Workplace Conflict Effect on Innovative Behavior: The Roles of Engagement and Proactive Personality

Yıl 2024, , 563 - 576, 01.11.2024

Çetin Yelgin , Aslı Geylan

https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20240405

Öz

Conflict is as natural a phenomenon as harmony in social relations. In all industries, especially those prioritizing collaborative teamwork, it is clear that effective conflict management is critical to sustaining positive employee relationships. With this study, we set out to investigate the impact of workplace conflicts on employee innovation. For this purpose, data were collected from aviation industry employees through a survey, and 393 responses were received. Structural equation modeling was used to test hypotheses regarding the direct and indirect effects of conflict with colleagues on innovative behaviors. The study revealed that conflict with colleagues has a detrimental impact on both innovative behaviors and work engagement. Work engagement was identified as a completely mediator in the relationship between conflict and innovative behaviors. Furthermore, proactive personality was found to moderate the influence of conflict on innovative behaviors, also playing a significant role in the indirect relationship among these variables. The research concludes with practical recommendations and suggestions for future studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Conflict with colleagues, Innovative behaviors, Work engagement, Proactive personality.

Kaynakça

• Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake‐Beard, S., and Bhargava, S. (2012), “Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement”, Career Development İnternational. Vol.17 No3, 208-230.
• Akın, A., Abacı, R., Kaya, M., and Arıcı, N. (2011). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Short Proactive Personality Scale (SPPS). In ICES11 International Conference on Educational Sciences, 22, 25.
• Appelbaum, S. H., Abdallah, C., and Shapiro, B. T. (1999). The self‐directed team: a conflict resolution analysis. Team Performance Management: An International Journal.5 (2), 60-77.
• Appelberg, K., Romanov, K., Honkasalo, M. L., and Koskenvuo, M. (1991). Interpersonal conflicts at work and psychosocial characteristics of employees. Social Science Ve Medicine, 32(9), 1051-1056.
• Bakker, A. B., and Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development İnternational. 13(3), 209-223.
• Bakker, A. B. & Leiter, M. P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbookofessentialtheoryandresearch.Psychology press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203853047
• Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 29(2), 147-154.
• Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., and Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 4-28.
• Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., and Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359-1378.
• Bakker, A.B., Albrecht, S.L. and Leiter, M.P. 2011. “Key Questions Regarding Work Engagement”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20 (1),4-28.
• Bakker, Arnold B., Maria Tims and Daantje Derks (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: the role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359-1378.
• Bani-Melhem, S., Zeffane, R., and Albaity, M. (2018). Determinants of employees’ innovative behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 30(3), 1601-1620.
• Bateman, T. S. & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
• Blumer, H. (1975). Comments on ‘parsons as a symbolic interactionist. Sociological Inquiry, 45, 59-62.
• Burnes, B. & Cooke, B. (2013). K urt L ewin’s Field Theory: A Review and Re‐evaluation. International journal of management reviews, 15(4), 408-425.
• Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International journal of testing, 1(1), 55-86.
• Chen, X. H., Zhao, K., Liu, X., and Wu, D. D. (2012). Improving employees’job satisfaction and innovation performance using conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 3(2), 1-172.
• Chen, Y. S. & Huang, S. Y. (2016). A conservation of resources view of personal engagement in the development of innovative behavior and work- family conflict. Journal of Organizational Change Management, (6), 1030-1040.
• Choi, Y. & Ha, J. (2018). Job satisfaction and work productivity: The role of conflict-management culture. Social Behavior and Personality: An İnternational Journal, 46(7), 1101-1110.
• Crant JM (2000) Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462.
• Crant, J. M. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 532.
• Çalışkan, A., Akkoç, İ., and Turunç, Ö. (2019). Innovative behavior: a scale adaptation study. International Journal of Economics and Administrative Studies, 5(1), 94-111.
• De Raeve, L., Jansen, N. W., van den Brandt, P. A., Vasse, R. M., and Kant, I. (2008). Risk factors for interpersonal conflicts at work. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 96-106.
• De Sant, D. A. L. M., and De Hilal, A. V. G. (2021). The impact of human factors on pilots’ safety behavior in offshore aviation companies: A Brazilian Case. Safety Science, 140, 105272.
• Dikkers JS, Jansen PG, de Lange AH, Vinkenburg CJ, and Kooij D (2010) Proactivity, job characteristics, and engagement: A longitudinal study. Career Development International, 15(1),59-77.
• Frese M. & Fay D (2001) 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3, 33-187.
• Fuller Jerry, B. & Laura E. Marler (2009). Change Driven by Nature: A Meta- Analytic Review of the Proactive Personality Literature, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 329-345.
• George, D. & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference (10. Baskı). GEN, Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc, 10.
