THE ROLE OF PERSONAL AND SOCIAL FACTORS AT IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT'S IMPACT ON CAREER SUCCESS

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 1 - 18, 26.12.2015

Şebnem Aslan , Şükrü Toygar , Demet Ulutaş

Öz

 

 

Abstract: The aim of this study is to examine the impact of personal and social factors such; EQ (Emotional Quotient), self-respect and social comparison on the impression management's impact on subjective career success and also to ascertain health care personnel's opinions on career success. The research has been conducted in 6 major hospitals with 330 health care workers in Konya, province of Turkey. Bolino and Turnley's (1999) impression management scale; Greenhaus, Parasuraman and Wormley's (1990) career success scale; Rosenberg's self-esteem scale and Gibbon and Buunk's (1999) social comparison orientation scale have been used.The results show that impression management does not have an impact on career success directly, rather it affects on social comparison variables. Social comparison variables constitute a direct link between impression management and career success. The results of the study reveal that other variables such as; EQ and self-esteem have no impact on this relationship.

 

Keywords: Impression management, career success,  healthcare employees

 

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

İZLENİM YÖNETİMİNDE KİŞİSEL VE SOSYAL FAKTÖR ROLLERİNİN KARİYER BAŞARISI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Öz

Araştırmanın amacı, izlenim yönetiminin sübjektif kariyer başarısına etkisinde duygusal zekâ, kendine saygı ve sosyal karşılaştırma gibi kişisel ve sosyal faktörlerin aracılık etkisini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Araştırmada bir diğer amaç ise, sağlık çalışanlarının objektif ve sübjektif kariyer başarısına ilişkin görüşlerinin tespit edilmesidir. Araştırma, Türkiye’de Konya ilinde 6 büyük hastanede 330 sağlık çalışanı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bolino ve Turnley (1999) tarafından geliştirilen izlenim yönetimi ölçeği; Greenhaus, Parasuraman ve Wormley (1990) tarafından geliştirilen sübjektif kariyer başarısı ölçeği; Wong ve Law (2002) tarafından geliştirilen duygusal zekâ ölçeği; Rosenberg’in Kendine Saygı Ölçeği (Self-Esteem Scale) ve Gibbons ve Buunk (1999) tarafından geliştirilen Sosyal Karşılaştırma Eğilimi Ölçeği kullanılmıştır.Araştırmanın sonucunda izlenim yönetiminin sübjektif kariyer başarısı üzerine etkisi direkt etkiden ziyade sosyal karşılaştırma aracı değişkeni vasıtasıyla gerçekleşmiştir. Yani sosyal karşılaştırma değişkeni, izlenim yönetimi ve sübjektif kariyer başarısı arasındaki ilişkide tam aracı role sahiptir. Diğer değişkenlerin, yani duygusal zekâ ve kendine saygı değişkenlerinin bu ilişkide anlamlı bir etkisi tespit edilememiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

