The role of apiculture in rural development in Turkey

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 9, 48 - 54, 26.12.2016

Mustafa Sağdıç

Öz

In this study, the role of apiculture in rural development is examined with the help of rural development projects, implemented in Turkey. Accordingly, since 2000, rural development projects implemented by public and private sectors were evaluated. Document analysis method as a main methodology was used in the present study to analyze rural development projects. In addition, the findings were presented with the current literature results. The preliminary results showed that apiculture was not sufficiently emphasized in rural development projects in Turkey. However, there has been recently a significant increase in the number of projects about beekeeping in Turkey. These projects are mainly supported by the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, TUBITAK and Ministry of forestry and water affairs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Apiculture, Rural development, Projects, Turkey

Teşekkür

A part of this study are presented in the proceedings of 3th Asian Apicultural Association (AAA) Conference-2016. Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,

Kaynakça

• Adgaba, N.,Al-Ghamdi, A., Shenkute, A.G., Ismaiel, S., Al-Kahtani, S., Tadess, Y., Ansari, M.J., Abebe, W., Abdulaziz, M. Q. A., 2014. Socio-economic analysis of beekeeping and determinants of box hive technology adoption in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 24 (6), 1876-1884.
• Agriculture and Rural Development Support Institution, 2016. IPARD- Program Evaluations, Beekeeping Sector Meeting Final Report.
• Arie, O., Longworth, N., Yildiz, A., (2005), “Turkey’s economy and regional income distribution” Burrell, A., Arie O. (Editors), Turkey in the European Union: Implications for Agriculture, Food and Structural Policy, CABI Publishing, The Netherlands.
• Boluktepe F. E., Yilmaz S, 2008. Familiarity and Purchase Frequency of Bee Products, Uludag Bee Journal May 2008, 8 (2): 53-62.
• Celik, Z., 2005. A Consideration on the Policy and Practices of Rural Development in Turkey, Journal of the Chamber of City Planners (Union of Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects), 5 (2), 61-91.
• Dincol, A.,1982. Hittites, Encyclopedia of Anatolian Civilisations, Volume I, Gorsel Publication, 18-136.
• Emekli, G., Sudas,I., Soykan, F., 2007. Migration, Rural Development-Rural Tourism and Turkey, 38th International Asian and North African Studies Congress September 2007 Ankara,
• Firatli, C. and H.V. Gencer, 1995. Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Aricilik. Türkiye II. Teknik Aricilik Kongresi (8-9 February 1994), T.C. Ziraat Bankası Kultur Yayinlari No: 28: 20-28, Ankara.
• Firatli, C., Genc, F., Karacaoglu, M., Gencer, H.V. 2000. Turkiye Ariciliginin Karsilastirilmali Analizi Sorunlar- Oneriler. Turkiye Ziraat Muhendisliği V. Teknik Kongresi, 17–21 January 2000, Ankara,8–11.
• Gulcubuk, B., Yildirak, N., Kizilaslan, N., Ozer, D., Kan, M., Kepoglu, A., 2010. Rural Development Approaches and Policy Changes, Turkey Ziraat Engineering VII. Technical Congress, Ankara.
• Gurel F. ve Gosterit A. (2011). Ethical Evaluation of Beekeeping. Access address: http://www.aricilikmuzesi.net/images/ Date of access: 31,03,2015.
• Inal Cekic, T., Okten, A.N., 2009. Re-evaluation of Rural Development Problematic in the Context of Social Capital, Megaron, 4(3):203-213.
• Kence, A. (2006). Genetic Diversity of Honey Bees in Turkey and the Importance of its Conservation. Uludag Bee Journal 6(1):25-32.
• Kumova, U., Korkmaz A., 2001, Bee Breeding, TUBİTAK; Turkey Agricultural Research Project Publications.
• Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 2011. Rural Development Plan (2010-2013), Ankara.
• Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, 2004. The Commission Reports of Rural Development Policies, II. The Agricultural Council, Ankara.
• Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, General directorate of livestock, 2015, Ankara.
• Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, 2015.
• Okan, T., Cosgun, U., 2012. An Evaluation on Honey Production Forest: Antalya/ Gundogmus, III. Congress on Socio-Economic Problems in Forestry, Istanbul (18-20 October 2012), 209-218.
• Ministry of forestry and water affairs, General directorate of forestry, 2016, Ankara.
• Ozmete, E., 2012. Womens’ empowerment for rural development: social work models, Ankara Journal of Health Sciences, 1(1), 117-128.
• Ozsan, M., 2011. Rural development research in the forest villages of Beypazari, Sutcu Imam University, Institute of Science and Technology, Master's thesis, Kahramanmaras.
• Ozturk, S., 2009. Rural development approaches and petty commodity production, Anadolu University, Journal of social sciences, 9(2), 173–188.
• Ozturk, H., Gulpinar, V., 2012. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Beekeeping Policies and Supports, 3rd International Mugla Beekeeping and Pine Honey Congress (01–04 November 2012). Pages: 113–121. Mugla.
• Saner, G., S. Engindeniz, B.Tolon, F.Cukur (2004). The Ekonomic Analysis of Beekeeping Enterprise in Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Turkey, APIACTA 38, 3 (4), 342-351.
• Specialization Commission Report on Rural Development. 8th Five-year Development Plan (2001–2005) Ankara.
• State Planning Organization, (2006). “2007–2013 Specialization Commission Report on Rural Development” 9th Five-year Development Plan (2007–2013). Ankara
• Soysal, A., 2013. Women's entrepreneurship in rural areas: An assessment for Turkey, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, The journal of faculty of economics and administrative sciences, 8(1), 163‐189.
• Taori, K., Chakravarty, P., 1994. Rural development through beekeeping, Journal of Rural Development, 13 (4), 565-581. Turkish Statistical Institute, 2015.
• Yilmaz, H., Akbas, S., 2010. Evaluation of rural development activities to livestock sector in Turkey: The case of Ordu, Giresun Provinces, Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 5(2), 103-111.
• http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QP/E, 07.03.2016