Öğretmen Adaylarının Yenilenebilir Enerji Kavramına ilişkin Görüşleri

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 56, 607 - 625, 22.06.2023

Şenol Şen , Senar Temel

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1227283

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının yenilenebilir enerjiye yönelik görüşlerini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Çalışmanın yürütülmesinde nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya toplam olarak 30 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Katılımcıların seçimi sırasında amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmaya daha önce çevre eğitimi ile ilgili dersler almış olan öğretmen adayları katılmıştır. Araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanmış olan üç açık uçlu soru veri toplamak için kullanılmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarına yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının kullanılmasının önemi, yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının kullanımının önündeki engeller ve yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının kullanımının artırılması konularında sorular sorulmuştur. Sorulara verilmiş olan cevaplar yazılı olarak toplandı. Toplanan verilerin analizi sırasında içerik analizi kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular kategorilere ayrılmış ve daha sonra temalar belirlenmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarının yenilenebilir enerji kavramına ilişkin görüşleri temalar ve kategoriler aracılığıyla ortaya konmuştur. Araştırmanın sonuçları, öğretmen adaylarının yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları konusunda farkındalıklarının olduğunu ancak bilgilerinin istenilen düzeyde olmadığını göstermiştir. Sonuçlar, politika yapıcılara, ulusal alanda toplumun farkındalığını artırmak için uzun vadede öğretmen eğitiminin planlanması sürecinde yenilenebilir enerji hakkında yeni bilgiler sağlayabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları, içerik analizi, öğretmen adayları, yenilenebilir enerji, görüş, nitel araştırma., Prospective Teachers, Renewable energy sources, content analysis, prospective teachers, renewable energy, view, qualitative research.

Prospective Teachers' Views on the Concept of Renewable Energy

Öz

This study aims to reveal the prospective teachers’ views on the concept of renewable energy. The study employed a qualitative research method. A total of 30 prospective teachers attended the study. A purposeful sampling method was used to choose the participants. Prospective teachers who had taken courses related to environmental education before participated in the study. The data were collected through three open-ended questions prepared by the researchers. The prospective teachers were asked questions on the importance of using renewable energy sources, obstacles to the usage of renewable energy sources, and increasing the usage of renewable energy sources. Their answers to questions were collected in writing. Content analysis was used to analyze the collected data. The findings were divided into categories and then the themes were specified. Prospective teachers’ views about the concept of renewable energy were demonstrated through the themes and categories. The results of the study showed that prospective teachers had awareness of renewable energy sources but that their knowledge was not at the desired level. The results could provide policymakers with new information about renewable energy in the process of planning teacher training in the long term to raise society’s awareness in the national arena.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları, içerik analizi, öğretmen adayları, yenilenebilir enerji, görüş, nitel araştırma., Renewable energy sources, content analysis, prospective teachers, renewable energy, view, qualitative research.

