TÜRKİYE’DE PARA POLİTİKALARININ KREDİ KANALI AKTARIMI: VAR YAKLAŞIMI

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 185 - 208, 23.11.2017

Harun Kaya , Murat Belke

https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.346346

Öz

Bu
çalışma parasal aktarım mekanizması kanallarından banka kredileri kanalının
Türkiye ekonomisinde etkinliğini incelemektedir. Çalışmada, 2003:1-2016:12
dönemine ilişkin aylık veriler kullanılarak VAR modeli tahmin edilmektedir. VAR
modeline dayalı olarak uygulanan etki-tepki, varyans ayrıştırma ve Granger
nedensellik analizleri sonucu elde edilen bulgular incelenen dönem itibariyle
banka kredi kanalının zayıf da olsa etkin olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Para Politikası, Parasal Aktarım Mekanizması, Kredi Kanalı, VAR Modeli.

Kaynakça

• AKERLOF, G.A. 1970. The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
• AKLAN, N.A. ve NARGELEÇEKENLER, M. (2008). Para Politikalarının Banka Kredi Kanalı Üzerindeki Etkileri. İ.Ü. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 39,109-132.
• ASTERİOU, D. ve HALL, S.G. (2007). Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach. New York: Pallgrave Macmillan (revised edition).
• BEAN, C., Larsen, J. ve NİKOLOV, K. (2002). Financial Frictions and the Monetary Transmission Mechanism: Theory, Evidence and Policy Implications.
• European Central Bank (ECB) Working Paper, 113, 1-59.
• BERNANKE, B.S. ve BLİNDER, A.S. (1998). Credit Money and Aggregate Demand. The American Economic Review, 78(2), 435-439.
• BERNANKE, B.S. ve GERTLER, M. (1995). Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission, Journal of Economic Perspective, 9, 27- 48.
• BERNANKE, B.S. (1993). Credit in the Macroeconomy. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Economic Review, 18(1), 50-70.
• BERNANKE, B.S. ve BLİNDER, A.S. (1992). The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 901-921.
• CECCHETTİ, S.G. (1995). Distinguishing Theories of the Monetary Transmission Mechanism. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 83-97.
• CENGİZ, V. ve DUMAN, M. (2008). Türkiye’de Banka Kredi Kanalının Önemi Üzerine Etki Tepki Fonksiyonlarına Dayalı Bir Değerlendirme (1990-2006). Hacettepe Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 26(2), 81-104.
• ÇAVUŞOĞLU, T. (2002). Credit Transmission Mechanism in Turkey: An Emprical Investigation. Middle East Technical University Economic Research Center (ERC) Working Papers in Economics, 02(3), 1-30.
• ÇİÇEK, M. (2005). Türkiye’de Parasal Aktarım Mekanizması: VAR (Vektör Otoregresyon) Yaklaşımıyla Analizi. İktisat İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, 20(233), 82-105.
• DE BONDT, G. (2004). The Balance Sheet Channel of Monetary Policy: First Empirical Evidence for The Euro Area Corporate. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 9(3), 219-228.
• DE BONDT, G. (1997). Monetary Transmission in six EU-Countries: an Introduction and Overview, De Nederlandsche Bank NV, Econometric Research and Special Studies Department Research Memorandum WO&E, 527(9742), 1-30.
• DİCKEY, D.A. ve FULLER, W.A. (1979), Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
• DİCKEY, D.A. ve FULLER, W.A. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with A Unit Root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
• ENDERS, W. (2014). Applied Econometric Time Series (fourth revised edition), New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• FARİNHA, L. ve MARQUES, C.R. (2001). The Bank Lending Channel of Monetary Polıcy: Identification and Estimation Using Portuguese Micro Data Bank. European Central Bank (ECB) Working Paper, 102, 1-58.
• GERTLER, M. ve GİLCHRİST, S. (1994). Monetary Policy, Business Cycles, and the Behavior of Small Manufacturing Firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 309-340.
• GRANGER, C.W.J. (1969). Investigating Casual Relations by Econometric Models and Cross Spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
• GUJARATI, D.N. (2006). Temel Ekonometri (Ü. Şenesen ve G. Günlük-Şenesen, Çev.). İstanbul: Literatür Yayınları.
