Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Tüketici Bakış Açısından Stratejik Marka Kavramları ve Marka Mimarisi Stratejileri Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir Alan Çalışması

Yıl 2021, , 775 - 798, 25.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.798043

Öz

İlgili literatüre göre hem sayı hem de format olarak farklı marka mimarisi stratejileri vardır. Çeşitli özellikli ürünler için fonksiyonel, deneyimsel ve sembolik kavramlarla çeşitli marka mimarisi stratejilerini izlemek mümkündür. Bundan dolayı çalışmanın konusu ürün yelpazesindeki stratejik marka kavramlarına göre izlenen marka mimarisi stratejileridir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ürünün fonksiyonelliğini, deneyimselliğini ve sembolizmini sunan öğelere göre ne tür marka mimarisi stratejilerinin izlendiğinin incelenmesidir. Anket yöntemi ile 247 katılımcıdan veri toplanmıştır. Araştırma hipotezlerini test etmek için tek yönlü ANOVA kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, tüketici açısından bakıldığında, ürün yelpazesi çeşitli sembolik ve deneyimsel stratejik marka kavramlarının bir kombinasyonunu içerdiği durumda, ürün ve hedef gruba özgü marka mimarisi stratejisinin izlendiği görülmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Aaker, D. A. ve Joachimsthaler, E. (2000), Brand leadership. New York: The Free Press.
  • Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. 1. Baskı, İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Åsberg, P. E. ve Uggla, H. (2009). The brand relationship cycle: Incorporating co-branding into brand architecture, ICFAI Journal of Brand Management, 6(2), 45-53.
  • Balmer, J. M. T. (1998). Corporate identity and the advent of corporate marketing, Journal of Marketing Management, 14, 963–996.
  • Bhat, S. ve Reddy, S. K. (1998). Symbolic and functional positioning of brands, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(1), 32-43.
  • Brexendorf, T. O. ve Keller, K. L. (2017). Leveraging the corporate brand: The importance of corporate brand innovativeness and brand architecture, European Journal of Marketing, 51(9/10), 1530-1551.
  • Campbell, R. M. J. (2002). Measuring consumers' evaluations of the functional, symbolic and experiential benefits of brands, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Chailan, C. (2009). Brand architecture and brands portfolio: A clarification, Euromed Journal of Business, 4(2), 173-184.
  • De Chernatony, L. ve Dall'Olmo Riley, F. (1998). Defining a "brand": Beyond the literature with experts' interpretations, Journal of Marketing Management, 14(5), 417-443.
  • Devlin, J. F. ve Mckechnie, S. (2008). Consumer perceptions of brand architecture in financial services, European Journal of Marketing, 42(5/6), 654-666.
  • Dooley, G. ve Bowie, D. (2005). Place brand architecture: Strategic management of the brand portfolio, Place Branding, 1(4), 402–419.
  • Douglas, S. P., Craig, C. S. ve Nijssen, E. J. (2001). Integrating branding strategy across markets: Building international brand architecture, Journal of International Marketing, 9(2), 97-114.
  • Esbjerg, L. ve Bech-Larsen, T. (2009). The brand architecture of grocery retailers: Setting material and symbolic boundaries for consumer choice, Journal of Retailing And Consumer Services, 16(5), 414-423.
  • Fennell, G. (1978). Consumers' perceptions of the product. Use situation, The Journal of Marketing, 38-47.
  • Freire, J. R. (2016). Managing destination brand architecture–the case of cascais municipality, Place Branding And Public Diplomacy, 12(1), 78-90.
  • Gabrielli, V. ve Baghi, I. (2016). Brand architecture shift and corporate brand equity: An exploratory study, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(6), 777-794.
  • Harish, R. (2008a). The concept and origin of brand architecture: A comprehensive literature survey.
  • Harish, R. (2008b). Brand architecture and its application in strategic marketing: The example of L'Oréal, ICFAI Journal of Marketing Management, May 2008, 7 (2), 39-51. 13p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts, 1 Graph.
  • Harish, R. (2010). Brand architecture in tourism branding: The way forward for India, Journal of Indian Business Research, 2(3), 153-165.
