SECTORAL AND OCCUPATIONAL BASE ANALYSIS OF OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENTS IN TURKEY

Yıl 2008, Sayı: 015, 97 - 108, 15.04.2008

Hüseyin Güran Ünal Arif Gök , Kadir Gök

Öz

Occupational accidents happen nearly
all occupation groups and work sectors. At the results of these accidents it
consist serious economic and physiologic lost. In this study, the dispersion of
occupational accidents according to occupations and work sectors in Turkey were
investigated. It was determined that the total number of insured person, number
of occupational accident, number of fatal occupational accident, occupational
accident rate, fatal occupational accident rate, number of occupational
accident by the occupation and the cause of occupational accident during 2003-2005. In the end of
research it was established that the higher number of occupational accident is
at the manufacturing good by metal, the higher number of fatal occupational
accident is at the construction, the higher ratio of fatal occupational
accident / insured person and occupational accident / insured person is at the
coal mining. Furthermore, it was established that the higher number of
occupational accident is at the craft and related trades workers without
specification and the higher cause of occupational accident is at the stepping on, striking against or struck by
objects excluding falling objects.For
decrease of occupational accident in Turkey, it is necessary to
determination of occupational accident characteristic. It expects that results
of this research will a step for decreasing occupational accidents which
afflict all us.  

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Occupational accident, causes of occupational accident, occupational fatality, occupational safety, accident rate

TÜRKİYE’DE İŞ KAZALARININ SEKTÖRLER VE MESLEKLER BAZINDA ANALİZİ

Öz

İş
kazaları, hemen hemen tüm meslek gruplarında ve iş sektörlerinde karşılaşılan
bir durumdur. Bu kazalar sonucu ciddi miktarda maddi ve manevi kayıplar söz
konusudur. Bu araştırmada Türkiye’deki iş kazalarının sektörel ve meslek
gruplarına göre dağılımı incelenmiştir. 2003–2005 yıllarını kapsayan bir
dönemde, sektörlerdeki çalışan sayısı, iş kazası sayısı, ölümcül iş kazası
sayısı, iş kazası oranı, ölüm oranı, meslek gruplarındaki iş kazası miktarı ve
iş kazası sebepleri araştırılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda en çok iş kazasının
metalden eşya imalatı sanayinde, en çok ölümcül iş kazasının inşaat sektöründe,
en yüksek ölümcül kaza/çalışan sayısı ve iş kazası/çalışan sayısı oranının
kömür madenciliği sektöründe olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Meslek grupları
içerisinde en yüksek iş kazası miktarı sanatkârlar ve ilgili işlerde çalışanlar
ana grubunda tespit edilmiştir. İş kazalarının sebepleri konusunda da ilk
sırayı bir veya birden fazla cismin
sıkıştırması, ezmesi, batması, kesmesi ana grubu almaktadır.Türkiye’de iş kazalarının azaltılması için iş
kazaları karakteristiğinin sağlıklı bir şekilde ortaya konması gerekmektedir.
Bu araştırma sonuçlarının hepimizi üzen iş kazalarının azaltılması
çalışmalarında bir basamak olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İş kazası, iş kazası sebepleri, ölümcül iş kazası, iş güvenliği, kaza oranı

Kaynakça

• [1] Takala, J. ‘Global estimates of fatal occupational accidents’ Epidemiology 10, 640–646. (1999)
• [2] Herbert, R., Landrigan, P.J. ‘Work-related death a continuing epidemic’ American Journal of Public Health 90, 541–545 (2000).
• [3] Hamalainen, P., Takala J., Saarela, K.L. ‘Global estimates of occupational accidents’ Safety Science 44 : 137–156 (2006).
• [4] Andersson, R., Lagerlof, E. ‘Accident data in the new Swedish information system on occupational injuries’ Ergonomics 26, 33–42 (1983).
• [5] Biering-Sorensen, F. ‘National statistics in Denmark –back trouble versus occupation’ Ergonomics 28, 5–29 (1985).
• [6] Hettinger, T. ‘Statistics on diseases in the Federal Republic of Germany with particular reference to diseases of the skeletal system’ Ergonomics 28, 17–20 (1985).
• [7] Metzler, F. ‘Epidemiology and statistics in Luxembourg’ Ergonomics 28, 21–24 (1985).
• [8] Nicholson, A.S. ‘Accident information from four British industries’ Ergonomics 28, 31–43 (1985).
• [9] Zuidema, H. ‘Risk of individual occupations in the Netherlands’ Ergonomics 28, 45–49 (1985).
• [10] Lawlor, M.G. and Chevoya, R.A. ‘Fatal occupational injuries in Rhode Island’ Rhode Island Medicine. 78, 204 (1995).
• [11] Driscoll. T.R., Ansari, G., Harrison, J.E., Frommer, MS., Ruck, E.A. ‘Traumatic work related fatalities in commercial fishermen in Austria’ The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 51, 612–616 (1994).
• [12] Marshall, S.W., Kawachi, I., Cryer, P.C., Wright, D., Slappendel, C., Laid, I. ‘The epidemiology of forestry work-related injuries in New Zealand’ New Zealand Medicine Journal. 107, 434–437 (1994).
• [13] Madery-Wygonic, G., Brondum, J., Parker, D. ‘The Minnesota fatal accident circumstances and epidemiology study, Surveillance of occupational fatalities’ Minnesota Medicine. 75, 22–24 (1992).
• [14] Suruda, A. and Halperin, W. ‘Work-related deaths in children’ American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 19, 739–745 (1991).
• [15] Meyrs, J.R. ‘National surveillance of occupational fatalities in agriculture’ American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 18, 163- 168. 1990.
• [16] Trent, R.B. and Wyant, W.D. ‘Fatal hand tool injuries in construction’ International Occupational Medicine. 32, 71 1-714 (1990).
• [17] Byung, Y. J. ‘Comparisons of variables between fatal and nonfatal accidents in manufacturing industry’ International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 23, 565–572 (1999).
• [18] Byung, Y. J. ‘Characteristics of occupational accidents in the manufacturing industry of South Korea’ International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 20, 301–306. 1997.
• [19] Buck, P.C. ‘Slipping, tripping and falling accidents at work a national picture’ Ergonomics, (28): 949–958 (1985).
• [20] Anonim. SSK 2003 İstatistik Yıllığı. Ankara.
• [21] Anonim. SSK 2004 İstatistik Yıllığı. Ankara.
• [22] Anonim. SSK 2005 İstatistik Yıllığı. Ankara.
• [23] Leigh, J.P., Marcin, J.P., Miller, T.R. ‘An estimate of the US governments undercount of nonfatal occupational injuries’ The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 46, 10–18(2004).
• [24] Jacinto, C. and Aspinwall, E. ‘A survey on occupational accidents reporting and registration systems in the European Union’ Safety Science 42, 933–960 (2004).
• [25] Leigh, J.P. ‘Causes of Death in the Workplace’ Quorum Books, Westport, Connecticut (1995).
• [26] Toscano, G. ‘Dangerous jobs’ Comp. Work Cond. 2 (2) (1997).
• [27] Bailer, A.J., Stayner, L.T., Stout, N.A., Reed, L.D., Gilbert, S.J. ‘Trends in occupational fatal injury rates in the US (1983–1992)’ The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 55, 485–498 (1998).
• [28] Toscano, G., Windau, W.D. ‘Fatal work injuries: results from the 1992 national census’ Monthly Labour Rev. 116 (10), 39–48 (1993).
• [29] Angela, C. M., Ines, L. S. ‘Analysis of occupational accidents in Portugal between 1992 and 2001’. Safety Science (43), 269–286 (2005).