Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Obstetrik Becerilerin Geliştirilmesinde Gerçekliğe Yakınlığı Yüksek Doğum Simülatörü Kullanımının Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Memnuniyet ve Performansı Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 1 - 16, 01.02.2019

Öz

DOI: 10.26650/FNJN341399


Amaç: Araştırma, obstetrik tanılama
uygulamaları kapsamında gerçekliğe yakınlığı yüksek doğum simülatörü ile yapılan
eğitimin, öğrencilerin obstetrik beceri uygulamalarına ve memnuniyet
düzeylerine etkisinin incelemesi amacıyla yapıldı.



Yöntem: Yarı deneysel tipte gerçekleştirilen
araştırmanın örneklemini 90 öğrenci oluşturdu. Araştırmada girişim grubundaki öğrenciler
gerçekliğe yakınlığı yüksek doğum simülatörü ile (n=47), kontrol grubundaki öğrenciler
ise yüksek teknoloji içermeyen basit düzey maketler (n=43) kullanılarak, gebe
ve lohusanın fizik muayenesini gerçekleştirmek üzere obstetrik beceri eğitimine
alındı. Araştırma verilerinin toplanmasında; Obstetrik Tanılama Klinik Beceri
Rehberi, Eğitim Yöntemlerinden Memnuniyet Anketi ve Mesleksel Beceri
Laboratuvarı Geribildirim Formu kullanıldı. Araştırmadan elde edilen
sosyo-demografik veriler Statistical Package for Social Science for Windows
Version 15.0 paket programı kullanılarak sayı ve yüzde dağılımları ile değerlendirildi.
Gruplar arası karşılaştırmalarda Independent Sample T Testi, Mann-Withney U
Testi ve Ki-Kare Testi kullanıldı.



Bulgular: Girişim grubundaki öğrencilerin kontrol
grubuna göre obstetrik beceri puan ortalamaları anlamlı oranda daha yüksek
bulundu. Gruplar arasında eğitim yönteminden memnun olma durumları açısından
anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı. Girişim grubundaki öğrenciler ‘laboratuvar fizik
ortamının uygunluğu, malzemelerin yeterliliği ve laboratuvar uygulamalarının
teorik/kuramsal bilgi ile uyumu’ maddelerine daha olumlu yanıt verdi. Girişim
grubundaki öğrencilerin %81’i, kontrol grubundaki öğrencilerin %58’i
laboratuvar uygulamasını yeterli buldu.



Sonuç: Gerçekliğe yakınlığı yüksek doğum
simülatörü kullanımında öğrencilerin laboratuvar becerileri daha yeterli ve
laboratuvar çalışmalarına yönelik geribildirimleri daha olumludur.
Üniversitelerde hemşirelik öğrencilerinin klinik uygulamalar öncesi mesleksel
beceri laboratuvar çalışmalarında, simülatörlerin yaygın şekilde kullanımı
önerilebilir. 