  • Harish, R. (2015). Brand architecture designing a framework in the Indian context.
  • Hasanbegović, D. (2011). Corporate reputation and brand architecture: The debate, South East European Journal of Economics And Business, 6(2), 37-43.
  • Hsu, L., Fournier, S. ve Srinivasan, S. (2016). Brand architecture strategy and firm value: How leveraging, separating, and distancing the corporate brand affects risk and returns, Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 44(2), 261-280.
  • Kapferer, J-N (1999). Strategic Brand Management: Creating And Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term, London: Kogan Page.
  • Keller, K. L. (1998). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Keller, K. L. (2014). Designing and implementing brand architecture strategies, Journal of Brand Management, 21(9), 702-715.
  • Laforet, S. Ve John, S. (1999). Managing brand portfolios: Why leaders do what they do, Journal of Advertising Research, 39 (January / February), 51-66.
  • Mccracken, G. D. (1990). Culture And Consumption: New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities, bloomington. Indiana University Press. Muylle, S., Dawar, N. ve Rangarajan, D. (2012). B2B brand architecture, California Management Review, 54 (2), 58-71.
  • Muzellec, L. ve Lambkin, M. C. (2009). Corporate branding and brand architecture: A conceptual framework, Marketing Theory, 9(1), 39-54.
  • Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J. ve Maclnnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management, The Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145.
  • Petromilli, M., Morrison, D. ve Million, M. (2002). Brand architecture: Building brand portfolio value, Strategy & Leadership, 30(5), 22-28.
  • Petromilli, M. ve Berman, S. (2003). Brand architecture as a strategic weapon, Handbook of Business Strategy, 4(1), 348-355.
  • Rahman, K. ve Areni, C. S. (2014). Marketing strategies for services: Is brand architecture a viable way forward?, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22(4), 328-346.
  • Rajagopal, R. ve Sanchez, R. (2004). Conceptual analysis of brand architecture and relationships within product categories, The Journal of Brand Management, 11(3), 233-247.
  • Serota, K. B. ve Bhargava, M. (2010). Brand-usage networks: A demand side approach to brand architecture, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(6), 451-471.
  • Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, (3rd edition). Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum: New Jersey.
  • Strebinger, A. (2004). Strategic brand concept and brand architecture strategyba proposed model, ACR North American Advances.
  • Strebinger, A. (2011). BASE-A Brand-architecture strategy explorer, International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 1(11), 115-124.
  • Strebinger, A. (2014). Rethinking brand architecture: A study on industry, company-and product-level drivers of branding strategy, European Journal of Marketing, 48(9/10), 1782-1804.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, (5th edition). Pearson Education:Boston.
  • Talay, M. B., Townsend, J. D. ve Yeniyurt, S. (2015). Global brand architecture position and market-based performance: The moderating role of culture, Journal of International Marketing, 23(2), 55-72.
  • Uggla, H. (2006). The corporate brand association base: A conceptual model for the creation of inclusive brand architecture, European Journal of Marketing, 40(7/8), 785-802.
  • Uggla, H. ve Filipson, D. (2008). Moving beyond the brand relationship spectrum: A semiotic postmortem, The Icfai University Journal Of Brand Management, 5(4), 26-36.
  • Uncles, M. D., Cocks, M. ve Macrae, C. (1995). Brand architecture: Reconfiguring organisations for effective brand management, Journal of Brand Management, 3 (2), 81-92.
  • Uygun, M. ve Akın, E. (2012). Markaların" işlevsel, sembolik ve deneyimsel" yararlarına ilişkin tüketici değerlendirmelerinin incelenmesi, Anadolu University Journal Of Social Sciences, 12(2), 107-122.
  • Woods, W. A. (1960). Psychological dimensions of consumer decision, Journal of Marketing, 24 (January), 15-19.

