Tekstil Endüstrisi Atıksularının Dinamik ve Mikrofiltrasyon Membranları ile Arıtımında Filtrasyon Performans Kıyaslanması ve Kirletici Karakterizasyonu

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 1, 1 - 11, 28.04.2021

Adem Yurtsever , Erkan Başaran Deniz Uçar

Öz

Membran filtrasyonu, tekstil endüstrisi atıksularının arıtımı için kullanılan en umut verici teknolojilerden biridir. Literatürde kirlenme kontrolü üzerine oldukça fazla sayıda çalışma yapılmasına rağmen, membran kirlenmesi son derece önemli bir sorun olmaya devam etmektedir. Bu çalışma kapsamında, işletilen bir tekstil endüstrisi atıksuyu arıtımı için işletilen anaerobik dinamik membran biyoreaktör (AnDMBR)’de meydana gelen membran kirlenmesinin karakterizasyonu yapılmıştır. Ayrıca eş zamanlı olarak işletilen mikrofiltrasyon (MF) membranı ile kıyaslanması yapılmıştır. Bu amaçla çalışmada, jel permeasyon kromatografisi (GPC), taramalı elektron mikroskopisi (TEM), Fourier Dönüşümlü Kızıl Ötesi Spektrofotometre (FTIR) ve kirlenme hızı (FR) analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kek tabakası oluşumunun ardından dinamik membran ile mikrofiltrasyon membranı benzer filtrasyon verimleri göstermiştir. Karakterizasyon analizleri ise dinamik tabakada 1 kDa’dan 9000 kDa’ya kadar geniş bir aralıkta moleküler büyüklüğe sahip partiküllerin büyük oranda mikrobiyal ürünlerce oluşmuş kek tabakası sayesinde filtrelendiğine işaret etmektedir. Yapılan TEM görüntülemesinde, MF membranında dinamik membrana kıyasla daha pürüzsüz ve gözeneksiz bir yapı gözlenmiştir. Dinamik membrandaki kirlenme hızı da MF membranınkinden daha düşük olarak elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

anaerobik dinamik membran, mikrofiltrasyon membranı, kirletici karakterizasyonu, taramalı elektron mikroskobu, kirlenme hızı

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Proje Numarası

117Y213

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma 117Y213 numaralı proje ile Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TÜBİTAK) tarafından desteklenmiştir.

