Üniversitelerde Dijital Eğitim-Öğretim Faaliyetleri Ve Teknostres: İletişim Akademisyenleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2024, , 105 - 134, 30.01.2024

Büşra Küçükcivil , Esra Gargalık , Murat Koçyiğit

https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1352212

Öz

Üniversitelerde eğitim-öğretim faaliyetlerinin dijitalleşmesi durumunu, teknostres kavramı ve iletişim akademisyenleri üzerinden incelemeyi amaçlayan bu çalışmada, nitel araştırma türlerinden biri olan görüşme tekniği kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırmanın desenini ise nitel araştırma deseni olan fenomenolojik yaklaşım oluşturmaktadır. İlgili teknik ve desen ile katılımcıların teknostrese ilişkin deneyimlerini yansıtmak, bu araştırmanın öncelikli amacıdır. Araştırmanın bulguları değerlendirildiğinde katılımcıların eğitim-öğretim faaliyetlerini gerçekleştirirken farklı dijital araç ve platformlar ile birlikte çeşitli dijital eğitim-öğretim modellerini kullandıkları görülmektedir. İletişim akademisyenlerinin teknostrese ilişkin sorulara verdikleri yanıtlar incelendiğinde, katılımcıların ifadelerinde genel anlamda tekno aşırı yüke maruz kaldıklarını dile getirdikleri görülmektedir. Katılımcı deneyimlerinin ifadelerine yansımasından hareketle, iletişim akademisyenlerinin tekno istilaya maruz kalıp kalmamalarına ilişkin eşit oranda görüş bildirdikleri anlaşılmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, katılımcıların yanıtları incelendiğinde tam tersi cevaplara nazaran, tekno karmaşıklık ve tekno belirsizlik yaşadıkları görülmektedir. Son olarak ise tekno güvensizliğe yönelik katılımcı ifadeleri incelendiğinde, iletişim akademisyenlerinin eğitim-öğretim faaliyetlerindeki dijitalleşme sürecini güvensiz bulmadıkları anlaşılmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, iletişim akademisyenlerinin eğitim-öğretim faaliyetlerindeki dijitalleşme sürecinde teknostres kavramı ile yüzleştikleri ve bu bağlamda konuya ilişkin olumlu ya da olumsuz yönde bir görüş bildirecek tecrübeye eriştikleri yine bu araştırmanın sonuçları arasındadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dijital Teknolojiler, Dijital Eğitim-Öğretim Faaliyetleri, Teknostres, İletişim Akademisyenleri, Nitel Araştırma.

Digital Education Activities And Technostress In Universities: A Research On Communıcation Academics

Öz

The interview technique, which is one of the qualitative research types, was used in this study which aims to examine the digitalization of education activities in universities through the concept of technostress and communication academics. The pattern of this research is the phenomenological approach which is a qualitative research design. The purpose of this research is to reflect the participants' technostress experiences with the relevant technique and design. Coming up to the results of the research, it is realized that the participants use different types of digital education models, digital tools, and platforms while performing their educational activities. When the responses of the communication academics to the questions about technostress are examined, it is seen that the participants stated that they were generally exposed to techno overload. Based on the reflection of the participant’s experiences in their statements, it is understood that communication academics equally expressed opinions on whether they are exposed to techno invasion. Additionally, when the responses of the participants are analyzed, it is seen that they experience techno complexity and techno uncertainty with a slight difference compared to the opposite responses. Finally, when the participant expressions regarding techno insecurity are examined, it is understood that communication academics do not find the digitalization process in education activities insecure, with a slight lead. Regarding all these, it is also among the results of this research that communication academics face the concept of technostress in the digitalization process of education activities and that, in this context, they have the experience to express a positive or negative opinion on this subject.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Technologies, Digital Education Activities, Technostress, Communication Academics, Qualitative Research.

