THE RELATIONSHIP AND THE IMPACT OF REMOTE WORK ARRANGEMENTS ON FREIGHT FORWARDERS’ JOB PERFORMANCE, SATISFACTION, AND MOTIVATION

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 71 - 100, 30.06.2024

Taha Talip Türkistanlı , Gökçe Tuğdemir Kök

https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.1459049

Öz

Remote work arrangements have become a critical argument both for employees and employers, particularly during the COVID-19 coronavirus crisis. The continuity of remote work arrangements has come into question as the pandemic disease diminished. Several industries and companies have recognized the advantages of remote work and made remote or flexible work a permanent part of their operations. Additionally, certain employees, perceiving the more favorable conditions provided by remote work, have refused to return to the office or have requested permanent remote work arrangements. Still, many employers are still questioning the pros and cons of remote work. In this context, this research focuses on freight forwarder employees who are assumed to be adaptable to work remotely due to the nature of their work. The research aims to determine current working arrangements and the effect of working remotely on the productivity, satisfaction, and motivation of freight forwarders. Data on these variables were collected through an online survey. All participants were individuals working for private companies in the freight forwarding industry. In an effort to minimize cultural impacts, companies located in Turkey have been chosen as the main sampling in the study. Through statistical analysis, the impact and factors influencing remote work arrangements on employee performance are explored. The effects and relationships between job performance, job motivation, job satisfaction, and work arrangement were examined by regression, correlation, and mediation analysis methods. Revealed findings present significant results for employers aiming to measure the effectiveness of remote work practices and policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Remote work, Freight forwarder, Job satisfaction, Work motivation, Job Performance

Uzaktan çalışma düzenlerinin nakliye işleri komisyoncularının iş performansı, memnuniyeti ve motivasyonu üzerindeki etkisi

Öz

Uzaktan çalışma düzenleri, özellikle COVID-19 koronavirüs krizi sırasında, hem çalışanlar hem de işverenler için kritik bir argüman haline gelmiştir. Pandeminin etkileri azaldıkça ise uzaktan çalışma düzenlerinin devamlılığı sorgulanmaya başlamıştır. Birçok endüstri ve şirket, uzaktan çalışmanın avantajlarını fark etmiş ve uzaktan veya esnek çalışmayı operasyonlarının kalıcı bir parçası haline getirmiştir. Ayrıca, uzaktan çalışmanın sağladığı çalışma koşullarını daha uygun olarak algılayan bazı çalışanlar, ofise dönmeyi reddetmiş veya uzaktan çalışma düzenlerinin kalıcı olarak devam etiirilmesini talep etmiştir. Ancak birçok işveren hala uzaktan çalışmanın avantajlarını ve dezavantajlarını sorgulamaktadır. Bu bağlamda araştırma, işlerinin doğası nedeniyle uzaktan çalışmaya uyum sağlayabilecekleri varsayılan nakliye işlemleri komisyoncuları çalışanlarına odaklanmaktadır. Araştırma, mevcut çalışma düzenlerini ve uzaktan çalışmanın iş performansı, memnuniyeti ve motivasyonu üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu değişkenlere ait veriler, çevrimiçi bir anket aracılığıyla katılımcılardan toplanmıştır. Tüm katılımcılar, özel şirketlerde çalışan bireylerden oluşmaktadır. Kültürel etkileri en aza indirmek amacıyla, çalışmada Türkiyede bulunan şirketler ana örneklem unsuru olarak seçilmiştir. Bu sayede, elde edilen veriler üzerinden uzaktan çalışma düzeninin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisi ve belirleyicileri, istatistiksel analizler aracılığıyla incelenmiştir. İş performansı, iş motivasyonu, iş memnuniyeti ve çalışma düzeni arasındaki etkiler ve ilişkiler, regresyon, korelasyon ve aracı analiz yöntemleriyle incelenmiştir. Ortaya çıkan bulgular, uzaktan çalışma uygulamaları ve politikalarının etkinliğini ölçmeyi amaçlayan işverenler için önemli sonuçlar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

uzaktan çalışma, Nakliye işlemleri komisyoncu, iş memnuniyeti, iş motivasyonu, iş performansı