İzlenim yönetimi, kariyer başarısı, sağlık çalışanları

Kaynakça

• Aslan, Ş ve Erkuş, E. (2008). Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: Validity and Reliability Sturdies of Two Scales, World Applied Sciences Journal, 4 (3), 430–438.
• Aslan, Ş ve Erkuş, E. (2008). Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: Validity and Reliability Sturdies of Two Scales, World Applied Sciences Journal, 4 (3), 430–438.
• Aslan, Ş. (2009). Duygusal Zekâ ve Dönüşümcü, Etkileşimci Liderlik. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F. (2006). Target Practice: An Organizational Impression Management Approach to Attracting Minority and Female Job Applicants. Personnel Pscyhology, 59, 157-187.
• Basım, N. H. ve Tatar, İ. (2006). Kamuda İzlenim Yönetimi. Karşılaştırmalı Bir Çalışma. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, (39):4: 225-244).
• Baumeister, F. R. (1989). Motives and Costs of Self-Presentation in Organizations, pp: 57-72. In: Impression Management in the Organization. Ed.: Robert A. Giacalone and Paul Rosenfeld. New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.
• Bolino, M.C. & Turnley, W.H. (1999). Measuring Impression Management in Organizations: A Scale development Based on the Jones and Pittman Taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 187-206.
• Bolino, M.C. & Turnley, W.H. (1999). Measuring Impression Management in Organizations: A Scale development Based on the Jones and Pittman Taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 187-206.
• Boyatzis, E. R. Goleman, D., Rhee, K. (1999). Clustering Competence in Emotional Intelligence: Insights from the Emotional Comptencie Inventory. Department of Organizational Behavior Weatherhead School of Management Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.
• Bozeman, P. D., & Kacmar, M. K. (1997). A Cybernetic Model of Impression Management Processes in Organizations. Organızatıonal Behavıor and Human Decision Processes (69):1 March, pp. 9–30.
• Branden, N. (1992). The Power of Self-Esteem An Inspring Look at Our Most Important Psychological Resource. Florida: Health Communications Inc.
• Buunk, A.P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2006). Social comparison orientation: a new perspective on those who do and those who dont compare with others. In Guimond, S. (Ed.) Social Comparison and Social Psychology: Understanding copnition, intergroup relations and culture (pp. 15-33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Buunk, A.P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2006). Social comparison orientation: a new perspective on those who do and those who dont compare with others. In Guimond, S. (Ed.) Social Comparison and Social Psychology: Understanding copnition, intergroup relations and culture (pp. 15-33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Buunk, B.P., Belmonte, J., Peiro, J.M., Zurriaga, R., &Gibbons, F. X. (2005). Diferencias individuales en la comparacion social: Propiedades de la escala espanloa de orientacion hacia la comparacion social. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologio, 37, 561-681.
• Buunk, B.P., Belmonte, J., Peiro, J.M., Zurriaga, R., &Gibbons, F. X. (2005). Diferencias individuales en la comparacion social: Propiedades de la escala espanloa de orientacion hacia la comparacion social. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologio, 37, 561-681.
• Cherniss, C. (1998). Social and Emotional Learning for Leaders. Educational Leadership, 55(7):26-28.
• Crandal, R. (1973). The measurment of self-esteem and related constructs, Pp. 80-82 in J.P. Robinson& P.R. Shaver (Eds), Measures of social psychological attitudes. Revised edition. Ann Arbor: ISR.
• Crandal, R. (1973). The measurment of self-esteem and related constructs, Pp. 80-82 in J.P. Robinson& P.R. Shaver (Eds), Measures of social psychological attitudes. Revised edition. Ann Arbor: ISR.
• Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self- Categorisation, Commitment to the Group Self- Esteem as Related But Distinct Aspects of Social Identity. European Journal of Social Pscyhology, 29, 371-389.
• Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7: 117-140.
• Giacalone, R. A. & Rosenfeld, P. (1989). Impression Management in the Organization. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.
• Gibbons, F. X. & Buunk, B.P. (1999). Individual differences in Social Comparison: The development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. (76):129-142.
• Gibbons, F. X. & Buunk, B.P. (1999). Individual differences in Social Comparison: The development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129-142.
• Gibbons, F. X. & Buunk, B.P. (1999). Individual differences in Social Comparison: The development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129-142.
• Gilbert,, D. T., Giesler, R. B., Morris, K. A. (1995). When Comparisons Arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. (69):227-236.
• Ginzel, E. L., Kramer, M. R., Sutton, I. R. (1991). Organizational Images as Negotiated Accounts: A Dynamic Conception of Impression Management Ed.: L. L. Cummings and B M Staw Research in Organizational Behavior, Volume 14,JAI Press.
• Goffman, E. (2009). Günlük Yaşamda Benliğin Sunumu. Çev.: Barış Cezar. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• Goleman, D., Boyatzis, E. R. McKee, A. (2004). Primal Leadership: Realizing the Power of Emotional Intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
• Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., Wormley, W. M. (1990). affects of Race on Organizational Experiences, Job Perform. Academy of Management Journal, (33)1: 64-86.
• Greenhaus, Jeffrey H. Parasuraman, Saroj, Wormley, Wayne M. (1990). affects of Race on Organizational Experiences, Job Perform, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 1, 64-86.
• Harris L. C. ve Ogbonna, E. (2006). Approaches to Career Success: An Exploration of Surreptitious Career- Success Strategies”, Human Resource Management, Cilt:43(1): 66.
