ÖĞRENME YETENEĞİ, TEKNOLOJİK ÖĞRENME, ÖRGÜTSEL HAFIZA VE FİRMA YENİLİKÇİLİĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Yıl 2022, , 315 - 329, 28.01.2022

Salih Zeki İmamoğlu , Hülya Türkcan , Ertuğrul Çetinkaya

https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.995317

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmada öğrenme yeteneği, teknolojik öğrenme, örgütsel hafıza ve firma yenilikçiliği arasındaki ilişkileri ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Kocaeli’nde faaliyet gösteren firmalarda çalışan 329 KOBİ yöneticisinden anket yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Araştırma hipotezleri yapısal eşitlik modeli ile test edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları, öğrenme yeteneği ile hem teknolojik öğrenmenin hem de örgütsel hafızanın pozitif ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte teknolojik öğrenmenin firma yenilikçiliği ile pozitif ilişki olduğu saptanmıştır. Son olarak, örgütsel hafıza boyutlarından deklaratif hafızanın firma yenilikçiliği ile pozitif ilişkili olduğu, prosedürel hafıza ile firma yenilikçiliği arasında ise herhangi bir anlamlı ilişki bulunmadığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öğrenme Yeteneği, Teknolojik Öğrenme, Örgütsel Hafıza, Firma Yenilikçiliği

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEARNING CAPABILITY, TECHNOLOGICAL LEARNING, ORGANIZATIONAL MEMORY AND FIRM INNOVATIVENESS

Öz

In this study, it is aimed to reveal the relationships between learning capability, technological learning, organizational memory, and firm innovativeness. In line with this purpose, data were collected from 329 SME managers working in firms in where Kocaeli through questionnaires. The research hypotheses were tested with the structural equation model. Research findings showed learning capability is positively related to both technological learning and organizational memory. Besides, it was found that technological learning is positively related to firm innovativeness. Finally, it was found that declarative memory, which is one of the dimensions of organizational memory, is positively related to firm innovativeness, but there is no significant relationship between procedural memory and firm innovativeness.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Learning Capability, Technological Learning, Organizational Memory, Firm Innovativeness

