EUDAİMONİK ÖZ DÜZENLEME ÖLÇEĞİNİN (EÖDÖ) GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4, 1803 - 1839, 20.12.2023

Nida Ates , Kuntay Arcan , Omer Simsek

https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1282677

Öz

The purpose of this current study is to develop the Eudaimonic Self-Regulation Scale, which measures the regulation of emotions, cognitions, behaviors and interpersonal relationships in order to reach the eudaimonia explained by ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Eudaimonic Self-Regulation Scale, Flourishing Scale, Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale, Personal Growth Initiative Scale, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale were used as measurement instruments. Participants of the study consisted of 1042 adults between the ages of 18 and 65, including 3 different sample groups. As a result of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) of Eudaimonic Self Regulation Scale, a 10-factor structure model with 43 items, which explained % 57.93 of the total variance was obtained. According to the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) results, the factor loadings ranged from .48 to .88. In addition, model fit indices were satisfactory (χ2=2395.39; df=815, χ2/df=2.93, RMSEA=0.054, CFI=0.97, IFI=0.97, SRMR=0.050). Cronbach’s α values of sub-scales ranged from .75 to .89. In terms of convergent validity, eudaimonic self-regulation indicated significant correlations with psychological well-being, mindfulness, self-efficacy, and personal growth initiative. According to the results of test-retest reliability analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from .82 to .94, Pearson's correlation coefficients were between .71 and .88. These results indicated that this scale was a valid and reliable instrument to assess eudaimonic self-regulation in the relevant researches.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eudaimonik öz düzenleme, Eudaimonia, Öz düzenleme, Psikolojik iyi oluş.

DEVELOPING EUDAIMONIC SELF-REGULATION SCALE (ESRS): VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

Öz

The purpose of this current study is to develop the Eudaimonic Self-Regulation Scale, which measures the regulation of emotions, cognitions, behaviors and interpersonal relationships in order to reach the eudaimonia explained by ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Eudaimonic Self-Regulation Scale, Flourishing Scale, Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale, Personal Growth Initiative Scale, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale were used as measurement instruments. Participants of the study consisted of 1042 adults between the ages of 18 and 65, including 3 different sample groups. As a result of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) of Eudaimonic Self Regulation Scale, a 10-factor structure model with 43 items, which explained % 57.93 of the total variance was obtained. According to the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) results, the factor loadings ranged from .48 to .88. In addition, model fit indices were satisfactory (χ2=2395.39; df=815, χ2/df=2.93, RMSEA=0.054, CFI=0.97, IFI=0.97, SRMR=0.050). Cronbach’s α values of sub-scales ranged from .75 to .89. In terms of convergent validity, eudaimonic self-regulation indicated significant correlations with psychological well-being, mindfulness, self-efficacy, and personal growth initiative. According to the results of test-retest reliability analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from .82 to .94, Pearson's correlation coefficients were between .71 and .88. These results indicated that this scale was a valid and reliable instrument to assess eudaimonic self-regulation in the relevant researches.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Eudaimonic self-regulation, Eudaimonia, Self-regulation, Psychological well-being.

