Investigation of the Effect of New LCR Type Sleepers on Railway Track Stiffness

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 16, 36 - 50, 31.07.2022

Ferhat Çeçen , Bekir Aktaş

https://doi.org/10.47072/demiryolu.1105999

Cited By: 2

Öz

In this study, the railway track stiffness and the effect of the flexural modulus of sleepers on track stiffness were investigated. For this purpose, an extensive literature review, simplified examples, and comparative tests were used. During the tests, standard B70 type prestressed concrete railway sleepers, and the new LCR type sleepers which have been developed in Türkiye, were used. As a result of the study, it has been seen that the new type of sleepers provides an optimum solution in terms of mass and flexural modulus, combining the optimum flexural modulus advantage of wooden sleepers and the high mass and environmental durability advantages of concrete sleepers. In addition, it has been examined whether it can maintain this optimum modulus throughout its service life, and it has been observed that the new type of sleepers largely maintains its flexural modulus during repeated loading steps. In addition, plastic deformations occurring even at high load levels are at least as low as seen in prestressed competitors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Railway track stiffness, track flexural resistance, track module, sleeper flexural modulus

Yeni LCR Tipi Traverslerin Demiryolu Hat Rijitliğine Etkisinin Araştırılması

Öz

Bu çalışma kapsamında, demiryolu hat rijitliği ve traverslerin eğilme modüllerinin bu hat rijitliğine etkisi, geniş bir literatür taraması, basitleştirilmiş örneklendirmeler ve karşılaştırmalı deneylerle incelenmiştir. Deneyler esnasında, standart B70 tipi öngerilmeli beton demiryolu traversleri ve ülkemizde son yıllarda geliştirmeye alınan yeni LCR tipi traversler kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, yeni tip traverslerin kütlesi ve eğilme modülü bakımından, ahşap traverslerin optimum eğilme modülü avantajını ve beton traverslerin yüksek kütle ve çevresel dayanıklılık avantajlarını bir araya getirerek, optimum bir çözüm sağladığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca sahip olduğu bu optimum eğilme modülünü, servis ömrü boyunca koruyup koruyamayacağı da incelenmiş ve yeni tip traverslerin tekrarlı yükleme adımlarında eğilme modülünü büyük oranda koruduğu ve yüksek değerli yüklere rağmen plastik deformasyonlarının en az öngerilmeli rakipleri kadar düşük olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Demiryolu hat rijitliği, hat esneme direnci, hat modülü, travers eğilme modülü

