Simülasyon ile Öğrenme İçin Tasarlanmış Web Tabanlı Yeni Bir Elektrik Ticareti Oyunu

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 1, 21 - 37, 30.04.2022

Ishmael Coffie Abusah , Saltuk Buğra Selçuklu

Öz

In many countries, the electricity industry went through a deregulation process that changed it from a regulated and monopolistic/oligopolistic system to a liberal one. The new system allows independent producers to join the electricity market and sell electricity through bidding. In some markets, consumers can also bid to demand electricity. The characteristics of the liberalized electricity market in addition to its never-ending evolution make it difficult for students and young professionals to comprehend its structure and functioning. This manuscript sets out to achieve two goals. First, we will present a new web-based electricity trading simulation program that simulates the dynamics of the electricity market including investment and trading. Secondly, we compare classical classroom teaching methods against the simulation game teaching method to demonstrate the superiority of the latter in explaining the workings of the complex liberalized electricity market. Questionnaire results show that student’s knowledge increased by approximately 94%. Test results exhibit an average success rate of 80% for the game-related questions. The average success rate for subjects taught by classical methods is approximately 70%. The results show that the simulation game proves to be a better teaching method for complex subjects such as the liberalized electricity market.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Electricity markets, Simulation-based learning, Market-clearing price, Day-ahead markets, Intraday Markets

Kaynakça

• [1] Parker, D., 1999. Regulation of privatised public utilities in the UK: performance and governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 12(1999), 213–235.
• [2] Gencer, B., Larsen, E. R., & van Ackere, A. 2020. Understanding the coevolution of electricity markets and regulation. Energy Policy, 143(2020), 111585.
• [3] Baumol, W. J. 1977. On the proper cost tests for natural monopoly in a multiproduct industry. The American economic review, 67(1977), 809-822.
• [4] Armstrong, M., & Sappington, D. E. 2006. Regulation, competition and liberalization. Journal of economic literature, 44(2006), 325-366.
• [5] Paşaoǧlu, G. 2011. Using the decentralized and liberalized electricity market microworld (LEMM) as an educational tool. Energy Policy, 39(2011), 187–199.
• [6] Ku, A. 1995. Modeling Uncertainty in Electric Capacity Planning. London Business School, Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Thesis, 472s, London
• [7] Delarue, E., Laga, E., Meeus, L., Belmans, R., & D’Haeseleer, W. 2011. Achieving learning potentials in an educational simulation game for trading and generating electrical energy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2011), 703–712.
• [8] Demsetz, H. 1968. Why regulate utilities?. The Journal of Law and Economics, 11(1968), 55-65.
• [9] Winston, C. 1998. US industry adjustment to economic deregulation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1998), 89-110.
• [10] Posner, R. A. 1969. Natural monopoly and its regulation: a reply. 21 Stanford. Law. Review 548 (1968).
• [11] Thatcher, M. 2004. Winners and losers in Europeanisation: Reforming the national regulation of telecommunications. West European Politics, 27(2004), 284-309.
• [12] Watts, D., & Ariztía, R. 2002. The electricity crises of California, Brazil and Chile: lessons to the Chilean market. LESCOPE'02. 2002 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering. Conference Proceedings, 26-28 June, Halifax, 7-12.
• [13] Bye, T., & Hope, E. 2005. Deregulation of electricity markets: the Norwegian experience. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(2005), 5269-5278.
• [14] Green, R., 1998. Electricity deregulation in England and Wales. Deregul. Electr. Util. Springer, 28(1998), 179–202.
• [15] Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. 2005. Electricity market reform in the European Union: review of progress toward liberalization & integration. The Energy Journal, 26(2005), (special issue).
• [16] Dyner, I., & Larsen, E. R. 2001. From planning to strategy in the electricity industry. Energy policy, 29(2001), 1145-1154.
• [17] Joskow, P. L. 2008. Lessons learned from electricity market liberalization. The Energy Journal, 29(Special Issue# 2).
• [18] Hunt, S. 2002. Making competition work in electricity. John Wiley & Sons, 467s
• [19] Adenikinju, A. F. 2005. Analysis of the cost of infrastructure failures in a developing economy: The case of the electricity sector in Nigeria, 44s, Ibadan.
• [20] Energy and manufacturing. Stat Norway, 2017. https://www.ssb.no/en/energi-og-industri. (Erişim Tarihi: 25. 11. 2020).
• [21] Larsen, E. R., Dyner, I., Bedoya, L., & Franco, C. J. 2004. Lessons from deregulation in Colombia: successes, failures and the way ahead. Energy policy, 32(2004), 1767-1780.
• [22] Green, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. 1992. Competition in the British electricity spot market. Journal of political economy, 100(1992), 929-953.
• [23] Dnes, A. W., Kodwani, D. G., Seaton, J. S., & Wood, D. 1998. The regulation of the United Kingdom electricity industry: an event study of price-capping measures. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 13(1998), 207-226.
• [24] Larsen, E. R., & Bunn, D. 1999. Deregulation in electricity: Understanding strategic and regulatory risk. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(1999), 337–344. [25] Kiili, K. 2005. Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. 8(2005), 13–24.
• [26] Prensky, M. 2001. Digital game-based learning. USA7 McGraw-Hill 464s.
• [27] Norman, D. A. 1993. Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Basic Books; Revised ed. Edition, 304s.
• [28] Shahidehpour, M., & Alomoush, M. 2002. Restructured Electric Power Systems: Operation, Trading, and Volatility [Book Review]. IEEE Computer Applications in Power, 15(2002), 60-62.
• [29] Stoft, S. 2002. Power system economics. Journal of Energy Literature, 8(2002), 94-99.
• [30] Jennings, D. 2002. Strategic management: an evaluation of the use of three learning methods. Journal of Management Development, 21(2002), 655-665.
• [31] Senge, P. M. 2006. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday, 445s.
• [32] Hur, J., Kang, D. J., Kook, K. S., Kim, T. H., Lee, J. H., & Moon, Y. H. 2003. The framework design of an electricity market simulator. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 36(2003), 653-657.