Investigation of the Effect of Using Fe + Pure Water Nano Fluid on Thermal Performance in a Two Phase Closed Thermosiphon

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 357 - 372, 27.06.2021

Kerim Martin

https://doi.org/10.29109/gujsc.933147

Öz

Heat is a type of energy that is used in many applications and can be easily converted into other types of energy. In this study, a performance analysis was carried out by using Fe + Pure water nano fluid in place of pure water in a two phase closed thermosiphon, which has a wide place in practice due to its simple structure. In the study, a copper thermosiphon with a length of 1 m, diameter of 14 mm and wall thickness of 1 mm was used. Experiments were performed with both pure water and nano fluid to be make a comparison. To observe the performance of system in different operating conditions, the experiments were carried out at 3 different heating power (150, 300, 450 W) and 3 different coolant flow rates (3, 6, 9 g/s). In all experimental conditions, Fe + Pure water nanofluid had better results than pure water. The highest efficiency value was found to be 77.9% in the experiment using Fe + Pure water nano fluid, performed at 150 W power and 9 g/s water flow rate. When pure water was used in this experiment, the efficiency value was obtained as 67.7% and the improvement rate was 15%. The highest improvement rate was obtained as 50.3% in the experiment conducted at 450 W heating power and 3 g/s coolant flow rate. The use of nano fluid has also reduced the thermal resistance of the thermosiphon. The highest rate of decrease in thermal resistances was obtained as 56.7% in the experiment performed at 150 W heating power and 3 g/s coolant flow rate.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Heat Pipe, Nano Fluid, Thermal Performance, Waste Heat

Kaynakça

• OlabiA.G. et. al., “Application of Nanofluids for Enhanced Waste Heat Recovery: A Review”, Nano Energy, s. 105871, 2020.
• C. Forman, I. K. Muritala, R. Pardemann, and B. Meyer, “Estimating the global waste heat potential”, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., c. 57, ss. 1568–1579, 2016.
• Europan Comission, “2030 climate & energy framework”, 2021. [Online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2030_en#tab-0-0. [Access: 20-Şub-2021].
• A. Ozsoy and V. Corumlu, “Thermal performance of a thermosyphon heat pipe evacuated tube solar collector using silver-water nanofluid for commercial applications”, Renew. Energy, c. 122, ss. 26–34, 2018.
• M. Kaya et.al., “Performance analysis of using CuO-Methanol nanofluid in a hybrid system with concentrated air collector and vacuum tube heat pipe”, Energy Convers. Manag., c. 199, number August, 2019.
• E. ÇİFTÇİ, “AlN/Saf Su Nanoakışkanının Isı Borusu Performans Parametreleri Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Deneysel Olarak Araştırılması”, Gazi University Journal of Science Part C: Design and Technology, c. 8, number 4, ss. 858–871, 2020.
• W. W. Wang et. al., “A two-phase closed thermosyphon operated with nanofluids for solar energy collectors: Thermodynamic modeling and entropy generation analysis”, Sol. Energy, c. 211, number May, ss. 192–209, 2020.
• E. Khajehpour, A. R. Noghrehabadi, A. E. Nasab, and S. M. H. Nabavi, “Experimental investigation of the effect of nanofluids on the thermal resistance of a thermosiphon L-shape heat pipe at different angles”, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., c. 113, number March, s. 104549, 2020.
• A. Gallego, B. Herrera, R. Buitrago-Sierra, C. Zapata, and K. Cacua, “Influence of filling ratio on the thermal performance and efficiency of a thermosyphon operating with Al2O3-water based nanofluids”, Nano-Structures and Nano-Objects, c. 22, s. 100448, 2020.
• R. Vidhya, T. Balakrishnan, and B. Suresh Kumar, “Investigation on thermophysical properties and heat transfer performance of heat pipe charged with binary mixture based ZnO-MgO hybrid nanofluids”, Mater. Today Proc., 2020.
• A. K. Reji, G. Kumaresan, A. Sarathi, A. G. . Saiganesh, R. Suriya Kumar, and M. M. Shelton, “Performance analysis of thermosyphon heat pipe using aluminum oxide nanofluid under various angles of inclination”, Mater. Today Proc., 2020.
• N. Alagappan and C. S. Rathnasabapathy, “Performance of Two Phase Copper Thermosyphon Operated with Cerium IV Oxide and Iron II, III Oxide Nano Fluid using Box-Behnken Design”, Mater. Today Proc., c. 24, ss. 2094–2107, 2019.
• A. Sözen et.al., “Upgrading of the Performance of an Air-to-Air Heat Exchanger Using Graphene/Water Nanofluid”, Int. J. Thermophys., c. 42, sayı 3, 2021.
• Nanografi, “Nanografi Nano Teknoloji A.Ş”. [Online]. Available at: nanografi.com.tr. [Access: 25-Oca-2021].
• H. M. Ali, Hybrid Nanofluids for Convection Heat Transfer. 2020.
• R. S. Khedkar, S. S. Sonawane, and K. L. Wasewar, “Heat transfer study on concentric tube heat exchanger using TiO2-water based nanofluid”, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., c. 57, ss. 163–169, 2014.
• A. Sözen, M. Gürü, T. Menlik, U. Karakaya, and E. Çiftçi, “Experimental comparison of Triton X-100 and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate surfactants on thermal performance of TiO2–deionized water nanofluid in a thermosiphon”, Exp. Heat Transf., c. 31, number 5, ss. 450–469, 2018.
• N. Sezer, M. A. Atieh, and M. Koç, “A comprehensive review on synthesis, stability, thermophysical properties, and characterization of nanofluids”, Powder Technol., c. 344, ss. 404–431, 2019.