INVESTIGATION OF MICROALGAE GASIFICATION UNDER STEAM ATMOSPHERE IN DOWNDRAFT GASIFIER BY USING ASPEN PLUS®

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 149 - 160, 28.06.2022

Berna Kekik , Uğur Özveren

https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.873981

Öz

Energy production is facing the environmental and economic issues due to growing population and uncertainties about the fossil fuels. These concerns prompt the researchers to find widely available and renewable alternative such as biomass instead of the fossil fuels. Microalgae is one of the promising biofuels owing to its rapid growth speed and higher calorific value. Steam gasification is an alternative way converting biomass to syngas with higher H2 and lower CO2 content compared with the other thermochemical conversion processes. In the present work, the downdraft gasifier model was developed by using Aspen Plus® program that has the capability to investigate the performance of microalgae gasification. Before the performance evaluation of the gasification, validation of the model successfully completed and exit gas compositions of H2, CO2, CO and CH4 were found very close for experimental study and the developed model. Effects of the main parameters of the process such as steam/biomass ratio and gasification temperature were assessed on the syngas composition and higher heating value (HHV) of syngas. The obtained results were stated that the increment in the temperature showed great effect on the H2 and CO compositions of syngas, they increased from 50.72% to 56.47% and 28.11% to 28.84% respectively. The simulation results also illustrated that the rising of the S/B ratio was favored the steam related reactions and increased the H2 content in syngas. However decreasing trend of the CH4 caused reducing of the HHV of syngas as a function of temperature and steam as well.

Anahtar Kelimeler

gasification, aspen plus, biomass, microalgae, downdraft gasifier

INVESTIGATION OF MICROALGAE GASIFICATION UNDER STEAM ATMOSPHERE IN DOWNDRAFT GASIFIER BY USING ASPEN PLUS®

Öz

Energy production faces environmental and economic problems due to growing population and fossil fuel uncertainty. These concerns have led researchers to find a widely available and renewable alternative such as biomass instead of fossil fuels. Microalgae is one of the most promising biofuels because it grows quickly and has a higher calorific value. Steam gasification is an alternative method to convert biomass into syngas with higher H2 content and lower CO2 content compared to other thermochemical conversion processes. In the present work, the downdraft gasifier model was developed using Aspen Plus® simulation software, which is capable of investigating the performance of microalgae gasification. Prior to the gasification performance evaluation, the validity of the model was tested with the results of an experimental study conducted with a different feedstock. The validation of the model was successfully completed, and it was found that the initial gas compositions of H2, CO2, CO and CH4 were very similar between the experimental study and the developed model. The effects of the main process parameters, such as the steam/biomass ratio and the gasification temperature, on the syngas composition and the higher heating value (HHV) of the syngas were evaluated. The results obtained with Aspen Plus® showed that increasing the temperature had a great effect on the H2 and CO composition of the syngas. They increased from 50.72% to 56.47% and from 28.11% to 28.84%, respectively. The simulation results also showed that the increasing S/B ratio favored the steam-related reactions and increased the H2 content in the syngas. However, a decreasing trend in CH4 content also decreased the HHV of the syngas as a function of temperature and steam.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gasification, Biomass, Microalgae, Downdraft Gasifier, Aspen Plus®

