journal of Operations Management. 29, 604-615.
  • Yurdakul, M. ve Kazan, H. (2020). Effects of Eco-Innovation on Economic and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Turkey’s Manufacturing Companies. Sustainability. 12, 3167.
  • Zavala-Alcivar, A. Verdecho, M. J. ve Alfaro-Saiz, J. J. (2020). A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain. Sustainability. 12(16), 6300.
Toplam 95 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İş ve Örgüt Sosyolojisi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Şerife Kuzgun 0000-0002-6145-6349

Ebru Gözükara 0000-0003-0337-5337

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Temmuz 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 6 Ocak 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 49

Kaynak Göster

APA Kuzgun, Ş., & Gözükara, E. (2023). ÖRGÜTSEL DAYANIKLILIK KAPASİTESİ, YEŞİL YENİLİK, ALGILANAN YEŞİL ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK PERFORMANSI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER: İSO 500 UYGULAMASI. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(49), 399-432. https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1230408

Cited By

Mantardan Deri Görünümlü Sürdürülebilir Yenilikçi Yüzey Oluşturma; “Fomes fomentarius”
Journal of Fungus
https://doi.org/10.30708/mantar.1550291
 Kapak Resmi İndir

Sayın Araştırmacı;

Dergimize gelen yoğun talep nedeniyle Ekim 2024 sayısı için öngörülen kontenjan dolmuştur, gönderilen makaleler ilerleyen sayılarda değerlendirilebilecektir. Bu hususa dikkat ederek yeni makale gönderimi yapmanızı rica ederiz.

Yönetim Bilimler Dergisi Özel Sayı Çağrısı
Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 2024 yılının Eylül ayında “Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijitalleşmenin Sosyal Bilimlerde Yansımaları” başlıklı bir özel sayı yayınlayacaktır.
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Biga İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi tarafından 5-6 Temmuz 2024 tarihlerinde çevrimiçi olarak düzenlenecek olan 4. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Konferansı’nda sunum gerçekleştiren yazarların dergi için ücret yatırmasına gerek olmayıp, dekont yerine Konferans Katılım Belgesini sisteme yüklemeleri yeterli olacaktır.
Gönderilen makalelerin derginin yazım kurallarına uygun olması ve DergiPark sistemi üzerinden sisteme yüklenmesi gerekmektedir. Özel sayı ana başlığı ile ilgisiz makaleler değerlendirmeye alınmayacaktır. Özel sayı için gönderilen makalelerin "Makalemi özel sayıya göndermek istiyorum" kutucuğu işaretlenerek sisteme yüklenmesi gerekmektedir. Özel sayı için gönderilmemiş makalelerin bu sayıya eklenmesi mümkün olmayacaktır.
Özel Sayı Çalışma Takvimi
Gönderim Başlangıcı: 15 Nisan 2024
Son Gönderim Tarihi: 15 Temmuz 2024
Özel Sayı Yayınlanma Tarihi: Eylül 2024

Dergimize göndereceğiniz çalışmalar linkte yer alan taslak dikkate alınarak hazırlanmalıdır. Çalışmanızı aktaracağınız taslak dergi yazım kurallarına göre düzenlenmiştir. Bu yüzden biçimlendirmeyi ve ana başlıkları değiştirmeden çalışmanızı bu taslağa aktarmanız gerekmektedir.
İngilizce Makale Şablonu için tıklayınız...

Saygılarımızla,