Kaynakça

• [1] “Elastic modulus,” [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_modulus [22.03.2022]
• [2] “Stiffness,” [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiffness [22.03.2022]
• [3] “Flexural modulus,” [Online]. Available:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexural_modulus[22.03.2022]
• [4] “Concrete,” [Online]. Available: https://testbook.com/question-answer/consider-the-following-statements-concerning-elast--5f1c4ac72d4b290d0e7eaefa/amp [22.03.2022]
• [5] “Modül,” [Online]. Available: http://bilsenbesergil.blogspot.com/p/modul-modulus.html [22.03.2022]
• [6] E. B. Türkel, “Betonda Basınç Dayanımı İle Elastisite Modülü Arasındaki İlişkiler,” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2002
• [7] P. H. Bischoff, S. H. Perry, “Compressive behaviour of concrete at high strain rates,” Materials and Structures, vol. 24(6), pp. 425-450, 1991, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02472016
• [8] F. Çeçen, B. Aktaş, “Dinamik Demiryolu Kuvvetlerinin Darbe Simülasyonlarıyla İncelenmesi,” Demiryolu Mühendisliği, Sayı: 16, Sayfa: 23-35. Temmuz 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.47072/demiryolu.1096371
• [9] Z. Öztürk, V. Arlı, Demiryolu Mühendisliği, İstanbul, ISBN 978-605-60958, 2009
• [10] E. Balcı, E. Yalçın, T. U. Yelce, N. Ö. Bezgin, “Bir Demiryolu Hattının Birim Esneme Direnci Üzerinde Etkisi Olan Mekanik Ve Geometrik Niteliklerin İncelenmesi,” Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, vol. 9(4), pp. 1408 – 1423, 2021
• [11] “The contact patch,” [Online]. Available: https://the-contact-patch.com/book/rail/r1412-track-behaviour [22.03.2022]
• [12] C. Esveld, Modern railway track. ISBN 978-1-326-05172-3, 2014
• [13] G. Michas, “Slab track systems for high-speed railways,” Master Degree Project, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2012
• [14] V. A. Profillidis, Railway management and engineering, Aldershot: Ashgate, 3rd Edition, 2006
• [15] A. V. Belkom. “A simplified method for calculating load distribution and rail deflections in track, incorporating the influence of sleeper stiffness,” Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 23(11), pp. 2358–2372, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220911144
• [16] B. Lichtberger, Track Compedium; Formation, Permanent Way, Maintenance, Economics, Hamburg, Germany, ISBN 3-7771-0320-9, 1st Edition, 2005
• [17] F. Çeçen, “Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforced concrete railway sleepers,” Master Thesis, Gazi Osman Paşa University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 156 pages, Tokat, 2019. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22723.43049
• [18] F. Çeçen, B. Aktaş, “Yeni nesil demiryolu traversleri ve yerli frp donatı kullanımının deneysel araştırması,” Demiryolu Mühendisliği, Sayı: 13, Sayfa: 53-64. Ocak 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.47072/demiryolu.803452
• [19] F. Çeçen, B. Aktaş, “Modal and harmonic response analysis of new cfrp laminate reinforced concrete railway sleepers,” Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol: 127, ID: 105471, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105471
• [20] H. P. J. Taylor, “The railway sleeper: 50 years of pretensioned, prestressed concrete,” 1993. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288948138_The_prestressed_concrete_railway_sleepers_-_50_years_of_pretensioned_prestressed_concrete [09.03.2022]
• [21] F. Çeçen, B. Aktaş, H. Öztürk, İ. Ş. Öztürk, M. B. Navdar, “Comparison of new LCR and ordinary prestressed concrete railway sleepers with LUR tests,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol: 321, ID: 126414, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126414
• [22] F. Çeçen, B. Aktaş, H. Öztürk, İ. M. B. Navdar, Ş. Öztürk, “Behaviour of new LCR and ordinary prestressed concrete railway sleepers under repeated impact loads,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol: 319, ID: 126151, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126151
• [23] B. Aktaş, F. Çeçen, H. Öztürk, M. B. Navdar, İ. Ş. Öztürk, “Comparison of prestressed concrete railway sleepers and new LCR concrete sleepers with experimental modal analysis,” Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol: 131, ID: 105821, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105821
• [24] F. Çeçen, B. Aktaş, “Incremental LUR tests of new LCR concrete railway sleepers,” Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol: 130, ID: 105793, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105793
• [25] F. Çeçen, B. Aktaş, “Lamine CFRP Donatılı Traverslerin Deneysel ve Sonlu Eleman Analizleriyle İncelenmesi,” Demiryolu Mühendisliği, Sayı: 14, Sayfa: 26-38, Temmuz 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.47072/demiryolu.869946
• [26] F. Çeçen, B. Aktaş, H. Öztürk, M. B. Navdar, İ. Ş. Öztürk, “Karbon-Fiber Plaka Donatılı Traverslerin, B70-Tipi Öngerilmeli Beton Traverslerle Karşılaştırmalı İncelenmesi,” Demiryolu Mühendisliği, Sayı: 15, Sayfa: 97-110, Ocak 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.47072/demiryolu.1028740
