Electronic Learning in Undergraduate Medical Education

Yıl 2021, , 45 - 48, 03.05.2021

Beyza Özçınar , Aykhan Abbasov Alper Ozturk Firat Tutal Leyla Turker Sener , Nihat Aksakal , Melih Kara Özgür Albuz , Yesim Erbil

https://doi.org/10.26650/experimed.2021.865477

Öz

Objective: This study was designed to assess the impact of elec-tronic education on students' learning levels and to compare the video-based electronic learning with text-based learning among medical faculty students.

Materials and Methods: This study was conducted as a single center, cross-sectional study. All of the volunteers were fourth year students of the medical faculty. All students were randomly divided into two groups. Each group had 100 students. In group 1, all students were educated by video-based electronic learning about wound healing, and in group 2, all students were educated by standard lectures from textbook. Both groups were evaluated according to their correct response rates.

Results: The video-based learning increased the correct response rates by 25 fold for more than five questions (OR: 25, p=0.0001) and increased the correct response rates by 10 fold for more than seven questions (OR: 10, p=0.0001).

Conclusion: In this study, video-based learning was found more successful than the text-based learning as a learning method.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Video-based learning, text -based learning, succsess, medical education, correct response rate

Destekleyen Kurum

Istanbul University Scientific Research Project number 26915.

Proje Numarası

26915

Mezuniyet Öncesi Tıp Eğitiminde Elektronik Öğrenme

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, tıp fakültesi öğrencileri arasında elektronik eği-timin öğrencilerin öğrenme düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisini değerlen-dirmek ve video tabanlı elektronik öğrenmeyi metin tabanlı öğren-me ile karşılaştırmak için tasarlanmıştır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma tek merkezli, kesitsel bir çalışma olarak yapılmıştır. Gönüllülerin tamamı tıp fakültesinin dördüncü sınıf öğrencileridir ve tüm öğrenciler rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Her gruba 100 öğrenci dahil edildi. Grup 1'de tüm öğrencilere yara iyi-leşmesi hakkında video tabanlı elektronik öğrenme ile eğitim veril-di ve 2. gruptaki tüm öğrenciler ders kitabından standart derslerle eğitildi. Her iki grup da doğru yanıt oranlarına göre değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Video tabanlı öğrenme, beşten fazla soru için doğru yanıt oranlarını 25 kat arttırırken (OR: 25, p=0.0001) yediden fazla soru için 10 kat arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir (OR: 10, p=0.0001).

Sonuç: Bu çalışmada video temelli öğrenme, bir öğrenme yöntemi olarak metin temelli öğrenmeye göre daha başarılı bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Video temelli öğrenme, metin temelli öğrenme, tıp eğitim, doğru yanıt oranı

Proje Numarası

26915

Kaynakça

• 1. Sobral Dejano T. What kind of motivation drives medical students' learning quests? Med Educ 2004; 38: 950-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 2. Bedford TA. Learning Styles: A Review of Literature (1st draft). In: Toowoomba, Australia: OPACS, The University of Southern Que-ensland; 2006. google scholar
• 3. Barbe, Walter Burke; Swassing, Raymond H.; Milone, Michael N. Teaching through modality strengths: concepts practices. Colum-bus, Ohio: Zaner-Bloser; 1979.p. 117. google scholar
• 4. Keefe JW. Learning Style: An overview, in JW Keefe (ed.) Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs, NASSP; 1979.p.11-7. google scholar
• 5. Dunn, Rita Stafford; Dunn, Kenneth J. Teaching students through their individual learning styles: a practical approach. Reston, VA: Reston Pub. Co; 1978.p.431. google scholar
• 6. Schwerdtfeger K, Wand S, Schmid O, Roessler M, Quintel M, Leiss-ner KB, et al. A prospective, blinded evaluation of a video-assisted '4-stage approach' during undergraduate student practical skills training. BMC Medical Education 2014; 14: 104. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 7. Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate me-dical education. BMJ 2001; 322: 40-4. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 8. Alick BE. Case studies of the effect of learning styles, problem-sol-ving strategies and instructional strategies on the achievement of African American college students in general chemistry (Afri-can-American). Diss Abstr Int 1993; 54/06: A2108. google scholar
• 9. Boydak AL. Learning Styles. Istanbul, Turkey: White; 2001.p.8-10. google scholar
• 10. Brown B. Myths and Realities No. 26: Teaching Style vs. Learning Style. Columbus, OH: Educational Resources Information Center 2003. google scholar
• 11. Murphy RJ, Gray SA, Straja SR, Bogert MC. Student learning prefe-rences and teaching implications. J Dental Educ 2004; 68: 859-66. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 12. Zhang S. Students' Perceptions of Multimedia Classrooms at East Tennessee State University.(dissertation).Johnson City, TN: East Tennessee State Univ; 2002.p.721. google scholar
• 13. Fulton JF. History of medical education. Br Med J 1953; 2: 457-61. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 14. Bonwell CC, Eison JA. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. Washington, DC: George Washington Univ; 1991.p.121. google scholar
• 15. Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Adv Physiol Educ 2006; 30: 13-6. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 16. Lujan LH, Dicarlo SE. Too much teaching, not enough learning: what is the solution? Adv Physiol Educ 2006, 30: 17-22. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 17. Fleming ND. Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. New Zeland; 2001.p.128. google scholar
• 18. Kharb P, Samanta PP, Jindal M, Singh V. The learning styles and the preferred teaching-learning strategies of first year medical stu-dents. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7: 1089-92. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 19. Fleming N, Baume D. Learning Styles Again: VARKing up the right tree! Educational Developments, SEDA Ltd; 2006; 7: 4-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 20. Baykan Z, Naçar M. Learning styles of first-year medical students attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey, Advances in Physi-ology Education Published 1 Vol. 2007; 31: 158-60. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 21. Slater JA, Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. Does gender influence learning style preferences of first-year medical students? Adv Physiol Educ 2007; 31: 336-42. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 22. Rezaeinejad M, Azizifar A, Gowhary H. Procedia - Social and Beha-vioral Sciences 2015; 199: 218-24. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 23. Whillier S, Lystad RP, Abi-Arrage D, McPhie C, Johnston S, Williams C, et al. The learning style preferences of chiropractic students: A cross-sectional study. J Chiropr Educ 2014; 28: 21-7. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 24. Laxman Khanal, Sandip Shah, Sarun Koirala. Exploration of prefer-red learning styles in medical education using VARK modal. Russi-an Open Medical Journal 2014; 3: 0305. [CrossRef] google scholar
• 25. Samarakoon L, Fernando T, Rodrigo C. Learning styles and approa-ches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgradu-ates. BMC Med Educ 2013; 25:13-42. [CrossRef] google scholar