Kaynakça

• Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H. ve Byrne, J. (2012). The role of organizational emotional memory on declarative and procedural memory and firm innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(3), 432-451.
• Alegre, J. ve Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315-326.
• Antunes, H. D. J. G. ve Pinheiro, P. G. (2020). Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 140-149.
• Baba, M., Mahmood, R. ve Halipah, A. (2017). The moderating role of environmental turbulence on the relationship between organizational learning and firm innovativeness. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 7(2), 148-159.
• Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T. ve Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524.
• Camisón, C. ve Villar-López, A. (2011). Non-technical innovation: Organizational memory and learning capabilities as antecedent factors with effects on sustained competitive advantage. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1294-1304.
• Carayannis, E. G. (1999). Knowledge transfer through technological hyperlearning in five industries. Technovation, 19(3), 141-161.
• Catalanello, R. F. (1994). Speed, depth and breadth: Assessing learning in learning organizations. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 21, 143-146.
• Cegarra-Navarrol, J. G., Cepeda-Carrion, G. ve Jimenez-Jimenez, D. (2011). Linking unlearning with innovation through organizational memory and technology. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 1-10.
• Cheng, H., Niu, M. S. ve Niu, K. H. (2014). Industrial cluster involvement, organizational learning, and organizational adaptation: An exploratory study in high technology industrial districts. Journal of Knowledge Management. 18(5), 971-990.
• Çalıpınar, H. ve Baç, U. (2007). KOBI’lerde inovasyon yapmayı etkileyen faktörler ve bir alan araştırması. Ege Academic Review, 7(2), 445-458.
• Fang, C. H., Chang, S. T. ve Chen, G. L. (2011). Organizational learning capability and organizational innovation: The moderating role of knowledge inertia. African Journal of Business Management, 5(5), 1864-1870.
• Fiol, C. M. ve Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813.
• Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–51.
• García, J. S., Álvarez, C. A. A., Gómez, J. M. C., & Toro, J. J. A. (2017). Measuring organizational capabilities for technological innovation through a fuzzy inference system. Technology in Society, 50, 93-109.
• Goh, S. C., Elliott, C. ve Quon, T. K. (2012). The relationship between learning capability and organizational performance: A meta‐analytic examination. The Learning Organization, 19(2), 92-108.
• Goh, S. ve Richards, G. (1997). Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations. European Management Journal, 15(5), 575-583.
• Huang, H. C. (2013). Technological learning and technological innovation creation: An empirical analysis of biotechnology R&D teams. Journal of Engineering Science & Technology Review, 6(2), 120-124.
• Hull, C. E. ve Covin, J. G. (2010). Learning capability, technological parity, and innovation mode use. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), 97-114.
• Idowu, A. (2013). Organizational learning, innovativeness and financial performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and management, 5(2), 179-186.
• Imran, A., Nisar, Q. A. ve Ashraf, S. (2014). Exploring relationship among organizational learning practices, innovativeness and non-financial performance: A descriptive study on NGOs sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(10), 193-209.
• Jerez-Gomez, P., Céspedes-Lorente, J. ve Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). Organizational learning capability: A proposal of measurement. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 715-725.
• Kim, C. S. ve Inkpen, A. C. (2005). Cross-border R&D alliances, absorptive capacity and technology learning. Journal of International Management, 11(3), 313-329.
• Kmieciak, R. (2019). Improving SME performance through organizational memory: The role of open-mindedness culture. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(4), 473-491.
• Kmieciak, R. ve Michna, A. (2018). Knowledge management orientation, innovativeness, and competitive intensity: Evidence from Polish SMEs. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16(4), 559-572.
• Lee, J. S. (1999). Organizational learning in China. Business Horizons, 42(1), 37-45.
• Lee, Y., Shin, J. ve Park, Y. (2012). The changing pattern of SME's innovativeness through business model globalization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 832-842.
• Leitner, K. H. (2011). The effect of intellectual capital on product innovativeness in SMEs. International Journal of Technology Management, 53(1), 1-18.
• Lin, X. (2019). Review of knowledge and knowledge management research. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 9, 1753-1760.
• Liu, J. J., Qian, J. Y. ve Chen, J. (2006). Technological learning and firm-level technological capability building: Analytical framework and evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 36(1-3), 190-208.
• Lopez, S. P., Peón, J. M. M. ve Ordás, C. J. V. (2005). Organizational learning as a determining factor in business performance. The Learning Organization, 12(3), 227-245.
• Mena, J. A. ve Chabowski, B. R. (2015). The role of organizational learning in stakeholder marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(4), 429-452.
• Moorman, C. ve Miner, A. S. (1997). The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 91-106.
• Moorman, C. ve Miner, A. S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 698-723.
• Nezam, M. H. K., Ataffar, A., Isfahani, A. N. ve Shahin, A. (2013). Human capital and new product development performance efficiency-the mediating role of organizational learning capability. International Journal of Learning and Development, 3(6), 79-87.
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Nwankpa, J. ve Roumani, Y. (2014). Understanding the link between organizational learning capability and ERP system usage: An empirical examination. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 224-234.
• Obeidat, D., Yousef, B., Nofal, R. ve Masa'deh, R. E. (2018). The effect of transformational leadership on entrepreneurial orientation: The mediating role of organizational learning capability. Modern Applied Science, 12(11), 77-104.
• Obermayer, N., Kővári, E. ve Bak, D. G. (2019). Online and offline networks: Social media usage within the Hungarian wine SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management Application and Practice, 1(1), 9-16.
• Pınar, İ. ve Arıkan, C. (2015). Örgütsel öğrenme yeteneği ile örgütsel yenilik arasındaki ilişki: Tekstil sektöründe bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(2), 65-76.
• Pillay, D. ve Barnard, B. (2019). Entrepreneurship and knowledge management: Knowledge requirements, utility, creation, and competency. Expert Journal of Business and Management, 7(1), 44-81.
• Radas, S. ve Božić, L. (2009). The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy. Technovation, 29(6-7), 438-450.
• Raj, R. ve Srivastava, K. B. (2013). The mediating role of organizational learning on the relationship among organizational culture, HRM practices and innovativeness. Management and Labour Studies, 38(3), 201-223.
• Raj, R. ve Srivastava, K. B. (2016). Mediating role of organizational learning on the relationship between market orientation and innovativeness. The Learning Organization, 23(5), 370 – 384.
• Shahin, A. ve Zeinali, Z. (2010). Developing a relationship matrix for organizational learning and innovativeness: With a case study in a manufacturing company. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(7), 187-203.
• Stein, E. W. (1995). Organization memory: Review of concepts and recommendations for management. International Journal of Information Management, 15(1), 17-32.
• Walsh, J. P. ve Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57-91.
• Yam, R. C., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F. ve Tang, E. P. (2004). An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: Some empirical findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33(8), 1123-1140.
• Yu, Y., Dong, X. Y., Shen, K. N., Khalifa, M. ve Hao, J. X. (2013). Strategies, technologies, and organizational learning for developing organizational innovativeness in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2507-2514.
• Zahra, S. A. (2012). Organizational learning and entrepreneurship in family firms: Exploring the moderating effect of ownership and cohesion. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 51-65.
• Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D. ve Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925-950.
• Zhang, J. (2004). Memory process and the function of sleep. Journal of Theoretics, 6(6), 1-7.