Kaynakça

• Acikgoz, C. (2011). Renewable energy education in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 36(2), 608-611.
• Açışlı Çelik, S. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes and metaphoric perceptions towards renewable energy resources. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 8(4), 2334-2352.
• Akçöltekin, A., & Doğan, S. (2013). The determination of the classroom teachers’ attitudes towards renewable energy. International Journal of Social Science, 6(1), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS_564
• Aksan, Z., & Çelikler, D. (2019). The science teaching candidates’ opinions related to the hydroelectric plants. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 13(2), 859-878. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.541641
• Antink-Meyer, A., & Aldeman, M. (2021). Middle grades teachers’ content knowledge for renewable energy instruction design. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(4), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1767048
• Assali, A., Khatib, T., & Najjar, A. (2019). Renewable energy awareness among future generation of Palestine. Renewable Energy, 136, 254-263.
• Başaran Uğur, A. R., Bektaş, O., & Güneri, E. (2021). Pre-service science teacher’ views regarding renewable energy sources. MANAS Journal of Social Studies, 10(2), 828-850.
• Baysal, H. & Daşdemir, İ. (2023). Determining the awareness level of science teachers about renewable energy resources. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 52(237), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1064629
• Bayulgen, O., & Benegal, S. (2019). Green Priorities: How economic frames affect perceptions of renewable energy in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 47, 28-36.
• Berkovski, B., & Gottschalk, C. M. (1997). Strengthening human resources for new and renewable energy technologies of the 21st century: UNESCO engineering education and training programme. Renewable Energy, 10(2-3), 441-450.
• Bojic, M. (2004). Education and training in renewable energy sources in Serbia and Montenegro. Renewable Energy, 29(10), 1631-1642.
• Bozdogan, A. E., & Yigit, D. (2014). Investigation of prospective teachers' opinions to the alternative energy sources according to different variables. Electronic Journal of Education Sciences, 3(6), 113-130.
• BritishPetroleum. (2011). Energy outlook 2030. Retrieved from https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2011, 2019;.pdf
• Cebesoy, U. B., & Karısan, D. (2017). Investigation of preservice science teachers’ knowledge, teaching efficacy perceptions and attitude towards renewable energy sources. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 14(1),1377-1415.
• Çelikler, D. (2013). Awareness about renewable energy of pre-service science teachers in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 60, 343-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.05.034
• Çolak, K., Kaymakçı, S., & Akpınar, M. (2015). The status of renewable energy resources in the Turkish social studies textbooks and prospective teachers’ perceptions. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 41, 59-76.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice?. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
• Demirbağ, M., & Yılmaz, Ş. (2020). Preservice teachers’ knowledge levels, risk perceptions and intentions to use renewable energy: A structural equation model. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 6(3), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.625409
• Doğru, M., & Çelik, M.. (2019). Analysis of pre-service science and classroom teachers' attitudes and opinions concerning renewable energy sources in terms of various variables. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 9(4), 1761-1771.
• Dönmez Usta, N., Karslı, F. & Durukan, Ü. G. (2016). Effect of the computer assisted instruction material on prospective teachers’ learning of the renewable energy sources. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 12(1), 196-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.17860/efd.70389
• Driver, R., & Millar, R. (1986). Energy Matters: Proceedings of an Invited Conference: Teaching about Energy within the Secondary Science Curriculum. Leeds [England]: University of Leeds, Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
• Ergül, N. R. & Çalış, S. (2022). Investigation of the knowledge levels of science teacher candidates on renewable energy and its resources. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 35 (1), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.994400
• European Commission. (2019). 2030 Climate & Energy Framework. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2030_en
• Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research competencies for analysis and application. Merrill an Imprint of Prentice Hall.
• Genç, M. (2019). Determination of attitudes on renewable energy sources of pre-service teachers. MANAS Journal of Social Studies, 8(1), 811-821. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.474079
• Goulgouti, A., Plakitsi, A., & Stylos, G. (2019). Environmental literacy: Evaluating knowledge, affect, and behavior of pre-service teachers in Greece. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 15(1), e02202.
• Guven, G., & Sulun, Y. (2017). Pre-service teachers' knowledge and awareness about renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 663-668.
• Halder, P., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Pietarinen, J., & Pelkonen, P. (2011). Bio-energy and youth: Analyzing the role of school, home, and media from the future policy perspectives. Applied Energy, 88(4), 1233-1240.
• Halder, P., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Pietarinen, J., Zyadin, A., & Pelkonen, P. (2014). Subject knowledge and perceptions of bioenergy among school teachers in India: Results from a survey. Resources, 3(4), 599-613.
