Örgütsel sosyalleşmenin, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlıkla ilişkisi: ilköğretim okulu yöneticileri üzerinde bir araştırma

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 47 - 74, 01.10.2012

Ali Balcı Ali Baltacı Tuncer Fidan Caner Cereci , Uğur Acar

Öz

Bu çalışmada; örgütsel sosyalleşmenin, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık kavramları ile ilişkileri yanında örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık değişkenlerinin örgütsel sosyalleşmeyi yordama düzeyi araştırılmıştır. Araştırma, “karma araştırma” türünde desenlenmiştir. Dolayısıyla araştırmada nicel ve nitel araştırma teknikleri bir arada kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın nicel boyutunda ilköğretim okulu müdürlerinin örgütsel sosyalleşme, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı düzeylerini belirlemek üzere ilgili ölçekler uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın nitel boyutunda ise ilköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin örgütsel sosyalleşme strateji ve taktiklerini belirlemek üzere nitel görüşme tekniği uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın hedef evrenini, Ankara İli dokuz merkez ilçesinde görev yapan 580 ilköğretim okul müdürü oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada evrenin tamamına ulaşılarak, “tam sayım” tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma verilerini toplamak üzere gerekli izinler alınarak Örgütsel Sosyalleşme Ölçeği (Taormina, 2004) ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Ölçeği (Cheney, 1982; Demirel, Çakınberk & Derin, 2011) Türkçeye uyarlanmıştır. Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Ölçeği ise araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın nicel boyutunda sözü edilen ölçeklerle toplanan verilerin analizinde, ilköğretim okulu müdürlerinin örgütsel sosyalleşme, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık düzeylerini saptamak üzere frekans, yüzde, aritmetik ortalama ve standart sapma betimsel istatistik teknikleri hesaplanmıştır. Örgütsel sosyalleşmenin örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlıkla ilişki düzeyini ve bu iki değişkenin (örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık) örgütsel sosyalleşmeyi yordama düzeyini saptamak üzere de çoklu doğrusal regresyon tekniği uygulanmıştır. Manidarlık sınamaları p≥.05 düzeyinde yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın nitel boyutunda ise görüşme verileri içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Nicel tarama bulguları, ilköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin örgütsel sosyalleşme ve örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeylerinin beklenenin altında olduğunu göstermiştir. Çoklu regresyon analizi sonucuna göre, örgütsel sosyalleşmenin örgüte ilişkin anlayış boyutunu, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel vatandaşlık boyutları arasında sadece örgütsel özdeşleşmenin özdeşleşme boyutu düşük düzeyde yordamaktadır. Nitel tarama bulguları ise, ilköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin sosyalleşmesinin genellikle informel, kesintili bireysel süreçlerle gerçekleştiğini, okul yöneticilerinin okuldaki sosyal gruplarla özdeşleştiklerini ve ekstra rol davranışları sergilediklerini göstermiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Sosyalleşme, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme, Örgütsel Vatandaşlık, Sosyalleşme Strateji ve Taktikleri, İlköğretim Okulu Müdürleri

The relationship of organizational socialization to organizational identification and organizational citizenship: A search on Turkish primary school administrators

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

Primary School Administrators, Organizational Socialization, Organizational Identification, Organizational Citizenship, Socialization Strategy and Tactics

