Assessing of the Some Feeding Quality Characteristics of Triticale in Comparison with Other Winter Cereals

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 24 - 31, 30.01.2019

İsmet Baser , Zahit Kayihan Korkut Alpay Balkan Levent Ozduven Oguz Bılgın

Öz

    The study was carried out with 20 winter cereal genotypes including 3 triticale, 2 rye, 3 bread and 3 durum wheat, 3 two-rowed and 3 six-rowed barley and 3 oat in two different locations (Tekirdağ and Luleburgaz) in 2015-2016 growing years. Protein content, fat content, moisture content, ash content, cellulose, starch, NDF, ADF and ADL properties were investigated in the sample obtained from whole plant parts. It was determined that protein content ranged between 11.2- 11.8% for rye, 12.4-13.6% for bread wheat, 13.9-15.4% for durum wheat, 12.4-15.5% for barley, 10.0-13.2% for oat and 13.3-14.8% for triticale. The fat ratio ranged from 1.5-1.7% for rye, 1.4-1.5% for bread wheat, 1.6-1.7% for durum wheat, 1.6-1.8% for barley, 1.1-1.6% for oats and 1.5-1.5% for triticale. The ash content was found to be 1.6-1.7% for rye, 1.4-1.5% for bread wheat, 1.5% for durum wheat, 2.0-2.6% for barley, 1.5-2.1% for oats and 1.6% for triticale. The cellulose ratios ranged between 2.7-2.9% for rye, 2.5-2.7% for bread wheat, 2.6-2.8% for durum wheat, 4.6-5.1% for barley, 10.0-13.2% for oats and 4.5-8.4% in triticale. The starch ratios for rye, bread wheat, durum wheat, barley, oat and triticale ranged from 57.7-59.1%, 58.7-59.9%, 57.0-59.0%, 48.3-51.1%, 42.0-50.3% and 57.2-58.6%, respectively. NDF ratios were calculated at intervals 13.61-15.85% for rye, 15.70-23.56% for bread wheat, 18.56-20.50% for durum wheat, 19.56-30.64% for barley, 20.25-22.61% for oat and 13.87-18.80% for triticale. ADF ratios ranged between 3.77-5.61% for rye, 4.78-7.88% for bread wheat, 4.02-5.38% for durum wheat, 5.56-9.48% for barley, 5.56-6.75% for oat and 5.1- 5.55% for triticale. ADL ratios of the varieties investigated ranged from 1.62-2.47% for rye, 1.61-2.85% for bread wheat, 0.83-2.25% for durum wheat, 0.96-1.99% for barley, 0.96-1.79% for oat and 1.27-1.50% for triticale.

Anahtar Kelimeler

triticale, protein ratio, fat content, ash content, cellulose, starch, NDF

Kaynakça

• Ammar K, Mergoum M and S Rajaram (2004). The history and evolution of triticale. In: Mergoun M, Gomez Macpherson H (eds), Triticale Improvement and Production, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1-10.
• AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
• Demir İ, Korkut KZ, Altınbaş M, Akdemir H. ve C Dutlu (1986). Yazlık triticale ıslah çalışmaları. In: Tübitak-TOAG. Bitki Islahı Sempozyumu Bildirileri, İzmir, 131-140 (In Turkish).
• Demirci U, N Yen, G and Kele Y (2011) Effects of bacterial inoculants on fermentation and aerobic stability of baled triticale hungarian vetch silage and lamb performance., Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., Vol.17 ; pp: 297-302.
• DuğanS(2010).Tritikaleninfarklıtoprakkoşullarına uyum yeteneğinin belirlenmesi ve diğer serin iklim tahılları ile verim ve kalite yönünden karşılaştırılması. Namık Kemal Üni. Fen Bilimleri Enst. Yüksek Lisan Tezi (yayınlanmamış) (In Turkish).
• Furan MA, Demir İ, Yüce S, Akçalı Can, RR ve F Aykut (2005). Ege Bölgesi Tritikale Çeşit Geliştirme Çalışmaları; Geliştirilen Çeşit ve Hatların Verim ve Kalite Özellikleri Üzerinde Araştırmalar. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2):251-256 (In Turkish).
• Goering HK and PJ Van Soest (1983). Forage Fiber Analyses. Agricultural Handbook, No 379, Washington.
• Kınacı G and E Kınacı (2000). Yeni tahıl türü triticalenin buğdaya karıştırılması ile elde edilen paçalların, kalite özellikleri ve ekmek yapımında kullanılma olanakları. Unlu Mamuller Teknolojisi 4: 41-47 (In Turkish).
• Korkut KZ, Gençtan T, Orak A, Başer İ, Sağlam N, Bilgin O, Nizam İ, Balkan A ve MG Çubuk (2007). Verim Yeteneği, Kalite ve Yemlik Potansiyeli Yüksek Trakya Bölgesine Uygun Triticale Genotiplerin Belirlenmesi Üzerinde Araştırmalar TÜBAP-591 (In Turkish). Korkut KZ, Gençtan T, Orak A, Başer İ, Sağlam N, Bilgin O, Nizam İ ve A Balkan (2009). Trakya Bölgesine Uygun Tritikale Genotiplerinin Verim Stabilitesi Yönünden Değerledirilm esi. Türkiye VIII. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 19 -22 Ekim 2009, Hatay. Cilt I, s. 824 -828 (In Turkish).
• McGoverin CM, Snyders F, Muller N, Botes W, Fox G and M Manley (2011). A review of triticale uses and the effect of growth environment on grain quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91: 1155-1165. Oettler G (2005). The fortune of a botanical curiosity- triticale: past, present and future. J. Agric. Sci. 143: 329-346.
• Ozduven ML, Onal ZK and F Koc (2010). The effects of bacterial inoculants and/or enzymes on the fermentation, aerobic stability and in vitro dry and organic matter digestibility characteristics of triticale silages, Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 16 (5): 751-756.
• Stallknecht GF, Gilbertson KM and JE Ranney (1996). Alternative wheat cereals as food grains: einkorn, emmer, spelt, kamut, and triticale. In: Proceedings of the third National Symposium, ASHA Press, Alexandria, 156-170.
• Turan İ (2008). Kahramanmaraş Koşullarında Bazı Buğday, Arpa ve Tritikale Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Verim Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Tarla Bitkileri Anabilim DalıYüksek Lisans Tezi. 42s. (Yayınlanmamış) (In Turkish).
• Villegas D, Casadesus J, Atienza S, Martos V, Maalouf F, Karam F, Aranjuelo I and S Nogues (2010). Tritordeum, wheat and triticale yield components under multi-local Mediterranean drought conditions. Field Crops Res., 116: 68-74.