Investigation of Weeds Problematic in Agricultural Areas of Adana Province and Chemical Control Status

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1, 229 - 247, 28.03.2025

Ramazan Gürbüz , Ayşe Usanmaz Bozhüyük , Harun Alptekin , Ramazan Taşkın

https://doi.org/10.18185/erzifbed.1586325

Öz

Araştırma 2021 yılında Adana il ve ilçelerinde tarım alanlarında ve kültür bitkilerinde sorun olan yabancı ot türlerini, tarım ve tarım dışı alanlarda kimyasal mücadele durumunu ve herbisitlere dayanıklı yabancı ot durumunu belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Adana Tarım ve Orman Müdürlüğüne bağlı ruhsatlı 100 Bitki Koruma Ürünleri bayileri ile yüz yüze anketler yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, bayilerin %61’i tarım alanlarında yoğun bir yabancı ot probleminin olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Sorun teşkil eden bu yabancı otların başında sırasıyla; %80 A. sterilis, %79 E. crus-galli ve %76 S. halepense yabancı ot türlerinin geldiğini bildirmişlerdir. Kültür bitkilerinde en büyük yabancı ot sorununun buğday (%78), mısır (%76) ve yer fıstığı (%61) ekim alanlarında olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Buna ek olarak tarım alanlarında en fazla Glyphosate Potasyum Tuzu (%72), clethodium (%65) ve pendimethalin (%62) aktif maddeli herbisitlerin kullanıldığını ifade etmişlerdir. Bayilerin %62’si bölgede ciddi bir dayanıklılık problemin olduğunu ve herbisit kullanılmasına rağmen bazı yabancı ot türlerinin kontrol altına alınmasının mümkün olmadığını belirtmişlerdir. Bu yabancı otların başında da sırasıyla; A. sterilis (%58), C. arvensis (%37) ve A. rigidum (%32) türlerinin geldiğini bildirmişlerdir. Bayilerin %66’sı total yabancı ot kontrolünün yapıldığını ve en fazla glyphosate isopropylamin tuzu ve Diquat Dibromide aktif maddeli herbisitlerin kullanıldığını belirtmişlerdir. Bu souçlara göre; Adana ilinde yabancı otların tarım ve tarım dışı alanlarda büyük sorun teşkil ettiği ve herbisitlerin yoğun ve sık kullanılmasından dolayı yabancı otlarda gelişen herbisit dayanıklılığının gün geçtikçe daha fazla sorun teşkil ettiği görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Adana, survey, resistance, herbicide, weed management