Kaynakça

• Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49 (2), 155-173.
• Akın A. & Anlı G. (2011). Bireysel gelişim inisiyatifi ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (1), 42-49.
• Akın, A., Demirci, İ., Çardak, M., Işık, Y. & Yıldız, E. (2012). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cognitive and Affective Regulation Scale. Paper presented at the International Interdisciplinary Social Inquiry Conference- IISIC, Haziran, 17-21, Bursa, Turkey.
• Aristoteles (2014). Nikomakhos’a etik. F. Akderin (çev.), İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
• Aristoteles (2015). Eudemos’a etik. S. Babür (çev.), Ankara: Bilge Su Yayıncılık.
• Artıran, M. (2015). Akılcı Duygucu Davranışçı Kuram ve öz-belirlenim kuramı çerçevesinde yeni bir ölçek: Akılcı-Duygucu Öz-Belirlenim (ADÖB) Ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İstanbul: İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi, SBE.
• Aydın, S., Keskin, M. Ö. & Yel, M. (2013). Öz-düzenleme ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Turkish Journal of Education, 3 (1), 24-33.
• Aypay, A. (2010). Genel Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği’nin GÖYÖ Türkçe’ye Uyarlama Çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (2), 113-112.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hail.
• Bandura, A. (2010). Self-Efcacy. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836
• Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83 (5), 762.
• Baumeister, R.F. (Ed.). (1999). The self in social psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
• Baumeister R.F., Vohs K.D. (2004). Understanding self-regulation: An introduction. R.F. Baumeister & K.D. Vohs (Eds.) içinde, Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications, (s.1-9). NewYork: Guilford Press.
• Baumeister, R.F., Heatherton, T.F. & Tice, D.M. (1994). Losing Control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Boylu, Ş. A. (2018). Evli bireylerin bilinçli farkındalık düzeyleri ile evlilik doyumu ve problem çözme becerisi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yükseklisans tezi. İstanbul: İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi.
• Brown, J. M. (1998). Self-regulation and the addictive behaviors. W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Ed.) içinde, Treating Addictive Behaviors (s. 61-74). NewYork: Plenum Press.
• Brown, J. M., Miller, W. R. & Lawendowski, L. A. (1999). The self-regulation questionnaire. L. VandeCreek & T. L. Jackson (Ed.) içinde, Innovations in clinical practice: A sourcebook, vol. 17 ( s. 281 – 292). Sarasota, FL: ProfessionalResource Press/Professional Resource Exchange.
• Brown, K. W. & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (4), 822.
• Bujang, M. A. & Baharum, N. (2017). A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Archives of Orofacial Science, 12 (1), 1-12.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32 (32), 470-483.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
• Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Conners, C. K., Sitarenios, G., Parker, J. D. & Epstein, J. N. (1998). The revised Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26 (4), 257-268.
• Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10 (1), 7.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2017). S. K. Akbaş (çev.), Akış. Ankara: Buzdağı Yayınevi.
• Çelikler, A. N. (2017). Bir grup genç yetişkinde bilinçli farkındalık düzeyi ile başa çıkma tutumları ve psikolojik iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İstanbul: Haliç Üniversitesi, SBE.
• Çolak, İ., Yorulmaz, Y. İ. & Altınkurt, Y. (2017). Öğretmen özyeterlik inancı ölçeği geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4 (1), 20-32.
• De Ridder, D. T. & De Wit, J. B. (2006). Self-regulation in health behavior: concepts, theories, and central issues. UK: John Wiley & Sons.
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S. & Biswas Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156.
• Duyan, V. & Gelbal, S. (2010). Barnett Çocuk Sevme Ölçeği’ni Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33 (148), 40-48.
• Duyan, V., Gülden, Ç. & Gelbal, S. (2012). Öz-Denetim Ölçeği (ÖDÖ): güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Journal of Society & Social Work, 23 (1), 25-38.
• George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn ve Bacon.
• Goldstein, G. & Watson, J. R. (1989). Test-retest reliability of the Halstead Reitan battery and the WAIS in a neuropsychiatric population. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3(3), 265-272.
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Grossarth-Maticek, R. & Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Self-regulation and mortality from cancer, coronary heart disease, and other causes: A prospective study. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 781–795.
• Harma, M. (2008). The impact of parental control and marıtal conflict on adolescents’ self regulatıon and adjustment. Unpublished Master’ s Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
• Huta, V. (2013). Eudaimonia. S. A. David, I. Boniwell ve A. Conley Ayers (Ed.) içinde, Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of happiness (s.201–213). Oxford University Press.
• Kanfer, F. H. (1970). Self-regulation: Research, issues, and speculations. C. Neuringer ve J. L. Michael (Ed.) içinde, Behavior modification in clinical psychology (s. 178-220). New York: Meredith Corporation.
• Kermen, U., Tosun, N. İ. & Doğan, U. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ve psikolojik iyi oluşun yordayıcısı olarak sosyal kaygı. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2 (1), 20-29.
• Köroğlu, E. (2015). Psikiyatri başvuru elkitabı. 3. Baskı. Ankara: HYB yayıncılık.
• Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self- regulation: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.) içinde, Handbook of self- regulation (s. 111–169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Miller, W. R. ve Brown, J. M. (1991). Self-regulation as a conceptual basis for the prevention and treatment of addictive behaviours. N. Heather, W. R. Miller ve J. Greeley (Ed.) içinde, Self-control and the addictive behaviours. Sydney: Maxwell Macmillan Publishing Australia.
• Moilanen, K. L. (2007). The adolescent self-regulatory inventory: The development and validation of a questionnaire of short-term and long term self regulation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36 (6), 835-848.
• Nagel, T. (1972). Aristotle on eudaimonia. Phronesis, 17 (3), 252-259.
• Özyeşil, Z., Arslan, C., Kesici, Ş. Ve Deniz, M. E. (2011). Bilinçli Farkındalık Ölçeği’ni Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36 (160), 225-235.
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T. & McKeachie W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED338122.
• Robitschek, C. (1998). Personal growth initiative: The construct and its measure. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30 (4), 183.
• Rupp, D. E., Vodanovich, S. J. & Credé, M. (2005). The multidimensional nature of ageism: Construct validity and group differences. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145 (3), 335-362.
• Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069 –1081.
• Sayar, K., Güleç, H. & Ak, I. (2001). Yirmi soruluk Toronto Aleksitimi Ölçeği’nin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. 37. Ulusal Psikiyatri Kongresi Kitabı, (s 130).
• Scherer, R. F., Luther, D. C., Wiebe, F. A. & Adams, J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 62 (3), 763-770.
• Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S. & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18 (3), 242.
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A. & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99 (6), 323-338.
• Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (2010). The general self-efficacy scale (GSE). Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 12, 329-345.
• Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayıncılık.
• Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (sixth ed.). Boston: Pearson.
• Telef, B. B. (2013). Psikolojik İyi Oluş Ölçeği (PİOO): Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28 (3), 374-384.
• Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
• Van den Bergh, B. R. & Van Ranst, N. (1998). Self-concept in children: Equivalence of measurement and structure across gender and grade of Harter's Self Perception Profile for Children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70 (3), 564-582.
• Yiğit, İ., & Guzey Yiğit, M. (2019). Psychometric properties of Turkish version of difficulties in emotion regulation scale-brief form (DERS-16). Current Psychology, 38, 1503-1511.
• Yurcu, G. ve Atay, H. (2015). Çalışanların öznel iyi oluşunu etkileyen demografik faktörlerin incelenmesi: Antalya ili konaklama işletmeleri örneği. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (2), 17-34.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.) içinde, Handbook of self-regulation (s. 13-40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, doi: 10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7