A Field Study for The Relationship Between Strategic Brand Concepts and Brand Architecture Strategies from The Point of Consumer's Perspective

Yıl 2021, , 775 - 798, 25.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.798043

Öz

According to the relevant literature, there are different brand architecture strategies both in number and format. It is possible to follow various brand architecture strategies with functional, experiential and symbolic concepts for various featured products. Therefore, the subject of the study is brand architecture strategies followed according to strategic brand concepts in the product range. The aime of this study is to investigate what kind of brand architecture strategies are followed according to items presenting product functionality, experiential and symbolism. Data were collected in 247 participants by questionnaire method. One-way ANOVA was used to test research hypotheses. As a result, from the consumer perspective, when the product range includes a combination of various symbolic and experiential strategic brand concepts, it is seen that the brand architecture strategy specific to the product and target audience is pursued.

Kaynakça

  • Aaker, D. A. ve Joachimsthaler, E. (2000), Brand leadership. New York: The Free Press.
  • Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. 1. Baskı, İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Åsberg, P. E. ve Uggla, H. (2009). The brand relationship cycle: Incorporating co-branding into brand architecture, ICFAI Journal of Brand Management, 6(2), 45-53.
  • Balmer, J. M. T. (1998). Corporate identity and the advent of corporate marketing, Journal of Marketing Management, 14, 963–996.
  • Bhat, S. ve Reddy, S. K. (1998). Symbolic and functional positioning of brands, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(1), 32-43.
  • Brexendorf, T. O. ve Keller, K. L. (2017). Leveraging the corporate brand: The importance of corporate brand innovativeness and brand architecture, European Journal of Marketing, 51(9/10), 1530-1551.
  • Campbell, R. M. J. (2002). Measuring consumers' evaluations of the functional, symbolic and experiential benefits of brands, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Chailan, C. (2009). Brand architecture and brands portfolio: A clarification, Euromed Journal of Business, 4(2), 173-184.
  • De Chernatony, L. ve Dall'Olmo Riley, F. (1998). Defining a "brand": Beyond the literature with experts' interpretations, Journal of Marketing Management, 14(5), 417-443.
  • Devlin, J. F. ve Mckechnie, S. (2008). Consumer perceptions of brand architecture in financial services, European Journal of Marketing, 42(5/6), 654-666.
  • Dooley, G. ve Bowie, D. (2005). Place brand architecture: Strategic management of the brand portfolio, Place Branding, 1(4), 402–419.
  • Douglas, S. P., Craig, C. S. ve Nijssen, E. J. (2001). Integrating branding strategy across markets: Building international brand architecture, Journal of International Marketing, 9(2), 97-114.
  • Esbjerg, L. ve Bech-Larsen, T. (2009). The brand architecture of grocery retailers: Setting material and symbolic boundaries for consumer choice, Journal of Retailing And Consumer Services, 16(5), 414-423.
  • Fennell, G. (1978). Consumers' perceptions of the product. Use situation, The Journal of Marketing, 38-47.
  • Freire, J. R. (2016). Managing destination brand architecture–the case of cascais municipality, Place Branding And Public Diplomacy, 12(1), 78-90.
  • Gabrielli, V. ve Baghi, I. (2016). Brand architecture shift and corporate brand equity: An exploratory study, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(6), 777-794.
  • Harish, R. (2008a). The concept and origin of brand architecture: A comprehensive literature survey.
  • Harish, R. (2008b). Brand architecture and its application in strategic marketing: The example of L'Oréal, ICFAI Journal of Marketing Management, May 2008, 7 (2), 39-51. 13p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts, 1 Graph.
  • Harish, R. (2010). Brand architecture in tourism branding: The way forward for India, Journal of Indian Business Research, 2(3), 153-165.
  • Harish, R. (2015). Brand architecture designing a framework in the Indian context.
  • Hasanbegović, D. (2011). Corporate reputation and brand architecture: The debate, South East European Journal of Economics And Business, 6(2), 37-43.
  • Hsu, L., Fournier, S. ve Srinivasan, S. (2016). Brand architecture strategy and firm value: How leveraging, separating, and distancing the corporate brand affects risk and returns, Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 44(2), 261-280.
