Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Convolutional Neural Networks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of State-of-the-Art Segmentation Networks

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 06 Sayı: 2, 61 - 66, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.34110/forecasting.1190289

Öz

The prevalence of brain tumor is quite high. Brain tumor causes critical diseases. Also, brain tumor causes a variety of symptoms in most people. This study aims to segmentation of the tumor in the brain. For this purpose, state-of-art architectures, such as UNet, Attention UNet, Residual UNet, Attention Residual UNet, Residual UNet++, Inception UNet, LinkNet, and SegNet were used for segmentation. 592 magnetic resonance (MR) images were utilized in the training and testing of segmentation architectures. In the comparative analysis, Attention UNet achieved the best predictive performance with a 0.886 dice score, 0.795 IoU score, 0.881 sensitivity, 0.993 specificity, 0.891 precision, and 0.986 accuracy.

Teşekkür

This paper has been prepared by AKGUN Computer Incorporated Company. We would like to thank AKGUN Computer Inc. for providing all kinds of opportunities and funds for the execution of this project.

Kaynakça

  • E. Dandil, M. Çakiroǧlu, Z. Ekşi, Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Malign and Benign Brain Tumors on MR Images, in: Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., Springer Verlag, 2015: pp. 157–166. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09879-1_16/COVER.
  • R. Tufel, The National Brain Tumor Foundation: Giving Help, Giving Hope, Neoplasia. 3 (2001) 264–265. doi:10.1038/sj.neo.7900159.
  • O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in: Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (Including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), Springer Verlag, 2015: pp. 234–241. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28/COVER.
  • O. Oktay, J. Schlemper, L. Le Folgoc, M. Lee, M. Heinrich, K. Misawa, K. Mori, S. McDonagh, N.Y. Hammerla, B. Kainz, B. Glocker, D. Rueckert, Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreas, (2018). doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.03999.
  • Z. Zhang, Q. Liu, Y. Wang, Road Extraction by Deep Residual U-Net, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 15 (2018) 749–753. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2018.2802944.
  • X. Chen, L. Yao, Y. Zhang, Residual Attention U-Net for Automated Multi-Class Segmentation of COVID-19 Chest CT Images, (2020). doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.05645.
  • D. Jha, P.H. Smedsrud, M.A. Riegler, D. Johansen, T. De Lange, P. Halvorsen, H.D. Johansen, ResUNet++: An Advanced Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation, in: Proc. - 2019 IEEE Int. Symp. Multimedia, ISM 2019, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2019: pp. 225–230. doi:10.1109/ISM46123.2019.00049.
  • I. Delibasoglu, M. Cetin, Improved U-Nets with inception blocks for building detection, J. Appl. Remote Sens. 14 (2020) 044512. doi:10.1117/1.jrs.14.044512.
  • A. Chaurasia, E. Culurciello, LinkNet: Exploiting encoder representations for efficient semantic segmentation, in: 2017 IEEE Vis. Commun. Image Process. VCIP 2017, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018: pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/VCIP.2017.8305148.
  • V. Badrinarayanan, A. Kendall, R. Cipolla, SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39 (2017) 2481–2495. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615.
  • A. Derin, A.F. Bayram, C. Gurkan, A. Budak, H. Karatas, Automatic Skull Stripping and Brain Segmentation with U-Net in MRI Database, Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 40 (2022) 75–81. doi:10.31590/ejosat.1173065.
  • A.F. Bayram, A. Derin, C. Gurkan, A. Budak, H. Karatas, Analysis of the Effects of Segmentation Networks and Loss Functions in Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation, Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 40 (2022) 82–87. doi:10.31590/ejosat.1173070.
  • F. Karakaya, C. Gurkan, A. Budak, H. Karatas, Classification and Segmentation of Alzheimer Disease in MRI Modality using the Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 40 (2022) 99–105. doi:10.31590/ejosat.1171810.
  • T. Saba, A. Sameh Mohamed, M. El-Affendi, J. Amin, M. Sharif, Brain tumor detection using fusion of hand crafted and deep learning features, Cogn. Syst. Res. 59 (2020) 221–230. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.09.007.
  • J. Zhang, Z. Jiang, J. Dong, Y. Hou, B. Liu, Attention Gate ResU-Net for Automatic MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation, IEEE Access. 8 (2020) 58533–58545. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983075.
  • Br35H :: Brain Tumor Detection 2020 | Kaggle, (n.d.). https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ahmedhamada0/brain-tumor-detection (accessed 14 October 2022).
  • A. Derin, C. Gurkan, A. Budak, H. Karatas, Pancreas Segmentation Using U-Net Based Segmentation Networks in CT Modality: A Comparative Analysis, Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 40 (2022) 94–98. doi:10.31590/ejosat.1171803.
Yıl 2022, Cilt: 06 Sayı: 2, 61 - 66, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.34110/forecasting.1190289