Kaynakça

  • Akyüz, A. (2011, Kasım). Hemşirelik beceri eğitiminde yenilikçi uygulamalar. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Klinik ve İletişim Beceri ve Eğitimleri Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara. Au, M.L, Lo, M.S, Cheong, W., Wang, S.C, & Van, I. K. (2016). Nursing students’ perception of high-fidelity simulation activity instead of clinical placement: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 39, 16-21. Başak, T., Unver, V., Moss, J., Watts, P., & Gaioso, V. (2016). Beginning and advanced students’ perceptions of the use of low-and high-fidelity mannequins in nursing simulation. Nurse Education Today, 36, 37-43. Bradley, P., & Postlethwaite, K. (2003). Setting up a clinical skills learning facility. Medical Education, 37(1), 6-13. Bremner, M. N., Aduddell K., Bennett D. N., & VanGeest, J. B. (2006). The use of human patient simulators: Best practices with novice nursing students. Nurse Educator, 31, 170-174. Childs, J.C., & Sepples, S. (2006). Clinical teaching by simulation: Lessons learned from a complex patient care scenario. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27, 154-158. Coşkun, A. (2008). Hemşire ve ebeler için kadın sağlığı ve hastalıkları öğrenim rehberi. İstanbul: İstanbul Medikal Yayıncılık. Crytzer, M.L. (2011). The effect of high-fidelity home health simulations on nursing students’ clinical performance. (Doctoral dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania) Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535967 Çetinkaya, E., & Sevil, Ü. (2016). Perinatolojiye Giriş Ed: Ertem G, Sevil Ü.(Ed) Perinatoloji ve Bakım kitabı içinde (s. 1-38). Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri.
  • Dayal, A. K., Fisher, N., Magrane, D., Goffman, D., Bernstein, PS., & Katz, NT. (2009). Simulation training improves medical students’ learning experiences when performing real vaginal deliveries. Empirical Investigation, 4(3), 155-159. Deering, S., Poggi, S., Macedonia, C., Gherman, R., & Satin, A.J. (2004). Improving resident competency in the management of shoulder dystocia with simulation training. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103(6), 1224-1228. Deering, S.H, Hodor, J.G, Wylen, M., Poggi,S., Nielsen, P.E, & Satin, A.J. (2006). Additional training with an obstetric simulator improves medical student comfort with basic procedures. Simulation Healthcare, 1(1), 32-34. Dikici, M.F., & Yarış, F. (2007). Standardized and simulated patient program in Ondokuz Mayıs University School of Medicine: Medical education. Türkiye Klinikleri Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(5), 738-743. Doolen, J., Mariani B., Atz, T., Horsley, T. L., O’Rourke, J., & McAfee K., et al. (2016). High-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education: A review of simulation reviews. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(7), 290-302. Edeer, AD., & Aklime D. (2015). Hemşirelik eğitiminde simülasyon kullanımı ve simülasyon tipleri. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi, 12(2), 121-125. Ewertsson, M., Allvin, R., Holmstr€om, I. K., & Blomberg, K. (2015). Walking the bridge: Nursing students’ learning in clinical skill laboratories. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(4), 277-283. Freeth, D., & Fry, H. (2005). Nursing students’ and tutors’ perceptions of learning and teaching in a clinical skills centre. Nurse Educatiın Today, 25(4), 272-282.
  • Goldsmith, M., Stewart, L., & Ferguson, L. (2006). Peer learning partnership: An innovative strategy to enhance skill acquisition in nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 26(2), 123-130. Göriş, S., Bilgi, N., & Bayındır, S. K. (2014). Hemşirelik eğitiminde simülasyon kullanımı. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(2), 25-29. Gürpınar, E., Akyıldız, F., Özbudak, Ö., & Şenol, Y. (2005) Akdeniz üniversitesi tıp fakültesinde uygulanan probleme dayalı öğrenimin eğitim yönlendiricileri tarafından değerlendirilmesi. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 20, 46-52. Gürpınar, E., Alimoglu, M. K., Mamaklı, S., & Aktekin M. (2010). Can learning style predict student satisfaction with different instruction methods and academic achievement in medical education. Advances Physiology Education, 34(4), 192-196. Holmstrom, S.W., Downes, K., Mayer, J.C, & Learman, L.A. (2011). Simulation training in an obstetric clerkship: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 118(3), 649-654. Jeffries, P.R, & Rizzolo, M.A. (2006). Designing and Implementing Models for the Innovative Use of Simulation to Teach Nursing Care of III Adults and Children: A National, Multi-Site, MultiMethod Study. In P.R. Jeffries (Ed.), Simulation in Nursing Education: From Conceptualization to Evaluation (pp. 147-159). New York, NY: National League for Nursing. Jeffries, P. R., Rew, S., & Cramer, J. (2002). A comparison of student centered versus traditional methods of teaching basic nursing skill in a learning laboratory. Nursing Education Perpectives, 23(1), 14-19. Jude, D.C, Gilbert, G.G, & Magrane, D. (2006). Simulation training in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 195(5), 1489-1492. Kapucu, S, & Bulut, H. (2011). Turkish nursing students’ views of their clinical learning environment: A focus group study. Pakistan Journal of Medicine Sciences, 27(5), 1149-1153. Karaçay, P., & Göktepe, N. (2011). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin eğitiminde ilk klinik uygulama öncesi simülasyon yönteminin kullanımı. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Klinik ve İletişim Beceri Eğitimleri Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri. Keetsemang, S., John, M., Timothe’e, S., Maphosa, M., Jennifer, C., & Petra, B. (2008). Student evaluation of a clinical self-study laboratory. Nurse Education Practice, 8(5), 359-367. Kul S. (2011). Klinik araştırmalarda örnek genişliği belirleme. Extraplevral, 11, 129-132. Lubbers, J., & Rossman, C. (2016). The effects of pediatric community simulation experience on the self-confidence and satisfaction of baccalaureate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 39, 93-98. Mete, S, & Uysal, N. (2010). Hemşirelik Mesleksel Beceri Laboratuarındaki Psikomotor Beceri Eğitiminin Öğrenci ve Eğiticiler Tarafından Değerlendirilmesi. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 2, 29-38. Morgan, R. (2006). Using clinical skills laboratories to promote theory–practice integration during first practice placement: an Irish perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(2), 155-161. Nehring, W. M, & Lashley, FR. (2009). Nursing simulation: A review of the past 40 years. Simulation Gaming, 40(4), 528-552. Peterson, M. J., & Bechtel, G. A. (2000). Combining the arts: An applied critical thinking approach in the skills laboratory. NursingConnections, 3(2), 43-49. Schoening, A. M, Sittner, A. J, & Todd, M. J. (2006). Simulated clinical experience; nursing students’ perceptions and educators’ role. Nurse Education, 31(6), 253-258. Taşkın, L. (2015). Doğum ve Kadın Sağlığı Hemşireliği. Genişletilmiş XIII. Baskı, Akademisyen Yayınevi. Terzioğlu, F. Yücel, Ç., Koç, G., Şimşek, Ş., Yaşar, BN., Şahan, FU., et al. (2016). A new strategy in nursing education: From hybrid simulation to clinical practice. Nurse Education Today, 39, 104-108. Wagner, D., Bear, M., & Sander, J. (2009). Turning simulation into reality: Increasing student competence and confidence. Journal of Nurse Education, 48(8), 465-467. Wotton, K., Davis, J., Button, D., & Kelton, M. (2010). Third-year undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of high-fidelity simulation. Journal of Nurse Education, 49(11), 632-639.