  • Kapferer, J-N (1999). Strategic Brand Management: Creating And Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term, London: Kogan Page.
  • Keller, K. L. (1998). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Keller, K. L. (2014). Designing and implementing brand architecture strategies, Journal of Brand Management, 21(9), 702-715.
  • Laforet, S. Ve John, S. (1999). Managing brand portfolios: Why leaders do what they do, Journal of Advertising Research, 39 (January / February), 51-66.
  • Mccracken, G. D. (1990). Culture And Consumption: New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities, bloomington. Indiana University Press. Muylle, S., Dawar, N. ve Rangarajan, D. (2012). B2B brand architecture, California Management Review, 54 (2), 58-71.
  • Muzellec, L. ve Lambkin, M. C. (2009). Corporate branding and brand architecture: A conceptual framework, Marketing Theory, 9(1), 39-54.
  • Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J. ve Maclnnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management, The Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145.
  • Petromilli, M., Morrison, D. ve Million, M. (2002). Brand architecture: Building brand portfolio value, Strategy & Leadership, 30(5), 22-28.
  • Petromilli, M. ve Berman, S. (2003). Brand architecture as a strategic weapon, Handbook of Business Strategy, 4(1), 348-355.
  • Rahman, K. ve Areni, C. S. (2014). Marketing strategies for services: Is brand architecture a viable way forward?, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22(4), 328-346.
  • Rajagopal, R. ve Sanchez, R. (2004). Conceptual analysis of brand architecture and relationships within product categories, The Journal of Brand Management, 11(3), 233-247.
  • Serota, K. B. ve Bhargava, M. (2010). Brand-usage networks: A demand side approach to brand architecture, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(6), 451-471.
  • Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, (3rd edition). Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum: New Jersey.
  • Strebinger, A. (2004). Strategic brand concept and brand architecture strategyba proposed model, ACR North American Advances.
  • Strebinger, A. (2011). BASE-A Brand-architecture strategy explorer, International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 1(11), 115-124.
  • Strebinger, A. (2014). Rethinking brand architecture: A study on industry, company-and product-level drivers of branding strategy, European Journal of Marketing, 48(9/10), 1782-1804.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, (5th edition). Pearson Education:Boston.
  • Talay, M. B., Townsend, J. D. ve Yeniyurt, S. (2015). Global brand architecture position and market-based performance: The moderating role of culture, Journal of International Marketing, 23(2), 55-72.
  • Uggla, H. (2006). The corporate brand association base: A conceptual model for the creation of inclusive brand architecture, European Journal of Marketing, 40(7/8), 785-802.
  • Uggla, H. ve Filipson, D. (2008). Moving beyond the brand relationship spectrum: A semiotic postmortem, The Icfai University Journal Of Brand Management, 5(4), 26-36.
  • Uncles, M. D., Cocks, M. ve Macrae, C. (1995). Brand architecture: Reconfiguring organisations for effective brand management, Journal of Brand Management, 3 (2), 81-92.
  • Uygun, M. ve Akın, E. (2012). Markaların" işlevsel, sembolik ve deneyimsel" yararlarına ilişkin tüketici değerlendirmelerinin incelenmesi, Anadolu University Journal Of Social Sciences, 12(2), 107-122.
  • Woods, W. A. (1960). Psychological dimensions of consumer decision, Journal of Marketing, 24 (January), 15-19.
Toplam 45 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Zübeyir Çelik 0000-0003-1692-9378

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Aralık 2021
Kabul Tarihi 30 Eylül 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021

Kaynak Göster

APA Çelik, Z. (2021). Tüketici Bakış Açısından Stratejik Marka Kavramları ve Marka Mimarisi Stratejileri Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir Alan Çalışması. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(60), 775-798. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.798043

TRDizinlogo_live-e1586763957746.pnggoogle-scholar.jpgopen-access-logo-1024x416.pngdownload.jpgqMV-nsBH.pngDRJI-500x190.jpgsobiad_2_0.pnglogo.pnglogo.png  arastirmax_logo.gif17442EBSCOhost_Flat.png?itok=f5l7Nsj83734-logo-erih-plus.jpgproquest-300x114.jpg

ERÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 2021 | iibfdergi@erciyes.edu.tr

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-Gayri Ticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. 

 88x31.png