Kaynakça

• Ahmad, K. Z. (2011). The association between training and organizational citizenship behavior in the digital world. IBIMA Publishing, 2011, 1-11. Article ID 448699, 11.
• Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990). Organizational socialization tactics: a longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers' commitment and role orientation. The Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), 847-858.
• Anakwe, U. P. & Greenhaus, J. H. (1999). Effective socialization of employees: Socialization content perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 11 (3), 315-329.
• Ashford, S. J. & Cummings, L. L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 67-79.
• Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 465-487.
• Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organizations. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
• Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Ashforth, B. E., & Sluss, D. M. (2008). How relational and organizational identification converge: Processes and conditions. Organization Science, 19, 807-823.
• Balcı, A. (2003). Örgütsel sosyalleşme. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
• Ballard, A. & Blessing, L. (2006). Organizational socialization through employee orientations at North Carolina state university libraries. College & Research Libraries, 67 (3), 240-248.
• Bandura, A. (1979). Self referent mechanisms in social learning theory. American Psychologist 34 (5), 439-441.
• Basım, N. & Şeşen, H. (2006). Kontrol odağının çalışanların nezaket ve yârdim etme davranışlarına etkisi: kamu sektöründe bir araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16, 159-168.
• Bateman, T. S. & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: the relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587–595.
• Bauer, T. N. & Green, S. G. (1994). Effect of newcomer involvement in work-related activities: a longitudinal study of socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (2), 211-223.
• Bauer, T. N., Morrison, E. W. & Callister, R. R. (1998). Organizational socialization. A review and directions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 149-214.
• Boivie, S., Lange, D., McDonald, M. & Westphal, J. D. (2011). Me or we: The Effects of CEO organizational identification on agency costs. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 551- 576.
• Boroş, S. (2008). Organizational identification: Theorical and empirical analyses of competing conceptualizations. Cognitive, Creier, Comportament/Cognition, Brain, Behaviour, 12 (1), 1- 27.
• Brown, M. E. (1969). Identification and some condition of organizational involvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14 (3), 346-355.
• Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19 (4), 533-546.
• Buluç, B. (2008). Ortaöğretim okullarında örgütsel sağlık ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6 (4), 571-602.
• Buono, A. F. & Kamm, J. B. (1983). Marginality and the organizational socialization of female managers. Human Relations, 36, 1125-1140.
• Chao, G. T., O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J. & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (5), 730-743.
• Cheney, G. & Tompkins P. K. (1987). Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment. Central States Speech Journal, 38 (1), 1-15.
• Clair, R. P. (1996). The political nature of the colloquialism. A real job: Implications of organizational socialization. Communication Monographs, 63, 249-267.
• Cooper, D. & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2010). Identification in organizations: The role of self- concept orientations and identification motives. Academy of Management Review, 35 (4), 516-538.
• Crow, G. M. (2006). Complexity and the beginning principal in the United States: perspectives on socialization. Journal of Educational Administration, 44 (4), 310-325.
• Demirel, E. T., Çakınberk, A. & Derin, N. (2011). Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin örgütsel bağlılıkla biçimlenmesi: Malatya ve Tunceli özel eğitim kurumları örneği. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (1), 89-121.
• Der Velde, M. E. G., Ardts, J. C. A. & Jansen, P. G. W. (2005). The longitudinal effect of information seeking on socialisation and development in three organisations: Filling the research gaps. Canadian Journal of Career Development, 4 (2), 32-42.
• Dipaola, M. F. & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Organizational citizenship of faculty and achievement of high school students. The High School Journal, 88 (3), 35-44.
• Dipaola, M. F. & Neves, P. M. M. (2009). Organizational citizenship behaviors in American and Portuguese public schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 47 (4), 490-507.
• Dipaola, M. F. & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Organizational citizenship behaviour in schools and its relation to school climate. Journal of School Leadership, 11 (5), 424-447.
• Dutton, J., Dukerich, J. & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and membership commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 239-263.
• Edwards, M. R. & Peccei, R. (2010). Perceived organizational support, organizational identification, and employee outcomes: Testing a simultaneous multifoci model. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9 (1), 17-26.
• Edwards, M. R. (2005). Organizational identification: a conceptual and operational review. International Journal Reviews, 7 (4), 207-230.
• Feldman, D. C. (1976). A contingency theory of socialization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 433-452.
• Feldman, D. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of group members. Academy of Management Review, 6 (2), 309-318.
• Fiol, C. M. (1991). Managing culture as a competitive source: An identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17,191-211.
• Fisher, C. D. (1986). Organizational socialization: An integrative view. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 4, 101-145.
• Foreman, P. & Whetten, D. A. (2002). Members’ identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13 (6), 618-635.
• Gautam, T., Van Dick, R. & Wagner, U. (2004). Organizational identification and organizational commitment: distinct aspects of two related concepts. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 301-315.
• Gonzales, J. Jr. (2001). Personal and social identity in organizations: a study of organizational commitment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Texas A & M University.
• Grant, A. M. & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 28, 3-34.
• Greenfield, W. D. (1985). Being and becoming a principal: responses to work contexts and socialization processes. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. http//www.eric.ed.gov. İndirme Tarihi: 21.10.2011.
• Hart, A. W. (1993). Principal succession: Establishing leadership in schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Hartley, K. (1992). Socialization by way of symbolic interactionism and culture theory: A Communication perspective. Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association. Chicago, IL. http//www.eric.ed.gov İndirme Tarihi: 21.10.2011.
