DENİZCİLİKTE GELECEĞİN BEKLENTİLERİNE YÖNELİK LOJİSTİK VE LİMAN YÖNETİMİ MÜFREDATI

Yıl 2023, Denizcilik Sektöründe Güncel Gelişmeler, 1 - 19, 29.10.2023

Pınar Özdemir , Taner Albayrak , Alaettin Sevim

https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.1108615

Öz

Bu makalede, denizcilik sektöründeki son gelişmelerin lojistik müfredatına nasıl yansıması gerektiği sektördeki tüm paydaşların görüşleri yardımıyla ele alınarak değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma MINE-EMI* Projesi kapsamında kapsamında yapılan bir anketten elde edilen verilere dayanmaktadır. MINE-EMI Projesi, denizcilik sektöründe sürdürülebilirliği sağlamak, gündemdeki denizcilik meseleleriyle ilgili farkındalığı arttırmak için beceri ve yetkinliklerin geliştirilmesini amacıyla. Denizcilik Üniversiteleri için biri "Liman İşletmeciliği ve Lojistik" olmak üzere üç modülden oluşan ortak bir yüksek lisans programı oluşturmaktır. Modüllerde yer alacak derslerin müfredatları sektörün gelecekteki beklentilerini ve ihtiyaçlarını karşılayacak şekilde belirlenmeye çalışılmaktadır. Müfredatta yer alması gereken konuları belirlemek amacıyla yapılan ankete proje ortağı 5 ülkeden toplam 225 paydaş katılmıştır. Anket sonuçları Liman İşletmeciliği ve Lojistik modülünde yer alması planlanan derslerin daha verimli ve hızlı kargo elleçleme sistemlerine, liman yönetiminde teknolojinin etkin kullanımına, çok modlu taşımacılık düzenlemelerine ve liman tesislerinin güncellenmesine odaklanması gerektiğini göstermiştir. Müfredatın sektörün ihtiyaç ve beklentileri doğrultusunda düzenlenmesi, eğitim öğretim kurumlarının daha etkin eğitim vermelerini sağlamakla kalmayacak, aynı zamanda denizcilikte sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın gerçekleştirilmesi için de önemli bir rol oynayacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Denizcilikte Eğitim ve Öğretim, Lojistik, Liman Yönetimi, Müfredat, Denizcilikte Gelecekteki Eğilimler

Proje Numarası

Project 2019-1-TR01-KA203-077463

INNOVATIVE PORT AND LOGISTICS CURRICULUM TO MEET STAKEHOLDERS FUTURE EXPECTATIONS

Öz

This paper discusses reflections on the recent developments in the maritime sector and the expectations of the stakeholders on maritime education and training in terms of logistics curriculum. The study is based on the survey results that were obtained within the frame of MINE-EMI* Project, which aims to create an international graduate program for maritime universities. The survey in the project was replied to by 225 stakeholders from 5 countries. Its results showed that the courses in the new module should mainly focus on more efficient and fast cargo handling systems, effective use of technology in port management, multimodal transport regulations, and updating port facilities. Modification of the curriculum by taking the needs and expectations of the sector into consideration will not only enable the institutions to give more effective education to help the graduates meet the challenges of the future but also equip them with a curriculum for sustainable development in the maritime sector.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Maritime Education and Training (MET), Logistics, Port Management, Curriculum, Future Maritime Trends

