Sanal Dünya ve Web Temelli Öğrenme Ortamlarının Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarıları ve Motivasyonları Açısından Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 371 - 402, 12.01.2016

Serkan Yıldırım , Sami Şahin

https://doi.org/10.17556/jef.98976

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bilgisayar ve internet teknolojisi çok çeşitli ortamlarda uzaktan eğitim faaliyetlerinin yürütülmesine imkan tanımaktadır. Son zamanlarda alternatif uzaktan eğitim ortamları arasına sanal dünyalar katılmıştır. Bu araştırmanın amacı birinci olgunluk düzeyine göre tasarlanmış sanal dünya temelli e-öğrenme ortamı ile web temelli e-öğrenme ortamının öğrenenlerin akademik başarıları, öğrenme stilleri ve motivasyon düzeyleri açısından karşılaştırılmaktır. Araştırmada son test karşılaştırmalı yarı deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Çalışmaya 2011- 2012 eğitim–öğretim yılında Atatürk Üniversitesi, Hemşirelik Lisans Tamamlama Programına kayıtlı 116 öğrenci katılmıştır. Eşzamanlı ve ayrı zamanlı öğrenme aktiviteleri ile yürütülen 8 haftalık uygulamanın sonunda öğrencilere başarı testi uygulanmıştır. Motivasyon anketi, öğrenme stilleri envanteri ve görüşme formu ile veri toplanmıştır. Bulgular öğrencilerin web temelli ve sanal dünya temelli ortalamalarda başarı ve motivasyon açısından farklılaşmadığını ve öğrenme stillerine göre başarılarının farklılaşmadığını ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sanal Dünyalar, Web Temelli Öğrenme Ortamları, E-Öğrenme, Uzaktan Eğitim, Öğrenme Stili, 3D Olgunluk Modeli, Second Life

