THE APPROACH OF CANADIAN PRIME MINISTER JEAN CHRÉTIEN TO THE OCCUPATION OF IRAQ

Yıl 2020, , 55 - 71, 01.07.2020

Melih Dinçer

https://doi.org/10.18354/esam.657829

Öz

The invasion of Iraq in 2003 was an important milestone in international relations. Bush administration wanted to topple Saddam regime. He put forward that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. According to him, Saddam regime was very dangerous for peace and security of the world. Some countries didn’t support this opinion while others were endorsing this point of view. At the time of the invasion, Canada and its government were hesitating about claims of Bush administration. Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chrétien didn’t send military forces to invading Iraq on 20 March 2003. Which factors caused Prime Minister Jean Chrétien to take the decision not to go to the war? This is our research question. Although Canada and the US had strong relations, Canadian foreign policy didn’t support the invasion of Iraq under Chrétien government at the time of the occupation. This article argued that there were three reasons of this decision. The first reason is that according to Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, weapons of mass destruction of Iraq should be analyzed thoroughly. The United Nations inspection teams should do more research. There was no strong evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. The second reason is that Prime Minister Jean Chrétien didn’t want to make action without endorsement of the UN Security Council. He stressed that Canada would not join the war unless the Security Council adopts a new resolution authorizing military intervention. The third reason is to show political independence of Canada in constructing its own foreign policy. Prime Minister Jean Chrétien criticized that some people perceived Canada as the 51st state of the US. He stated that this non-interventionist decision consolidated political independence of Canada in foreign policy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Jean Chrétien, Invasion of Iraq, Canada, the United States of America

Kaynakça

• Barry, D. (2005). ''Chrétien, Bush, and the War in Iraq'', American Review of Canadian Studies, Vol.35, No.2, 215-245.
• BBC, Iraq war illegal, says Annan, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3661134.stm [Access: 29 November 2019].
• CBC, Canadian activists stage anti-war rallies, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canadian-activists-stage-anti-war-rallies-1.356085 [Access: 8 December 2019].
• Clarkson, S. and Lachappelle, E. (2005). ''Jean Chrétien's legacy in managing Canadian‐American relations'', Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, Vol.12, No.2, 65-82.
• CNN, Transcript of President Bush's address, https://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/20/gen.bush.transcript/ [Access: 17 November 2019].
• CNN, Pentagon assessment of Desert Fox: 'Job extremely well done', http://edition.cnn.com/US/9812/19/iraq.us.forces.02/ [Access: 5 November 2019].
• CNN, Canada's Chretien criticizes 'regime change' in Iraq, http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/americas/02/28/sprj.irq.canada.us.reut/ [Access: 28 November 2019].
• CNN, Transcript of Blix's U.N. presentation, http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/07/sprj.irq.un.transcript.blix/ [Access: 29 November 2019].
• CTV News, Saying 'no' to Iraq War was 'important' decision for Canada: Chretien, https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/saying-no-to-iraq-war-was-important-decision-for-canada-chretien-1.1192878 [Access: 25 November 2019].
• Dorion-Soulié, M. and Roussel, S. (2014). ''« Oui » à l'Irak? Le baptême du feu de Stephen Harper et l’émergence du néocontinentalisme (2002–2003)'', Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, Vol.20, No.1, 9–18.
• Enemark, C. and Michaelsen, C. (2005). ''Just War Doctrine and the Invasion of Iraq'', Australian Journal of Politics & History, Vol.51, No.4, 545-563.
• Fawn, R. (2008). ''No Consensus with the Commonwealth, No Consensus with Itself? Canada and the Iraq War'', the Round Table, Vol.97, No.397, 519 – 533.
• Gallup, Unwilling Coalition? Majorities in Britain, Canada Oppose Military Action in Iraq, https://news.gallup.com/poll/7798/unwilling-coalition-majorities-britain-canada-oppose-military-act.aspx [Access: 29 November 2019].
• Ismael, T.Y. and Ismael, J.S. (2005). ''Whither Iraq? Beyond Saddam, sanctions and occupation'', Third World Quarterly, Vol.26, No.4-5, 609 – 629.
• Lachapelle, G. (2003). ''Pourquoi le gouvernement canadien a-t-il refusé de participer à la guerre en Irak ?'', Revue française de science politique, Vol.53, 911-927.
• Le Devoir, La plus grosse manifestation de l'histoire du Québec, https://www.ledevoir.com/societe/20668/la-plus-grosse-manifestation-de-l-histoire-du-quebec [Access: 25 November 2019].
• Le Devoir, Irak: les 10 ans du non canadien - Jean Chrétien ne regrette rien, https://www.ledevoir.com/politique/canada/373123/jean-chretien-ne-regrette-rien# [Access: 3 December 2019].
• O'Connor, B. and Vucetic, S. (2010). ''Another Mars–Venus divide? Why Australia said ‘yes’ and Canada said ‘non’ to involvement in the 2003 Iraq War'', Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol.64, No.5, 526-548.
• Patrick, S. (2003). ''Beyond Coalitions of the Willing: Assessing U.S. Multilateralism'', Ethics & International Affairs, Vol.17, No.1, 37-54.
• Reuters, IAEA chief: should have 'howled' louder on Iraq, https://www.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-41663720090810 [Access: 29 November 2019].
• The Government of Canada, The Canadian Armed Forces Legacy in Afghanistan, https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/operations/military-operations/recently-completed/canadian-armed-forces-legacy-afghanistan.html [Access: 24 November 2019].
• The House of Commons of Canada, House Publications 17 March 2003, https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/37-2/house/sitting-71/hansard [Access: 29 November 2019].
• The House of Commons of Canada, House Publications 21 March 2003, https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/37-2/house/sitting-75/hansard#SOB-467216 [Access: 29 November 2019].
• The United Nations Security Council Resolution, Number of Resolution: 660, Date of Resolution: 2 August 1990.
• The United Nations Security Council Resolution, Number of Resolution: 661, Date of Resolution: 6 August 1990.
• The United Nations Security Council Resolution, Number of Resolution: 678, Date of Resolution: 29 November 1990.
• The United Nations Security Council Resolution, Number of Resolution: 687, Date of Resolution: 3 April 1991.
• The United Nations Security Council Resolution, Number of Resolution: 707, Date of Resolution: 15 August 1991.
• The United Nations Security Council Resolution, Number of Resolution: 1060, Date of Resolution: 12 June 1996.
• The United Nations Security Council Resolution, Number of Resolution: 1368, Date of Resolution: 12 September 2001.
• The United Nations Security Council Resolution, Number of Resolution: 1441, Date of Resolution: 8 November 2002.
• The United Nations, UNSCOM Chronology, https://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm [Access: 27 November 2019].
• The U.S. Department of State Archive, U.S. - Canada Smart Border/30 Point Action Plan Update, https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/wha/rls/fs/18128.htm [Access: 24 November 2019].
• The Washington Post, Text of President Bush's 2002 State of the Union Address, https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/onpolitics/transcripts/sou012902.htm? [Access: 27 November 2019].
• Vucetic, S. (2006). ''Why did Canada sit out of the Iraq war? One constructivist analysis'', Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, Vol.13, No.1, 133-153.