The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric Skills

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 1 - 16, 01.02.2019

Öz

DOI: 10.26650/FNJN341399


Aim: Research was carried out to examine
the effect of training with realizing high fidelity birthing simulator on
obstetric skill applications and satisfaction levels of students with in the
scope of obstetric diagnostic applications.



Method: The sample of the research, which
was conducted in semi-experimental design, consisted of 90 students. In the
study, the students in experiment group with high fidelity birthing simulator
(n=47) and the students in control group (n=43) using basic-level modeling, not
including advanced technology were in obstetric skills training in order to
perform physical examination of pregnant and postpartum women. During
collection of research data following forms were used; Obstetric Diagnostic
Clinical Skills Guides, Satisfaction from Education Methods Survey and
Professional Skills Laboratory Feedback Form. The socio-demographic data
obtained from study were evaluated with number and percentage distributions
using the Statistical Package for Social Science for Windows Version 15.0
package program. Independent Sample T Test, Mann-Withney U Test and Chi-Square
Test were used for comparison between groups.



Results: Obstetric skill mean scores of the
students in the experiment group were significantly higher than the control
group. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of satisfaction
with the education method. The students in the experiment group responded more
positively to “ the suitability of the laboratory physics environment, the
adequacy of the materials and adaptation with theoretical knowledge of the
laboratory applications. Eighty one percent of the students in the experiment
group and 58% of the students in the control group stated that “Laboratory
practice” found sufficient.



Conclusion: When using a high-fidelity
birth simulator, students’ laboratory skills are more adequate and their
feedbacks towards laboratory studies are more positive. As a result of study it
is recommended that the simulation-based education is widely used by nursing
students at laboratory studies prior to clinic applications in universities providing
education at the bachelor degree. 