Kaynakça

• Adams, N.B. (2007). Toward a model for knowledge development in virtual environments: strategies for student ownership. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences 2(2): 71-77.
• Akkoyunlu, B., ve Yılmaz Soylu, M. (2008). A study of student’s perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (1), 183-193.
• Antonacci, D. M., Modaress, N., Lameureux, E. L., Thomas, D., and Allen, T. (2011). Using the interaction-combinations integration model to explore real-life learning user-created virtual worlds. In Vincenti, G. and Braman, J. Ed. Multi User Virtual Environments for Classroom: Pratical Approaches to Teaching in Virtual Worlds. Hersey: Information Science Referance.
• Boulos, M. N. K., Hetheringtont, L., and Wheeler, S. (2007). Second Life: An overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24, 233–245.
• Bruder, I. (1989). Distance learning: What’s holding back this boundless delivery system?. Electronic Learning, 8(6), 30-35.
• Clarke, J., Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., and Nelson, B. (2006). A design-based research strategy to promote scalability for educational innovations. Educational Technology, 46(3), 27−36.
• Damer, B. (2008). A brief history of virtual worlds as a medium for user-created events. Virtual Worlds Research: Past, Present & Future 1(1): 1-17.
• Dede, C., Clarke, J., Ketelhut, D., Nelson, B., and Bowman, C. (2005-a). Fostering motivation, learning, and transfer in multi-user virtual environments. http://muve.gse.harvard.edu/rivercityproject/documents/Dede_Games_Symposium_AERA_2005.pdf [13 Ağustos 2012]
• Dede, C., Clarke, J., Ketelhut, D., Nelson, B., and Bowman, C. (2005-b). Students’ motivation and learning of science in a multi-user virtual environment http://muve.gse.harvard.edu/rivercityproject/documents/motivation_muves_aera_2005.pdf [12 Ağustos 2012]
• Delwiche, A. (2006). Massively multiplayer online games (MMOs) in the new media classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 160-172.
• Dieterle, E., and Clarke, J. (2009). Multi-user virtual environments for teaching and learning, encyclopedia of multimedia technology and networking. (2nd Ed.). New York: Information Science Reference, Hershey.
• Fitzer, K. (2007). Student interactions in face-to-face vs SL role-play activities, Final SL Project Paper Mind, Media and Learning
• Gamage, V., Tretiakov, A., and Crump, B. (2011). Teacher perceptions of learning affordances of multi-user virtual environments. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2406-2413.
• Gamor, K. I. (2011). Signs and guideposts: Expanding the course paradigm with vietual worlds. In Vincenti, G. and Braman, J. Ed. Multi User Virtual Environments for Classroom: Pratical Approaches to Teaching in Virtual Worlds. Hersey: Information Science Referance.
• Gencel, İ. E. (2007). Kolb’un deneyimsel öğrenme kuramına dayalı öğrenme stilleri envanteri-III’ü Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(2), 120-139.
• Hauptman, H., and Cohen, A. (2011). The synergetic effect of learning styles on the interaction between virtual environments and the enhancement of spatial thinking. Computers & Education 57(2011), 2106-2117.
• Ho, C. M. L., Nelson, M. A., and Müller-Wittig. (2011). Design and implementation of a student-generated virtual museum in a language curriculum to enhance collaborative multimodal meaning-making, Computer & Education 57(2011), 1083-1097.
• Holmberg, K., and Huvila, I. (2008). Learning together apart: Distance education in a virtual world. http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2178/2033[18/10/2011]
• Honey, M., Connor, K., Veltman, M., Bodily, D., and Dinner, S. (2012). Teaching with Second Life!: Hemorrhage management as an example of a process for developing simulations for multiuser virtual environments. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 8(3), 79-85.
• Hsu, L. (2012). Web 3d simulation-based application in tourism education: A case study with second life. Journal of Hospitality Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 11(2012), 113-124.
• Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., and Liaw, S. S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a contructivist approach, Camputer & Education, 55(2010), 1171-1182.
• İşman, A. (2008). Uzaktan Eğitim. (3. basım). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Kapp, M. K. ve O’Driscoll, T. (2010). Learning in 3D: Adding a new dimension to enterprise learning and colloboration. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
• Karataş S. (2005). Deneyim eşitliğine dayalı internet temelli ve yüzyüze öğrenme sistemlerinin öğrenci başarısı ve doyumu açısından karşılaştırılması. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara
• Karataş, S. (2008). Temel kavramlar ve kuramsal temeller, H. İbrahim Yalın (Ed.), İnternet Temelli Eğitim. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175-185.
• Kennedy-Clark, S. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on using scenario-based virtual worlds in science education. Computers & Education, 57(2011), 2224-2235.
• Keskitalo, T., Pyykkö, E., and Ruokamo, H. (2011). Exploring the meaningful learning of students in SL. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 16–26.
• Kıncal, R. Y. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kim, K. Y. (2005). Adult learners’ motivation in self-directed e-learning. http://www.google.com.tr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=adult%20learners%E2%80%99%20motivation%20in%20self-directed%20e-learning&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CCsQFjAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fscholarworks.iu.edu%2Fdspace%2Fbitstream%2Fhandle%2F2022%2F7107%2Fumi-indiana-1145.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1&ei=Uw5FUOXbH8rktQa5tIGIAg&usg=AFQjCNEhK7DXAwofO9D4EUYTOweU0ESeMg [03 Eylül 2012]
• Lee, J., Hong, N. L., Ling, N. L. (2002). An analysis of students’ preparation for the virtual learning environment. Internet and Higher Education 4(2002), 231-242.
• Lee, E. A., Wong, K. A., and Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computer & Education 55(2010), 1424-1442.
• Mayrath, M., Sanchez, J., Traphagan, T., Heikes, J., and Trivedi, A. (2007). Using SL in an English Course: Designing class activities to address learning objectives. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
• Metcalf, S. J., Kamarainen, A., Grotzer, T.A., and Dede, C. J. (2011). Ecosystem science learning via multi-user virtual environments. American Educational Research Association (AERA) Conference, New Orleans, LA.
• Mungania, P. (2003). The seven e-learning barriers facing employess. http://aerckenya.org/docs/ElearningReport.pdf [ 15 Eylül 2012]
• Nelson, B. C., and Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). Scientific inquiry in educational multi-user virtual environments. Educ Psychol Rev, 19, 265-283.
• Schmidt, M., Laffey, J. M., Schmidt, C. T., Wang, X., and Stichter, J. (2012). Developing metods for understanding social behavior in a 3d virtual learning environment. Computer in Human Behavior, 28(2012), 405-413.
• Shih, C., and Gamon, J., (2001)., Web-based learning: Relationships among student motivation, attitude, learning styles, and achievement. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 12-20.
• Speece, M. (2012). Learning style, culture and delivery mode in online distance education. Us-China Education Review, 1(2012), 1-12.
• Sutcliffe, A., and Alrayes, A. (2012). Investigating user experience in second life for collaborative learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(2012), 508-525.
• Tasa, B. U. (2009). İçeriği kullanıcılar tarafından oluşturulan 3 boyutlu sanal dünyalarda sanat ve mimari tasarım: Second Life® üzerine bir vaka çalışması, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Trahan, M. P., Adams, N. B., and Dupre, S. (2011). Virtual learning environmets: Second Life MUVEs to leverage student ownership. In Vincenti, G. and Braman, J. Ed. Multi User Virtual Environments for Classroom: Pratical Approaches to Teaching in Virtual Worlds. Hersey: Information Science Referance.
• Traphagan, T. W., Chiang, Y. V., Chang, H. M., Wattanawaha, B., Lee, H., Mayrath, M. C., Woo, J., Yoon, H., Jee, M. J., and Resta, P. E. (2010). Cognitive, social and teaching presence in a virtual world and a text chat. Computer & Education, 55(2010), 923-936.
• Verhagen, T., Feldberg, F., Hoff, B., Meents, S., and Merikivi, J. (2012). Understanding users’ motivations to engage in virtual worlds: A multipurpose model and emprical testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 484-495.
• Wrzesien, M., and Raya, M. A. (2010). Learning in serious virtual worlds: Evaluation of learning effectiveness and appeal to students in the e-junior project, Computers & Education 55(2010), 178-187.
• Yiğit, N., Alev, N., Altun, T., Özmen, H., ve Akyıldız S. (2005). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme. Trabzon: Derya Kitabevi.