• [27] F. Çeçen, B. Aktaş, “B70 Tipi Demiryolu Traverslerinde Polipropilen Fiber Kullanımının Deneysel İncelenmesi,” Demiryolu Mühendisliği, Sayı: 15, Sayfa: 158-169, Ocak 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.47072/demiryolu.990316
• [28] A. Manalo, T. Aravinthan, W. Karunasena, A. Ticoalu, “A review of alternative materials for replacing existing timber sleepers,” Composite Structures, Vol. 92, pp. 603–611, 2010
• [29] C. A. Bolin, S. T. Smith, “Life Cycle Assessment of Creosote-Treated Wooden Railroad Crossties in the US with Comparisons to Concrete and Plastic Composite Railroad Crossties,” Journal of Transportation Technologies, Vol: 3, pp: 149-161, 2013
• [30] R. C. Sharma, S. Palli, S. K. Sharma, M. Roy, “Modernization of Railway Track with Composite Sleepers,” International Journal of Vehicle Structures & Systems, Vol: 9(5), pp. 321-329, 2017
• [31] M. Siahkouhi, X. Lia, V. Markine, G. Jinga, “An experimental and numerical study on the mechanical behavior of Kunststof Lankhorst Product sleepers,” Scientia Iranica, Vol: 28(5), pp. 2568-2581, 2021
• [32] A. M. Remennikov, S. Kaewunruen, “A review of loading conditions for railway track structures due to train and track vertical interaction,” Struct. Control Health Monit., Vol. 15, pp. 207–234, 2007
• [33] T. Koh, S. Hwang, “Field evaluation and durability analysis of an eco-friendly pressurised concrete sleeper,” J. Materials in Civil Eng., vol. 27(7), 2015
• [34] K. L. Auler, Hicaz Demiryolu İnşa Edilirken, İş Bankası Kültür Yay., ISBN 9786052951255, 2017
• [35] V. Lojda, A. Belkom, “Fire safety of polymer sleepers in terms of fire propagation,” 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo Conference, SGEM 2019, pp. 247-256, doi: 10.5593/sgem2019/1.2/S02.032
• [36] R. Lampo, T. Nosker, H. Sullivan, “Development, Testing and Applications of Recycled Plastic Composite Cross Ties,” Us Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Champaign, 2003
• [37] T. Nosker, R. Renfree, J. Lynch, M. Lutz, B. Gillespie, R. Lampo, K. E. Van Ness, “A performance‐based approach to the development of a recycled plastic/composite crosstie,” Proceedings of the Technical Papers of The Annual Technical Conference‐Society of Plastics Engineers Incorporated; Society of Plastics Engineers Inc.: Brookfield, CT, USA, pp. 2912–2915, 1998
• [38] S. Ju, J. Yoon, D. Sung, S. Pyo, “Mechanical Properties of Coal Ash Particle‐Reinforced Recycled Plastic‐Based Composites for Sustainable Railway Sleepers,” Polymers, vol. 12, pp. 2287, 2020
• [39] C. Salih, A. Manalo, W. Ferdous, R. Abousnina, P. Yu, T. Heyer, P. Schubel, “Behaviour of timber-alternative railway sleeper materials under five-point bending,” Construction and Building Materials, Vol: 316, ID: 125882, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125882
• [40] W. Ferdous, A. Manalo, G. Van Erp, T. Aravinthan, S. Kaewunruen, A. M. Remennikov, “Composite railway sleepers–Recent developments, challenges and future prospects,” Compos. Struct., Vol. 134, pp. 158–168, 2015
• [41] C. Salih. A. Manalo, W. Ferdous, R. Abousnina, P. Yu, T. Heyer, P. Schubel, “ Novel Bending Test Method for Polymer Railway Sleeper Materials,” Polymers, vol. 13, pp. 1359, 2021
• [42] J. Nairn, N. Stevens, “Rational design method for prestressed concrete sleepers,” CORE 2010: Rail, Rejuvenation and Renaissance Engineers, pp. 174, Wellington, Australia, 2010
• [43] A. I. Zeitouni, D. C. Rizos, Y. Qian, “Benefits of high strength reduced modulus (HSRM) concrete railroad ties under center binding support conditions,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 192, pp. 210–223, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.124
• [44] M. McHenry, Y. Gao, J.P. Billargeon, “Implementing Improved Composite Tie Design and Testing Guidelines” Proceedings of the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance‐of‐Way Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 206–227, 2018
• [45] S. Kaewunruen, C. Ngamkhanong, P. Sengsri, M. Ishida, “On Hogging Bending Test Specifications of Railway Composite Sleepers and Bearers,” Front. Built Environ, vol. 6, ID:592014, 2020
• [46] E. Berggren, “Railway track stiffness. Dynamic measurements and evaluation for efficient maintenance,” Ph.D. dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2009
• [47] W. Ferdous, “Static Flexural Behaviour of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Composite Beam: An alternative railway sleeper,” Master thesis, School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Canberra, Australia, 2012
• [48] R. D. Mindlin, “Influence of rotatory inertia and shear in flexural motions of isotropic elastic plates,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 18, pp. 31–38, 1951
• [49] “Three point flexural test,” [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-point_flexural_test [22.03.2022]