Başaklı Köyü (Diyarbakır-Bismil) Civarında Yaşayan Puhu (Bubo bubo)’ların Peletlerindeki Küçük Memelilerin Dağılımı

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1, 34 - 42, 05.04.2012

Alaettin Kaya Seven Seçkin Yüksel Coşkun

Öz

Mart - 2006’da Diyarbakır-Bismil Başaklı Köyü’nden Puhu (Bubo bubo)’ya ait 52 pelet toplanmış ve içerikleri incelenmiştir. Peletlerde 9 farklı memeli türü (Mus macedonicus, Microtus guentheri, Rattus rattus, Rattus norvegicus, Rattus sp., Meriones tristrami, Cricetulus migratorius, Crocidura suaveolens, Suncus etruscus) ve kuş kalıntıları tespit edilmiştir. Mus macedonicus % 38,5 oranı ile en sık rastlanan memeli türüdür. Bunu sırasıyla Microtus guentheri (% 24,2), Crocidura suaveolens (% 13,2) ve Suncus etruscus (% 2,2) takip etmiştir. Suncus etruscus Bismil’den ilk kez kayıt edilmiştir. 52 pelet içerisinde toplam 91 adet memeli kalıntısı, bir pelette ise en fazla 9 hayvan kalıntısı tespit edilmiştir. Pelet toplanan alanın yerleşim yerlerine yakın olması nedeniyle M. macedonicus en çok tercih edilen avdır. Kuş kalıntıları pellet içeriklerinin % 14,2’lik bölümünü oluşturmuştur. Diyarbakır Bismil’de Bubo bubo’nun av tercihinin ağırlıklı olarak muridlerden yana olduğu; ayrıca tespit edilen diğer memeli türleri ile kuş kalıntılarının Puhu kuşunun geniş bir canlı grubu ile beslendiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Diyarbakır, Bubo bubo, Pelet analizi, Puhu

The Remains of Small Mammals in the Eagle Owl (Bubo Bubo) Pellets from Başaklı Village (Diyarbakır-Bismil) Province

Öz

52 pellets Eagle owl (Bubo bubo) from Diyarbakır-Bismil, Başaklı village were collected at March- 2006 and remains were analiysed. In the pellets, 9 different mammalian species (Mus macedonicus, Microtus guentheri, Rattus rattus, Rattus norvegicus, Rattus sp., Meriones tristrami, Cricetulus migratorius, Crocidura suaveolens, Suncus etruscus) and some bird remains were identified. Mus macedonicus was mostly found with a ratio of 38,5 % in mammal remains. It was followed by Microtus guentheri, Crocidura suaveolens and Suncus etruscus with the rate of 24,2 %, 13.2% and 2.2 %, respectively. Suncus etruscus is the first record for Bismil. Because of the sampling area was close to the settlement, Mus macedonicus became most prefered prey item. Bird remains were consisted 14,2 % the part of pellets contents. In Diyarbakır-Bismil province, Bubo bubo prey preference were mainly consist of Murids, additionaly the other small mammals species and bird remains were identified, this indicate that Eagle Owl fed on a large scale living things.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Diyarbakır, Bubo bubo, Pellet analysis, Eagle Owl

