The Relationship between University Students' Perceived Control Level and Social Self-Efficacy Perceptions with Psychological Symptoms

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3, 477 - 487, 29.09.2023

Mehmet Palancı

https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.1311359

Öz

The aim of this study is to determine the explanatory relationship between problem symptoms, perceived control, and social self-efficacy, as well as to reveal the level of this relationship. In line with this general purpose, data were collected from a total of 654 foundation and state university students, 347 of whom were female and 307 were male. The Perceived Control Scale (PCS), Social Self-Efficacy Scale (SSES), and Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) were used to collect data. Additionally, for the longitudinal study, the new data were compared with the PCS and SSES preliminary data of 300 university students collected in 1999 and 2002. Data analyzes were provided with SPSS/Windows 22.0 and AMOS package program. In data analysis, t-test was used for longitudinal comparisons of measurements taken from two different sources. Scale validity and reliability analyzes were performed using SPSS EFA and AMOS CFA analyzes. The results revealed that a positive moderate correlation was determined between the perception of control and social self-efficacy. Furthermore, a significant negative correlation was observed between psychological symptoms subtests and perception of control and social self-efficacy. Moreover, the results show that the effect of control perception on psychological symptoms is direct, while it is indirect through social self-efficacy. Finally, the findings showed that the perceived control of university students significantly changed during the longitudinal period, but the change in their social self-efficacy levels was not statistically significant.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Perception of control, psychological symptoms, social self-efficacy, longitudinal analysis

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Algılanan Kontrol Düzeyi ve Sosyal Öz Yeterlik Algılarının Psikolojik Semptomlarla İlişkisi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın genel amacı, problem belirtileri ile kontrol algısı ve sosyal öz yeterlik arasındaki açıklayıcı ilişki ve bu ilişkinin düzeyinin ortaya koyulmasıdır. Bu genel amaç doğrultusunda 347’si kadın, 307’si erkek toplam 654 vakıf ve devlet üniversitesi öğrencisinden Kontrol Algısı Ölçeği (KAÖ), Sosyal Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği (SÖZYE-Ö) ve Ruhsal Belirti Tarama Listesi (SCL-90) ile veri toplanmıştır. Ayrıca karşılaştırma çalışması için 1999 ve 2002 yıllarında toplanmış bulunan 300 üniversite öğrencisine ait KAÖ ve SÖZYE ön verileri ile toplanan yeni veriler karşılaştırma yapmak için kullanılmıştır. Veri analizleri SPSS/Windows 22.0 ve AMOS paket programı ile sağlanmıştır. Veri analizinde iki farklı kaynaktan alınan ölçümleri karşılaştırmak için t testi kullanılmıştır. Ölçek geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri için SPSS AFA ve AMOS DFA analizleri kullanılarak (kullanılmıştır şeklinde cümle bitirilirse cümle yapısı daha uygun olur) Analizler sonucunda kontrol algısı (KA) ile sosyal öz yeterlik (SÖZYE) arasında pozitif orta düzey korelasyon belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca psikolojik belirtiler (PB) ile KA ve SÖZYE arasında anlamlı negatif korelasyon izlenmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra sonuçlar, KA’nın PB üzerindeki etkisinin doğrudan ve SÖZYE aracılığı ile dolaylı olduğunu göstermektedir. Son olarak aradan geçen sürede üniversite öğrencilerinin kontrol algılarının anlamlı düzeyde değiştiği ancak sosyal öz yeterlik düzeylerinin değişiminin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde olmadığı görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kontrol algısı, psikolojik belirtiler, sosyal öz yetkinlik, boylamsal analiz