Kaynakça

• [1] Feng X., Huang R.Y.M. 1997. Liquid separation by membrane pervaporation: a review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 36 (1997), 1048–1066.
• [2] Chidambaram T.,Oren Y., Noel M. 2015. Fouling of nanofiltration membranes by dyes during brine recovery from textile dye bath wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal. 262 (2015), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.062.
• [3] Liu M., Chen Q., Lu K., Huang W., Lü Z., Zhou C., Yu S., Gao C. 2017. High efficient removal of dyes from aqueous solution through nanofiltration using diethanolamine-modified polyamide thin-film composite membrane. Separation and Purification Technology. 173 (2017), 135–143.
• [4] Yurtsever A., Basaran E., Ucar D. 2020. Process optimization and filtration performance of an anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor treating textile wastewaters. Journal of environmental management. 273 (2020), 111114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111114.
• [5] Yurtsever A., Basaran E., Ucar D., Sahinkaya E. 2021. Self-forming dynamic membrane bioreactor for textile industry wastewater treatment. Science of the Total Environment. 751 (2021), 141572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141572.
• [6] Ersahin M.E., Ozgun H., Dereli R.K., Ozturk I., Roest K., van Lier J.B. 2012. A review on dynamic membrane filtration: materials, applications and future perspectives. Bioresource Technology. 122 (2012), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.086.
• [7] Lin H., Liao B., Chen J., Gao W., Wang L., Wang F., Lu X. 2011. New insights into membrane fouling in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor based on characterization of cake sludge and bulk sludge. Bioresource Technology. 102 (2011), 2373–2379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.103.
• [8] Bérubé P.R., Hall E.R., Sutton P.M. 2006. Parameters governing permeate flux in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating low‐strength municipal wastewaters: A literature review. Water environment research. 78 (2006), 887–896.
• [9] Ramesh A., Lee D.J., Lai J.Y. 2007. Membrane biofouling by extracellular polymeric substances or soluble microbial products from membrane bioreactor sludge. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 74 (2007), 699–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0706-x.
• [10] Lyko S., Al-Halbouni D., Wintgens T., Janot A., Hollender J., Dott W., Melin T. 2007. Polymeric compounds in activated sludge supernatant—characterisation and retention mechanisms at a full-scale municipal membrane bioreactor. Water Research. 41 (2007), 3894–3902.
• [11] An Y., Wang Z., Wu Z., Yang D., Zhou Q. 2009. Characterization of membrane foulants in an anaerobic non-woven fabric membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal. 155 (2009), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.003.
• [12] Zhu X., Wang Z., Wu Z. 2011. Characterization of membrane foulants in a full-scale membrane bioreactor for supermarket wastewater treatment. Process Biochemistry. 46 (2011), 1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2011.01.020.
• [13] Meng F., Chae S.R., Drews A., Kraume M., Shin H.S., Yang F. 2009. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): Membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Research. 43 (2009), 1489–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.044.
• [14] Yurtsever A., Çınar Ö., Sahinkaya E. 2016. Treatment of textile wastewater using sequential sulfate-reducing anaerobic and sulfide-oxidizing aerobic membrane bioreactors. Journal of Membrane Science. 511 (2016), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.044.
• [15] Seo D.J., Kim Y.J., Ham S.Y., Lee D.H. 2007. Characterization of dissolved organic matter in leachate discharged from final disposal sites which contained municipal solid waste incineration residues, Journal of Hazardous Materials. 148 (2007), 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.03.027.
• [16] Karis T.E., Marchon B., Hopper D.A., Siemens R.L. 2002. Perfluoropolyether characterization by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and gel permeation chromatography. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry. 118 (2002), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1139(02)00197-5.
• [17] Wang Z., Wu Z. 2009. Distribution and transformation of molecular weight of organic matters in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge process. Chemical Engineering Journal. 150 (2009), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.01.018.
• [18] Lyko S., Wintgens T., Al-Halbouni D., Baumgarten S., Tacke D., Drensla K., Janot A., Dott W., Pinnekamp J., Melin T. 2008. Long-term monitoring of a full-scale municipal membrane bioreactor—Characterisation of foulants and operational performance. Journal of Membrane Science. 317 (2008), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2007.07.008.
• [19] Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A.G. 2006. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science. 284 (2006), 17–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.019.
• [20] Nagaoka H., Nemoto H. 2005. Influence of extracellular polymeric substances on nitrogen removal in an intermittently-aerated membrane bioreactor. Water Science & Technology. 51 (2005), 151–158.
• [21] Drews A. 2010. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors—Characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures. Journal of Membrane Science. 363 (2010), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.046.
• [22] Ji J., Qiu J., Wong F., Li Y. 2008. Enhancement of filterability in MBR achieved by improvement of supernatant and floc characteristics via filter aids addition. Water Research. 42 (2008), 3611–3622. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2008.05.022.
• [23] Kaya Y., Ersan G., Vergili I., Gönder Z.B., Yilmaz G., Dizge N., Aydiner C. 2013. The treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater using in a submerged membrane bioreactor under different sludge retention times. Journal of Membrane Science. 442 (2013), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.059.
• [24] Zinadini S., Vatanpour V., Zinatizadeh A.A., Rahimi M., Rahimi Z., Kian M. 2015. Preparation and characterization of antifouling graphene oxide/polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane: Application in MBR for dairy wastewater treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 7 (2015), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.07.005.
• [25] Shao S., Qu F., Liang H., Chang H., Yu H., Li G. 2014. Characterization of membrane foulants in a pilot-scale powdered activated carbon–membrane bioreactor for drinking water treatment. Process Biochemistry. 49 (2014), 1741–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2014.06.024.
• [26] Zhang W., Jiang F. 2018. Membrane fouling in aerobic granular sludge (AGS)-membrane bioreactor (MBR): effect of AGS size. Water Research. 157(2019), 445-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2018.07.069.
• [27] Villarroel R., Delgado S., González E., Morales M. 2013. Physical cleaning initiation controlled by transmembrane pressure set-point in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Separation and Purification Technology. 104 (2013), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.10.047.
• [28] Jin L., Ong S.L., Ng H.Y. 20 13. Fouling control mechanism by suspended biofilm carriers addition in submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors. Journal of Membrane Science. 427 (2013), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.016.
• [29] Hodgson P.H., Leslie G.L., Fane A.G., Schneider R.P., Fell C.J.D., Marshall K.C. 1993. Cake resistance and solute rejection in bacterial microfiltration: The role of the extracellular matrix. Journal of Membrane Science. 79 (1993), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(93)85016-P.