Kaynakça

• Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D. and Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological science in the public interest, 16(2), 40-68.
• Anandhi, K. and Perumal, R. (2013). Job satisfaction in logistics sector: A review and research agenda. International Journals of Marketing and Technology, 3(5), 114-126.
• Arifin, A. Z., Siswanto, H. P., Kurniawan, V. K. and Kristian, M. (2023). The Effects of Work from Home and Flexible Working Arrangement on Employee Performance During Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Application on Economics and Business, 1(4), 2107-2122.
• Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
• Beckel, J. L. and Fisher, G. G. (2022). Telework and worker health and well-being: A review and recommendations for research and practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 3879.
• Bourini, I. F., Jahmani, A., Mumtaz, R., and al-Bourini, F. A. (2019). Investigating the managerial practices’ effect on Employee-Perceived Service Quality with the moderating role of supportive leadership behavior. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25(1), 8-14.
• Brown, T., VanderWeele, T. and Hong, S. (2019). Assessing mediation using marginal structural models in the presence of confounding and moderation. Statistics in Medicine, 38(21), 4092-4112. Bruce, W. M. and Blackburn, J. W. (1992). Balancing job satisfaction & performance: A guide for human resource professionals. London: Quorum Books.
• Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H. and Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance, in Schmitt, N. and Borman, W.C. (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations, pp. 35-70, USA: Wiley.
• Çancı, M. and Erdal, M. (2003). Uluslararası Taşımacılık Yönetimi, Freight Forwarder El Kitabı. İstanbul, Türkiye: 1. Utikad Yayınları.
• Çekerol, G. S. (2013). Lojistik Yönetimi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
• Davidescu, A. A., Apostu, S. A., Paul, A. and Casuneanu, I. (2020). Work flexibility, job satisfaction, and job performance among Romanian employees—Implications for sustainable human resource management. Sustainability, 12(15), 6086.
• Diamantidis, A. D. and Chatzoglou, P. (2018). Factors affecting employee performance: an empirical approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(1), 171-193.
• Doğrucu, M. (2006). Freight Forwarder Hukuki Mahiyeti ve Bu Konudaki Yargıtay Kararlarının Değerlendirilmesi. In: Galatasaray Üniversitesi Deniz Hukuku Derneği Sempozyumu. İstanbul, Türkiye.
• Elshaiekh, N. E. M., Hassan, Y. A. A. and Abdallah, A. A. A. (2018). The impacts of remote working on workers performance. In: Proceedings of 2018 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT). Werdanye, Lebanon.
• Eski, S. and Kaya, S. (2018). Outsourcing in Logistics Process: Freight Forwarder Companies. International Journal of Academic Value Studies (Javstudies), 4(19), 320-332.
• FIATA (2007). Model Rules for Freight Forwarding Services, https://fiata.com/uploads/media/Model_Rules_07.pdf, Access Date: 03.01.2024.
• Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384-412.
• Güzel, D. and Aydın, G. (2021). Covid-19 döneminde uzaktan çalışma sisteminde iş performansını etkileyen faktörler: banka çalışanları üzerine bir uygulama. Ardahan Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 128-133.
• Groen, B. A., Van Triest, S. P., Coers, M. and Wtenweerde, N. (2018). Managing flexible work arrangements: Teleworking and output controls. European Management Journal, 36(6), 727-735.
• Hansen, S., Lambert, P. J., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Sadun, R. and Taska, B. (2023). Remote work across jobs, companies, and space. Working Paper No. 31007, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
• Huang, S. T., Bulut, E. and Duru, O. (2019). Service quality evaluation of international freight forwarders: Empirical research in East Asia. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 4, 1-16.
• Jacobs, S. (2017). DRIVERS: Creating Trust and Motivation at Work. Panoma Press.
• Kaya, S. (2018). Freight Forwarder İşletmelerinde Müşteri Memnuniyetinin Araştırılması; İstanbul İlinde Mevcut Freight Forwarder Müşterileri Üzerine Bir Uygulama, Master Thesis, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Kaynak, T. (2021). Mediation Analysis – Arabulucu Analizi Ve R Dilinde Uygulanması. https://tugcekaynak.medium.com/mediation-analysisarabulucu- anali%CC%87zi%CC%87-ve-r-di%CC%87li%CC%87ndeuygulanmasi- 1fa54d14df99, Access Date: 02.03.2024
• Kleinginna Jr, P. R. and Kleinginna, A. M. (1981). A categorized list of motivation definitions, with a suggestion for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5(3), 263-291.
• Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., Vugt, M. V. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77.
• Ko, J., Jang, H. and Kim, S. Y. (2021). The effect of corporate social responsibility recognition on organisational commitment in global freight forwarders. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 37(2), 117-126.
• Koban, E. and Keser, H. (2011). Dış Ticarette Lojistik. Bursa, Türkiye: Ekin Yayınevi.
• Lee, J.-S. (2009). Administrative dictionary. Seoul: Daeyoung Cultural History.
• Marshall, G. W., Michaels, C. E. and Mulki, J. P. (2007). Workplace isolation: Exploring the construct and its measurement. Psychology & Marketing, 24(3), 195-223.
• Motowidlo, S. J. (2003). Job performance. Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, 12(4), 39-53.
• Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C. and Schmit, M. J. (2014). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance, in Walter C. Borman, Stephan J. Motowidlo (Eds.) Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Contextual Performance, pp. 71-83. New Jersey: Psychology Press.