• Haslam, S. A., Eggins R. A. & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). The ASPIRe model: actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76 (1), 83-113.
• Holton, E. F. III. (2005). Holton's evaluation model: New evidence and construct elaborations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7 (1), 37-54.
• Jablin, F. M. (1982). Organizational communication: An assimilation approach. Social cognition and communication. (Edt. M. E. Roloff & C. R. Berger). Newbury Park, CA; Sage Publications. pp. 255-286.
• Jimmieson, N. L., Hannam R. L. & Yeo, G. B. (2010). Teacher organizational citizenship behaviours and job efficacy: Implications for student quality of school life. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 453-479.
• Jones, G. R. (1983). Psychological orientation and the process of organizational socialization: An interactionist perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 8 (3), 464-474.
• Kreiner, G. E. & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 (1), 1-27.
• Lee, S. M. (1971). An empirical analysis of organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 14, 213-226.
• Lipponen, J., Bardi, A. & Haapamäki, J. (2008). The interaction between values and organizational identification in predicting suggestion-making at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 241–248.
• Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25 (2), 226-251.
• Matin, Z. M., Jandaghi, G. & Ahmadi, F. (2010). A comprehensive model for identifying factors impacting on development of organizational citizenship behavior. African Journal of Business Management, 4 (10), 1932-1945.
• Miller, V. D. & Jablin, F. M. (1991). Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the process. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 92-120.
• Millward, L. J., Haslam, S. A. & Postmes, T. (2007). Putting employees in their place: The impact of hot desking on organizational and team identification. Organization Science, 18, 547-559.
• Mitus, J. S. (2006). Organizational socialization from a content perspective and its effect on the affective commitment of newly hired rehabilitation counselors. Journal of Rehabilitation, 72 (2), 12-20.
• Mogotsi, I. C., Boon, J. A. & Fletcher, L. (2011). Modelling the relationships between knowledge sharing, organisational citizenship, job satisfaction and organisational commitment among school teachers in Botswana. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 21 (1), 41-58.
• Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behaviour: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
• Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its construct cleanup. Human Performance, 10 (2), 85-97.
• Ostroff, C. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1992). Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psychology, 45, 849-874.
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.
• Parsons, T. (1982). On institutions and social evolution. Selected writings. (Edt: L. H. Mayhew). Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.
• Patchen, M. (1970). Participation, achievement, and involvement on the job. New Jersey: Prentice – Hall.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. & Philip, M. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1 (2), 107-142.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B. & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviours: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26 (3), 513-563.
• Porter, L, W., Lawler, E. E., III. & Hackman. J. R. (1975). Behavior in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Ravishankar, M. N. & Pan, S. L. (2008). The influence of organizational identification on organizational knowledge management (KM). OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 36 (2), 221-234.
• Reichers, A. E. (1987). An interactionist perspective on newcomer socialization rates. Academy of Management Review, 12, 278-287
• Riketta, M. (2005). Cognitive differentiation between self, ingroup and outgroup: The roles of identification and perceived intergroup conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 97-106.
• Saks, A. M. & Gruman, J. A. (2010). Getting newcomers engaged: The role of socialization tactics. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26 (5), 383-402.
• Schein, E. H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
• Shamir, B. (1990). Calculations, values and identities: The sources of collectivist work motivation. Human Relations, 43, 313-332.
• Song, Z. & Chathoth, P. K. (2010). An interactional approach to organization’s success in socializing their intern newcomers: The role of general self efficacy and organizational socialization inventory. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 34 (3), 364-387.
• Steers, R. M. (1981). Introduction to organizational behavior. Santa Monica, California: Goodyear Publishing Company, Inc.
• Sun, J. M. & Wang, H. (2011). Organizational identification in China. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of AOM in Anaheim, CA.
• Taormina, R. J. (1994). The organizational socialization inventory. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2 (3), 133-145.
• Taormina, R. J. (1997). Organizational socialization: A multidomain, continuous process model. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5 (1), 29-47.
• Tierney, W. G. (1997). Organizational socialization in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 68 (1), 1-16.
• Titrek, O., Bayrakçı, M. & Zafer, D. (2009). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarına ilişkin görüşleri. Akademik Bakış, 17. http://www.akademikbakis.org.
• Tompkins, P. K. & Cheney G. (1985). Communication and unobtrusive control in contemporary organizations. Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions (Edt: R. D. McPhee & P. K. Tompkins). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE. pp. 179-210.
• Van Dick, R., Grojean, M. W., Christ, O. & Wieseke, J. (2006). Identity and the extra mile: Relationships between organizational identification and organizational citizenship behaviour. British Journal of Management, 17, 283–301
• Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J. & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization organizational identification: which aspect really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171-191.
• Van Knippenberg, D. & Van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.
• Van Maanen, J. & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward of theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 209-264.
• Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E. & Malik, S. D. (1984). Organizational socialization and group development: toward an integrative perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 9 (4), 670-683.
• Yılmaz, K. & Taşdan, M. (2009). Organizational citizenship and organizational justice in Turkish primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 47 (1), 108-125.
• Yi, X. & Uen, J. F. (2006). Relationship between organizational socialization and organization identification of professionals: Moderating effects of personal work experience and growth need strength. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 10 (1), 362–371.