Örgütsel Adaletin Meta Analiz Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2, 101 - 112, 30.04.2016

İlksun Didem Ülbeği

Öz

Bu araştırmada örgütsel adalet ile alan yazında ele alınmış olan çeşitli değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler meta analiz yöntemi kullanılarak incelenmektedir. Çalışmada toplam 158 araştırmadan elde edilmiş olan veri ile etki büyüklükleri tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları örgütsel adaletin alt boyutları arasındaki ilişkiler ile örgütsel adalet, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı, örgütsel bağlılık, tükenmişlik, sinizm, örgütsel özdeşleşme, örgütsel güven, iş tatmini ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkileri ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Meta analiz, örgütsel adalet, dağıtım adaleti, etkileĢim adaleti, işlem adaleti

Kaynakça

• Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Ġçinde, Advances in Experimenlat Social Psychology (Vol. 2) (s. 267-299). New York: Academic Press. Aquino, K., Lewis, M. U. ve Bradfield, M. (1999). Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: A proposed model and empirical test. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1073-1091. Aryee, S. ve Chay, Y. W. (2001). Workplace justice, citizenship behavior, and turnover intentions in a union context: Examing the mediating role of perceived union support and union instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 154-160. Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S. ve Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267-279. Beugré, C. D. (1998). Managing Fairness in Organizations. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Beugré, C. D. (2007). A Cultural Perspective of Organizational Justice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Cohen-Charash, Y. ve Spector, P. E. (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Constant Validation of a Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. ve Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445. Field, A. P. ve Gillett, R. (2010). How to do meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 665-694. Folger, R. ve Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness Theory: Justice as Accountability. J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.) Ġçinde, Advances in Organizational Justice (s. 1-55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Folger, R. ve Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130. Fox, S. , Spector, P. E. ve Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291-309. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340-342. Greenberg, J. (1987). A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories. The Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9-22. Greenberg, J. (1996). The Quest for Justice on the Job; Essays and Experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Hunter, J. E. ve Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Ġnce, M. ve Gül, H. (2011). The effect of employees' perceptions of organizational justice on organizational citizenship behavior: an application in turkish public ınstitutions. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(6), 134-149. ĠĢcan, Ö. F. ve Sayın, U. (2010). Örgütsel adalet, iĢ tatmini ve örgütsel güven arasındaki iliĢki. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 24(4),195-216. Korsgaard, M. A., Schewiger, D. M. ve Sapienza, H. J: (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 60-84. Lind, E. A. ve Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum. Manogran, P. Stauffer, J. ve Conlon, E. J. (1994). Leader-member exchange as a key mediating variable between employees’ perceptions of fairness and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 249-253. Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M. ve Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738-748. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. ve Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. McFarlin, D. B. ve Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive avd procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637. Niehoff, B. P. ve Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a Mediator of the Relationship between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556. Özgan, H. (2011). Örgütsel davranıĢ bağlamında öğretmenlerin örgütsel adalet, güven, bağlılık, yönetici değerlendirme ve çatıĢma yönetimi stratejileri algıları arasındaki iliĢkilerin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(1), 229-247. Roberts, J. A., Colson, K. R. ve Chonko, L. B. (1999). Salesperson percceptions of equity and justice and their impact on organizational commitment and intent to turnover. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 1-16. ġeĢen, H. (2010). Adalet algısının tükenmiĢliğe etkisi: iĢ tatmininin aracı değiĢken rolünün yapısal eĢitlik modeli ile testi. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 67-90. Uğurlu, C. T. ve Üstüner, M. (2011). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılık düzeylerine yöneticilerinin etik liderlik ve örgütsel adalet davranıĢlarının etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41, 434-448.