Kaynakça

• Akgün, F. (2019). Öğretim Elemanlarının Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerine Yönelik Kabulleri ve Teknostres Algıları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 40-66. https://doi.org/10.22521/jesr.2019.92.1
• Aksu, H. (2019). Dijitopya: Dijital Dönüşüm Yolculuk Rehberi. Pusula 20 Teknoloji ve Yayıncılık A.Ş.
• Aras Beger, G., & Türker, D. (2018). Değişime Direnç ve Algılanan Stres İlişkisi: Sistematik Literatür Taraması ve Nicel Bir Araştırma. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 241-272.
• Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963
• Aziz, A. (2020). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Teknikleri. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Azizoğlu, Ö., & Kaya, M. (2023). Tekno-Stres. İçinde E. Aydın (Ed.), Güncel Örgütsel Davranış Yaklaşımları (ss. 63-86). Efe Akademi Yayınları.
• Bondanini, G., Giorgi, G., Ariza-Montes, A., Vega-Munoz, A., & Andreucci-Annunziata, P. (2020). Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218013
• Bonfield, C. A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M., & Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847
• Boyer-Davis, S. (2020). Technostress in Higher Education: An Examination of Faculty Perceptions Before and During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Business and Accounting, 13(1), 42-58.
• Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. Addison-Wesley.
• Burke, M. S. (2009). The Incidence of Technological Stress among Baccalaureate Nurse Educators using Technology during Course Preparation and Delivery. Nurse Education Today, 29(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.06.008
• Carlotto, M. S., Welter Wendt, G., & Jones, A. P. (2017). Technostress, Career Commitment, Satisfaction with Life, and Work-Family Interaction among Workers in Information and Communication Technologies. Actualidades En Psicología, 31(122), 91-102.
• Chiappetta, M. (2017). The Technostress: Definition, Symptoms and Risk Prevention. Senses and Sciences, 4(1), 358-361.
• Christian, M., Purwanto, E., & Wibowo, S. (2020). Technostress Creators on Teaching Performance of Private Universities in Jakarta During Covid-19 Pandemic. Technology Reports of Kansai University, 62(6), 2799-2809.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
• Çetin, D., & Bülbül, T. (2017). Okul Yöneticilerinin Teknostres Algıları ile Bireysel Yenilikçilik Özellikleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 1241-1264. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2017.17.31178-338821
• Daymon, C., & Holloway, I. (2010). Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications. Taylor & Francis.
• Diwan, P. (2017). Is Education 4.0 an imperative for success of 4th Industrial Revolution? Medium. https://pdiwan.medium.com/is-education-4-0-an-imperative-for-success-of-4th-industrial-revolution-50c31451e8a4
• Erasmus, E. (2003). Psychological Character of Computerrelated Technostress. 1-11.
• Espino-Diaz, L., Fernandez-Caminero, G., Hernandez-Lloret, C.-M., Gonzalez-Gonzalez, H., & Alvarez-Castillo, J. L. (2020). Analyzing the Impact of COVID-19 on Education Professionals. Toward a Paradigm Shift: ICT and Neuroeducation as a Binomial of Action. Sustainability, 12(14), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145646
• Estrada-Munoz, C., Vega-Munoz, A., Castillo, D., Müller-Perez, S., & Boada-Grau, J. (2021). Technostress of Chilean Teachers in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Teleworking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5458), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105458
• Giorgi, A. (2009). The Descriptive Phenomenological Method in Psychology: A Modified Husserlian Approach. PA: Duquesne University Press.
• Govender, R., & Mpungose, C. (2022). Lecturers’ technostress at a South African university in the context of coronavirus (COVID-19). Cogent Education, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2125205
• Ismail, N. A., Abu Seman, N. A., & Mohd Adi, M. N. (2022). The Impact of Technostress on Malaysia Educator’s Performance in the Age of Covid-19. Research in Management of Technology and Business, 3(1), 988-1002. https://doi.org/10.30880/rmtb.2022.03.01.068
• Jasper, M. A. (1994). Issues in Phenomenology for Researchers of Nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(2), 309-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01085.x
• Khitskov, E. A., Veretekhina, S. V., Medvedeva, A. V., Mnatsakanyan, O. L., Shmakova, E. G., & Kotenev, A. (2017). Digital Transformation of Society: Problems Entering in the Digital Economy. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(5), 855-873. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejac.2017.00216a
• Koçyiğit, M., & Küçükcivil, B. (2021a). Covid-19 Pandemi Sürecinde Halkla İlişkiler Eğitiminde Dijitalleşme. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 326-349. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.988597
