Doğa Eğitimi Etkinliklerinin İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Çevreye Yönelik Tutum ve Bilgi Düzeylerine Etkisi

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 53, 495 - 517, 30.06.2022

Gökçe Ok

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1081969

Öz

Çalışmanın temel amacı, derse entegre ancak ders dışında uygulanan Doğa Eğitimi Etkinliklerinin (DEE), ilköğretim yedinci sınıf öğrencilerinin çevre eğitimine yönelik tutum ve bilgi düzeylerine etkisini araştırmaktır. Yarı deneysel olarak kurgulanan bu çalışmanın örneklemini rastgele örnekleme yolu ile seçilen İzmir ili Tire ilçe merkezinde bulunan bir ortaokulun iki şubesinde öğrenim gören 56 öğrenci (30 kız ve 26 erkek) oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada veri toplama araçları olarak, araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen Çevreye Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği (ÇTÖ) ve Çevre Bilgisi Testi (ÇBT) kullanılmıştır. Araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen Doğa Eğitimi Etkinliklerinin (DEE) uygulandığı deney grubunun çevreye yönelik tutum ile başarı ön, son ve kalıcılık testleri ortalaması kontrol grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevre bilgisi, çevre eğitimi, çevreye yönelik tutum, doğa eğitimi

The Effect of Nature Education Activities on the Attitudes and Knowledge Levels of Primary School Students towards the Environment

Öz

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of Nature Education Activities (NEA), which are integrated into the lesson but implemented outside the classroom, on the attitudes and knowledge levels of primary school seventh grade students towards environmental education. The sample of this study, which was designed as quasi-experimental, consists of 56 students (30 girls and 26 boys) studying in two branches of a secondary school located in Tire town centre of İzmir province, selected by random sampling. In the study, Environmental Attitude Scale (EAS) and Environmental Knowledge Test (EKT) developed by the researcher were used as data collection tools. The attitude towards the environment and the average of achievement pre, post and permanence tests of the experimental group, in which the Nature Education Activities (NEA) developed by the researcher were applied, were found to be statistically significant compared to the control group.

Anahtar Kelimeler

environmental attitude, environment education, environment knowledge, nature education