• Huppatz, K. (2010). Respectability and the Paid Caring Occupations: An Empirical Investigation of Normality, Morality, Impression Management, Esteem in Nursing and Social Work. Health Sociology Review, 19 (1), 73-85.
• Jain, A. K. (2012). Does Emotional Intelligence Predict Impression Management?. Journal of Organizational Culture, 16 (2), 1-14.
• Jaskolka G., Beyer, J.M., Trice, H.M. (1985). Measuring and Predicting Managerial Success. Journal of Vocational Behavior (26):189-205.
• Judge, A. T. ve Bretz, D. R. (1994). Political Influence Behavior and career success. Journal of Management, (20):43-65.
• Judge, A. T., Cable, M. D., Boudredau, W. J., Bretz, D. R. (1995). An Empirical Investigation of the Predictors of Executıve Career Success. Personnel Psychology. 48: 485-519.
• Judge, A. T., Higgins, A. C., Thoresen, J. C., Barrick, R. M. (1999). The Big Five Personality Traits, General Mental Ability, and Career Success Across The life Span. Personnel Psychology. 52: 621-652.
• Kacmar, K.M., Delery, J. E.,&Ferris, G. R. (1992). Differential affectiveness of candidate IM tactics on employment interview decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22: 1250–1272.
• Kristof-Brown, A., Barrick, R. M., Franke, M. (2002). Applicant Impression Management: Dispositional Influences and Consequences for Recruiter Perceptions of Fit and Similarity. Journal of Management, (28)1:27-46.
• Kotze, M., & Venter, I. (2011). Differences in Emotional Intelligence between Effective and Ineffective Leaders in the Public Sector: An Empirical Study. International Review of Administrative Sciences , 77 (2), 397-427.
• Kuijpers, M., Schyns, B., Scheerens, J. (2006). Career Competencies for Career Success. The Career Development Quarterly, 55:168-178.
• Leary, M. R. ve Kowalsky, R. M. (1990). Impression Management: A Literature Review And Two-Component Model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1):34-37.
• Lopes, P. N., Brackett, M. A., Nezlek, J. B., Schütz, A., Sellin, I., & Salovey, P. (2004). Emotional Intelligence and Social Interaction. Pers Soc Psychol Bull , 30 (8), 1018-1034.
• Lynn, B. A. (2000). Activities for Developing Emotional Intelligence. Amherst: HRD Press.
• McFarland, A. L., Ryan, M. A., Kriska, D. A. (2003). Impression Management Use and affectiveness Across Assessment Methods. Journal of Management. 29(5) 641–661.
• Mruk, J. C. (2006). Self Esteem Research, Theory and Practice. 3rd Ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company Inc.
• Neff, A., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., Unger, D. (2012). What’s Mine is Yours: The Crossover of Day- Specific Self- Esteem. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 385-394.
• Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management As Symbolic Action. In: L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds), Research in organizational behavior (Vol 3, pp 1-52) Greenwich: CT JAI Press
• Ralston, M. S. ve Kirkwood, G. W. (1999). The Trouble with Applicant Impression Management. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. (13): 190-207.
• Riordan, C. A., Gross, T., Maloney, C. C. (1994). Self- Monitoring, Gender, and the Personel Consequences of Impression Management. The American Behavioral Scientist, 37 (5), 715-725.
• Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R. A., & Riordan, C. A. (1995). Impression Management in Organizations: Theory, Measurement, Practice. New York: Routledge.
• Sanchez-Nunez, M. T., Fernandez-Berrocal, P., & Latorre, J. M. (2013). Assessment of Emotional Intelligence in the Family: Influences Between Parents and Children on Their Own Perception and That of Others. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families , 2 (1), 65-73.
• Schlaerth, A., Ensari, N., & Christian, J. (2013). A Meta-Analytical Review of the Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Leaders’ Constructive Conflict Management. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations , 16 (1), 126-136.
• Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Seibert, E. S., Kraimer, L. M., Liden, C. R. (2001). A Social Capital Theory of Career Success. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2): 219-237.
• Singh, V., Kumra, S., Vinnicombe, S. (2002). Gender and Impression Management: Playing the Promotion Game. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 77-89.
• Snyder, M. & Cofeland, J. (1989). Self-Monitoring Processes in Organizational Settings, pp:7-20. In: Impression Management in the Organization. Ed.: Robert A. Giacalone and Paul Rosenfeld. New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.
• Sparkes, A. C., Samaniego, C. P., Smith, B. (2011). Social Comparison Processes, Narrative Mapping and Their Shaping of the Cancer Experience: A Case Study of an Elite Athlete. Health, 16 (5), 467-488.
• Stevens, C. K., ve Kristof, A. L. (1995). Making the right impression: A Field Study Of Candidate İmpression Management During Job İnterviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 587–606.
• Taylor, S. E. ve Lobel, M. (1989). Social Comparison Activity Under Threat: Downward Evaluation and Upward Contacts. Psychological Review, 96(4): 569-575.
• Tedeschi, J. T., & Riess, M. (1981). Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research. In: Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression Management Theory And Social Psychological Research. New York: Academic Press.
• Wayne, S. J., Kacmar, K.M. (1991). The affects of impression management on the performance appraisal process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48: 70–88.
• Wong C-S., Law K.S. (2002). The affects of Leader and Follower Emotional Intelligence on Performance and Attitude: An Exploratory Study, The Leadership Quarterly 13, 243–274.
• Wong C-S., Law K.S. (2002). The affects of Leader and Follower Emotional Intelligence on Performance and Attitude: An Exploratory Study, The Leadership Quarterly 13, 243–27.