Etik Beyan

var

Destekleyen Kurum

Iğdır Üniversitesi

Teşekkür

Iğdır Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etik Kurulu

Kaynakça

• [1] Tuik (2021). Turkish Statistical Institute (http//www.tuik.gov.tr) Access date (17.03.2021).
• [2] Sen, B., (2009). Determination of possible effects of climate change on 1st and 2nd crop maize yield in Cukurova region using regional climate models. PhD Thesis, Cukurova University, Institute of Science, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Adana.
• [3] Thobatsi, T. J., (2009). Growth and yield responses of maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) in an intercropping system. University of Pretoria (South Africa).
• [4] Gokalp, O., & Uremis, İ., (2015). Determination of weed species, prevalence and density in Mardin wheat planting areas. Mustafa Kemal University Faculty Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(1): 13-22.
• [5] Karabacak, S., & Uygur, F. N. (2017). Problematic weed species and densities in sunflower cultivation areas of Cukurova Region. Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 20(2): 46-54.
• [6] Uludag, A., Uremis, İ., Rusen, M., Tursun, N. (2017). Possible uses of allelopathy in weed control in organic farming in Türkiye. Acta Herbologica, 26 (2): 87-93.
• [7] Vats, S., (2015). Herbicides: history, classification and genetic manipulation of plants for herbicide resistance. In Sustainable agriculture reviews, 153-192.
• [8] Fao (2021). Food and Agriculture Organization. www.fao.org. (Access date: 18.05.2021.)
• [9] Cullen, M. G., Thompson, L. J., Carolan, J. C., Stout, J. C., & Stanley, D. A. (2019). Fungicides, herbicides and bees: A systematic review of existing research and methods. PloS one, 14(12), e0225743.
• [10] Silva, V., Mol, H. G., Zomer, P., Tienstra, M., Ritsema, C. J., & Geissen, V. (2019). Pesticide residues in European agricultural soils–A hidden reality unfolded. Science of the Total Environment, 653: 1532-1545.
• [11] Jabłońska-Trypuć, A., Wydro, U., Wołejko, E., & Butarewicz, A. (2019). Toxicological effects of traumatic acid and selected herbicides on human breast cancer cells: In vitro cytotoxicity assessment of analyzed compounds. Molecules, 24(9): 1710.
• [12] Guncan, A., (1977). Side Effects of Herbicides on the Living World. Ataturk University Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 8:2-3.
• [13] Henderson, A. M., Gervais, J. A., Luukinen, B., Buhl, K., Stone, D., Strid, A., ... & Jenkins, J. (2010). Glyphosate Technical Fact Sheet; National Pesticide Information Center, Oregon State University Extension Services. Retrieved October, 20, 2013.
• [14] Greenland, R. G. (2003). Injury to vegetable crops from herbicides applied in previous years. Weed technology, 17(1): 73-78.
• [15] Charles, G., (2013). Herbicide Damage Symptoms Guide. Cotton Reaserch and Development Corporations. Section J2, October 2013. A [16] Derr, J., (2016). Plant Injury From Herbicide Residue. Virginia Cooperative Extension. Virginia Tech, 2016.
• [17] Hancerli, L., & Uygur, F. N. (2017). Weed species in corn plantations in Cukurova region. Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 20(2): 55-60.
• [18] Ozkil, M., Torun, H., Eymirli, S., Uremis, İ., & Tursun, N. (2019). Determination of the prevalence and density of weeds in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivation areas of Adana province. Mustafa Kemal University Faculty Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 24(2): 87-96.
• [19] Tunk, S., & Uygur, F. N. (2020). Investigation of whether the weed species included in the labels of herbicides recommended for wheat cultivation areas in Cukurova Region are main pests, harmful or beneficial. Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 23(1):24-33.
• [20] Oksar, M., & Uygur, F.N., (2000). Weeds in Cukurova and their biological control possibilities, Cukurova University, Institute of Science, Department of Plant Protection, Master Thesis, Adana, 86 p.
• [21] Orel, E., & Uygur, F.N., (1996). Determination of weed Species that maybe indicators of some ecological factors in wheat and corn plantations in Cukurova region. Cukurova University, Institute of Science, Department of Plant Protection, Master Thesis, Adana, 133p.
• [22] Gönen, O., & Uygur, F.N., (1999). Germination biology of summer weed species in Cukurova region and determination of their morphological characters for computer-aided diagnosis. Cukurova University, Institute of Science, PhD Thesis, Adana, 233 p.
• [23] Gungor, M., & Uygur, F.N., (2005). Investigation of the ımportance of chemical control applied against weeds in maize plantations in Adana province and the emerging problems. Cukurova University, Institute of Science, Master Thesis, Adana, 171 p.
