DO THE STUDENT UTILIZE THE TECHNOLOGY FOR THE PRODUCTIVE PURPOSES? STUDENTS’ VIEWS VERSUS LOG RECORDS

Yıl 2020, , 219 - 236, 31.01.2020

Hatice Çıralı Sarıca , Yasemin Koçak Usluel

https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.627278

Cited By: 1

Öz

In this study, it is aimed to determine whether students use technology
for productive purposes in digital storytelling process and how they use
technology from a wider perspective by comparing data obtained from log records
and semi-structured interviews. In this context, digital storytelling activity
was realized with 29 primary school students. The tablet PC was delivered to
the students for use in the digital storytelling process and there was no
restriction on their use. Before the tablets were handed over to the students, the “App Usage
Tracker”, an open source application, was installed. This application provides
log records as to which programs were running in the background during the
tablets’ usage. It was therefore possible to determine what the students were
doing in the background while they were creating their digital stories. The
tablets were delivered to all students with the same standard applications
installed; camera, gallery, photo editor, internet and drawing applications.
When the logs and interview records regarding the applications that the
students used on the tablets are compared, it is noticed that while the logs
indicate that the DST applications were used the most, the students had stated
that they mostly played games according to the interview transcripts.
Consequently, it is deemed important to design activities for students where
technology may be utilized for productive purposes, instead of focusing on the
risks that technology may bring upon learners and imposing limitations. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

digital storytelling, technology, usage, student opinions

ÖĞRENCİLER TEKNOLOJİYİ ÜRETİM AMAÇLI MI KULLANIYORLAR? LOG KAYITLARINA KARŞI ÖĞRENCİ GÖRÜŞLERİ

Öz

Bu çalışmada, öğrencilerin dijital hikâye anlatımı sürecinde
teknolojiyi üretim amaçlı kullanıp kullanmadıklarının, daha geniş bir
perspektiften teknolojiyi nasıl kullandıklarının log kayıtları ve yarı
yapılandırılmış görüşmelerden elde edilen verilerin karşılaştırılması yoluyla
belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu
bağlamda 29 ikinci sınıf öğrencisi ile dijital hikâye anlatımı etkinliği
gerçekleştirilmiştir. Öğrencilere DHA sürecinde kullanmaları için tablet PC
dağıtılmış ve kullanımları konusunda hiçbir sınırlama getirilmemiştir. Tablet
PC’ler verilmeden önce öğrencilerin dijital hikâyelerini oluşturmada kullanabilecekleri
standart uygulamalar (kamera, galeri, fotoğraf düzenleyici, internet üç tane
ücretsiz çizim uygulaması) ve arka planda yapılanların loglarını kayıt eden bir
uygulama yüklenmiştir. Öğrencilerin tablet PC kullanımı konusunda log ve
görüşme verileri karşılaştırıldığında log’larda daha çok dijital hikâye
anlatımı uygulamalarının kullanıldığı, görüşmelerde ise daha çok oyun
oynadıklarını dile getirdikleri dikkati çekmiştir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma ile
verimsiz çalışma zamanı, ilgi ve motivasyon eksikliği, v.b. olası riskler
nedeniyle öğrenenlerin sınırlandırılması yerine uygun etkinlikler tasarlanır ve
bununla ilgili yol gösterilirse teknolojinin üretim amaçlı da kullanılabileceği
ortaya konulmuştur.   