• GÜNDÜZ, L. (2001). Türkiye’de Parasal Aktarım Mekanizması ve Banka Kredi Kanalı. İMKB Dergisi, 5(1)8, 13-30.
• HALLSTEN, K. (1999). “Bank Loans and the Transmission Mechanism of Monetary Policy”, Sveriges Riksbank Working Paper (revised version), 73, 1-44. 29.03.2017 tarihinde https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/82425/1/wp_073.pdf, adresinden erişildi.
• HOLTEMÖLLER, O. (2002). “Identifying a Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission and Empirical Evidence for Germany”, 1-19, 30.03.2017 tarihinde www.ibrarian.net adresinden erişildi.
• HUBBARD, G.R. (1995). Is There a ‘Credit channel’ for Monetary Policy. Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Lois Review, 63-77.
• HÜLSEWİG, O., Mayer, E. ve WOLLMERSHAUSER, T. (2006). Bank loan supply and monetary Policy transmission in Germany: An assessment based on matching impulse responses. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(10), 2893-2910.
• KARA, H. (2012). Küresel Kriz Sonrası Para Politikası. TCMB Çalışma Tebliği, No: 12-17.
• KASHYAP, A.K. ve STEIN, J.C. (2000). What Do a Million Observations on Banks Say about the Transmission of Monetary Policy? The American Economic Review, 90(3), 407-428.
• KASHYAP, A.K. ve STEIN, J.C. (1994).The Impact of Monetary Policy on Bank Balance Sheets. NBER Working Papers, 4821, 1-63.
• KASHYAP, A.K. ve STEIN, J.C. (1995). The Impact of Monetary Policy on Bank Balance Sheets. Carnegie- Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 42, 151-195.
• KASHYAP, A.K., STEIN, J.C. ve Wilcox, D.W. (1993). Monetary Policy and Credit Conditions: Evidence from the Composition of External Finance. The American Economic Review, 83(1), 78-98.
• KING, R.G. (2000). The New IS-LM Model: Language, Logic and Limits. Federal Reserve of Richmond Quarterly Economic Review, 86(3), 45–104.
• KISHAN, R.P. ve OPIELA, T.P. (2000). Bank Size, Bank Capital, and the Bank Lending Channel. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 32(1), 121-141.
• KUTTNER, K.N. ve MOSSER, P.C. (2002). The Monetary Transmission Mechanism: Some Answers and Further Questions. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 15-26.
• LEEPER, E.M., SIMS, C.A. ve ZHA, T. (1996). What Does Monetary Policy Do? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 1-63.
• LUTKEPOHL, H. (2005). New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
• LUTKEPOHL, H. (2011). Vector Autoregressive Models. European Universtiy Institute (EUI) Working Paper, 30, 1-28.
• MACKINNON, J.G. (1991). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests. R.F. Engle ve C.W.J. Granger (Yay. Haz.). Long Run Economic Relationships: Reading in Cointegration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• MAUSKOPF, E. (1990). The Transmission Channels of Monetary Policy: How Have They Changed? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Lois, Federal Reserve Bulletin, 76(12), 984-1072.
• MELTZER, A.H. (1995). Monetary, Credit and (Other) Transmission Processes: A Monetarist Perspective. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 49-72.
• MISHKIN, F.S. (1996). The Channels of Monetary Transmission: Lesson For Monetary Policy. National Bureau Of Economic Research (NBER) Working Series,5464, 1-27.
• MISHKIN, F.S. (1995). Symposium on the Monetary Transmission Mechanism. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 3-10.
• MODIGLIANI, F. (1975). Contemporary Issues in Economics. M. Parkin (Yay. Haz.). The life-cycle hypothesis of saving twenty years later içinde (ss.2-35). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• MODIGLIANI, F. ve MILLER, M.H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
• MORRIS, C.S. ve SELLON, G.H. (1995). Bank Lending and Monetary Policy: Evidence on a Credit Channel. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, Second Quarter, 59-75.
• NELSON, C. ve PLOSSER C. (1982). Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconmic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implications. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10(2), 139-162.
