Evaluation of the Usefuness of Youtube Videos as Sources Related to Vitrectomy in Vitreous Hemorrhage

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 2, 114 - 118, 29.04.2022

Murat Serkan Songur , Mehmet Çıtırık

https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.978328

Cited By: 1

Öz

Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of YouTube videos about vitrectomy in vitreous hemorrhage surgery as a resource.
Methods: The first 100 videos were evaluated when they were scanned by typing "vitreous hemorrhage vitrectomy" in the YouTube search engine. These videos were also analyzed and scored using DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and Global Quality (GQ) scoring systems.
Results: The DISCERN score of the evaluated videos was 37.2 ±6.5; JAMA score 1.9 ± 0.5; The GQ score was 2.0 ± 0.5. According to the results, vitrectomy in vitreous hemorrhage surgery videos, DISCERN score is weak; The JAMA score was evaluated as low quality and poor quality in the GQ score.
Conclusion: Although there are enough videos on YouTube with vitrectomy in vitreous hemorrhage, its usefulness as a resource is low and its quality is poor.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Vitreous hemorrhage, vitrectomy, YouTube, DISCERN score, JAMA score, Global Quality score

Vitreus Hemorajisinde Vitrektomi Cerrahisi ile İlgili Youtube Videolarının Kaynak Olarak Yararlılığının Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Vitreus hemorajisinde vitrektomi cerrahisiyle ilgili YouTube videolarının kaynak olarak yararlılığını değerlendirmek.
Gereç ve Yöntem: YouTube arama motorunda ‘vitreous hemorrhage vitrectomy’ yazarak taratıldığında, ilk çıkan 100 video değerlendirildi. Bu videolar ayrıca, DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) ve Global Quality (GQ) skorlama sistemleri ile analiz edilerek skorlandı.
Bulgular: Değerlendirilen videoların DISCERN skoru 37.2±6.5; JAMA skoru 1.9±0.5; GQ skorlaması ise 2.0±0.5 idi. Sonuçlara göre vitreus hemorajisinde vitrektomi cerrahisi videoları, DISCERN skoru zayıf; JAMA skoru düşük kalite ve GQ skorlamasında ise zayıf kaliteye sahip olarak değerlendirildi.
Sonuç: Vitreus hemorajisinde vitrektomi cerrahisi ile YouTube da yeterince video bulunmasına rağmen, kaynak olarak yararlılığı düşük ve kalitesi zayıftır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Vitreus hemorajisi, vitrektomi, YouTube, DISCERN skoru, JAMA skoru, Global Quality skoru

Kaynakça

• 1.Blodi BA, Paluska SA. Cataract after vitrectomy in young patients. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1092–5.
• 2. Melberg NS, Thomas MA. Nuclear sclerotic cataract after vitrectomy in patients younger than 50 years of age. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1466–71.
• 3. Novak MA, Rice TA, Michels RG, Auer C. The crystalline lens after vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1984;91:1480–4.
• 4. Chen E. 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2007;18(3):188–193.
• 5- Khan MA, Kuley A, Riemann CD, Berrocal MH, Lakhanpal RR, Hsu J, et al. Long-term visual outcomes and safety profile of 27-Gauge pars plana vitrectomy for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(3):423–431.
• 6. Ed Bennet. “Social media and hospitals: from trendy to essential,” in Future scan 2011, Health Administration Press, 2011.
• 7. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2016;49:1194-1200.
• 8. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLOS ONE 2013;8:e82469.
• 9. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health.1999;53:105-111.
• 10. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis d a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 2012;39:899-903.
• 11. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA. 1997;277:1244-1245.
• 12. Weil AG, Bojanowski MW, Jamart J, Gustin T, Lévêque M. Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2014; 82:31-39.
• 13. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine 2018;43(22):e1334-e1339.
• 14. Social media statistics & facts. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/. Accessed December 18,2018.
• 15. Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/. Accessed December 19, 2018.
• 16. Patel R, Chang T, Greysen SR, Chopra V. Social media use in chronic disease: a systematic review and novel taxonomy. The American journal of medicine, 2015;128(12):1335-1350. 17. Guthrie G, Davies RM, Fleming CK, Browning AC. YouTube as a source of information about retinitis pigmentosa. Eye 2014;28(4):499–500
• 18. Borgersen NJ, Henriksen MJV, Konge L, Sørensen TL, Thomsen ASS, Subhi Y. Direct ophthalmoscopy on YouTube: analysis of instructional YouTube videos’ content and approach to visualization. Clinical Ophthalmology 2016;10:1535.
• 19. Young BK, Verter E, Howard MA. Quality analysis of publicly available videos for pediatric strabismus surgery. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2020;24(2):102-104.
• 20. Şahin A, Şahin M, Türkcü FM. YouTube as a source of information in retinopathy of prematurity. Irish Journal of Medical Science 2049;188(2):613-617.
• 21. Abdelmseih M. Evaluation and reliability of YouTube videos for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)-A warning sign. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2016;7:05.
• 22. Vance K, Howe W, Dellavalle RP. Social internet sites as a source of public health information. Dermatol Clin 2009;27:133–6.
• 23. Syed-Abdul S, Fernandez-Luque L, Jian WS, Li YC, Crain S, Hsu MH, et al. Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube. Journal of medical Internet research, 2013;15(2):e30.
• 24. Amante DJ, Hogan TP, Pagoto SL, English TM, Lapane KL. Access to care and use of the Internet to search for health information: results from the US National Health Interview Survey. J Med Internet Res 2015;17(4):e106.
• 25. Kuçuk B, Sirakaya E. An analysis of YouTube videos as educational resources for patients about refractive surgery. Cornea 2020;39(4):491-494.
• 26. Kalayci M, Cetinkaya E, Suren E, Yigit K, Erol MK. Are YouTube Videos Useful in Informing Patients about Keratoplasty? In Seminars in Ophthalmology 2021;2:1-6.
• 27. Altunel O, Sirakaya E. Evaluation of YouTube videos as sources of information about multifocal intraocular lens. In Seminars in Ophthalmology 2021;3:1-5.
• 28. Mangan MS, Cakir A, Yurttaser Ocak S, Tekcan H, Balci S, Ozcelik Kose A. Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube. Strabismus, 2020:1-6.