Investigating Redundant on-Screen Text, Learner Control and Self-Regulation in a Foreign Language Learning Context

Year 2022, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 31 - 52, 30.06.2022

Bedi Cananoglu , Yavuz Akpınar

Abstract

There are not sufficient guidelines for designing a multimedia learning environment for language teaching. This study aimed to examine the effects of the redundant on-screen text, learner control and self-regulatory skills on students’ learning simple past tense in an online tutorial that were variably used. English as foreign language learners (n=132) with beginner level of English studying at the preparatory school of English and Vocational School of Justice participated in this quasi-experimental study. All the groups received narrated slides, but additional instructional components in four treatment conditions were changed: Text with student control, text without student control, student control without text, and without text and student control. Each participant was given a prior knowledge test, an academic self-regulation scale, a retention test and a transfer test. Statistical analysis of data showed that redundant on-screen text is not a hinder in language learning context; and that providing novice learners with a learner-controlled system would result in a deterioration in learning. Rather, it is more useful if the learners are guided through a pre-structured and controlled system, which would alleviate the cognitive burden in the novice learners with low experience and prior knowledge in the course material. Further, results for self-regulation are not congruent with each other: In some conditions students with low self-regulation outperformed students with high self-regulation in retention or transfer tests, and in some others vice versa. The study discussed the findings and presented some implications.

Keywords

Redundancy, Learner Control, Self-Regulation, Foreign Language Learning

References

• Arkavazi, S., & Nostratinia, M. (2018). Self-regulation and locus of control predicting EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(8), 1094-1103.
• Atkinson-Ari. F., Flores, R., Inan, F. A., Cheon, J., Crooks, S. M., Paniukov, D., & Kuruçay, M. (2014). The effects of verbally redundant information on student learning. Computers and Education, 76, 199-204.
• Bailey, K. M., & Savage, L. (1994). New Ways in Teaching Speaking. VA: TESOL.
• Borras, I., & Lafayette, R. C. (1994). Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. Modern Language Journal, 78, 61-75.
• Brown, K. G. (2001). Using computers to deliver training: Which employees learn and why? Personal Psychology, 54, 271-296.
• Cananoglu, B. (2020). Redundant on-screen text, learner control and self-regulation: Effects on learning past tense in English, Unpublished Master Thesis, Boğaziçi Unv. Turkey.
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
• Chen, S. Y., Fan, J. P., & Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation in hypermedia learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 251-266.
• Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., &, Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 428-434.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research. NY: Pearson Education.
• Diao, Y., & Sweller, J. (2007). Redundancy in foreign language reading comprehension instruction. Learning and Instruction, 17, 78-88.
• Garza, T. J. (1991). Evaluating the use of captioned video materials in advanced foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 239-258.
• Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and Practice of Writing. London: Longman.
• Granger, B. P., & Levine, E. L. (2010). The perplexing role of learner control in e-learning. International Journal of Training and Development, 14(3), 180-197.
• Hasler, B. S., Kersten, B., & Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 713-729.
• Jamet, E., & Le Bohec, O. (2007). The effect of redundant text in multimedia instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 588-598.
• Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for Academic Purposes. NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-372.
• Kaplan, E. (2014). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenliği öğrencilerinde öz-düzenleme. Unpublished master-thesis. Akdeniz Unv. Turkey.
• Kelly, A. E. (1993). Designing instructional hypertext for use in lecture note review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2, 149-176.
• Kinzie, M. B. (1990). Requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 5-21.
• Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31(2), 187-194.
• Lange, C., & Costley, J. (2018). The moderating effects of intrinsic load on the relationship between self-regulated effort and germane load. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34, 652-660.
• Last, D. A., O’Donnell, A. M., & Kelly, A. E. (2001). The effects of prior knowledge and goal strength on the use of hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 3-25.
• Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 117-131.
• Leslie, K. C., Low, R., Jin, P., & Sweller, J. (2012). Redundancy and expertise reversal effects when using educational technology to learn primary school science. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 1-13.
• Markham, P. L. (1999). Captioned videotape and second-language listening word recognition. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 321-328.
• Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 403-423.
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 43-71), NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 806-813.
• Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390-397.
• Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187-198.
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 156-163.
• Moss, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 270-298.
• Moussa, I. J., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2012). Improving listening skills in English as a foreign language by reading rather than listening. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 391-402.
• Persky, A. M., & Robinson, J. D. (2017). Moving from novice to expertise and its implications for instruction. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(9), 72-80.
• Ping, A. M., Baranovich, D. L., Manueli, M. K., & Siraj, S. (2015). Promoting self-regulation in vocabulary learning among Chinese EFL learners. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 137-146.
• Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 221-243.
• Pociask, F. D., & Morrison, G. R. (2008). Controlling split attention and redundancy in physical therapy instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 379-399.
• Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 58, 327-345.
• Resnick, L. B. (1972). Open education: Some tasks for technology. Educational Technology, 12(1), 70-76.
• Samur, Y. (2012). Redundancy effect on retention of vocabulary words using multimedia presentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 166-170.
• Schreiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 389-411.
• Schreiter, K. (2014). The learner control principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 487-512), NY: Cambridge University Press.
• She, J., Wang, H., Chen, L., & Chen, S. (2009). Improvement of redundancy principle for multimedia technical foreign-language learning. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 34, 264-269.
• Smith, F. (1994). Writing and the Writer. NJ: LEA.
• Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional Design in Technical Areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. NY: Springer.
• Tabbers, H. K., & de Koeijer, B. (2010). Learner control in animated multimedia instructions. Instructional Science, 38, 441-453.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307-313.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk and B. J. Zimmerman (eds.), Self-Regulated Learning from Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice (pp. 1-19), NY: Guilford Press.