Feminist Voice of Digital Mothers: The Role of Web Sites and Blog Contents in Opening Motherhood Construction to Discussion

Yıl 2021, , 421 - 440, 29.01.2021

Derya Gül Ünlü

https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.811867

Cited By: 1

Öz

Women’s increasing participation in digital communication media due to their needs
related to motherhood roles was accompanied by the production of content on the
pre-determined requirements of motherhood role, thereby carrying the construction
of motherhood to digital media. As women start to produce content about maternity
practices on digital media, such digital media each turned into a presentation of
motherhood model where suggestions related to appropriate motherhood role are
provided, and new domains that bring forward suggestions about motherhood practices
emerged. Based on this focus, the study aims to evaluate what role the digital content
produced on maternity role requirements can play in the process of opening maternity
construction for discussion. In line with this goal, the literature study examines the
potential of websites and blog contents for digital mothers in promoting women’s
feminist voices.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Communication, Digital Motherhood, Web Site, Blog, Feminist Activism.

Dijital Annelerin Feminist Sesi: Annelik İnşasının Tartışmaya Açılmasında Web Siteleri ve Blog İçeriklerinin Rolü

Öz

Kadınların annelik rollerine dair ihtiyaçları doğrultusunda dijital iletişim ortamlarında
yer almaya başlamaları, toplumsal yapı tarafından içeriği belirlenmiş annelik rolü
gerekliliklerinin yerine nasıl getirileceğine ilişkin içerik üretimini beraberinde getirmiş,
böylelikle annelik inşası dijital ortama taşınmıştır. Kadınların dijital iletişim ortamlarında
annelik pratikleri hakkında içerik üretip, tüketmeye başlamaları, bu dijital tartışma
ortamlarını uygun annelik rolüne ilişkin önerilerin yer aldığı birer annelik modeli
sunumuna dönüştürmüş ve kadınların benimseyebileceği örnek annelik uygulamaları
hakkında tavsiyeler sunan yeni alanlar ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu odak noktasından yola çıkan
çalışmada, annelik rol gerekliliklerine dair üretilen dijital içeriğin annelik inşasının
tartışmaya açılması sürecinde nasıl bir rol oynayabileceğinin değerlendirilmesi
hedeflenmektedir. Bu hedefe uygun olarak, gerçekleştirilen literatür çalışması içerisinde,
dijital annelere yönelik web siteleri ve blog içeriklerinin kadınların feminist sesinin
duyurulmasında nasıl bir potansiyele sahip olabileceği ele alınmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