Kaynakça

  • Akyüz, A. (2011, Kasım). Hemşirelik beceri eğitiminde yenilikçi uygulamalar. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Klinik ve İletişim Beceri ve Eğitimleri Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara. Au, M.L, Lo, M.S, Cheong, W., Wang, S.C, & Van, I. K. (2016). Nursing students’ perception of high-fidelity simulation activity instead of clinical placement: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 39, 16-21. Başak, T., Unver, V., Moss, J., Watts, P., & Gaioso, V. (2016). Beginning and advanced students’ perceptions of the use of low-and high-fidelity mannequins in nursing simulation. Nurse Education Today, 36, 37-43. Bradley, P., & Postlethwaite, K. (2003). Setting up a clinical skills learning facility. Medical Education, 37(1), 6-13. Bremner, M. N., Aduddell K., Bennett D. N., & VanGeest, J. B. (2006). The use of human patient simulators: Best practices with novice nursing students. Nurse Educator, 31, 170-174. Childs, J.C., & Sepples, S. (2006). Clinical teaching by simulation: Lessons learned from a complex patient care scenario. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27, 154-158. Coşkun, A. (2008). Hemşire ve ebeler için kadın sağlığı ve hastalıkları öğrenim rehberi. İstanbul: İstanbul Medikal Yayıncılık. Crytzer, M.L. (2011). The effect of high-fidelity home health simulations on nursing students’ clinical performance. (Doctoral dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania) Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535967 Çetinkaya, E., & Sevil, Ü. (2016). Perinatolojiye Giriş Ed: Ertem G, Sevil Ü.(Ed) Perinatoloji ve Bakım kitabı içinde (s. 1-38). Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri.
  • Dayal, A. K., Fisher, N., Magrane, D., Goffman, D., Bernstein, PS., & Katz, NT. (2009). Simulation training improves medical students’ learning experiences when performing real vaginal deliveries. Empirical Investigation, 4(3), 155-159. Deering, S., Poggi, S., Macedonia, C., Gherman, R., & Satin, A.J. (2004). Improving resident competency in the management of shoulder dystocia with simulation training. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103(6), 1224-1228. Deering, S.H, Hodor, J.G, Wylen, M., Poggi,S., Nielsen, P.E, & Satin, A.J. (2006). Additional training with an obstetric simulator improves medical student comfort with basic procedures. Simulation Healthcare, 1(1), 32-34. Dikici, M.F., & Yarış, F. (2007). Standardized and simulated patient program in Ondokuz Mayıs University School of Medicine: Medical education. Türkiye Klinikleri Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(5), 738-743. Doolen, J., Mariani B., Atz, T., Horsley, T. L., O’Rourke, J., & McAfee K., et al. (2016). High-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education: A review of simulation reviews. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(7), 290-302. Edeer, AD., & Aklime D. (2015). Hemşirelik eğitiminde simülasyon kullanımı ve simülasyon tipleri. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi, 12(2), 121-125. Ewertsson, M., Allvin, R., Holmstr€om, I. K., & Blomberg, K. (2015). Walking the bridge: Nursing students’ learning in clinical skill laboratories. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(4), 277-283. Freeth, D., & Fry, H. (2005). Nursing students’ and tutors’ perceptions of learning and teaching in a clinical skills centre. Nurse Educatiın Today, 25(4), 272-282.
  • Goldsmith, M., Stewart, L., & Ferguson, L. (2006). Peer learning partnership: An innovative strategy to enhance skill acquisition in nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 26(2), 123-130. Göriş, S., Bilgi, N., & Bayındır, S. K. (2014). Hemşirelik eğitiminde simülasyon kullanımı. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(2), 25-29. Gürpınar, E., Akyıldız, F., Özbudak, Ö., & Şenol, Y. (2005) Akdeniz üniversitesi tıp fakültesinde uygulanan probleme dayalı öğrenimin eğitim yönlendiricileri tarafından değerlendirilmesi. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 20, 46-52. Gürpınar, E., Alimoglu, M. K., Mamaklı, S., & Aktekin M. (2010). Can learning style predict student satisfaction with different instruction methods and academic achievement in medical education. Advances Physiology Education, 34(4), 192-196. Holmstrom, S.W., Downes, K., Mayer, J.C, & Learman, L.A. (2011). Simulation training in an obstetric clerkship: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 118(3), 649-654. Jeffries, P.R, & Rizzolo, M.A. (2006). Designing and Implementing Models for the Innovative Use of Simulation to Teach Nursing Care of III Adults and Children: A National, Multi-Site, MultiMethod Study. In P.R. Jeffries (Ed.), Simulation in Nursing Education: From Conceptualization to Evaluation (pp. 147-159). New York, NY: National League for Nursing. Jeffries, P. R., Rew, S., & Cramer, J. (2002). A comparison of student centered versus traditional methods of teaching basic nursing skill in a learning laboratory. Nursing Education Perpectives, 23(1), 14-19. Jude, D.C, Gilbert, G.G, & Magrane, D. (2006). Simulation training in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 195(5), 1489-1492. Kapucu, S, & Bulut, H. (2011). Turkish nursing students’ views of their clinical learning environment: A focus group study. Pakistan Journal of Medicine Sciences, 27(5), 1149-1153. Karaçay, P., & Göktepe, N. (2011). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin eğitiminde ilk klinik uygulama öncesi simülasyon yönteminin kullanımı. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Klinik ve İletişim Beceri Eğitimleri Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri. Keetsemang, S., John, M., Timothe’e, S., Maphosa, M., Jennifer, C., & Petra, B. (2008). Student evaluation of a clinical self-study laboratory. Nurse Education Practice, 8(5), 359-367. Kul S. (2011). Klinik araştırmalarda örnek genişliği belirleme. Extraplevral, 11, 129-132. Lubbers, J., & Rossman, C. (2016). The effects of pediatric community simulation experience on the self-confidence and satisfaction of baccalaureate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 39, 93-98. Mete, S, & Uysal, N. (2010). Hemşirelik Mesleksel Beceri Laboratuarındaki Psikomotor Beceri Eğitiminin Öğrenci ve Eğiticiler Tarafından Değerlendirilmesi. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 2, 29-38. Morgan, R. (2006). Using clinical skills laboratories to promote theory–practice integration during first practice placement: an Irish perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(2), 155-161. Nehring, W. M, & Lashley, FR. (2009). Nursing simulation: A review of the past 40 years. Simulation Gaming, 40(4), 528-552. Peterson, M. J., & Bechtel, G. A. (2000). Combining the arts: An applied critical thinking approach in the skills laboratory. NursingConnections, 3(2), 43-49. Schoening, A. M, Sittner, A. J, & Todd, M. J. (2006). Simulated clinical experience; nursing students’ perceptions and educators’ role. Nurse Education, 31(6), 253-258. Taşkın, L. (2015). Doğum ve Kadın Sağlığı Hemşireliği. Genişletilmiş XIII. Baskı, Akademisyen Yayınevi. Terzioğlu, F. Yücel, Ç., Koç, G., Şimşek, Ş., Yaşar, BN., Şahan, FU., et al. (2016). A new strategy in nursing education: From hybrid simulation to clinical practice. Nurse Education Today, 39, 104-108. Wagner, D., Bear, M., & Sander, J. (2009). Turning simulation into reality: Increasing student competence and confidence. Journal of Nurse Education, 48(8), 465-467. Wotton, K., Davis, J., Button, D., & Kelton, M. (2010). Third-year undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of high-fidelity simulation. Journal of Nurse Education, 49(11), 632-639.
Toplam 3 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Şenay Ünsal Atan Bu kişi benim