Anahtar Kelimeler

dijital hikâye anlatımı, teknoloji, kullanım, öğrenci görüşleri

Kaynakça

• Adams Becker, S., Freeman, A., Giesinger Hall, C., Cummins, M., and Yuhnke, B. (2016). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2016 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Alexander, B. (2011). The new digital storytelling: Creating narratives with new media. England: Praeger.
• Anderson, R. E. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. Editörler J. Voogt, ve G. Knezek, International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 5-22). NY, USA: Springer.
• Bielefeldt, T. (2002). Teacher outcomes: Improved technology skills. In J. Johnson, & L. Barker (Eds.), Assessing the impact of technology in teaching and learning: A sourcebook for evaluators (pp. 119–137). University of Michigan: Institute for Social Research.
• Boase, J., ve Ling, R. (2013). Measuring Mobile Phone Use: Self‐Report Versus Log Data. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 18(4), 508-519. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12021
• Belet, Ş. D., ve Dal, S. (2010). The use of storytelling to develop the primary school students’ critical reading skill: the primary education pre-service teachers’ opinions. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1830–1834. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.409
• Chang, M. K., ve Law, S. P. M. (2008). Factor structure for young’s internet addiction test: A confirmatory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2597–2619. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.001
• Chung, S. K. (2006). Digital storytelling in integrated arts education. The International Journal of Arts Education, 4(1), 33–50.
• Davis, A., ve Weinshenker, D. (2012). Digital storytelling and authoring identity. In C.C. Ching, ve B. F. Foley (eds.), Technology and identity: Research on the development and exploration of selves in a digital World (pp.47-64). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press
• Efimova, L. (2004). Discovering the iceberg of knowledge work. Fifth European Conference on Organisational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities (OKLV 2004) Kongresine Sunulmuş Bildiri.
• Ergün, E. ve Altun, A. (2012). Öğrenci gözüyle siber aylaklik ve nedenleri. Eğitim Teknolojisi: Kuram ve Uygulama, 2(1), 36-53.
• Hausknecht, S., Vanchu-Orosco, M., & Kaufman, D. (2016). New Ways to Tell My Story - Evaluation of a Digital Storytelling Workshop for Older Adults. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 2, 231-239.
• Hess, M. E. (2014). A new culture of learning: Digital storytelling and faith formation. Dialog, 53(1), 12-22.
• Frazel, M. (2010). Digital storytelling guide for educators. Washington, DC. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
• Gallardo-Echenique, E. E., Marqués-Molías, L., Bullen, M., ve Strijbos, J. W. (2015). Let’s talk about digital learners in the digital era. The International Review of research in open and distributed learning, 16(3), 156-187.
• Green, H., ve Hannon, C. (2007). Their space education for a digital generation. London: Demos.
• Gudanescu, S. (2010). New educational technologies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5646-5649. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.922
• Gurung, B., ve Rutledge, D. (2014). Digital learners and the overlapping of their personal and educational digital engagement. Computers ve Education, 77, 91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.012
• Hung, C.-M., Hwang, G.-J., ve Huang, I. (2012). A Project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students' learning motivation, problem-solving competence and learning achievement. Educational Technology ve Society, 15(4), 368–379.
• Istenic Starčič, A., Cotic, M., Solomonides, I., ve Volk, M. (2016). Engaging preservice primary and preprimary school teachers in digital storytelling for the teaching and learning of mathematics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 29-50. doi:10.1111/bjet.12253
• Kolikant, Y. B. D. (2010). Digital natives, better learners? Students’ beliefs about how the Internet influenced their ability to learn. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1384-1391. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.012
• Kolikant, Y. B. D. (2012). Using ICT for school purposes: Is there a student-school disconnect?. Computers ve Education, 59(3), 907-914. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.012
• Kopcha, T. J., ve Sullivan, H. J. (2007). Self-presentation bias in surveys of teachers’ educational technology practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 627-646.
• Lambert, J. (2013). Digital Storytelling: capturing lives, creating community (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
• Lenette, C., Cox, L., & Brough, M. (2013). Digital storytelling as a social work tool: learning from ethnographic research with women from refugee backgrounds. The British Journal of Social Work, 45(3), 988-1005.
• Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., ve Oliver, M. (2009). Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16‐year‐old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 87-104. doi: 10.1080/17439880902921949
• Luckin, R., Logan, K., Clark, W., Graber, R., Oliver, M. and Mee, A. (2008). Learners’ Use of Web 2.0 Technologies in and out of school in key stages 3 and 4. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1476/1/becta_2008_web2_learnersuse_report.pdf adresinden 8 Mart 2015 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• Malita, L., & Martin, C. (2010). Digital Storytelling as web passport to success in the 21st Century. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3060–3064.
• Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. [doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.008]. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444-453.
• McGee, P. (2015). The Instructional Value of Digital Storytelling: Higher Education, Professional, and Adult Learning Settings. USA: Routledge.
• Miller, L. C. (2010). Make me a story: Teaching writing through digital storytelling. USA: Stenhouse Publishers.
• Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., ve Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. Editörler J. Voogt, ve G. Knezek, International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 23-42). NY, USA: Springer.
• Ohler, J. (2013). Digital storytelling in the classroom. New media pathways to literacy, learning, and creativity. (2nd ed.) Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Parslow, R. C. , Hepworth, S. J., ve McKinney, P.A. (2003). Recall of past use of mobile phone handsets. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 106 (3), 233-240.
• Pedró, F. (2006). The new millennium learners: challenging our views on ICT and learning. Paris: OECD-CERI. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/38358359.pdf
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
• Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• de Reuver, M., ve Bouwman, H. (2015). Dealing with self-report bias in mobile Internet acceptance and usage studies. Information ve Management. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.12.002
• Rideout, V., Roberts, D., ve Foehr, U. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry Kayser Family Foundation.
• Robin, B. (2006). The Educational uses of digital storytelling. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology ve Teacher Education International Conference, 709-716.
• Robin, B., R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into Practice, 47(3), 220-228. doi: 10.1080/00405840802153916
• Skinner, E. M., & Hagood, M. C. (2008). Developing literate identities with english language learners through digital storytelling. The Reading Matrix, 8(2), 12-38.
• Stacey, G., & Hardy, P. (2011). Challenging the shock of reality through digital storytelling. Nurse Education in Practice, 11(2), 159-164. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.08.003
• Stenhouse, R., Tait, J., Hardy, P., & Sumner, T. (2013). Dangling conversations: reflections on the process of creating digital stories during a workshop with people with early‐stage dementia. Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 20(2), 134-141.
• Stewart, K., & Gachago, D. (2016). Being human today: A digital storytelling pedagogy for transcontinental border crossing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(3), 528-542. doi:10.1111/bjet.12450
• Straub, D., Limayem, M., ve Karahanna-Evaristo, E. (1995). Measuring system usage – implications for IS theory testing. Management Science, 41(8), 1328–2134.
• Şahin, M. C. (2009). Yeni binyılın öğrencileri’nin özellikleri. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 155-172.
• Şimşek, B. (2018). İletişim çalışmaları bağlamında dijital hikâye anlatımı: Kavramlar ve Türkiye deneyimi. İstanbul: Alternatif Bilişim. https://ekitap.alternatifbilisim.org/dijital_hikâye_anlatimi.html adresinden alınmıştır.
• Şimsek, B., & Erdener, B. (2012). Digital visual skills education for digital inclusion of elder women in the community. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4107-4113.
• Taner, S., Özdemir, A. A., ve Özgür, Y. K. (2013). Kendime yolculuk 2.-3. sınıf gönüllü kitabı. İstanbul: Türkiye Eğitim Gönüllüleri Vakfı Yayınları.
• Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world HC. McGraw-Hill.
• Teo, T. (2013). An initial development and validation of a Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS). Computers ve Education, 67, 51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.012
• Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers ve Education, 65, 12-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022
• Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S. ve Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52, 463–479
• Usluel, Y. K., ve Atal, D. (2013). Students’ approach to social network in educational context. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 9(2), 188-198.
• Usluel, Y. K., Avcı, Ü., Kurtoğlu, M., ve Uslu, N. (2013). Yeniliklerin benimsenmesi sürecinde rol oynayan değişkenlerin betimsel tarama yöntemiyle incelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(1), 53-71.
• Usluel, Y. K., ve Altıntaş, A. (2012). Lise öğrencilerinin Web 2.0 kullanımları Nasıldır? 6. Uluslararası Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumuna Sunulmuş Bildiri.
• Van Galen, J. A. (2017). Agency, shame, and identity: Digital stories of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 84-93.
• Yang, Y-T. C., & Wu, W-C. U. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59, 339–352.
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). USA: Sage Publications.
• Yuksel, P., Robin, B., ve McNeil, S. (2011). Educational uses of digital storytelling all around the world. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology ve Teacher Education International Conference, 2011(1), 1264-1271.