Biyofilik Tasarım Açısından Bartın Kenti Örneğinde Bir Değerlendirme

Yıl 2023, , 253 - 268, 29.12.2023

Aybüke Özge Boz Demir , Canan Cengiz

https://doi.org/10.58816/duzceod.1259445

Öz

Biyofilik tasarım, yapılı çevre içinde bozulmuş olan insan-doğa ilişkisini tekrar kuran ve sürdürülebilirliğini sağlayan tasarım yaklaşımı olarak öne çıkmaktadır. İnsanların doğa ile temasını sağlayan bu tasarım yaklaşımı sağlık ve yaşam kalitesi açısından önem taşımaktadır. Çalışmada, Bartın ilinde yer alan Köypark’ın biyofilik tasarım kriterleri açısından değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda çalışma alanı olan Köypark, mekânda doğa, doğal analoglar ve mekânın doğası başlıkları altında yer alan 14 biyofilik tasarım kriteri açısından incelenmiştir. Parkta, suyun varlığı, dinamik ve dağınık ışık, biyomorfik formlar ve desenler, doğa ile malzeme bağlantısı ve gizem kriterleri konusunda zayıflıklar olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu zayıflıkların giderilmesi ve çalışma alanının biyofilik tasarım kriterlerine uyumunun artırılması için çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biyofilik tasarım, Köypark, Bartın

An Evaluation in the Case of the City of Bartın in Terms of Biophilic Design

Öz

Biophilic design stands out as a design approach that re-establishes the human-nature relationship that has been disrupted in the built environment and enables the sustainability of this relationship. This design approach, which allows people to be in contact with nature, bears importance in terms of both health and quality of life. In this study, it has been aimed to evaluate the Köypark located in the borders of Bartın province in terms of biophilic design criteria. Within this scope, Köypark, which constitutes the study area, was analysed in terms of 14 biophilic design criteria under the titles of nature in the space patterns, natural analogues patterns and nature of the space patterns. It has been determined that the park shows weaknesses in the following criteria: presence of water, dynamic and diffuse light, biomorphic forms and patterns, material connection with nature and mystery. Accordingly, various suggestions have been presented to overcome these weaknesses and to improve the compliance of the study area with the biophilic design criteria.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biophilic design, Köypark, Bartın