• Grant, A. M. & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research İn Organizational Behavior, 28, 3-34.
• Ji, M., Liu, B., Li, H., Yang, S., and Li, Y. (2019). The effects of safety attitude and safety climate on flight attendants’ proactive personality with regard to safety behaviors. Journal of Air Transport Management, 78, 80-86.
• Jung, H. S. & Yoon, H. H. (2018). Improving frontline service employees’ innovative behavior using conflict management in the hospitality industry: The mediating role of engagement. Tourism Management, 69, 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tourman.2018.06.035
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.
• Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509-523.
• Kim, T. Y., Hon, A. H., and Lee, D. R. (2010). Proactive personality and employee creativity: The effects of job creativity requirement and supervisor support for creativity. Creativity research journal, 22(1), 37-45.
• Kim, Y. K. & Lee, H. R. (2009). Airline employee’s service behavior toward different nationalities. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(3), 454-465.
• Kline, R. B. (2015). The mediation myth. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(4), 202-213.
• Ko. S. & Joo, S. 2018. The Effect of Core Self-Evaluation of Airline Crew on Job Satisfaction and Innovative Behavior. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics,120 (6), 5295-5309.
• Kong, Y. & Li, M. (2018). Proactive personality and innovative behavior: The mediating roles of job- related affect and work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An İnternational Journal, 46(3), 431- 446.
• Lee, K. H. & Hyun, S. S. (2016). An extended model of employees’ service innovation behavior in the airline industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(8), 1622–1648. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2015-0109.
• Li, L. & Mao, S. (2014). Moderating effects of proactive personality on factors influencing work engagement based on the job demands-resources model. Social Behavior and Personality: An İnternational Journal, 42(1), 7-15.
• Li, L., Zhong, J. A., Chen, Y., Xie, Y., and Mao, S. (2014). Moderating effects of proactive personality on factors influencing work engagement based on the job demands-resources model. Social Behavior and Personality, 42(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.2224/ sbp.2014.42.1.7
• Maslach, C. & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World psychiatry: official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 15(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311
• Memon, M. A., Cheah, J. H., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2019). Moderation analysis: issues and guidelines. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 3(1), 1-11.
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Okabe, N. (2017). Creating of customer loyalty by cabin crew A study of the relation between emotional labor and job performance. Transportation research procedia, 25, 149-164.
• Özkalp, E. & Meydan, B. (2015). Analysis of the reliability and validity of the Work Engagement Scale developed by Schaufeli and Bakker in Turkish. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 17(3), 1-19.
• Park, Y. K., Song, J. H., Yoon, S. W., and Kim, J. (2014). Learning organization and innovative behavior: The mediating effect of work engagement. European Journal of Training and Development, 38, 75-94.
• Rahim, M. A. (1985). A strategy for managing conflict in complex organizations. Human Relations, 38(1), 81- 89. Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A. (2015). Örgütsel davranış, (Çev. Ed.: İnci ERDEM). Ankara: Nobel (14th ed.).
• Robinson, D., Perryman, S., and Hayday, S. (2004). The drivers of employee engagement. Institute for Employment Studies.
• Sadullah, Ö. Z., Uyargil, C. B., Acar, A. C., Özçelik, A. O., Dündar, G., Ataay, İ. D., and Tüzüner, V. L. (2015). Human resource management. Istanbul: Beta Publishing.
• Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(3), 293-315. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., and Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., and Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.
• Schaufeli, W. & Salanova, M. (2007). Work engagement. Managing social and ethical issues in organizations, 135, 177.
• Scott, Susanne G. & Reginald A. Bruce (1994). Determinates of ınnovative behavior: a path model of ındividual ınnovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, Cilt 137, s. 580-607.
• Seedhouse, E., Brickhouse, A., Szathmary, K., and Williams, E. D. (2020). Human Factors: An Introduction. In Human Factors in Air Transport. Springer: Cham.
• Spitzmuller, M., Sin, H. P., Howe, M., and Fatimah, S. (2015). Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational research: A meta-analytic review. Human Performance, 28(4), 351-379.
• Thomas, Kenneth W. (1992), “Conflict and Conflict Management: Reflections and Update”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 265-274.
• Tosi, H.L., Rizzo, J.R. & Carroll, S.J. (1994), Managing Organizational Behavior, Third Edition, Blackwell Business, USA.
• Tosi, H. L., Rizzo, J. R., & Carroll, S. J. (2000). Managing Organizational Behavior, Blackwell Publishing, USA.
• Ulufer, S. & Soran, S. (2019). Effects of demographic factors and personality on Emotional Labor. Mediating role of intention to leave. A research on cabin crew. Transportation Research Procedia, 43, 129-138.
• Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science, 32(5), 590-607.
• West, M. A. & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4(1), 15–30.
• Yuan, F. & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342.