Öz

Kaynakça

  • E. Dandil, M. Çakiroǧlu, Z. Ekşi, Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Malign and Benign Brain Tumors on MR Images, in: Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., Springer Verlag, 2015: pp. 157–166. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09879-1_16/COVER.
  • R. Tufel, The National Brain Tumor Foundation: Giving Help, Giving Hope, Neoplasia. 3 (2001) 264–265. doi:10.1038/sj.neo.7900159.
  • O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in: Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (Including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), Springer Verlag, 2015: pp. 234–241. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28/COVER.
  • O. Oktay, J. Schlemper, L. Le Folgoc, M. Lee, M. Heinrich, K. Misawa, K. Mori, S. McDonagh, N.Y. Hammerla, B. Kainz, B. Glocker, D. Rueckert, Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreas, (2018). doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.03999.
  • Z. Zhang, Q. Liu, Y. Wang, Road Extraction by Deep Residual U-Net, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 15 (2018) 749–753. doi:10.1109/LGRS.2018.2802944.
  • X. Chen, L. Yao, Y. Zhang, Residual Attention U-Net for Automated Multi-Class Segmentation of COVID-19 Chest CT Images, (2020). doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.05645.
  • D. Jha, P.H. Smedsrud, M.A. Riegler, D. Johansen, T. De Lange, P. Halvorsen, H.D. Johansen, ResUNet++: An Advanced Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation, in: Proc. - 2019 IEEE Int. Symp. Multimedia, ISM 2019, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2019: pp. 225–230. doi:10.1109/ISM46123.2019.00049.
  • I. Delibasoglu, M. Cetin, Improved U-Nets with inception blocks for building detection, J. Appl. Remote Sens. 14 (2020) 044512. doi:10.1117/1.jrs.14.044512.
  • A. Chaurasia, E. Culurciello, LinkNet: Exploiting encoder representations for efficient semantic segmentation, in: 2017 IEEE Vis. Commun. Image Process. VCIP 2017, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018: pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/VCIP.2017.8305148.
  • V. Badrinarayanan, A. Kendall, R. Cipolla, SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39 (2017) 2481–2495. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615.
  • A. Derin, A.F. Bayram, C. Gurkan, A. Budak, H. Karatas, Automatic Skull Stripping and Brain Segmentation with U-Net in MRI Database, Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 40 (2022) 75–81. doi:10.31590/ejosat.1173065.
  • A.F. Bayram, A. Derin, C. Gurkan, A. Budak, H. Karatas, Analysis of the Effects of Segmentation Networks and Loss Functions in Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation, Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 40 (2022) 82–87. doi:10.31590/ejosat.1173070.
  • F. Karakaya, C. Gurkan, A. Budak, H. Karatas, Classification and Segmentation of Alzheimer Disease in MRI Modality using the Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 40 (2022) 99–105. doi:10.31590/ejosat.1171810.
  • T. Saba, A. Sameh Mohamed, M. El-Affendi, J. Amin, M. Sharif, Brain tumor detection using fusion of hand crafted and deep learning features, Cogn. Syst. Res. 59 (2020) 221–230. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.09.007.
  • J. Zhang, Z. Jiang, J. Dong, Y. Hou, B. Liu, Attention Gate ResU-Net for Automatic MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation, IEEE Access. 8 (2020) 58533–58545. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983075.
  • Br35H :: Brain Tumor Detection 2020 | Kaggle, (n.d.). https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ahmedhamada0/brain-tumor-detection (accessed 14 October 2022).
  • A. Derin, C. Gurkan, A. Budak, H. Karatas, Pancreas Segmentation Using U-Net Based Segmentation Networks in CT Modality: A Comparative Analysis, Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 40 (2022) 94–98. doi:10.31590/ejosat.1171803.
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Matematik
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Ahmet Furkan Bayram 0000-0002-1304-9941

Caglar Gurkan 0000-0002-4652-3363

Abdulkadir Budak 0000-0002-0328-6783

Hakan Karataş 0000-0002-9497-5444

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 17 Ekim 2022
Kabul Tarihi 4 Kasım 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 06 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Bayram, A. F., Gurkan, C., Budak, A., Karataş, H. (2022). Convolutional Neural Networks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of State-of-the-Art Segmentation Networks. Turkish Journal of Forecasting, 06(2), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.34110/forecasting.1190289
AMA Bayram AF, Gurkan C, Budak A, Karataş H. Convolutional Neural Networks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of State-of-the-Art Segmentation Networks. TJF. Aralık 2022;06(2):61-66. doi:10.34110/forecasting.1190289
Chicago Bayram, Ahmet Furkan, Caglar Gurkan, Abdulkadir Budak, ve Hakan Karataş. “Convolutional Neural Networks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of State-of-the-Art Segmentation Networks”. Turkish Journal of Forecasting 06, sy. 2 (Aralık 2022): 61-66. https://doi.org/10.34110/forecasting.1190289.
EndNote Bayram AF, Gurkan C, Budak A, Karataş H (01 Aralık 2022) Convolutional Neural Networks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of State-of-the-Art Segmentation Networks. Turkish Journal of Forecasting 06 2 61–66.
IEEE A. F. Bayram, C. Gurkan, A. Budak, ve H. Karataş, “Convolutional Neural Networks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of State-of-the-Art Segmentation Networks”, TJF, c. 06, sy. 2, ss. 61–66, 2022, doi: 10.34110/forecasting.1190289.
ISNAD Bayram, Ahmet Furkan vd. “Convolutional Neural Networks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of State-of-the-Art Segmentation Networks”. Turkish Journal of Forecasting 06/2 (Aralık 2022), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.34110/forecasting.1190289.
JAMA Bayram AF, Gurkan C, Budak A, Karataş H. Convolutional Neural Networks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of State-of-the-Art Segmentation Networks. TJF. 2022;06:61–66.
MLA Bayram, Ahmet Furkan vd. “Convolutional Neural Networks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of State-of-the-Art Segmentation Networks”. Turkish Journal of Forecasting, c. 06, sy. 2, 2022, ss. 61-66, doi:10.34110/forecasting.1190289.
Vancouver Bayram AF, Gurkan C, Budak A, Karataş H. Convolutional Neural Networks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation: A Comparative Analysis of State-of-the-Art Segmentation Networks. TJF. 2022;06(2):61-6.

INDEXING

   16153                        16126   

  16127                       16128                       16129