An Analysis of University Students’ Levels of Self-control According to Their Ego States

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 64, 0 - 0, 15.07.2016

Canani Kaygusuz , Ahmet Ragip Ozpolat

Öz

Problem Statement: Although it is well known that parents’ methods of raising their children significantly affect their children’s personalities and how they face life, this study has been designed because there is a lack of specific research on which ego states of adults are associated with selfcontrol. In the present study, self-control and ego states have been taken into consideration together and answers to the following questions were sought. Is there any association between the subdimensions of ego states and self-control? Do ego states predict self-control? Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between ego states of university students and their levels of self-control, and to determine whether or not ego states predict their levels of self-control. Methods: Since this study aims to investigate whether subdimensions of ego states and self-control are correlated, an associational survey model was used. The study was conducted with 290 participating university students. The data were collected using an ego states scale and a selfcontrol scale. The results suggested that the parent ego state, adult ego state, and child ego state dimensions are significantly correlated with the experiential self-control reformative self-control and redressive selfcontrol subdimensions of the self-control scale. Findings and Results: Based on the findings, it was concluded that the parent ego state is associated with reformative self-control, the adult ego state is associated with reformative and redressive self-control, and the child ego state is associated with experiential self-control. According to the results of the one way ANOVA, which tested the significance of the regression model, ego states predict the self-control levels of individuals significantly, F3-274: 6.356; p < .001. Conclusion and Recommendations: Results suggest that students with high parent ego states make decisions using reformative self-control; students with high adult ego states make decisions using reformative and redressive self-control; and students with high child ego states make decisions using experiential self-control. Keywords: Ego states, self-control, experiential self-control.