• Koçyiğit, M., & Küçükcivil, B. (2021b). The Effect of Digitalization Process on Public Relations Education: A Research on Academics. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 37, 310-328. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.858168
• La Torre, G., Esposito, A., Sciarra, I., & Chiappetta, M. (2019). Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: A systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 92(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1352-1
• Laptevа, A. V., & Efimov, V. S. (2016). New Generation of Universities. University 4.0. Journal of Siberian Federal University, 11, 2681-2696. DOI: 10.17516/1997-1370-2016-9-11-2681-2696
• Ly, R., & Ly, B. (2022). Technostress and Telecommuting in the Context of Covid-19: Evidence from Cambodia’s Higher Education Institutes. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 5(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.33215/sjom.v5i1.790
• McCracken, G. (1988). The Long Interview. Sage Publications.
• McCusker, C., & Babington, D. (2015). The 2018 Digital University: Staying Relevant in the Digital Age. PricewaterhouseCoopers, 1-16.
• Merdan, E., & Karadal, H. (2022). Teknostres ve İş Geriliminin Hizmet İnovasyon Davranışına Etkisi: Esnek Çalışma Düzenlemelerinin Aracılık Rolü. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(2), 540-557. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1096614
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage Publications.
• Narasalagi, V. M., Shintri, S., & Saraih, U. N. (2021). Technostress and Its Impact on Job Satisfaction: Evidences During COVID-19 Pandemic Among Faculty Members in Higher Education in Karnataka. Journal of Management Research and Analysis, 8(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jmra.2021.039
• Nastjuk, I., Trang, S., Grummeck-Braamt, J.-V., Adam, M. T. P., & Tarafdar, M. (2023). Integrating and Synthesising Technostress Research: A Meta-Analysis on Technostress Creators, Outcomes, and IS Usage Contexts. European Journal of Information Systems, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2154712
• Nisafani, A. S., Kiely, G., & Mahony, C. (2020). Workers’ Technostress: A Review of Its Causes, Strains, Inhibitors, and Impacts. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(1), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1796286
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
• Penado Abilleira, M., Rodicio-García, M.-L. Ríos-de Deus, M. P., & Mosquera-González, M. J. (2021). Technostress in Spanish University Teachers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617650
• Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Education 4.0: New Challenge of Learning. St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 92-97.
• Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
• Ronzhina, N., Kondyurina, I., Voronina, A., Igishev, K., & Loginova, N. (2021). Digitalization of Modern Education: Problems and Solutions. International Journal of Emerging Technology in Learning, 16(4), 122-135.
• Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Cifre, E. (2013). The Dark Side of Technologies: Technostress Among Users of Information and Communication Technologies. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 422-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.680460
• Sever, H., & Harbigil Sever, T. (2017). Ergonomi ve Teknostresin Sivil Havacılık Sektöründeki Etkisi. Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), 7(1), 39-46.
• Takmaz Demirel, F. (2023). Araştırmalarda Kullanılan Yöntem ve Teknikler: Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi İçerik Analizi. Veche, 2(1), 30-43.
• Tarafdar, M., Bolman, E., Pullins, & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2014). Technostress: Negative Effect on Performance and Possible Mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042
• Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
• Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. S. (2011). Crossing to the Dark Side: Examining Creators, Outcomes, and Inhibitors of Technostress. Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1995376.1995403
• Toffler, A. (1996). Üçüncü Dalga (A. Seden, Çev.). Altın Kitaplar Yayınevi.
• Ünlü, M. (2020). Eğitim ve Öğretimde Dijital Dönüşüm. İçinde H. T. Uysal, C. Aksoy, & F. Yılmaz, (Ed.), Dijital Yönetim (ss. 585-613). Nobel Yayınları.
• Wallner, T., & Wagner, G. (2016). Academic Education 4.0. International Conference on Education and New Developments 2016, 155-159.
• Wang, K., Shu, Q., & Tu, Q. (2008). Technostress Under Different Organizational Environments: An Empirical Investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 3002-3013.
• Yıldırım, S., Yıldırım, G., Çelik, E., & Kara, A. (2014). Dijital Rozetlere Yönelik Öğrenci Görüşlerinin Belirlenmesi. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(4), 208-216.
• Yiğit, A. G., Topçu, T., & Bayar, H. T. (2022). Teknostresin Dijital Tükenmişliğe Etkisinde Bilişsel Ön Yargıların Rolü. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(3), 1857-1883. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1034253