Kaynakça

• Agyapong, B., Obuobi-Donkor, G., Burback, L., & Wei, Y. (2022). Stress, burnout, anxiety and depression among teachers: a scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710706
• Alam, A. (2022). Positive psychology goes to school: conceptualizing students’ happiness in 21st century schools while ‘minding the mind!’are we there yet? evidence-backed, school-based positive psychology interventions. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 111-119.
• Albanese, A. M., Russo, G. R., & Geller, P. A. (2019). The role of parental self‐efficacy in parent and child well‐being: A systematic review of associated outcomes. Child: Care, Health and Development, 45(3), 333-363. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.11199ecst
• Almohandes, H., & Mohamed, M. (2023). Promoting Social Interaction Through Jeddah’s Neighborhood Parks Design. In Cities of the Future: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 107-121). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15460-7_8
• Bahadori, Khosroshahi, J., & Hashemi Nosrat Abad T, T. (2012). The relationship between social anxiety, optimism and self-efficacy with psychological well-being in students. Studies in Medical Sciences, 23(2), 115-122.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and actions: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
• Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy. In A. C. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology. NY: Oxford University Press. Vol. 7, pp. 212-213.https://doi.org/10.1037/10522-094
• Bandura, A., & Watts, R. E. (1996). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 10 (4). https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.10.4.313
• Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 13 (2). https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
• Bedford, O., & Yeh, K. H. (2019). The history and the future of the psychology of filial piety: Chinese norms to contextualized personality construct. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 87-100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00100
• Bilgin, M., & Akkapulu, E. (2007). Some variables predicting social self-efficacy expectation. Social Behavior and Personality, 35(6), 777-788. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.6.777
• Bowers, K. S. (1968). Pain, anxiety, and perceived control. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32(5, Pt.1), 596–602. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026280
• Calandri, E., Graziano, F., & Rollé, L. (2021). Social media, depressive symptoms and well-being in early adolescence. The moderating role of emotional self-efficacy and gender. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 660-674. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660740
• Cap, D., & Dag, I. (2019). The importance of family for psychological symptomatology in non-clinical population: expressed emotion and perceived control from mother. Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 32(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.14744/DAJPNS.2019.00034
• Caprara, G. V., & Steca, P. (2005). Affective and social self-regulatory efficacy beliefs as determinants of positive thinking and happiness. European Psychologist, 10, 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10.4.275 https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10.4.275
• Chen, Y., & Gao, Q. (2023). Effects of social media self-efficacy on informational use, loneliness, and self-esteem of older adults. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(5), 1121-1133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2062855
• Cheng, C., Cheung, S. F., Chio, J. H. M., & Chan, M. P. S. (2013). Cultural meaning of perceived control: a meta-analysis of locus of control and psychological symptoms across 18 cultural regions. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028596
• Cicognani, E. (2011). Coping strategies with minor stressors in adolescence: Relationships with social support, self‐efficacy, and psychological well‐being. Journal of Applied social psychology, 41(3), 559-578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00726.x
• Claggett, J.L., & Goodhue, D.L. (2011). Have is researchers lost Bandura's self-efficacy concept? A discussion of the definition and measurement of computer self-efficacy. The 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.219
• Dağ, I. (1991). Belirti Tarama Listesi (Scl-90-R)'nin Üniversite Öğrencileri için güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 2(1), 5-12.
• de Castro, E. K., Ponciano, C., Meneghetti, B., & Kreling, M. (2012). Quality of life, self-efficacy and psychological well-being in Brazilian adults with cancer: A longitudinal study. Psychology, 3(04), 304. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.34043
• DeLongis., Folkman, S. & Lazarus, S. R. (1998). The impacat of daily stress on health and mood: psychological and social resources as mediators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 486-495. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.486
• Derogatis, L.R., R.S. Lipman & L. Covi. (1973). SCL-90-R: An out Patient Psychistric Rating Scale and Preliminary Report, Psychopharm Bullet.
• DeWitz, S. J., & Walsh, W. B. (2002). Self-efficacy and college student satisfaction. Journal of career Assessment, 10(3), 315-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/10672702010003003
• Fatima, S., Sharif, S., & Khalid, I. (2018). How does religiosity enhance psychological well-being? Roles of self-efficacy and perceived social support. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(2), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000168
• Fishman, E. J., & Husman, J. (2017). Extending attribution theory: Considering students’ perceived control of the attribution process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(4), 545-559. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000158
• Flamant, N., Haerens, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Laporte, N., Mabbe, E., & Soenens, B. (2023). A Daily Examination of the Moderating Role of Adolescents’ Coping in Associations between Psychologically Controlling Parenting and Adolescents’ Maladjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(2), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01685-3
• Fletcher, G.J.O., Simpson, J.A., Campbell, L. & Overall, N.C. (2015) Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1745691614561683
• Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R., Gruen, J. R. & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Jounral of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 571-579. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.50.3.571
• Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R., Pimley, S., & Novacek, J. (1987). Age differences in stress and coping processes, Psychology and Aging, 2(2), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.2.2.171
• Gallagher, M. W., Bentley, K. H., & Barlow, D. H. (2014). Perceived control and vulnerability to anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 571-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9624-x
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/ public/process2012.pdf
• Hermann, K. S., & Betz, N. E. (2006). Path models of the relationships of instrumentality and expressiveness, social self-efficacy, and self-esteem to depressive symptoms in college students. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 1086-1106. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.10.1086
• Huang, N., Zhang, S., Mu, Y., Yu, Y., Riem, M. M., & Guo, J. (2023). Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Increase or Decrease the Global Cyberbullying Behaviors? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trauma, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838023117118
• Jackson, B. R., & Bergeman, C. S. (2011). How does religiosity enhance well-being? The role of perceived control. Psychology of Religion And Spirituality, 3(2), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021597