annelik, dijital annelik, web sitesi, blog, dijital aktivizm, feminist aktivizm

Kaynakça

• Aktan, E. ve Kayış, H. (2018). Sosyal medya ve değişim:Bloglar aracılığıyla anneliğin evrimi üzerine netnografik bir analiz. AJIT-e: Online Academic Journal of Information Technology, 9(32), 39-54.
• Aldous, J., Mulligan, G.M. & Bjarnason, T. (1998). Fathering over time: What makes the difference. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(4): 809-820.
• Ammari, T. ve Schoenebeck, S. (2015). Understanding supporting fathers and fatherhood on social media sites. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (s. 1905-1914). New York: ACM Conference.
• Bradly, E. ve Guerin, S. (2010). Not the romantic, all happy, coocy coo experience: A qualitative analysis of ınteractions on an Irish parenting web site. Family Relations, 59(1), 14-27.
• Budig, M., Misra, J. ve Boeckmann, I. (2012). The motherhood penalty inb cross-national perspective: The ımportance of work-family policies and cultural attitudes. Social Politics, 19(2), 163-193.
• Chen, G. (2013). Don’t call me that: A techno-feminist critique of the term mommy blogger. Mass Communication and Society, 16(4), 510-532.
• Christopher, K. (2012). Extensive mothering Employed mothers’ constructions of the good mother. Gender & Society, 26(1), 73-96.
• Crossley, A. (2015). Facebook feminism: Social media, blogs, and new technologies of contemporary U.S. feminism mobilization. An International Quarterly, 20(2), 253- 268.
• Daly, K. (1993). Reshaping fatherhood: Finding the models. Journal of Family Issues, 14(4), 510-530.
• Demo,D.H. & Acock, A.C. (1993). Family diversity and the division of domestic labor: How much have things really changed?. Family Relations, 42(3): 323-331.
• Fotopoulou, A. (2016). Digital and networked by default?: Women’s organizations and the social ımaginary of networked feminism. New Media & Society, 18(6), 989-1005.
• Friedman, M. (2013). Mommy blogs and the changing face of motherhood. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Gezer-Tuğrul, Y. (2018). Dindar kadınların annelik algısı: Reçel blog ve Müslüman anneler bloğunun karşılaştırmalı analizi. Fe Dergi, 10(2), 71-84.
• Gibson, L. ve Hanson, V. (2013). Digital motherhood: How does technology help new mothers? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (s. 313-322). New York: ACM Press.
• Gül-Ünlü, D. (2019). Web sitelerinde ebeveynlere sunulan içerik toplumsal cinsiyet rollerinden bağımsız olabilir mi?: ‘Bebek.com’ web sitesi örneği. Fe Dergi, 11(2), 24-37.
• Gürçayır-Teke, S. (2018). Dönüşen anneliğe yönelik netnografik bir Analiz: Blogger anneler. Milli Folklor, 26(103), 32-47.
• Husbands, L. (2008). Blogging the maternal: Self-representations of the pregnant and postpartum body. Culture & Social Justice, 32(2), 68-79.
• Johnson, S. (2015). Intimate mothering publics: Comparing face-to-face support groups and internet use for women seeking information and advice in transition to firsttime motherhood. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(2), 237-251.
• Kaya, Ş. (2018). Kadın ve sosyal medya. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(2), 563-576.
• Keller, J. (2012). Virtual feminisms: Girl’s blogging communities, feminist activism and participatory politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(3), 429-447.
• Koeber, A. (2001). Postmodernism, resistance, and cyberspace: Making rhetorical spaces for feminist mothers on the web. Women’s Studies in Communication, 24(2), 218- 240.
• Lopez, L. (2009). The racial act of mommy blogging: Redefining motherhood through the blogosphere. New Media & Society, 11(5), 729-747.
• Lupton, D. (2016). The use and value of digital media for information about pregnancy and Early Motherhood: A Focus Group Study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1), 171-181.
• Lupton, D. ve Pedersen, S. (2016). An Australian survey of women’s use of pregnancy and parenting apps. Woımen and Birth, 29(4), 368-375.
• Lupton, D., Pedersen, S. ve Thomas, G. (2016). Parenitng and digital media: From the early web to contemporary digital society. Sociology Compass, 10(8), 730-743.
• Madge, C. ve O’Connor, H. (2005). Mothers in the making? exploring liminality in cyber/ space. Trnasactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1), 83-97.
• Madge, C. ve O’Connor, H. (2006). Parenting gone wired: Empowerment of new mothers on the ınternet? Social & Cultural Geography, 7(2), 199-220.
• Martland, N. ve Rothbaum, F. (2006). Thinking critically about the internet: Suggestions for Practitoners. Child Welfare, 85(5), 837-852.
• Miller, T. (2010). Annelik duygusu: Mitler ve deneyimler. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Morris, M. (2014). Social networking site use by mothers of young children. Proceeidings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (s. 1272-1282). New York: ACM Press.
• Nardi, A., Schiano, D., Gumbrecht, M. ve Swartz, L. (2004). Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 41-46.
• Nelson, M. (2010). Parenting our of control: Anxious parents in uncertain times. New York: New York University Press.
• Orton-Johnson, K. (2017). Mummy blogs and representation of motherhood: “Bad mummies” and their readers. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1-17.
• Pedersen, S. (2014). Is it friday yet?: Mothers talking about sex online. Cyberpsychology, 8(2), 2-4.
• Pedersen, S. ve Lupton, D. (2016). What are you feeling right now?: Communities of maternal feeling on mumsnet. Emotion, Space, and Society, 26, 1-7.
• Pedersen, S. ve Smithson, J. (2013). Mothers with attitude- how the mumsnet parenting forum offers space for new forms of feminity to emerge online. Women’s Studies International Forum, 38, 97-106.
• Philips, N. ve Broderick, A. (2014). Has mumsnet changed me? SNS influence on identity adaptation and consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(9-10), 1039- 1057.
• Powell, R. (2010). Good mothers, bad mothers and mummy bloggers: Rhetorical Resistance and Fluid Subjectivities. MP: An Online Feminist Journal, 2(5), 37-50.
• Radey, M. ve Randolph, K. (2009). Parenting sources: How do parents differ in their efforts to learn about parenting. Femily Relations, 58, 536-548.
• Rashley, L. (2005). Work it out with your wife: Gendered expectations and parenting rhetoric online. NWSA Journal, 17(1), 58-92.
• Ratliff, C. (2009). Policing miscarriage: Infertility blogging, rhetorical enclaves, and the case of house bill 1677. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37(1), 125-145.
• Schoenebeck, S. (2013). The secret life of online moms: Anonymity and disinhibition on youbemom. 7th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (s. 88- 92). Boston: AAAI Conference.
• Schuster, J. (2013). Invisible feminists? social media and young women’s political participation. Political Science, 65(1), 8-24.
• Sever, M. (2014). Kadınlık, annelik, gönüllü çocuksuzluk: Elisabeth Badinter’den kadınlık mı annelik mi?; Tina Miller’dan annelik duygusu; Mitler ve deneyimler ve Corinne Maier’den no kid üzerinden bir karşılaştırmalı okuma çalışması. Fe Dergi, 7(2), 72- 86.
• Shetton, B.A. & John, D. (1993). Does marital status make a difference: Housework among married and cohabiting men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 14(3): 401-420.
• Wall, K., Aboim, S. ve Marinho, S. (2007). Fatherhood, family and work in men’s lives: Negotiating new and old masculinities. Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques, 38(2), 105-122.
• Yeung, W.J., Sandberg, J.F., Davis-Kean, P.E. & Hoffreth, S.L. (2011). Children’s time with fathers in ınact families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1): 136-154.
• Zimmerman, T.S., Haddock, S.A., Ziemba, S. & Rust, A. (2001). Family organizational labor: Who’s calling the plays?. Journal of Feminist Family Theraphy, 13(2-3): 65-90.