• OLINER, S.D. ve RUDEBUSCH, G.D. (1996). Is There a Broad Credit Channel for Monetary Policy. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review, 1, 3-13.
• ÖRNEK, İ. (2009). Türkiye’de Parasal Aktarım Mekanizması Kanallarının İşleyişi. Maliye Dergisi, 156, 104-125.
• ÖZÇİÇEK, Ö. (2006). Türkiye’ de 1980 Sonrası Para Aktarım Mekanizmasında Kredi Kanalının Yeri. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(1), 257-268.
• ÖZDEMİR, A.K. (2012). Parasal Aktarım Mekanizmasında Banka Kredi Kanalının Yeri: Türkiye Üzerine Bir İnceleme. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul: Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
• ÖZTÜRKLER, H. ve ÇERMİKLİ, A.H. (2007). Türkiye'de Bir Parasal Aktarım Kanalı Olarak Banka Kredileri. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 44(514), 57–68.
• PEEK, J. ve ROSENGREN, E.S. (1995). “Is Bank Lending Important for the Transmission of Monetary Policy? Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series, 39, 47-68.
• PEKER, O. ve CANBAZOĞLU, B. (2011). Türkiye’de Banka Kredi Kanalının İşleyişi: Ampirik Bir Analiz. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 18(12), 127-143.
• PERRON, P. (1989). The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6), 1361-1401.
• PHILLIPS, P.C.B. ve PERRON, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
• ROMER, C.D. ve ROMER, D.H. (1993). Credit Channel or Credit Actions? An Interpretation of the Postwar Transmission Mechanism. National Bureau Of Economic Research (NBER) Working Series, 4485, 1-64.
• ROMER, C.D. ve ROMER, D.H. (1990). New Evidence on the Monetary Transmission Mechanism. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 149-213.
• RUDEBUSCH, G.D. (1998). Do Measures of Monetary Policy in a Var Make Sense? International Economic Review, 39(4), 907-931.
• SAFAEI, J. ve CAMERON, N. E. (2003), Credit Channel and Credit Shocks in Canadian Macrodynamics - A Structural VAR Approach. Applied Financial Economics, 13(4), 267-277.
• SIMS, C.A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48.
• SIMS, C. A., STOCK, J. H. ve WATSON, M. W. (1990). Inference in Linear Time Series Models with Some Unit Roots. Econometrica, 58(1), 113-144.
• SMETS, F. ve WOUTERS, R. (1999), The Exchange Rate and the Monetary Transmission Mechanism in Germany. De Economist, 4(4), 489-521.
• STIGLITZ, J.E. ve WEISS, A. (1981). Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393-410.
• STOCK, J.H. ve WATSON, M.W. (2001), Vector Autoregressions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 101-115.
• SUN, L., FORD, J. L. ve DICKINSON, D. G., (2010), “Bank Loans and Effects of Monetary Policy of China: VAR/VECM Approach”, China Economic Review, Vol.21, Issue.1, (65-97).
• ŞENGÖNÜL, A. ve THORBECKE, W. (2005). The Effect of Monetary Policy on Bank Lending in Turkey Applied Financial Economics, 15(13), 931-934.
• TARI, R. (2010). Ekonometri. (10. Baskı.). Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayınları.
• TARI, R. (2014). Ekonometri (Gözden geçirilmiş 10. Baskı), Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayınları.
• TAŞ, S., ÖRNEK, İ. ve UTLU, S. (2012). Banka Kredi Kanalı ve Türkiye Uygulaması. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(1), 53-74.
• TOBIN, J. (1978). Monetary Policies and the Economy: The Transmission Mechanism. Southern Economic Journal, 44(3), 421-431.
• Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası (2013) “Parasal Aktarım” 30.03.2017 tarihinde http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/8cdd0f38-142f-493b-b489-bdc0111491bb/ParasalAktarim.pdf?MOD=AJPERES adresinden erişildi.
• WALSH, C.E. ve WILCOX, J.A. (1995). Bank Credit and Economic Activity. J. Peek ve E.S. Rosengren (Yay. Haz.). Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Conference Series, 39, 83-112.
• WORMS, A. (2001). Monetary Policy Effects on Bank Loans in Germany: A Panel-Econometric Analysis: The Reaction of Bank Lending to Monetary Policy Measures in Germany European Central Bank (ECB) Working Paper, 96, 1-39.
• ZIVOT, E. ve ANDREWS, D.W.K. (1992). Further Evidence of Great Crash, the Oile-Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statics, 10(3), 251-270.