• Johnson, B. T. (2016). The relationship between cognitive flexibility, coping and symptomatology in psychotherapy, (Order No. 10100044). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1784011416). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/relationship-between-cognitive-flexibility-coping/docview/1784011416/se-2
• Karasar, N. (1998). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kılıç, M. (1991). Belirti Tarama Listesi (SCL-90-R)'nin geçerlilik ve güvenirliği. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 1 (2) , 45-52 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tpdrd/issue/21422/229664
• Klein, C. T., & Helweg-Larsen, M. (2002). Perceived control and the optimistic bias: A meta-analytic review. Psychology and Health, 17(4), 437-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044022000004920
• Koğar, H. (2019). Belirti Tarama Listesi’nin (SCL-90) Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması: Mokken Ölçekleme Analizleri. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 9 (54) , 689-705 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tpdrd/issue/48897/623281
• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company.
• Liu, J. H. (2021). Introduction to Confucian psychology: Background, content, and an agenda for the future. Psychology and Developing Societies, 33(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333621990447
• Locke, E. A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Personnel psychology, 50(3), 801. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/self-efficacy-exercise-control/docview/220140280/se-2
• Manne, S., & Glassman, M. (2000). Perceived control, coping efficacy, and avoidance coping as mediators between spousal unsupportive behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychology, 19(2), 148-155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.2.155
• Matsushima, R. ve Shiomi, K. (2003). Social self-efficacy and interpersonal stress in adolescence. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31, 323-332 https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.4.323
• Neto, F., Mullet, E., Deschamps, J.-C., Barros, J., Benvindo, R., Camino, L., et al. (2000) Cross-cultural variations in attitudes toward love. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(5), 626–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0022022100031005005
• Oh, H. J., Kim, J., Chang, J. J., Park, N., & Lee, S. (2023). Social benefits of living in the metaverse: The relationships among social presence, supportive interaction, social self-efficacy, and feelings of loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107498
• Palancı, M. (2000). Algılanan kontrol düzeyine bağlı olarak farklılaşan stresle başaçıkma davranışları. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Trabzon.
• Palancı, M. (2004). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal kaygı problemlerini açıklama ve gidermeye yönelik gerçeklik terapisi oryantasyonlu bir yardım modelinin geliştirilmesi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Trabzon.
• Salami, S. O. (2010). Emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, psychological well-being and students attitudes: Implications for quality education. European Journal of Educational Studies, 2(3), 247-257. https://doi.org/10.18767/EJES.71026
• Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Postmes, T., & Garcia, A. (2014). The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 906-921. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035754
• Siddiqui, S. (2015). Impact of self-efficacy on psychological well-being among undergraduate students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2(3), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.25215/0203.040
• Sieber, S., Germann, N., Barbir, A., & Ehlert, U. (2006). Emotional well-being and predictors of birth-anxiety, self-efficacy, and psychosocial adaptation in healthy pregnant women. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 85(10), 1200-1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340600839742
• Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(3), 549. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549
• Skinner, E. A., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2011). Perceived control and the development of coping. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 35–59). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0003
• Smith, H. M., & Betz, N. E. (2000). Development and validation of a scale of perceived social self-efficacy. Journal of career assessment, 8(3), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907270000800306
• Smith, G. C., Kohn, S. J., Savage-Stevens, S. E., Finch, J. J., Ingate, R., & Lim, Y. O. (2000). The effects of interpersonal and personal agency on perceived control and psychological well-being in adulthood. The Gerontologist, 40(4), 458-468. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/40.4.458
• Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39(11), 1005-1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678603901104
• Sun, Y., Wu, Y., Fan, S., Dal Santo, T., Li, L., Jiang, X., ... & Thombs, B. D. (2023). Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts. BMJ, 2, 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-074224
• Swendsen D. J. (1998). The helplessness theory and daily mood experience: an idiographic and cross-situational perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psyhology, 74(5), 398-1408. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1398
• Taylor, S. E. , & Stanton , A. L. ( 2007 ). Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 377 – 401. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091520
• Telef, B., & Karaca, R. (2011). Ergenlerin öz-yeterliklerinin ve psikolojik semptomlarının incelenmesi/Adolescents' self-efficacy and psychological symptoms' investigation. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(16), 499-518. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mkusbed/issue/19554/208361
• Terry, J. D. & Hynes, J. G. (1998). Adjustment to a low-control situation: reexamining the role of coping responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psyhology, 74(4), 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.1078
• Tomaka, J. & Bloscovich, J. (1994). Effects of justice bliefs on cognitive appraisal of an subjective, physiolicigal, and behavioral responses to potential stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psyhology, 67(4), 732-740. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.732
• Trafimow, D., Sheeran, P., Conner, M., & Finlay, K. A. (2002). Evidence that perceived behavioural control is a multidimensional construct: Perceived control and perceived difficulty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602165081
• Turgut, M. F., ve Baykul, Y. (2015). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme (Yedinci Baskı). Pegem A yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Utkan, R. (2019). Romantik ilişkide psikolojik şiddet, algılanan sosyal destek ve öz yeterlik ilişkisinin incelenmesi [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi] Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi.
• Valentiner, P. D., Holahan, J. C. & Moos, H. R. (1994). Social support, appraisals of event controllability, and coping: an ıntergrative model, Journal of Personality and Social Psyhology, 66(6), 1094-1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1094
• Wallston, K. A., Wallston, B. S., Smith, S., & Dobbins, C. J. (1987). Perceived control and health. Current Psychology, 6, 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686633
• Wang, C. C. D., & Castañeda‐Sound, C. (2008). The role of generational status, self‐esteem, academic self‐efficacy, and perceived social support in college students' psychological well‐being. Journal of College Counseling, 11(2), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2008.tb00028.x
• Yeo, K. J., & Yap, C. K. (2023). Helping undergraduate students cope with stress: The role of psychosocial resources as resilience factors. The Social Science Journal, 60(1), 120-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1728501