Duygu Güleç Satır

Rüşen Öztürk Bu kişi benim

Oya Kavlak Bu kişi benim

Aynur Saruhan Bu kişi benim

Sezer Er Güneri Bu kişi benim

Ümran Sevil Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Şubat 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Ünsal Atan, Ş., Güleç Satır, D., Öztürk, R., Kavlak, O., vd. (2019). The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric Skills. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 27(1), 1-16.
AMA Ünsal Atan Ş, Güleç Satır D, Öztürk R, Kavlak O, Saruhan A, Er Güneri S, Sevil Ü. The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric Skills. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. Şubat 2019;27(1):1-16.
Chicago Ünsal Atan, Şenay, Duygu Güleç Satır, Rüşen Öztürk, Oya Kavlak, Aynur Saruhan, Sezer Er Güneri, ve Ümran Sevil. “The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric Skills”. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing 27, sy. 1 (Şubat 2019): 1-16.
EndNote Ünsal Atan Ş, Güleç Satır D, Öztürk R, Kavlak O, Saruhan A, Er Güneri S, Sevil Ü (01 Şubat 2019) The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric Skills. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing 27 1 1–16.
IEEE Ş. Ünsal Atan, D. Güleç Satır, R. Öztürk, O. Kavlak, A. Saruhan, S. Er Güneri, ve Ü. Sevil, “The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric Skills”, Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, c. 27, sy. 1, ss. 1–16, 2019.
ISNAD Ünsal Atan, Şenay vd. “The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric Skills”. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing 27/1 (Şubat 2019), 1-16.
JAMA Ünsal Atan Ş, Güleç Satır D, Öztürk R, Kavlak O, Saruhan A, Er Güneri S, Sevil Ü. The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric Skills. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. 2019;27:1–16.
MLA Ünsal Atan, Şenay vd. “The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric Skills”. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, c. 27, sy. 1, 2019, ss. 1-16.
Vancouver Ünsal Atan Ş, Güleç Satır D, Öztürk R, Kavlak O, Saruhan A, Er Güneri S, Sevil Ü. The Effect of Using High Fidelity Birthing Simulator on Satisfaction and Performance of Nursing Students in Developing Obstetric Skills. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. 2019;27(1):1-16.