Kaynakça

• [1] Nurcahyani PR, Hashimoto S, Matsumura Y. Supercritical water gasification of microalgae with and without oil extraction. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2020;165:104936.
• [2] Mian MM, Zeng X, Nasry AaNB, Al-Hamadani SM. Municipal solid waste management in China: a comparative analysis. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 2017;19:1127-35.
• [3] Heinimö J, Junginger M. Production and trading of biomass for energy–an overview of the global status. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2009;33:1310-20.
• [4] Ritchie H, Reay DS, Higgins P. The impact of global dietary guidelines on climate change. Global environmental change. 2018;49:46-55.
• [5] Cho S, Woo Y-b, Kim BS, Kim J. Optimization-based planning of a biomass to hydrogen (B2H2) system using dedicated energy crops and waste biomass. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2016;87:144-55.
• [6] Chen W-H, Lin B-J, Huang M-Y, Chang J-S. Thermochemical conversion of microalgal biomass into biofuels: a review. Bioresource technology. 2015;184:314-27.
• [7] Ward A, Lewis D, Green F. Anaerobic digestion of algae biomass: a review. Algal Research. 2014;5:204-14.
• [8] Azadi P, Brownbridge GP, Mosbach S, Inderwildi OR, Kraft M. Production of biorenewable hydrogen and syngas via algae gasification: a sensitivity analysis. Energy Procedia. 2014;61:2767-70.
• [9] Shin YS, Choi HI, Choi JW, Lee JS, Sung YJ, Sim SJ. Multilateral approach on enhancing economic viability of lipid production from microalgae: a review. Bioresource technology. 2018;258:335-44.
• [10] Fang P, Gong Z, Wang Z, Wang Z, Meng F. Study on combustion and emission characteristics of microalgae and its extraction residue with TG-MS. Renewable Energy. 2019;140:884-94. [11] Duan P, Savage PE. Upgrading of crude algal bio-oil in supercritical water. Bioresource technology. 2011;102:1899-906.
• [12] Raheem A, Cui X, Mangi FH, Memon AA, Ji G, Cheng B, et al. Hydrogen-rich energy recovery from microalgae (lipid-extracted) via steam catalytic gasification. Algal Research. 2020;52:102102.
• [13] Zhu Y, Piotrowska P, van Eyk PJ, Boström D, Wu X, Boman C, et al. Fluidized bed co-gasification of algae and wood pellets: gas yields and bed agglomeration analysis. Energy & Fuels. 2016;30:1800-9.
• [14] Duman G, Uddin MA, Yanik J. Hydrogen production from algal biomass via steam gasification. Bioresource technology. 2014;166:24-30.
• [15] Panwar N, Kothari R, Tyagi V. Thermo chemical conversion of biomass–Eco friendly energy routes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012;16:1801-16.
• [16] Adeyemi I, Janajreh I. Modeling of the entrained flow gasification: Kinetics-based ASPEN Plus model. Renewable Energy. 2015;82:77-84.
• [17] Nipattummakul N, Ahmed I, Kerdsuwan S, Gupta AK. High temperature steam gasification of wastewater sludge. Applied Energy. 2010;87:3729-34.
• [18] Jarungthammachote S, Dutta A. Experimental investigation of a multi‐stage air‐steam gasification process for hydrogen enriched gas production. International journal of energy research. 2012;36:335-45.
• [19] Sansaniwal S, Pal K, Rosen M, Tyagi S. Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;72:363-84.
• [20] Xiang X, Gong G, Wang C, Cai N, Zhou X, Li Y. Exergy analysis of updraft and downdraft fixed bed gasification of village-level solid waste. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2020.
• [21] Prasertcharoensuk P, Hernandez DA, Bull SJ, Phan AN. Optimisation of a throat downdraft gasifier for hydrogen production. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2018;116:216-26.
• [22] Susastriawan A, Saptoadi H. Effect of tuyer distance above grate on propagation front and performance of downdraft gasifier with the feedstock of rice husk. Renewable energy. 2019;134:1034-41.
• [23] Tavares R, Monteiro E, Tabet F, Rouboa A. Numerical investigation of optimum operating conditions for syngas and hydrogen production from biomass gasification using Aspen Plus. Renewable Energy. 2020;146:1309-14.
• [24] AlNouss A, Parthasarathy P, Shahbaz M, Al-Ansari T, Mackey H, McKay G. Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS. Applied Energy. 2020;261:114350.