• Halder, P., Prokop, P., Chang, C. Y., Usak, M., Pietarinen, J., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Pelkonen, P., & Cakir, M. (2012). International survey on bioenergy knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes among young citizens. Bioenergy Research, 5(1), 247-261.
• Hashim, H., & Ho, W. S. (2011). Renewable energy policies and initiatives for a sustainable energy future in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9), 4780-4787.
• Kaarbo, J., & Beasley, R. K. (1999). A practical guide to the comparative case study method in political psychology. Political Psychology, 20, 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00149
• Kaldellis, J. K. (2005). Social attitude towards wind energy applications in Greece. Energy Policy, 33(5), 595-602.
• Kaldellis, J. K., Kapsali, M., & Katsanou, E. (2012). Renewable energy applications in Greece—What is the public attitude? Energy Policy, 42, 37-48.
• Kandpal, T. C., & Broman, L. (2014). Renewable energy education: A global status review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 300-324.
• Karabulut, A., Gedik, E., Keçebaş, A., & Alkan, M. A. (2011). An investigation on renewable energy education at the university level in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 36(4), 1293-1297.
• Karakaya Cirit, D. (2017). Pre-service science teachers’ (PST) knowledge involving the topic of renewable energy sources. Turkish Journal of Educational Studies, 4(3), 21-43.
• Karasmanaki, E., & Tsantopoulos, G. (2019). Exploring future scientists' awareness about and attitudes towards renewable energy sources. Energy Policy, 131, 111-119.
• Kavcar, C. (2002). Cumhuriyet döneminde dal öğretmeni yetiştirme [Branch teacher training in the Republican period]. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 35, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000058
• Klick, H., & Smith, E. R. (2010). Public understanding of and support for wind power in the United States. Renewable Energy, 35(7), 1585-1591.
• Koca, N., & Bulut, R. (2015). Opinions of prospective social studies teachers about energy resources of Turkey. Electronic Turkish Studies, 10(11), 1007-1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8481
• Lalic, D., Popovski, K., Gecevska, V., Vasilevska, S. P., & Tesic, Z. (2011). Analysis of the opportunities and challenges for renewable energy market in the Western Balkan countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6), 3187-3195.
• Liarakou, G., Gavrilakis, C., & Flouri, E. (2009). Secondary school teachers’ knowledge and attitudes towards renewable energy sources. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 120-129.
• Liu, W., Wang, C., & Mol, A. P. (2013). Rural public acceptance of renewable energy deployment: The case of Shandong in China. Applied energy, 102, 1187-1196.
• Lloyd, B., & Subbarao, S. (2009). Development challenges under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)—Can renewable energy initiatives be put in place before peak oil? Energy Policy, 37(1), 237-245.
• Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. Falmer Press.
• McGowan, F., & Sauter, R. (2005). Public Opinion on Energy Research: A Desk Study for the Research Councils. Retrieved from https://epsrc.ukri.org/newsevents/pubs/public-opinion-on-energy-research-a-desk-study-for-the-research-councils/
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
• Negro, S. O., Alkemade, F., & Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Why does renewable energy diffuse so slowly? A review of innovation system problems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(6), 3836-3846.
• Özyurt, Ö. G. & Ercan Yalman, F. (2020). Identifying cognitive structure related to renewable energy using word association test: The Mersin province case. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(3), 1320-1338. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.780413
• Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications.
• Spiropoulou, D., Antonakaki, T., Kontaxaki, S., & Bouras, S. (2007). Primary teachers’ literacy and attitudes on education for sustainable development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16, 443-450. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10956-007-9061-7
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications.
• Van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Farla, J. C. (2014). Identifying and explaining public preferences for the attributes of energy technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 71-82.
• Walker, G. (1995). Renewable energy and the public. Land Use Policy, 12(1), 49-59.
• Wiggering, H., Dalchow, C., Glemnitz, M., Helming, K., Müller, K., Schultz, A., Stachow, U., & Zander, P. (2006). Indicators for multifunctional land use—Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecological indicators, 6(1), 238-249.
• Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683-2691.
• Yıldırır, H. E. , Işıktaş, T., & Yıldırım, A. (2020). Determining the perceptions of pre-service teachers from different disciplines towards the concept of energy. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 54, 20-48.
• Zografakis, N., Sifaki, E., Pagalou, M., Nikitaki, G., Psarakis, V., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2010). Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(3), 1088-1095.
• Zyadin, A., Puhakka, A., Ahponen, P., and Pelkonen, P. (2014). Secondary school teachers' knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward renewable energy in Jordan. Renewable Energy, 62, 341-348.
• Zyadin, A., Puhakka, A., Ahponen, P., Cronberg, T., & Pelkonen, P. (2012). School students' knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward renewable energy in Jordan. Renewable energy, 45, 78-85.