XAMINATION OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCHES WITHIN 2013: AJET, BJET, C&E, ETRD, ETS VE L&I JOURNALS

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 126 - 160, 08.02.2015

Ebru Kılıç Çakmak , Volkan Kukul Ekmel Çetin Burcu Berikan , Bülent Kandemir Bahattin Pamukçu , Necati Taşkın , Mehmet Marangoz

https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.17190

Cited By: 8

Öz

The aim of this study is to reveal general picture of the researches conducted in the field of Educational Technology in 2013. To fulfill the purpose of the study, 6 journals published in
2013, are indexed by Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) were analyzed according to the content analysis method. While examining the articles, “Article Publication Classification Form" developed by Göktaş et al. (2012) is used with some changes on it. At the first part of form, general information about article such as the name of author, name of article and etc. are provided and in remaining parts, some details related to data collection tools, sampling and analyzing data are provided. Within study, a subject classification form is used. According to result of the study, the most popular subject area is “Instructional Design” in 2013. "ICT in Education" and "Games in Learning " are other subject areas follow this subject area. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Content analysis, Educational Technology, Instructional Design, ICT in Education

2013 YILI EĞİTİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ ARAŞTIRMALARININ İNCELENMESİ: AJET, BJET, C&E, ETRD, ETS ve L&I DERGİLERİ

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı, 2013 yılında Eğitim Teknolojisi alanında yapılan araştırmaların genel bir resmini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaca ulaşmak için alanla ilgili yayın yapan ve Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) kapsamında taranan 6 derginin 2013 yılında yayınlanan makaleleri içerik analizi yöntemine göre incelenmiştir. Makaleler incelenirken Göktaş vd. (2012) tarafından geliştirilen “Makale Yayın Sınıflama Formu” üzerinde bazı güncellemeler yapılarak kullanılmıştır. Formun birinci bölümünde makalenin adı, yazarı vb. bilgiler yer alırken geri kalan bölümlerde makalenin yöntemi, veri toplama araçları, örneklem ve veri analiz yöntemleri yer almıştır. Araştırmada bir de konu sınıflaması formu kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucuna göre eğitim teknolojisi alanında 2013 yılında en fazla çalışılan konu alanı “Öğretim Tasarımı” olmuştur. Öğretim tasarımı konu alanını “Eğitimde Bilişim Teknolojileri” ve “Eğitimde Oyun Kullanımı” konu alanı takip etmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İçerik analizi, Eğitim Teknolojisi, Öğretim Tasarımı, Eğitimde Bilişim

Kaynakça

• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
• Göktaş, Y., Küçük, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacik, Ö., Yıldırım, G. & Reisoğlu, İ. (2012). Educational Technology Research Trends in Turkey: A Content Analysis of the 2000-2009 Decade. Educational Sciences:Theory and Practice. 12(1), 191-199.
• Gülbahar, Y. & Alper, A. (2009). A Content Analysis of the Studies in Instructional Technologies Area. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 42(2), 93-111.
• Hew, K. F., Kale, U., & Kim, N. (2007). Past research in instruc¬tional technology: Results of a content analysis of empirical studies published in three prominent instructional technology journals from the year 2000 through 2004. Journal of Educatio¬nal Computing Research, 36 (3), 269-300.
• Kinshuk-Huang, H.W., Sampson, D. & Chen, N-S. (2013). Trends in Educational Technology through the Lens of the Highly Cited Articles Published in the Journal of Educational Technology and Society. Educational Technology & Society. 16 (2), 3–20.
• Kücük, S., Aydemir, M., Yildirim, G., Arpacik, O. & Goktas, Y. (2013). Educational technology research trends in Turkey from 1990 to 2011. Computers & Education. 68, 42-50.
• Luor, T.T., Johanson, R.E., Lu, H.P. & Wu, L.L. (2008). Trends and lacunae for future computer assisted learning (CAL) research: An assessment of the literature in SSCI Journals from 1998–2006. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(8), 1313-1320.
• Masood, M. (2004). A ten year analysis: Trends in traditional educational technology literature. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology. 1(2), 1823-1844
• Özçınar, Z. (2009). The topic of instructional design in research journals: A citation analysis for the years 1980-2008. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 25(4), 559-580.
• Reeves, T. C. (1995). Questioning the questions of instructional technology research. In: Proceedings of the 1995 Annual National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), (17th, Anaheim, CA, 1995).
• Reiser, R.A. (2007). What field did you say you were in?: Defining and naming our field. In R.A. Reiser & J.V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (2nd ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
• Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49 (2), 57-67.
• Rushby, N. (2013). The Future of Learning Technology: Some Tentative Predictions. Educational Technology & Society. 16 (2), 52–58.
• Rushby, N. J. (2011). Editorial: trends in learning technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 6, 885–888.
• Rushby, N. J. (2010). Editorial: topics in learning technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 3, 343–348.
• Sözbilir, M. & Kutu, H. (2008). Development and Current Status of Science Education Research in Turkey. Essays in Education, Special Issue, 1-22.
• Spector, J.M. (2013). Emerging Educational Technologies and Research Directions. Educational Technology & Society. 16 (2), 21–30.
• Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 137-146.