URBAN TRANSFORMATION PROGRESS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE (RC) AND MASONRY-MIXED BUILDINGS IN ISTANBUL

Year 2021, Volume: 22 Issue: 3, 326 - 343, 29.09.2021

Çigdem Avcı-karataş , Hakan Çatalkaya

https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.998114

Abstract

Istanbul city is the center of increasing industrialization in Turkey with proportionally developing problems, such as distorted settlements, and slums, etc. The rapid migration to Istanbul, which is located in the earthquake hazard risk zone, has resulted in a raised population and these structures. Urban regeneration/transformation/planning is expressed as a comprehensive action plan that aims to provide a lasting solution to be economic, physical, social, and environmental conditions of a diverting region to solve the problems in the cities. This paper analyzes the urban transformation process and applications of reinforced concrete (RC) and masonry or mixed masonry-RC buildings in Istanbul within the scope of the urban planning law called “Law on Transformation of Areas at Risk of Natural Disaster” (Law No. 6306 dated 2012). To reach this goal, a total of 400 risky building forms with 150 RC buildings as well as 250 masonry-mixed buildings considered according to Law No. 6306 is compiled and evaluated as risky building data. The general characteristics of the RC and masonry-mixed buildings in Istanbul are determined by a date range of such as 2012–2020. With the results obtained from the paper, significant contributions have been made to the knowledge and technological capabilities at the international/national level.

Keywords

Earthquake, Masonry, Reinforced concrete (RC) structures, Risky buildings, Urban regeneration

URBAN TRANSFORMATION PROGRESS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE (RC) AND MASONRY-MIXED BUILDINGS IN ISTANBUL

