A Framework to Promote Publicness in Urban Open Spaces

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 225 - 236, 30.06.2023

Fulay Uysal

Öz

Urban public spaces are places where people, socialize, daily life activities take place, and are accessible to everyone. Urban space harbors public life. Today, the meaning of publicity is changing in the new centers of developing cities, and it is important to sustain public life in these areas. This study aims at determining the necessary framework for the formation of public open spaces and the provision of public use in urban open spaces. The examining and strenghtening of public open spaces are possible by reviewing daily life activities. The focus of this study is to use the studies on urban space as a tool for the improvement of public space, to examine the design approaches that develop appropriate design criteria, and to reveal formation of public space and the spaces that have potential for public life. Thus, publicness, public life and public use have led to the literature for this study. Approaches that deal with the environment, people and space relations have been adopted while the concept of publicness concept was discussed. In this context, parameters that provide formation of public open spaces in order to ensure public life and improve communication among urban residents have been proposed. These parameters, which reveal the characteristics and potentials of public space, can guide us through the design of new urban spaces or the renewal of existing urban spaces.

Anahtar Kelimeler

urban open spaces, public life, public use, urban public space

Teşekkür

The author thank to the advisor of the doctoral thesis, Prof.Dr. Selahattin Önür for his patience, valuable suggestions, guidance and criticism in the realization of this study.

Kaynakça

• [1] Alexander, C. (1987). A New Theory of Urban Design. Newyork: Oxford University Press.
• [2] Appleyard, D. (1981). Liveable Streets. London: University of California Press.
• [3] Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• [4] Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., and Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public Places Urban Spaces The Dimensions of Urban Design. Kent, UK: Architectural Press.
• [5] Carmona, M. (2010). Public Places - Urban Spaces. London: Routledge.
• [6] Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., Stone, A. M. (1992). Public Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• [7] Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., Stone, A. M. (2006). Need in Public Space. London: Routledge.
• [8] Cullen, G. (1976). The Concise Townscape. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
• [9] Curran, R. J. (1983). Architecture and the Urban Experience. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
• [10] Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings: using public space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
• [11] Gehl, J. (2004). Towards A Fine City For People - Public Spaces - Public Life. London: Transport for London and Central London Partnership.
• [12] Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for People. Washington: Island Press.
• [13] Habermas, J. (2007). Kamusallığın Yapısal Dönüşümü. Çev: Bora, T.; Sancar M. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• [14] Hood, W. (1999). Urban Diaries: Improvisation in West Oakland, California in Everyday Urbanism. New York: The Monacelli Press.
• [15] Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
• [16] Jacobs, J. (1998). A Vital Cities: An Interview with Jane Jacobs. Stewart Brand.
• [17] Kohn, M. (2004). Brave New Neighbourhoods: The Privatisation of Public Space. London: Routledge.
• [18] Lang, J. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory, The Role of Behavioral Sciences in Enviromental Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
• [19] Lang, J. (2005). Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products. UK: Architectural Press.
• [20] Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• [21] Lynch, K. (1972). The Openness of Open Space. New York: George Brazillier Inc.
• [22] Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and Private Spaces of the City. London: Routledge.
• [23] Mitchell, D. (2003). Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: Guilford Press.
• [24] Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a City: Urbanity, Vitality and Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116.
• [25] Newman, O. (1973). Defensible Place. New York: Mac Millan.
• [26] PPS (Project for public space). (2000). How To Turn a Place Around: A Handbook of Creating Successful Public Spaces. New York.
• [27] Sarkar, S. (2003). Qualitative Evaluation of Comfort Needs in Urban Walkways in Major Activity Centers. Transp. Q., 57(4), 39–59.
• [28] Tschumi, B. (1994). Architecture and Disjunction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• [29] Varna, G., Tiesdell, S. (2010). Assessing the Publicness of Public Space:The Star Model of Publicness. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 575–598.
• [30] Voordt, D. J. M., Jong, T. M. (2002). Ways to study and research : urban, architectural and technical design. Delft: DUP Science Press.
• [31] Whyte, W. H. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Washington: PPS-Project for Public Spaces Publication.
• [32] Whyte, W. H. (1988). City; rediscovering the centre, Doubleday Garden City. New York.
• [33] Whyte, W. H. (2000). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces, Common Ground Readings and Reflections on Public Space. New York: Routledge.
• [34] Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by Design: Environment/Behavior/Neuroscience in Architecture, Interiors, Landscape, and Planning. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
• [35] Zube, I. A., Eds., E. H. (1989). Public Places and Spaces Human Behavior and Environment. Newyork and London: Plenum Press.
• [36] Uysal, F. (2020). An Exemplar Analysis and Method Proposal Intended for Development of Open Spaces along Auto-Transport Corridors in Expanding Cities as Urban Public Space, Atılım University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara.