Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 47 Sayı: 2, 694 - 709, 01.10.2018

Nur Yigitoglu , Yesim Kesli Dollar

Öz

Conducting action research (AR) is considered important for
teachers’ professional development, their actual teaching practice and their
theoretical knowledge . However, for
many teachers, research is a new challenge and action research an unfamiliar
form of classroom research. AR is a process through which practitioners address
issues of importance in their practice. 
The interface between AR and teacher cognition can advance
our understanding of teaching practice in general. Very few, if any, however, has
investigated teachers’ deliberate decision-making processes after action
research processes. In an attempt to address this gap in literature, this
exploratory research study investigates the influence of AR on teacher
cognition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

action research, teacher education, in-service teachers

Kaynakça

• Yigitoglu & Belcher, D. (2014) Baker, A. (2014). Exploring teachers' knowledge of second language pronunciation techniques: Teacher cognitions, observed classroom practices, and student perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 48 (1), 136-163.
• Bartels, N. (2001). Professional preparation and action research: Only for language teachers? TESOL Quarterly, 36 (1), 71-78. Bausch, L. (2010). The power of teachers' writing stories: exploring multiple layers of reflective inquiry in writing process education. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 6(1), 20-39.
• Berger, J. G., Boles, K. C., Troen, V. (2005). Teacher research and school change: paradoxes, problems, and possibilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 93–105. Borg, S. (2001). Self-perception and practice in teaching grammar. ELT Journal, 55(1), 21-29.
• Borg, S. (2003a). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109. Borg, S. (2003b). Teacher cognition in grammar teaching: a literature review. Language Awareness, 12(3), 96-108.
• Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and Practice. London: Continuum. Burns, A. (2009). Action Research in Second Language Teacher Education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds), The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education (pp. 289-298). New York: Cambridge.
• Crookes, G. (1993). Action Research for second language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 130-144. Doyle, M. (1997). Beyond life history as a student: preservice teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning. College Student Journal, 31(4), 519-532.
• Ebbutt, D. (1985) Educational action research: some general concerns and specific quibbles. In R. Burgess (Ed.) Issues in educational research: qualitative methods. Lewes: The Falmer Press. Edge, J. (Ed.) (2001). Action Research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
• Farrell, T. S. C., & Lim, P. C. P. (2005). Conceptions of grammar teaching: a case study of teachers' beliefs and classroom practices. TESL-EJ, 9(2), 1-13. Goetz, Z. & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
• Gustavsen, B. , Hannson, A., & Qvale, T. U. (2008). Action research and the challenge of scope. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds). The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (2nd Ed.) (pp. 63-77). London: Sage Publications. Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9), 1277-1288.
• Hopkins, D. (1993). A teacher’s guide to classroom research. (2nd Ed.) Buckingham: Open University. Johnson, A. P. (2009). Action Research: What Every Teacher Should Know About. New Jersey: Pearson.
• Kemmis, S. (1991). Improving education through action research. Action research for change and development. In O. Zubber Skerrit(Ed.). Action Research for change and development. Aldershot, England: Gober Publishing Company.
• Lee, I. (2003). L2 writing teachers' perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback. Assessing Writing, 8(3), 216-237. McNiff, J. (1988). Action Research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge.
• Perrett, G. (2003). Teacher Development Through Action Research : A Case Study in Focused Action Research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 1-10. Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers' grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37(3), 380-390.
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding School Improvement with Action Research. Virginia: ASCD