Abstract

References

• [1] Japan International Co-operation Agency (JICA) and Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IMM) (JICA-IMM). The Study on a Disaster Prevention / Mitigation Basic Plan in Istanbul including Seismic Microzonation in the Republic of Turkey, Final Report, Tokyo-Istanbul, Turkey, 2002.
• [2] Erdik M, Durukal E. Earthquake risk and its mitigation in Istanbul. Nat Hazards, 2008; 44: 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9110-9.
• [3] Genc FN. Urban transformation in Turkey: General view of legislation and practices. CBU Journal of Management and Economics, 2008; 15(1): 115–130. (in Turkish). http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/yonveek/article/view/5000069205/5000064109.
• [4] Beyaz A, Livaoglu R. Evaluation of concrete compressive strength in urban transformation in Bursa. Uludag University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering, 2019; 24(1): 63–74. (in Turkish). https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.486033.
• [5] Yilmaz IC. A statistical evaluation of housing preference in Istanbul urban transformation. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, 2020; 5(2): 467–474. https://doi.org/10.29187/jscmt.2020.50.
• [6] Law No. 6306. Law on Transformation of Areas under Disaster Risk Numbered 6306, Published in the Official Gazette No. 28309 of 31 December 2012, Finalized in 2016 under Cabinet Decision number 2016/9654, Last updated: Jun 21, 2019, Turkey, 2012.
• [7] Ergunay O. A perspective of disaster in Turkey: Issues and prospects, urban settlements and natural disasters. In Proceedings of UIA Region II Workshop, Chamber of Architects of Turkey, 1999; Turkey.
• [8] U.S.G.S (2020) United States Geological Survey. Earthquake Hazard Program 2020-10-30 11:51:27 (UTC), 2017, accessed December 9, 2020 at URL https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000c7y0/executive.
• [9] Ozcebe G, Sucuoglu H, Yucemen MS, Yakut A, Kubin J. Seismic risk assessment of existing building stock in Istanbul a pilot application in Zeytinburnu district. In Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, April 18–22 2006; San Francisco, California, USA.
• [10] Bal IE, Crowley H, Pinho R, Gulay FG. Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment models. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2008; 28(10–11): 914–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.005.
• [11] Gunay Z. Renewal agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. Urbicide. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 2015; 3(1): 95–108. https://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/47.
• [12] Yakut A, Gulkan P. Housing report tunnel form building. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) an International Association for Earthquake Engineering (IAEE), Turkey/report 101, 2003. https://www.world-housing.net/WHEReports/wh100104.pdf.
• [13] BU-ARC. Earthquake risk assessment for the Istanbul metropolitan area. Bosphorus University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute, Istanbul, Turkey, 2002.
• [14] TSI / TUIK. Building census. Publication No: 2471, Ankara: State Institute of Statistics, 2000. (in Turkish).
• [15] TUIK. Address based census system registration (ADNKS). Turkey Statistical Institute, 2014. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=insaat-ve-konut-116&dil=1.
• [16] Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC-2007). Specifications for Buildings to be Built in Seismic Areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey, 2007. (in Turkish).
• [17] Turkish Risky Buildings Detection Code (RBTEIE-2013). Guidelines for the Assessment of Buildings under High Risk as per Law no. 6306. Last updated as RBTEIE-2019: February 16, 2019, Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Ankara, Turkey, 2013. (in Turkish).
• [18] Parsons T. Recalculated probability of M7 earthquakes beneath the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. J Geophys Res Solid Earth, 2004; 109(B5): 1978–2012. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002667.
• [19] Konukcu BE, Karaman H, Sahin M. Determination of building age for Istanbul buildings to be used for the earthquake damage analysis according to structural codes by using aerial and satellite images in GIS. Nat Hazards, 2017; 85: 1811–1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2666-5.
• [20] Celik OC, Yuksel E, Avci-Karatas C, Bal A, Gokce T, Bago Z, Koller G. Component testing of steel-core buckling restrained braces (BRBs) with pinned end connections. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures (ICASS-2015), July 21-24 2015; Lisbon, Portugal.
• [21] Avci-Karatas C, Celik OC, Yalcin C. Experimental investigation of aluminum alloy and steel core buckling restrained braces (BRBs). Int J Steel Strut, 2018; 18(2): 650–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0025-y.
• [22] Avci-Karatas C, Celik OC. Design, fabrication, and experimental investigation of steel core buckling restrained braces (BRBs). Technical Journal of Turkish Chamber of Civil Engineers, 2019; 30(1): 8861-8886. (in Turkish). https://doi.org/10.18400/tekderg.309415.
• [23] Avci-Karatas C, Celik OC, Eruslu SO. Modeling of buckling restrained braces (BRBs) using full-scale experimental data. KSCE J Civ Eng, 2019; 23(10): 4431–4444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-2430-y.
• [24] Avci-Karatas C. Prediction of ultimate load capacity of concrete-filled steel tube columns using multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). Steel Compos Struct, 2019; 33(4): 583–594. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.4.583.
• [25] Avci-Karatas C. Time history analysis of a reinforced concrete (RC) building in hilly terrain subjected to earthquake. 6th International congress on engineering, architecture and design, December 17-18 2020; Istanbul, Turkey.
• [26] TSI / TUIK. The results of address based population registration system. 31-12-2019". Turkish Statistical Institute, Retrieved 4 February 2020. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_districts_of_Istanbul.
• [27] Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC-1975). Specifications for Buildings to be Built in Seismic Areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey, 1975. (in Turkish).
• [28] Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC-1998). Specifications for Buildings to be Built in Seismic Areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey, 1998. (in Turkish).
• [29] Gunes O. Turkey's grand challenge: Disaster-proof building inventory within 20 years. Case Stud Constr Mater, 2015; 2: 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2014.12.003.
• [30] Canbaz M, Sengel S. Urban Transformation applications of reinforced concrete building: Eskişehir”, Bilecik Seyh Edebali University Journal of Science, 2015; 2(2): 9–16. (in Turkish). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bseufbd/issue/22287/239045.
• [31] Donduren MS. Calculation of loads and stresses acting on masonry wall. International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers, 2016; 4(4): 145–155. https://doi.org/10.18100/IJAMEC.49058.
• [32] Vielma J, Barbat AH, Oller S. Seismic performance of waffled-slab floor buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, 2009; 162(3): 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2009.162.3.169.
• [33] Sevim O. Concrete quality in existing reinforced concrete structures in the first seismic zone in Turkey. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 2014; 6(2). https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.346075.
• [34] Turkish Institute of Standardization. TS 10465: Test method for concrete obtaining samples and determination of compressive strength in hardened concrete in structures and components (destructive method). Ankara, Turkey, 1992. (in Turkish).
• [35] Turkish Institute of Standardization. TS EN12504-1: Testing concrete in structures—Part 1: cored specimens taking, examining and testing in compression. Ankara, Turkey, 2002. (in Turkish).
• [36] Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC-2018). Turkish Building Earthquake Code. Disaster and Emergency Management Authority, 2018. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/03/20180318M1-2.htm. (in Turkish).
• [37] AFAD Earthquake Catalogue (2013–present). Ministry of Interior, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Department of Earthquake, Turkish accelerometric Database and Analysis System, 2020. https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/ddakatalogu.
• [38] Ince O, Sahin H, Alyamac K, Ulucan Z. Investigation of soft stories in buildings with hollow block slab. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, 2018; 13(1): 37–44. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjst/issue/35841/400585.
• [39] Canbaz M, Albayrak U. (Editors, Rodrigues HC, Herskovits J, Mota Soares CM, Guedes IM, Araııjo AL, Folgado LO. Moleiro F, Madeira IFA.) Assessment of Corrosion and MechanicalProperties of Rebar Used in a 50 Years-Old Reinforced Concrete Industrial Building. EngineeringOptimization IV, Taylor&Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-02725-1, 809-814, 2007.
• [40] Yuksel I, Sakcali GB. Effects of reinforcement corrosion on reinforced concrete buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 2020; 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.19.00111.