Kaynakça

• Amr, Z.S., Al-Melhim, W.N. and Yousef, A., 1997. Mammals remain from pellets of the Eagle owl, from Azraq Nature Reserve, Jordan. Zool. Middle East, 14: 5-10.
• Georgiev, D.G., 2004. Conservation status of the small mammals (Mammalia: Insectivora, Lagomorpha, Rodentia) of Sakar Mountain (South-Eastern Bulgaria). Trav. Sci. Univ. Plovdiv. Animalia, 40(6): 153-164.
• Bontzorlos, V.A., Peris, S.J., Vlachos, C.H. and Bakaloudis, D.E., 2005. The diet of barn owl in the agricultural landscapes of central Greece. Folia Zoologica, 54(1-2): 99-110.
• Galeotti, P., F. Morimando and Violani, C., 1991. Feeding ecology of the tawny owls (Strix aluco) in urban habitats (northern Italy), Boll. Zool. 58: 143 - 150 (1991).
• Romanowskil, J. and Zmihorski, M., 2009. Seasonal and habitat variation in the diet of the tawny owl (Strix aluco) in Central Poland during unusually warm years. Biologia 64 (2): 365-369.
• Steiner, H. M. and Vauk, G., 1966. Säugetiere aus dem Beyşehir-Gebiet (Konya, Kleinasien). Zool. Anzeiger 176: 97-102.
• Hoppe, N., 1986. Pellet contents of the Barn Owl, near Samandağ, Turkey. Zool. Middle East, 1: 29-31.
• Kasparek, M.,1985. Die Sultanssümpfe. Naturgeschichte eines Vogelparadieses in Anatolien. Heidelberg, 156.
• Kasparek, M., 1988. Bafasee: Natur und Geschichte in der türkischgen Ägäis. Heidelberg, 174.
• Morgan, D., 1983. An analysis of some Eagle Owl pellets from Turkey. Sandgrouse 5: 105-106.
• Kock, D., 1990. Notes on mammals (Insectivora, Rodentia) taken by the Tawny Owl in NW Turkey. Zool. Middle E., 4: 5-9.
• Nadachowski, A., Smielowski, J., Rzebikkowalska, B. and Daoud, A., 1990. Mammals from the Near East in Polish collection. Acta Zool. Cracov, 33(6): 91-120.
• Seçkin, S. and Coşkun, Y., 2006. Mammalian remains in the pellets of the Long-eared Owls in Diyarbakır province. Tr. J. Zool. 30: 271-278.
• Obuch, J., 1994. Diet of Tawny Owl (Strix aluco) in selected regions of Bohemia and Moravia, Sylvia, 30, 77-85.
• Ellerman, J. R., 1940. Key to the Rodents of South West Asia. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 118: 785-792.
• Ellerman, J. R., 1941. The families and genera of living rodents. Vol. 2. Family: Muridae. British Museum Nat. Hist., London, 690.
• Ognev, S.I., 1947. Mammals of the USSR and adjacent countries, Rodents. Vol.5., 809p.
• Osborn, D. J., 1962. Microtinae from Turkey. Rodents of the subfamily Microtinae from Turkey. J. Mammal. 43(4): 515-529.
• Osborn, D. J. and Helmy, L.,1980. The contemporaryland mammals of Egypt (including Sinai), Fieldana Zoology, New Serie No. 5, Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Chicago.
• Yalden, D. W., 1977. The identification of remains in Owl Pellets. An occasional publication of the Mammal Society, 1-8.
• Corbet, G. B., 1978. The Mammals of the Palaearctic Region, A Taxonomic Review. British Museum (Natural History) Cornel University Press, London and Ithaca.
• Vinogradov, B.S. and Argiropulo, A.I. 1941. Fauna of the USSR. Key to rodents, 241.
• Kryštüfek, B. and Vohralik, V., 2001. Mammals of Turkey and Cyprus.Order Insectivora. Knjiznica Annales Majora, 79-88.
• Wilson, D. E. and Reeder, D. M., 2005. Mammal Species of The World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. 3rd Edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
• Kahila, G. and Tchernov, E., 1991. Barn owls as biological pest controlls, Israel. Land & Nature, 17(1): 68-73.
• Seçkin, S., 2009. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi Yırtıcı Kuş Peletlerindeki Küçük Memeli Hayvan Kalıntılarının Analizi. Doktora Tezi, Dicle Üniversitesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Diyarbakır.
• Tiranti, S. I., 1994. Mammal prey of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) in Parque Luro Reserve, La Pampa, Argentina. Hystrix, (n.s.) 5 (1-2): 47-52.
• Yom-Tov, Y. and Wool, D., 1997. Do the contents of Barn Owl pellets accurately represent the proportion of prey species in the field? The Cooper Ornithological Society, The Condor, 99, 972-976.
• Al-Melhim, W. N.; Amr, Z. S.; Disi, A. M.and Katbehbader, A., 1997. On the diet of the Little owl, Athena noctua, in the Safawi area, eastern Jordan. Zoology in the Middle East, 15, 19-28.
• Obuch, J. and Benda, P., 1996. Contribution to the feeding ecology ofStrix aluco and Bubo bubo (Aves: Strigiformes) in South-western Bulgaria. Acta Soc. Zool. Bohemia O, 43-49.
• Rifai, L. B., Al-Melhim, W. N., Gharaibeh, B. M. and Amr, Z. S., 2000. The diet of the Desert Eagle Owl, Bubo bubo ascalaphus, in the Eastern Desert of Jordan. Journal of Arid Environments, 44:369-372.
• Shehab, A. H. 2004. Diet of the Eagle Owl Bubo bubo, in Syria. Zoology in the Middle East, 33: 21-26.
• Seçkin, S., Coşkun, Y.ve Kaya, A., 2010. Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nden Etrüsk Sivrifaresi(Suncus etruscus) (Soricomorpha, Soricidae) Kayıtları. 20. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi, Denizli.