Kaynakça

• Akbag, M., & Deniz, L (2003). Ogretim elemani ve ogretmen adaylarinin birbirlerine
• yonelik algilari: Transaksiyonel analiz acisindan bir degerlendirme. [ The
• perception of student-teachers and their instructors toward each other: A
• transactional analysis evaluation]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(2),
• -292.
• Akkoyun, F. (2001). Psikolojide islemsel cozumleme yaklasimi. Transaksiyonel analiz.
• [Transactional analysis: Transactional analysis approach in psychology.]
• Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Press.
• Baumeister. R. F., Heatherton. T. F., & Tice. D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why
• people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press. Inc.
• Berne, E. (2001). Hayat denen oyun. [Games people play]. (S. Sargut, Cev.). Istanbul,
• Turkey: Kariyer Press.
• Chudek, J., Skrzypulec-Plinta, V., & Olszanecka-Glinianowicz, M. (2014). Coping
• with overweight strategies, self-esteem and body-esteem in the context of
• transactional analysis. Psychiatr. Pol, 48(3), 477-487.
• Ciucur, D. (2013). The ego states and the “big five” personality factors. Procedia-Social
• and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 581-585.
• DeLisi, M., Beaver, K.M., Vaughn, M.G., Trulson, C.R., Kosloski, A. E., Alan J. Drury,
• A. J., & Wright, J. P. (2010). Personality, gender, and self-control theory
• revisited: results from a sample of institutionalized juvenile delinquents.
• Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 6(1), 31- 46.
• Dokmen, U. (2013). Iletisim catismalari ve empati. [Communication conflicts and
• empathy]. Istanbul, Turkey: Remzi Press.
• Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ predicting
• academic performance in adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939-944
• Duyan, V., Gulden, C., & Gelbal, S. (2012). Oz-Denetim Olcegi - ODO: Guvenirlik ve
• gecerlik calismasi. [Self-Control Scale – SCS: Reliability and validity study].
• Society and Social Work, 23(1), 25-38.
• Engels, R., Finkenauer, C., den Exter Blokland, E. A. W. & Baumeister. R. F. (2000).
• Parental influences on self-control and juvenile delinquency. Manuscript in
• preparation. Utrecht University. Netherlands.
• Englert, C., & Bertrams, A. (2015). Integrating attentional control theory and the
• strength model of self-control. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.
• Eslinger, P.J., Flaherty-Craig, C.V., & Benton, A.L. (2004) Developmental outcomes
• after early prefrontal cortex damage. Brain and Cognition, 55, 84–103.
• Finkel, E., & Campbell, W. K. (2000). Ego depletion and accommodation in romantic
• relationships. Poster presented at the Society for Personality and Social
• Psychology. Nashville. TN.
• Fitzsimons, G. M., & Bargh, J. A (2004). Automatic self-regulation. In R. F.Baumeister
• & K. D. Vohs (Ed.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research theory and applications
• (pp. 151 -170). New York: Guilford Press.
• Fujita. K. (2011). On conceptualizing selfcontrol as more than the effortful inhibition
• of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 352–366.
• Gencoglu, C. (2006). Universite ogrencilerinin iyimserlik duzeyleri ile kisilik
• ozellikleri arasindaki iliskinin incelenmesi [Examination of relationship
• between university students' level of optimism and their personality traits].
• Unpublished master thesis, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
• Jackson, J. J., Bog, T., Walton, K.E., Wood, D., & Harms, P.D. (2009) Not all
• conscientiousness scales change alike: A multimethod multisample study of
• age differences in the facets of conscientiousness. Journal of Personality and
• Social Psychology, 96, 446–459.
• James. M., & Jongeward, D. (1993). Kazanmak icin dogariz. [Born to win]. (T. Şenruh
• Cev.). Istanbul, Turkey: Inkilap Press.
• Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri. [Scientific research methods]. Ankara,
• Turkey: Nobel Press.
• Kochanska, G., Coy, K.C., & Murray, K. T. (2001). The development of selfregulation
• in the first four years of life. Child Development, 72, 1091–1111.
• Mahone, E. M., Cirino. P. T., Cutting, L. E., Cerrone, P. M., Hagelthorn, K. M.,
• Hiemenz, J. R., Singer, H. S., & Denckla, M. B. (2002). Validity of the
• behavior rating inventory of executive function in children with ADHD
• and/or tourette syndrome. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17 (7), 643 –
• Mehta, R. (2010). Exploring self-control: Moving beyond depletion hypothesis.
• Advances in Consumer Research, 37, 174-178.
• Mitchell, J.P., Macrae, C.N., Schooler, J.. Rowe. A.C., & Milne. A.B. (2002). Directed
• remembering: Subliminal cues alter nonconscious memory strategies.
• Memory, 10, 381-388.
• Moffitt et al. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and
• public safety. PNAS, 108(7), 2693-2698.
• Ozpolat, A., Kaygusuz, C., & Duyan, V. (2015). Ego durumlari olceginin gecerlilik ve
• guvenirlik calismasi. [Psychometric features of ego states scale]. Turkish
• Journal of Family Medicine & Primary Care, 9(4), 150-157, doi:
• 5455/tjfmpc.186239
• Rosenbaum, M. (1993). The three functions of self-control behavior: Redressive,
• reformative, and experiential. Work and Stress, 7, 33-46.
• Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R. & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing
• the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and
• Social Psychology, 42, 5–37.
• Sumer, N. Akturk, G.E. & Helvaci, E. (2010). Anne-baba tutum ve davranislarinin
• psikolojik etkileri: Turkiye'de yapilan calismalara toplu bakis. [The relations
• between perceived parental support and peer bullying/victimization in male
• adolescents: The role of friendship quality]. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 13
• (25), 42-61.
• Sencer, M. (1989). Toplumbilimlerinde yontem. [Methods in sociology]. Istanbul, Turkey:
• Beta Press.
• Sahin, F. T., & Ozyurek, A. (2008). 5-6 yas grubu cocuga sahip ebeveynlerin
• demografik ozelliklerinin cocuk yetistirme tutumlarina etkisinin incelenmesi.
• [Examining of the effects to child raising attitudes of demographic
• characteristics of parents that have 5-6 years children group]. Journal of Turkish
• Educational Sciences, 6(3), 395-414.
• Tangney, J.P., Baumeister, R.F., & Boone, A.L. (2004). High self-control predicts good
• adjustment. Less pathology. Better grades and interpersonal success. Journal of
• Personality, 72(2), 271-324.
• Tudor, K. (2010). The state of the ego: Then and now. Transactional Analysis Journal,
• (3-4), 261-277.
• Tufekci, S. (2008). Romantik iliskilerde genc yetiskinlerin aska iliskin tutumlari ve kisilik
• ozellikleri: Transaksiyonel analiz ego durumlari acisindan bir degerlendirme. [An
• assessment of love attitudes and characteristics of young adults in romantic
• relationships in terms of transactionaol analaysis ego states]. Unpublished master
• thesis, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
• Wolfe, R. N. & Johnson. S. D. (1995). Persotnality as a predictor of college
• performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 177–185.
• Yildiz, M. & Dilmac, B. (2012). Ogretmen adaylarinin sahip olduklari degerler ile
• kisilik ozellikleri arasindaki iliskilerini incelenmesi [Analysis of the relation
• between values and personality traits held by candidate teachers]. Mersin
• University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 8(3), 122-134.