• [25] Kaushal P, Tyagi R. Advanced simulation of biomass gasification in a fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS. Renewable energy. 2017;101:629-36.
• [26] Nikoo MB, Mahinpey N. Simulation of biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS. Biomass and bioenergy. 2008;32:1245-54.
• [27] Adnan MA, Hossain MM. Gasification performance of various microalgae biomass–A thermodynamic study by considering tar formation using Aspen plus. Energy conversion and management. 2018;165:783-93.
• [28] Adnan MA, Xiong Q, Muraza O, Hossain MM. Gasification of wet microalgae to produce H2-rich syngas and electricity: a thermodynamic study considering exergy analysis. Renewable Energy. 2020;147:2195-205.
• [29] Phyllis2. ECN laboratories. https://phyllis.nl/Browse/Standard/ECN-Phyllis#1921
• [30] Soares RB, Martins MF, Gonçalves RF. A conceptual scenario for the use of microalgae biomass for microgeneration in wastewater treatment plants. Journal of environmental management. 2019;252:109639.
• [31] Bassyouni M, ul Hasan SW, Abdel-Aziz M, Abdel-hamid S-S, Naveed S, Hussain A, et al. Date palm waste gasification in downdraft gasifier and simulation using ASPEN HYSYS. Energy conversión and management. 2014;88:693-9.
• [32] Han J, Liang Y, Hu J, Qin L, Street J, Lu Y, et al. Modeling downdraft biomass gasification process by restricting chemical reaction equilibrium with Aspen Plus. Energy conversion and management. 2017;153:641-8.
• [33] Aspen Technology I. Getting Started Modeling Processes with Solids. USA2013.
• [34] Ramos A, Monteiro E, Rouboa A. Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019;110:188-206.
• [35] Dhanavath KN, Shah K, Bhargava SK, Bankupalli S, Parthasarathy R. Oxygen–steam gasification of karanja press seed cake: Fixed bed experiments, ASPEN Plus process model development and benchmarking with saw dust, rice husk and sunflower husk. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2018;6:3061-9.
• [36] Ramzan N, Ashraf A, Naveed S, Malik A. Simulation of hybrid biomass gasification using Aspen plus: A comparative performance analysis for food, municipal solid and poultry waste. Biomass and bioenergy. 2011;35:3962-9.
• [37] Son Y-I, Yoon SJ, Kim YK, Lee J-G. Gasification and power generation characteristics of woody biomass utilizing a downdraft gasifier. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2011;35:4215-20.
• [38] Rudra S, Tesfagaber YK. Future district heating plant integrated with municipal solid waste (MSW) gasification for hydrogen production. Energy. 2019;180:881-92.
• [39] Vargas-Moreno J, Callejón-Ferre A, Pérez-Alonso J, Velázquez-Martí B. A review of the mathematical models for predicting the heating value of biomass materials. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 2012;16:3065-83.
• [40] Shahbaz M, Al-Ansari T, Inayat M, Sulaiman SA, Parthasarathy P, McKay G. A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020;134:110382.
• [41] Kaewluan S, Pipatmanomai S. Potential of synthesis gas production from rubber wood chip gasification in a bubbling fluidised bed gasifier. Energy conversion and management. 2011;52:75-84.
• [42] Sikarwar VS, Ji G, Zhao M, Wang Y. Equilibrium modeling of sorption-enhanced cogasification of sewage sludge and wood for hydrogen-rich gas production with in situ carbon dioxide capture. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2017;56:5993-6001.
• [43] Monteiro E, Ismail TM, Ramos A, Abd El-Salam M, Brito P, Rouboa A. Assessment of the miscanthus gasification in a semi-industrial gasifier using a CFD model. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2017;123:448-57.
• [44] Mazumder J, de Lasa HI. Catalytic steam gasification of biomass surrogates: Thermodynamics and effect of operating conditions. Chemical engineering journal. 2016;293:232-42.
• [45] Couto N, Monteiro E, Silva V, Rouboa A. Hydrogen-rich gas from gasification of Portuguese municipal solid wastes. international journal of hydrogen energy. 2016;41:10619-30.
• [46] Ammar M, Mutalib MA, Yusup S, Inayat A, Shahbaz M, Ali B. Influence of effective parameters on product gas ratios in sorption enhanced gasification. Procedia engineering. 2016;148:735-41.