Kaynakça

• Ak, S. (2008). Investigation of environmental awareness of primary school teacher candidates in terms of some demographic variables [İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının çevreye yönelik bilinçlerinin bazı demografik değişkenler açısından incelenmesi]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.
• Akıllı, M., & Yurtcan, M. T. (2009). An ivestigation of prospective science teachers’ attitudes towards environment in terms of different factors (Sample of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty). Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 11(2), 119-131.
• Alat, Z., Akgümüş, Ö., & Cavalı, D. (2012). Early childhood teachers’ beliefs and practices. Mersin University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(3), 47-62.
• Atasoy, E. (2006). Education child nature interaction for environment [Çevre için eğitim çocuk doğa etkileşimi]. Bursa: Ezgi Bookstore.
• Altın, M., Bacanlı, H., & Yıldız, K. (2002). Attitudes of Biology Teacher Candidates towards the Environment. Paper presented at the 5th National Science and Mathematics Congress, METU, Ankara.
• Artun, H. (2013). Investigation of the effectiveness of the modular curriculum designed for environmental education of seventh grade students [Yedinci sınıf öğrencilerinin çevre eğitimine yönelik tasarlanan modüler öğretim programının etkililiğinin araştırılması]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Karadeniz Teknik University, Trabzon.
• Balcı, A. (2013). Research in the social sciences [Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma]. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
• Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Nature-based excursions: School students’ perspections of learning in natural environments. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(3), 218-231.
• Balım, A. G., Pekmez Şahin, E., & Erdem Özaçık, M. (2004). The effects of activities based on multiple intelligence theory on students’ achievement on the subject of acids and bases. Ege Journal of Education, 5(2), 13-19.
• Barker, M., & Lynnette R. (2004). In, about, for: Exploring the foundations of environmental education. Set 2004, 2, 15- 18.
• Bilton, H. (2010). Outdoor learning in the early years: Management and innovation. (3rd. Ed.). New York NY: Routledge.
• Bogner, F. X. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on longterm variables of environmental perspective. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(4), 17-29.
• Bolstad, R. (2003). Environmental education: Roots in the past, visions of the future, opprtinities in the present, Set: Research Informations for the Teachers, 3, 10-14.
• Bozdoğan, A. E., Ustaoğlu, F., & Bülbül, M. (2015). Examination of biology teachers' use of out-of-school environments in their lessons. Abstracts of the 24th National Educational Sciences Congress, Niğde. (p. 28). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
• Bögeholz, S. (2002). An empirical study of gender differences relevant to environmental education, in: U. Pasero & A. Gottburgsen (Eds.) Wie natürlich ist Geschlecht? Gender und die Konstruktion von Natur und Technik (Wiesbaden, Westdeutscher Verlag), 215-227.
• Brody, M., & Hall, R. (2002). Park visitor’s understandings, values and beliefs related to their experience at Midway Geyser Basin, Yellewstone National Park, USA. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1119-1141.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Manual of data analysis for social sciences (20th Ed.) [Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı]. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
• Carrier, S. J. (2009). Environmental education in the schoolyard: learning styles and gender. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 2-12.
• Carson, J. A. (2007). The ecology of school chance: an Australian primary school’s endeavor to integrate concept-based, experiential environmental learning throughout core curriculum. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The University of Arizona, Arizona.
• Cengiz, H. (2014). The effect of voluntary simple living behavior on attitudes towards death consumption behavior: A comparison between Turkish and American cultures [Gönüllü sade yaşam davranışının ölüm tüketimi davranışına yönelik tutumlar üzerine etkisi: Türk ve Amerikan kültürleri arasında bir karşılaştırma]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir.
• Chapman, D., & Sharma, K. (2001). Environmental attitudes and behavior of primary and secondary students in Asian cities: Am preview strategy for implementing an eco-schools programme. The Environmentalist, 21, 265-272.
• Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319.
• Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Psychology Press. Çepni, S. (2009). Introduction to research and project work (3rd Ed.) [Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş]. Trabzon: Celepler Printing.
• Çulha, O. (2014). Determination of perceived quality dimensions of computerized airline reservation and ticketing certificate training program in Tourism [Turizmde bilgisayarlı havayolu rezervasyon ve biletleme sertifika eğitim programının algılanan kalite boyutlarının belirlenmesi]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Adnan Menderes University, Aydın.
• Demirsoy, A. (2012). Naturerist [Doğaperest]. Ankara: Hacettepe University Press.
• DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. (2nd Ed.). London: Sage.
• DiEnno, C. M., & Hilton, S. C. (2005). High school students’ knowledge, attitudes, and levels of enjoyment of an environmental education unit on nonnative plants. The Journal Of Environmental Education, 37(1), 13-25.
• Duan, H., & Fortner, R. (2010). A cross-cultural study on environmental risk perception and educational strategies: Implications for environmental education in China. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 1(1), 1-19.
• Durmuş, Y., & Yapıcıoğlu, A. E. (2014). Kemaliye (Erzincan) ecology based nature education project in participants’ eyes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1134-1139.
• Engin, A. C. (2003). Environmental knowledge and attitudes of pre-service science and biology teachers before and after university ecology course [Fen bilgisi ve biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının üniversite ekoloji dersi öncesi ve sonrası çevre bilgileri ve tutumları]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Marmara University, İstanbul.
• Erdemir, E. (2007). Candidate orientation in recruitment: Conceptual framework and scale development [İşe almada aday odaklılık: Kavramsal çerçeve ve ölçek geliştirme]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
• Erdoğan, M., Uşak, M., & Bahar, M. (2012). A review of research on environmental education in non traditional settings in Turkey, 2000-2011. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(1), 37-57.
• Erentay, N. (2013). The effect of out-of-school nature practices on 5th grade students' science knowledge, scientific process skills and attitudes towards the environment [Okul dışı doğa uygulamalarının 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin fene ilişkin bilgi, bilimsel süreç becerileri ve çevreye yönelik tutumlarına etkisi]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Akdeniz University, Antalya.
• Erten, S. (2005). Investigation of preservice preschool teachers’ behaviors related to environmental awaress. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28, 91-100.
