Export Diversification and Economic Growth: Evidence From Emerging Economies

Yıl 2020, , 285 - 298, 27.04.2020

Muhammed Benli

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.609237

Cited By: 6

Öz

Although export expansion is considered to be an important component of development strategies, how and what type of exports contributes to economic growth has been still an open question. As a matter of fact, the export promotion also does not necessarily lead to economic growth. Revealing the true effect requires considering not only macroeconomic conditions and market structure of exporting countries but also what products and services these countries export. In this context, this paper not only investigates the long run relationship between economic growth, export diversification and domestic investment using panel cointegration techniques but also examines the causal relationship between these variables employing the causality test of Konyá (2006) in 19 emerging economies for the period 1995 - 2017. Panel cointegration test results do not provide evidence of a long run relationship between the variables while Konyá's (2006) causality test reveals various results for different countries.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Export Diversification, Panel Causality, Panel Cointegration

İhracat Çeşitliliği ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Yükselen Piyasa Ekonomileri Deneyimi

Öz

İhracat hacminin artması kalkınma stratejilerinin önemli bileşenlerinden birisi olmakla birlikte, ihracatın nasıl ve hangi türde ihracatın iktisadi büyümeye katkıda bulunduğu sıkça tartışılan bir konudur. Nitekim ihracat artışı mutlak surette ekonomik büyümeyi sağlamayabilirç İhracatın büyüme üzerindeki gerçek etkisinin ortaya konulması ekonomilerin içinde bulunduğu makroekonomik koşulların ve piyasa yapısının göz önünde bulundurulmasını gerektirdiği gibi, ihracatçı ülkelerin hangi mal ve hizmetleri ihraç ettikleri de bu manada önem arz etmektedir. Bu kapsamda, bu çalışmanın amacı 19 yükselen piyasa ekonomisinde 1995-2017 dönemi için ekonomik büyüme, ihracat çeşitliliği ve yurtiçi yatırımlar arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişkiyi panel eşbütünleşme testleri yardımıyla incelemek ve bahsi geçen değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisini ise Konyá (2006) testini kullanarak ortaya koymaktır. Değişkenler arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin varlığına işaret eden yeterli ampirik bulguya ulaşılamamakla birlikte, nedensellik testinden elde edilen bulgular ülkelere göre karma sonuçlar ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İhracat Çeşitliliği, Panel Nedensellik, Panel Eşbütünleşme

Kaynakça

• Aditya, A. and Roy, S. S. (2007). Export diversification and economic growth: Evidence from cross-country analysis (pp. 1-25). Mimeo.
• Agosin, M. R. (2007). Export diversification and growth in emerging economies. Santiago, Chile, University of Chile.
• Al-Marhubi, F. (2000). Export diversification and growth: an empirical investigation. Applied economics letters, 7(9), 559-562.
• Arip, M. A., Yee, L. S. and Abdul Karim, B. (2010). Export diversification and economic growth in Malaysia.
• Bleaney, M. and Greenaway, D. (2001). The impact of terms of trade and real exchange rate volatility on investment and growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of development Economics, 65(2), 491-500.
• Breusch, T. S. and Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The review of economic studies, 47(1), 239-253.
• Cadot, O., Carrère, C. and Strauss-Kahn, V. (2011). Export diversification: what's behind the hump?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 590-605.
• Dawe, D. (1996). A new look at the effects of export instability on investment and growth. World Development, 24(12), 1905-1914.
• Feenstra, R. and Kee, H. L. (2004). Export variety and country productivity. The World Bank.
• Feenstra, R. and Kee, H. L. (2008). Export variety and country productivity: Estimating the monopolistic competition model with endogenous productivity. Journal of international Economics, 74(2), 500-518.
• Ferreira, G. F. and Harrison, R. W. (2012). From Coffee Beans to Microchips: export diversification and economic growth in Costa Rica. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 44(4), 517-531.
• Funke, M. and Ruhwedel, R. (2001). Export variety and export performance: empirical evidence from East Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 12(4), 493-505.
• Greenaway, D., Morgan, W., and Wright, P. (1999). Exports, export composition and growth. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 8(1), 41-51.
• Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. The review of economic studies, 58(1), 43-61.
• Haddad, M., Lim, J. J., Pancaro, C. and Saborowski, C. (2013). Trade openness reduces growth volatility when countries are well diversified. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 46(2), 765-790.
• Hamed, K., Hadi, D. and Hossein, K. (2014). Export diversification and economic growth in some selected developing countries. African Journal of Business Management, 8(17), 700-704.
• Herzer, D. and Nowak-Lehmann, D. (2006). Export diversification, externalities and growth: Evidence for Chile.
• Hesse, H. (2009). Export diversification and economic growth. Breaking into new markets: emerging lessons for export diversification, 55-80.
• Imbs, J. and Wacziarg, R. (2003). Stages of diversification. American Economic Review, 93(1), 63-86.
• Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23(6), 978-992.
• Krugman, P. R. (1979). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of international Economics, 9(4), 469-479.
• Love, J. (1986). Commodity concentration and export earnings instability: A shift from cross-section to time series analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 24(2), 239-248.
• Michaely, M. (1977). Exports and growth: an empirical investigation. Journal of development economics, 4(1), 49-53.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of applied econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Pesaran, M. H. and Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
• Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A. and Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127.
• Volpe Martincus, C. (2010). Odyssey in international markets: an assessment of the effectiveness of export promotion in Latin America and the Caribbean.
• Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 69(6), 709-748.
• Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233.