• Mustajab, D., Bauw, A., Rasyid, A., Irawan, A., Akbar, M. A. and Hamid, M. A. (2020). Working from home phenomenon as an effort to prevent COVID-19 attacks and its impacts on work productivity. TIJAB (The International Journal of Applied Business), 4(1), 13-21.
• Newman, S. A. and Ford, R. C. (2021). Five steps to leading your team in the virtual COVID-19 workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 50(1), 100802.
• Nijp, H. H., Beckers, D. G., Geurts, S. A., Tucker, P. and Kompier, M. A. (2012). Systematic review on the association between employee worktime control and work-non-work balance, health and well-being, and job-related outcomes. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 38(4), 299-313.
• Özen, Ö. (2006). Denizyolu Taşımacılığında Yük Sevkiyatçılığının Karar Yaklaşımları ve Bilgi Teknolojileri Uygulamaları, Master Thesis, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Pinder, C. C. (2015). Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior. New York: Psychology Press.
• Pugliesi, K. (1999). The consequences of emotional labor: Effects on work stress, job satisfaction, and well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 125- 154.
• Qu, J. and Yan, J. (2023). Working from home vs working from office in terms of job performance during the COVID‐19 pandemic crisis: evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 61(1), 196-231.
• Ratten, V. (2020). Coronavirus (Covid-19) and entrepreneurship: changing life and work landscape. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(5), 503-516.
• Reijseger, G., Peeters, M. C., Taris, T. W. and Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). From motivation to activation: Why engaged workers are better performers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 117-130.
• Saeed, N. (2013). Cooperation among freight forwarders: Mode choice and intermodal freight transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 42(1), 77-86.
• Sánchez-Hernández, M. I., González-López, Ó. R., Buenadicha-Mateos, M. and Tato-Jiménez, J. L. (2019). Work-life balance in great companies and pending issues for engaging new generations at work. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(24), 5122.
• Sarpkaya, E. and Bayraktar, O. (2023). The Effect of Flexible Working on Job Performance During the Covid 19 Pandemic: The Mediation Role of Job Characteristics. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 7(2), 367-386.
• Shang, K. C. and Lu, C. S. (2012). Customer relationship management and firm performance: an empirical study of freight forwarder services. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 20(1), 64-72.
• Shockley, K. M. and Allen, T. D. (2012). Motives for flexible work arrangement use. Community, Work & Family, 15(2), 217-231.
• Sivaprakash, J. S. and Venkatesh, M. (2023). The Impact of Remote Work on Employee Productivity and Well-being: A Comparative Study of Preand Post-COVID-19 Era.
• Smith, J. and Johnson, L. (2020). The impact of remote work on job satisfaction: A comparative study. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 45(3), 123-145.
• Sonnentag, S., Volmer, J. and Spychala, A. (2008). Job performance, in J. Barling (Ed.), The Sage handbook of organizational behavior, pp. 427- 447. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
• Subramaniam, A. G., Overton, B. J. and Maniam, C. B. (2015). Flexible working arrangements, work life balance and women in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(1), 34- 38.
• Sundjoto, Sumaryono, R., and Sari, A. K. (2024). The Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction in the Influence of Non-Physical Environment on Employee Performance. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(6), 1- 13.
• Susilo, D. (2020). Revealing the effect of work-from-home on job performance during the COVID-19 crisis: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 26(1), 23-40.
• Syihabudhin, S. and Kinanti, L. S. (2022). Effect of Financial Compensation and Flexible Working Arrangement on Performance of Gojeks Driver. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Management, 1(2), 85-95.
• Tek, Ö. B. and Özgül, E. (2005). Modern Pazarlama İlkeleri – Uygulamalı Yönetsel Yaklaşım. İzmir: Birleşik Matbaacılık.
• Tietjen, M. A. and Myers, R. M. (1998). Motivation and job satisfaction. Management decision, 36(4), 226-231.
• Toscano, F. and Zappalà, S. (2021). Overall job performance, remote work engagement, living with children, and remote work productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Psychology Open. 80(3), 133– 142.
• Viswesvaran, C. and Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216-226.
• Vyas, L. (2022). “New normal” at work in a post-COVID world: work– life balance and labor markets. Policy and Society, 41(1), 155-167.
• Wahab, M. and Tatoglu, E. (2020). Chasing productivity demands, worker well-being, and firm performance: The moderating effects of HR support and flexible work arrangements. Personnel review, 49(9), 1823-1843.
• Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J. and Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16-59.
• Winkelhaus, S., Grosse, E. H. and Glock, C. H. (2022). Job satisfaction: An explorative study on work characteristics changes of employees in Intralogistics 4.0. Journal of Business Logistics, 43(3), 343-367.
• Yılmaz, V. and Dalbudak, Z. İ. (2018). Araci Değişken Etkisinin İncelenmesi: Yüksek Hizli Tren İşletmeciliği Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 14(2), 517- 534.
• Yousef, D. A. (2016). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and attitudes toward organizational change: A study in the local government. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(1), 77-88.
• Zhang, J. (2016). The dark side of virtual office and job satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(2), 40-46.