Destekleyen Kurum

Erasmus Program of the European Union /Türkiye Ulusal Ajansı

Proje Numarası

Project 2019-1-TR01-KA203-077463

Kaynakça

• Anderson, K. and Strutt, A. (2011) Asia's changing role in world trade: prospects for south-south trade growth to 2030. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series, No 264: 1-53 <https://think-asia.org/bitstream/handle/11540/2019/economics->.
• Bajpai, A. (2012). The “Rise of Asia” thesis: strategic constraints and theoretical deficits. world affairs. The Journal of International Issues, 16(2), 12–37.
• Behdani, B., Wiegmans, B., Roso, V. and Haralambides, H. (2020) Port-Hinterland transport and logistics emerging trends and frontier research, Maritime Economics and Logistics. 21: 1-25.
• BitNautic. (2020). Why is maritime shipping important?, viewed 17 September 2021 <https://medium.com/@bitnautic/why-is-maritime-shipping-important-6a1cd7cc99ef>.
• Chu, F., Sven, G., Liu L., and Ni, L. (2018). The future of automated ports. McKinsey & Company, viewed 21 September 2021, <https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/travel-logistics-and-infrastructure/our-insights/the-future-of-automated-ports>.
• Cousins, P.D. and Mengüc, B. (2006). The implications of socialization and integration in supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 24 (5): 604-621.
• Cowen, D. (2014). The deadly life of logistics: mapping violence in global trade. University of Minnesota Press.
• Deloitte. (2020). Global Port Trends 2030. The Future Port Landscape <https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nl/Documents/consumer-business/deloitte-nl-cb-global-port-trends-2030.pdf viewed 24.03.2022
• Deloitte (2022). About Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/ui/en/legal/about-deloitte.html viewed 24.03.2022
• European Union. (2018). Competence Center on Foresight, viewed 25 September 2021, <https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/foresight/topic/expanding-influence-east-south/power-shifts_en>.
• Franco, J. (2016). Multimodal transport regulation and case law, viewed 25 September 2021, <https://www.lexology.com/commentary/shipping-transport/colombia/franco-abogados-asociados/multimodal-transport-regulation-and-case-law>.
• Fruth, M. and Teuteberg, F. (2017). Digitization in maritime logistics—What is there and what is missing? Cogent Business & Management, 4:1, 1411066.
• Gulzar, A. A. (2021). Factors affecting curriculum development. Educare, viewed 20 October 2021, <https://www.educarepk.com/factors-affecting-curriculum-development.html>.
• Haezendonck, E. and Langenus, M. (2018). Integrated ports clusters and competitive advantage in an extended resource pool for the Antwerp seaport. Maritime Policy & Management, 46 (1), 74-91 DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2018.1471535
• Kia, M., Shayan, E and Ghotb, F. (2010). The Importance of Information Technology in Port Terminal Operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30 (3/4): 331-344.
• Langen, P. W. and Haezendonck, E. (2012) Ports as Clusters of Economic Activity. 638-655 in Wayne K. Talley (Ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Maritime Economics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Published .
• Lavenex, S., Serrano, O. and Büthe, T. (2021). Power Transitions and the Rise of the Regulatory State: Global Market Governance in Flux. Regulation and Governance, 15(3), 445–471.
• MAERSK. (2021). Supply chain efficiency through e-connectivity. EDI Solutions: Digital Solutions. viewed 20 August 2021, <https://www.maersk.com/supply-chain-logistics/edi-solutions? gclid=CjwKCAjw7rWKBhAtEiwAJ3CWLFnpyknHyf_lDQSEVD-FDJXVvcymSJSdcw7Jn_xLEqLifhmYXVCTWRoC7SUQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds>.
• Ng, K. (2006). Assessing the attractiveness of ports in the North European container transshipment market: an agenda for future research in port competition. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8: 234–250.
• Notteboom, T. (2008). The Relationship between seaports and the ınter-modal hinterland in light of global supply chains. OECD, International Transport Forum, OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers, viewed 5 September 2021, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23535797_The_Relationship_between_Seaports_and_the_Inter- Modal_Hinterland_in_Light_of_Global_Supply_Chains>.
• OECD. (2019). Ocean shipping and shipbuilding, viewed 17 September 2021, < https://www.oecd.org/ocean/topics/ocean-shipping/>.
• Ozment, J. and Keller, S.B. (2011). The Future of Logistics Education. Transportation Journal, 50 (1):65-83.
• Panayides, P. M. and Song, D. W. (2013). Maritime Logistics as an Emerging Discipline. Maritime Policy and Management, 40 (3): 295-308.
• Review of Maritime Transport. (2020). viewed 22 September 2021 <https://unctad.org/webflyer/review-maritime-transport-2020>.
• Rodrigue, J.P. and Notteboom, T. 2010. Foreland-Based Regionalization: Integrating Intermediate Hubs with Port Hinterlands. Research in Transportation Economics, 27(1): 19-29.
• Rodrigue, J. P., and Notteboom, T. (2022) Port Clusters, in Notteboom, T.; Athanasios, P. and Rodrigue, J.P. (Ed.), Port economics, management, and policy. Chapter 4.4. New York. Routledge Publishing, viewed 05. March 2022. <https://porteconomicsmanagement.org/pemp/contents/part4/port-clusters/>.
• Singh, A., Chhetri, P. and Padhaye, R. (2016). Understanding the port-centric logistics clusters: Concepts, characteristics, and measurements. Innovative Solutions for Implementing Global Supply Chains in Emerging Markets. (1st ed.): 257-272 IGI Global PA, USA.
• Sohal, A. S. and Rahman, S. (2013). Use of third party logistics services: an Asia-Pacific perspective. In J. H. Bookbinder (Ed.), Handbook of Global Logistics: Transportation in International Supply Chains International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 181: 45-67. Springer.
• Sun, L. and Song, G. (2018). Current State and Future Potential of Logistics and Supply Chain Education: A Literature Review. Journal of International Education in Business, 11 (2):124-143.
• The World Bank Group. (2020). Alternative port management structures and ownership models. Port Reform Tool Kit, viewed 15 August 2021,https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/library/port-reform-toolkit-ppiaf-world-bank-2nd-edition>.
• Tongzon, J. and Sawant. L. (2007). Port choice determinants in a competitive environment. Applied Economics, 39 (4): 477-492
• UNCTAD. (2001). Implementation of multimodal transport rules, viewed 25 September 2021, <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/posdtetlbd2.en.pdf>.
• Vermunt, J.D. (2005). Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher Education, 49(3): 205-234.
• Yap, W.Y. (2020). Competitiveness and competitive advantage of ports. Business and Economics of Port Management: An Insider’s Perspective (1st ed.). Routledge.
• Wang, Y. and Sarkis, J. (2021). Emerging digitalization technologies in freight transport and logistics: Current trends and future directions, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148:102291.
• Woodburn, A. (2010). Hinterland connections of seaports. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, viewed 2 September 2021 <https://unece.org/DAM/trans/doc/2010/itc/ECE-TRANS-210.pdf>.