Türkiye'de Kadın ve Erkek Perspektifinden Aile Planlaması ve Erkek Kondomu: Nitel Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 2, 187 - 195, 29.08.2024

Fatma Şule Bilgiç , Doğan Çağrı Tanrıverdi

https://doi.org/10.53490/egehemsire.1317284

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, gebeliği önleyici yöntem olarak erkek kondomu kullanan kadın ve erkeklerin yönteme ve aile planlamasına ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Yöntem: Nitel desende gerçekleştirilen araştırmanın örneklemini amaçlı örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilmiş ve cinsiyetlerine göre kategorize edilmiş 12 kadın ve 13 erkek oluşturmuştur.
Bulgular: Bu çalışma sonucunda erkek kondomu yöntemini kullanan kadın ve erkeklerin bulguları beş tema altında toplanmıştır. Temalar erkek kondomu karar verme süreci, erkek kondomunun cinsel yaşam üzerindeki etkisi, erkek kondomunun algılanan dezavantajları, aile planlaması kullanımında cinsiyet, aile planlaması kullanımında inançlardır.
Sonuç: Bu çalışmada erkeklerin çevreden duyarak erkek kondomu kullanmaya karar verdikleri, cinsel duyumlarının azaldığı, plastik/madde hissi yaşadıkları ve maliyetli buldukları saptanmıştır. Kadınların temiz olması ve çevreden işitilmesi, hazzın azalması, masraflı olması ve cinsel hayatlarını olumsuz etkilemesi nedeniyle tercih ettikleri belirlendi.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Aile Planlaması; erkek kondomu; erkek; kadın; yöntem seçimi.
Destekleyen kurumlar: Yoktur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Aile Planlaması;, erkek kondomu;, erkek;, kadın;, yöntem seçimi.

Destekleyen Kurum

YOK

Proje Numarası

YOK

Teşekkür

YOK

Family Planning and Men's Condom from the Perspective of Women and Men in Turkey: A Qualitative Study

Öz

Objective: In this study, it was aimed to examine the opinions of men and women who use male condoms as a contraceptive method, regarding the method and family planning.
Methods: The sample of the study, which was carried out in a qualitative design, was chosen by the purposeful sampling method and consisted of 12 women and 13 men, categorized according to their genders.
Results: As a result of this study, the findings of men and women using the male condom method were grouped under five themes. Themes are male condom decision making process, the effect of male condom on sexual life, disadvantages perceived by the male condom, gender in the use of family planning, beliefs in the use of family planning.
Conclusion: This study was found that men decided to use male condoms by hearing from the environment, reduced sexual sensation, had a feeling of plastic / substance and found it costly. It was determined that women preferred it because they were clean and heard from the environment, reduced pleasure, was costly and negatively affected their sexual life.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Family planning;, male condom;, male;, female;, method selection.

Proje Numarası

YOK

Kaynakça

• Analogbei, T., Dear, N., Reed, D., Esber, A., Akintunde, A., Bahemana, E., AFRICOS Study Group. (2020). Predictors and barriers to condom use in the African cohort study. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 34(5), 228-36.
• Aydın, E.İ., Bilgin, N. Ç. (2020). The relationship between family planning attitude, gender and religious orientation of ındividuals in the marriage stage. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine, 9(4), 214-224. doi:10.33880/ejfm.2020090404.
• Baltacı, A. (2019). Qualitative research process: How to conduct qualitative research? Journal of Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences, 5(2), 368-388.
• Bütün, M., Demir, S.B. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Ankara: Pegem Academy
• Cleland, J., Conde-Agudelo, A., Peterson, H., Ross, J., Tsui, A. (2012). Contraception and health. The Lancet, 380(9837), 149-156.
• Elo, S., Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
• Elshiekh, H. F., Hoving, C., de Vries, H. (2020). Exploring determinants of condom use among university students in Sudan.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 1379-1391. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01564-2.
• Fetner, T., Dion, M., Heath, M., Andrejek, N., Newell, S. L., Stick, M. (2020). Condom use in penile-vaginal intercourse among Canadian adults: results from the sex in Canada survey. PLoS One, 15(2), e0228981.
• Gavas, E., İnal, S. (2019). Situations and attitudes of women using family planning methods in Turkey: A systematic review . Journal of Health and Life Sciences, 1(2), 37-43.
• Harvey, S.M., Washburn, I., Oakley, L., Warren, J., Sanchez, D. (2017). Competing priorities: Partner-specific relationship characteristics and motives for condom use among at-risk young adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(4-5), 665-676. doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1182961
• Karaahmet, A.Y., Bilgiç, F.Ş. (2022, May). The effect of sexual taboos of ındividuals in Turkey on family planning. Paper presented at the 1st International 1st National Sivas Midwifery Congress
• Karthik, L., Kumar, G., Keswani, T., Bhattacharyya, A., Chandar, S. S., Bhaskara Rao, K.V. (2014). Protease inhibitors from marine actinobacteria as a potential source for antimalarial compound. PloS one, 9(3), e90972.
• Kırıcı, P., Kaplan, S., Karaçor, T., Nacar, M. C. (2020). The effect of family planning counseling on women's preference for contraceptive methods: Experience of a tertiary center. Journal of Gynecology-Obstetrics and Neonatology Medicine,17(3),425-430.
• Maharajh, R., Haffejee, F. (2021). Exploring male condom use among women in South Africa: a review of the literature. Afr JAIDS Res. 20(1):6-14. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2021.1872663.
• McKay, A., Quinn-Nilas, C., Milhausen, R. (2017). Prevalence and correlates of condom use among single midlife Canadian women and men aged 40 to 59. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 26(1), 38-47.
• Nieschlag, E. (2010). Clinical trials in male hormonal contraception. Contraception, 82(5), 457-70.
• Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing&Health, 23(4):334-340. 30.
• Selim, S., Bilgin, D. (2020). Investigation of factors affecting fertility according to religious beliefs in terms of interaction hypothesis. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences,22(4),1005-1019.
• Seyrek, S. G., Çakıroğlu, M. M., İncekara, N. (2021). Family planning and contraceptive methods. Turkey Health LiteracyJournal, 2(3),184-190.
• Skakoon-Sparling, S., Cramer, K.M. (2019). Are we blinded by desire? Relationship motivation and sexual risk-taking intentions during condom negotiation. Journal of Sex Research, 57, 545–558.
• Skakoon-Sparling, S., Cramer, K.M., Shuper, P.A. (2016). The impact of sexual arousal on sexual risk-taking and decision-making in men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0589-y.
• Solo, J., Festin, M. (2019). Provider bias in family planning services: a review of its meaning and manifestations. Global Health: Science and Practice, 7(3), 371-385.
• Tadele, A., Abebaw, D., Ali, R. (2019). Predictors of unmet need for family planning among all women of reproductive age in Ethiopia. Contraception and reproductive medicine, 4(1), 1-9.
• Tanrıverdi, F. Ş., Demirezen, E. (2021). The size of male contraception in reproductive health. Haliç University Journal of Health Sciences,4(2), 115-122.
• Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357.
• Turkey Demographic and Health Survey (2018). Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies Ministry of Health general directorate of mother and child health and family planning. Avaliable link: http://www.sck.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf
• Wongsomboon, V., Cox, D.J. (2021). Sexual arousal discounting: Devaluing condom-protected sex as a function of reduced arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01907-4.
• World Health Organization. (2014). Ensuring human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services: guidance and recommendations. Avaliable link: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/102539/9789241506748_eng.pdf