• Erten, S. (2004). What is environmental education and environmental awareness, how should environmental education be? Environment and Human Journal, Publication Organ of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Issue 65/66, Ankara.
• Fisman, L. (2005). The effects of local learning on environmental awareness in children: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(3), 39-50.
• Gotch, C., & Hall, T. (2004). Understanding nature‐related behaviors among children through a theory of reasoned action approach. Environmental Education Research, 10(2), 157-177.
• Güler, T. (2009). The effects of an ecology based environmental education on teachers’ opinions about environmental education. Education and Science, 34(151), 30-43.
• Hair, J. F., Babin, B. Money, A. H., & Samouel, P. (2003). Essentials of business research methods. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Hanna, G. (1995). Wilderness-related environmental outcomes of adventure and ecology education programming. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(1), 21-32.
• Harrison, S. (2010). Why we are here? ‘Taking Place’ into account in UK outdoor environmental education, Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 10(1), 3-18.
• Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967-988.
• Hinkin, T. R., Tracey, J. B., & Enz, C. A. (1997). Scale construction: Developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 21(1), 100-120.
• Kalender, Ç. (2010). Evaluation of nature education in Turkey: Example of Kaçkar Mountains National Park [Türkiye’de yapılan doğa eğitimlerinin değerlendirilmesi: Kaçkar Dağları Milli Parkı örneği]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin.
• Karasar, N. (2012). Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques [Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler]. Ankara: Nobel Publication.
• Karpudewan, M., Roth, W. M., & Abdullah, M. N. S. B. (2015). Enhancing primary school students' knowledge about global warming and environmental attitudes using climate change activities. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 31-54.
• Keleş, Ö., Uzun, N., & Uzun, F. (2010). The change of teacher candidates environmental consciousness, attitude, thought and behaviors with nature training project and the assessment of its permanence. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 9(32), 384-401.
• Kırbaşlar, F. G., Barış, Ç., G., & Ünal, M. (2009). A study on pre-service science teachers misunderstanding of fermentation, Hacettepe University Journal of Educaiton, 36, 158-168.
• Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Kocataş, A. (2012). Ecology: Environmental biology [Ekoloji: Çevre biyolojisi]. Bursa: Dora Print Publishing.
• Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
• Leeming, F. C., & Porter, B. E. (1997). Effects of participation in class activities on children’s environmental attitudes and knowledge. Journal of Environmental Education, 28(2), 33-43.
• Lewis, B. R., Templeton, G. F., & Byrd, T. A. (2005). A methodology for construct development in MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(4), 388-400.
• Lieberman, G. A., Hoody, L. L., & Lieberman, G.M. (2000). California student assesment project-The effects of environment based education on student achievement. San Diego, CA: State Education and Environment Roundtable.
• Mansaray, A., Ajiboye J. O., & Audu, U. F. (1998). Environmental knowledge and attitudes of some Nigerian secondary school teachers. Environmental Education Research, 4(3), 329-339.
• Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2007). Student-centered education application model [Öğrenci merkezli eğitim uygulama modeli]. Ankara: National Education Press.
• Okur, E. (2012). Experiential teaching outside the classroom: Ecology application [Sınıf dışı deneyimsel öğretim: Ekoloji uygulaması]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale.
• Özbay, Ş. (2010). The effect of the activities given about compost in the science and technology program on the academic achievement and environmental attitudes of the students [Fen ve teknoloji programı içinde kompost hakkında verilen etkinliklerin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına ve çevre tutumlarına etkisi]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale.
• Özdemir, O., & Uzun, N. (2006). The effect of science and nature activities carried out according to green class model on preschool student’s environment perception. Journal of Child Development and Education, 3(1), 12-20.
• Özdemir, O. (2010). The effects of nature-based environmental education on environmental perception and behavior of primary school students. Pamukkale University Journal of Education Faculty, 27, 125-138.
• Özerbaş, M. A. (2011). The effect of creative thinking teaching environment on academic achievement and retention of knowledge. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 31(3), 675-705.
• Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 32-36.
• Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207-320.
• Ruiz-Mallen, I., Barraza, L., Bodenhorn, B., & Reyes-García, V. (2009). Evaluating the impact of an environmental education programme: An empirical study in Mexico. Environmental Education Research, 15(3), 371-387.
• Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 3-43.
• Sinan, O., Şardağ, M., Salifoğlu, A., Çakır, C., & Karabacak, Ü. (2014). Investigation of primary school students’ science attitudes and self-efficacy. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 68-100.
• Sokoli, N., & Doka, D. (2004). Environmental education in Aibanian elementary and high schools. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 13(1), 67-72.
• Storksdieck, M., Ellenbogen, K., & Heimlich, J. E. (2005). Changing minds? Reassing outcomes in free-choice environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 353-369.
• Tecer, S. (2007). Education for the environment: A study on the determination of environmental attitudes, knowledge, sensitivity and active participation levels of primary school students in Balıkesir [Çevre için eğitim: Balıkesir ili ilköğretim öğrencilerinin çevresel tutum, bilgi, duyarlılık ve aktif katılım düzeylerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir çalışma]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Zonguldak.
• Vaske, J. J., & Kobrin, K. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 16-21.
• Veeravatnanond, V., & Singseewo, A. (2010). A developmental model of environmental education school. European Journal of Social Sciences, 17(3), 391-403.
• Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012). Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(3), 197-210.
• Wilson, R. (2008). Nature and young children: Encouraging creative play and learning in natural environments. New York: Routledge.
• Yardımcı, E. (2009). The effect of activity-based nature education in the summer science camp on the nature perceptions of primary school 4th and 5th grade children [Yaz bilim kampında yapılan etkinlik temelli doğa eğitiminin ilköğretim 4. ve 5. sınıftaki çocukların doğa algılarına etkisi]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.
• Yaşaroğlu, C. (2012). Evaluation of primary school students' attitudes and behaviors towards the environment [İlköğretim birinci kademe öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik tutum ve davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). İnönü University, Malatya.
• Zwick, T. T., & Miller, K. W. (1996). A comparison of integrated outdoor education activities and traditional science learning with American Indian students. Journal of American Indian Education, 35(2), 1-9.