• [24] Sahin, S., Gurbuz, R., & Coruh, I. (2020). Determination of weed species seen in cotton production areas of Igdir province and investigation of the effects of some herbicides on weed control and cotton yield. Journal of Agriculture, 3(2): 40-48.
• [25] Tursun, N., & Seyithanoglu, M. (2006). Determination of important weed species causing problems in important crop plants in Kahramanmaraş province and the most commonly used herbicides in combating them. Kahramanmaras Sütcü Imam University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 9(2): 116-120.
• [26] Tursun, N., Tursun, A. Ö., & Kacan, K. (2004). Determination of problematic weeds in cotton fields in Kahramanmaraş province and its districts. Kahramanmaras Sütcü Imam University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 7(1): 92-96.
• [27] Arıoglu, H. H., (2014). Peanut Cultivation and Breeding, Oil Crops Textbook, 1999, Çanakkale University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, GY No: 220, Y. No: A-70, P, 74.
• [28] Ulug, E., Kadıoglu, I., & Uremis, I. (1993). Weeds of Turkey and some of their characteristics. TKB Adana Agricultural Control Research Institute, Pub., 78:513, Adana.
• [29] Kadıoglu, I., Ulug, E., & Uremis, I., (1993). Research on weeds in cotton fields in the Mediterranean region. 1st Turkish Herbology Congress (3-5 February 1993, Adana) 151-156.
• [30] Uygur, S., (1997). Investigation of weed species in Cukurova region, disease agents hosted by these species, their distribution and the possibilities of using disease agents in biological control. PhD Thesis, Cukurova University, 148 p, Adana.
• [31] Arslan, M., & Uremis, I., (2003). Yield loss caused by sorghum (Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.) problem in peanut cultivation and determination of the most effective control method. 5th Turkish Field Crops Congress (13-17 October 2003, Diyarbakır) Volume I, 579-583.
• [32] Arslan, M., Uremis, I., & Uludag, A. (2006). The critical period of weed control in double-cropped soybean. Phytoparasitica, 34: 159-166.
• [33] Günes, E., Uludag, A., & Uremis, I. (2008). Economic impact of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense [L.] Pers.) in cotton production in Turkey. Journal of Plant Diseases and Proctection, Supplement, 21: 515-520.
• [34] Erturk, Y.E., Uremis, I., & Uludag, A., (2012). The economic impact of weeds and their control in Turkey. International Symposium: Current Trends in Plant Protection (25-28 September 2012, Belgrade, Serbia) Proceedings: 79-85.
• [35] Uludag, A., Uremis, I., Tursun, N., & Bukun, B., (2012). A review on critical period for weed control in Turkey. The 6th International Weed Science Congress (17-22 June 2012, Hangzhou, China), 37.
• [36] Özkil, M., & Uremis, I., (2020). Prevalence and density of evening primrose (Ipomoea spp.) and Field Ivy (Convolvulus spp.) species found in agricultural areas of the mediterranean region. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 57(2): 229-238.
• [37] Yasar, S., (2012). Determination of important weed species, their densities and frequencies in onion growing areas of Tekirdağ province. Namık Kemal University, Institute of Science, Master's Thesis, 38p.
• [38] Kaya, H., & Uremis, I., (2019). Determination of the prevalence and density of weeds in onion fields of Hatay province. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 24(1): 21-30.
• [39] Ozaslan, C., Onen, H., & Ozer, Z. (2002). Determination of problematic weeds in spring and autumn spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) cultivation in Tokat-Kazova. Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 5(1): 52-61.
• [40] Arıkan, L., Kitis, Y. E., Uludag, A., & Zengin, H. (2015). Determination of the prevalence and density of weeds in citrus orchards in Antalya province. Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 18(2): 12-22.
• [41] Gul, P., & Gurbuz, R. (2023). The effects of different biodegradable mulches on weed population and fruit yield in watermelon production field. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 55(2): 1–7.
• [42] Yetkin, C., Arslan, Z.F., & Bilgili, A., (2013). Determination of the usage status and problems of plant protection products in Şanlıurfa Province. 1st Plant Protection Products and Machinery Congress (2-5 April 2013, Antalya). Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, General Directorate of Food and Control Publications, Ankara, 1: 295-307.
• [43] Kaplan, E., (2014). Determination of problems related to plant protection applications in Gap region. Dicle University, Institute of Science, Master's Thesis, Department of Plant Protection, Diyarbakır, 53p.
• [44] Heap, I., (2021). The International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database. Online.