Kaynakça

• Anonim, (2022). Bartın’ın en büyük parkı hizmete açıldı. Erişim adresi: https://bartin.bel.tr/Haber/9967526/bartinin-en-buyuk-parki-hizmete-acildi Erişim tarihi: 20.11.2022.
• Arda Akyıldız, N. (2023). Biyofilik tasarım konulu lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi. Kent Akademisi, 16(2), 879-904.
• Asim, F., Rai, S., & Shree. V. (2020). Biophilic Architecture for restoration and therapy within the built environment. Visions for Sustainability, 15, 53-79.
• Browning, W. D., Ryan, C., & Clancy, J. (2014). 14 Patterns of biophilic design, improving health & well-being in the built environment. New York: Terrapin Bright Green.
• Cengiz, C., Cengiz, B., & Boz, A.Ö. (2021a). Climate-Smart landscapes for sustainable cities. In M. Ben Ahmed, İ. Rakıp Karaș, D. Santos, O. Sergeyeva, & A. A. Boudhir (Eds.), Innovations in Smart Cities Applications Volume 4: The Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Smart City Applications (pp. 571-582). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
• Cengiz, C., Cengiz, B., Smardon, R.C., & Karaelmas, D. (2021b). Assessing people-plant interactions within interior spaces in Bartın-Turkey. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 21(6), 2093-2099.
• Clancy, J., & Ryan, C. (2015). The role of biophilic design in landscape architecture for health and well-being. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 3(1), 54-62.
• Demirbaş, G. U., ve Demirbaş, Ö. O. (2019). Biyofilik tasarım kapsamında Peyzaj Mimarlığı ve İç Mimarlık arakesiti: Eğitim programlarının karşılıklı değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Peyzaj Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 50-60.
• Gillis, K., & Gatersleben, B. (2015). A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings, 5(3), 948-963.
• Gray, T., & Birrell, C. (2014). Are biophilic-designed site office buildings linked to health benefits and high performing occupants? International journal of environmental research and public health, 11(12), 12204-12222.
• Hady, S. I. M. A. (2021). Activating biophilic design patterns as a sustainable landscape approach. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 68, 1-16.
• Howell, A. J., Passmore, H. A., & Buro, K. (2013). Meaning in nature: Meaning in life as a mediator of the relationship between nature connectedness and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1681-1696.
• Hung, S. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2022). How do humans value urban nature? Developing the perceived biophilic design scale (PBDs) for preference and emotion. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 76, 127730.
• İbrahim, I. A., & Al-Chaderchi, B. M. (2022). Contribution of the biophilic design approach to the unsustainable development goals. In P. Chias & S. Hernandez (Eds.), Eco-Architecture IX: Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature (pp. 115-125). WIT Press.
• İrfanoğlu, H. İ., ve Suri, L. (2022). Biyofilik tasarım kriterlerinin mekanlar üzerinden değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(41), 95-116.
• Jimenez, M. P., DeVille, N. V., Elliott, E. G., Schiff, J. E., Wilt, G. E., Hart, J. E., & James, P. (2021). Associations between nature exposure and health: A review of the evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4790.
• Kellert, S. (2008). Dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design. In S. R. Kellert, J. H. Heerwagen, & M.L. Mador (Eds.), Biophilic design: The theory, scienceand practice of bringing buildings to life (pp. 3-19). New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
• Makram, A. (2019). Nature-based framework for sustainable architectural design-biomimetic design and biophilic design. Architecture Research, 9(3), 74-81.
• Meydanoğlu, K., Gülten, A., & Arda Akyıldız, N. (2020). Doğayla gelen iyilik: Biyofilik tasarım. III. Uluslararası Mardin Artuklu Bilimsel Araştırmalar Kongresi, 271-277, Mardin.
• Obiozo, R. N., & Smallwood, J. J. (2013). Biophilic workplace design: Improving construction ergonomics and workers’ performance through enhanced sustainable and psychosocial value of the worksite. The Seventh International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, Honolulu.
• Obiozo, R. N., & Smallwood, J. J. (2015). Biophilic construction site model: Enhancing the motivational and humanistic value of the green construction site. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(3), 05014018.
• Öztürk, S. P. (2021). Kentlerde biyofilik tasarım ve mekansal adalet ilişkisi: Mahalle parkları deneyimi. Kent Akademisi, 14(3),533-544.
• Parsaee, M., Demers, C.M., Hébert, M., Lalonde, J.F., & Potvin, A. (2019). A photobiological approach to biophilic design in extreme climates. Building and Environment, 154, 211–226.
• Peters, T., & D’Penna, K. (2020). Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: A critical review of literature and design recommendations. Sustainability, 12(17), 7064.
• Reeve, A. (2014). ‘Mainstreaming biophilic urbanism in Australian cities: A response to climate change, resource shortages and population pressures’. PhD Thesis. Queensland University of Technology.
• Richardson, M., & Butler, C.W. (2022). Nature connectedness and biophilic design. Building Research & Information, 50(1-2), 36-42.
• Ryan, C. O., & Browning, W. D. (2020). Biophilic design. In V. Loftness (Ed.), Sustainable Built Environments, A Volume in the Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology (pp. 43-85). Springer.
• Sanchez, J. A., Ikaga, T., & Sanchez, S. V. (2018). Quantitative improvement in workplace performance through biophilic design: A pilot experiment case study. Energy and Buildings, 177, 316-328.
• Wijesooriya, N., Brambilla, A., & Markauskaite, L. (2022). Student guide 2 - How to develop a biophilic design framework. A Biophilic Design Guide to Environmentally Sustainable Design Studios (2nd ed., pp. 55-81). Springer.
• Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Zelenski, J. M., & Nisbet, E. K. (2014). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 3-23.