Religion and Entrepreneurship

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 508 - 521, 23.10.2019

Serdar Yener

Öz

This research offering that religional
beliefs affects entrepreneurial behaviors through social values is done by
literature review. Religion phenomenon, which is accepted as a sociological
issue and religion institute is thought to affect entrepreneurship within
frames of new institutional approach of sociology. Within this frame a
milestone in almost each area of cultural life which is called axial age is
presented firstly. Then today’s popular religional beliefs are questioned
respectively. Within this frame Hinduism, Budhism, Judaism, Christianism, and
Islam perpectives were observed according to entrepreneurship. This research
which handles present religions tackles 
and explains the issue from the point of the effect of religion on
autonomy, risk taking, innovativeness, creativeness. The research is designed
and conducted within frames of Ajzen’s (1991:108) theory of planned behaviors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Religion, Entrepreneurship, Axial Era, Budhism, Hinduism

Din ve Girişimcilik

Öz

Dini inanışların değerler yoluyla
girişimsel davranışlar üzerinde etki oluşturabileceğini öneren bu çalışma
literatür taraması yöntemiyle yapılmıştır. Sosyolojik bir olgu olan din olgusu
ve kurumunun yeni kurumsal kuram çerçevesinde bireylerin girişimcilik
davranışları üzerinde etkili olabileceği düşünülmüştür. Bu çerçevede ilk olarak
eksen çağı olarak adlandırılan ve kültürel yaşamın hemen hemen bütün
alanlarında bir dönüm noktası olarak kabul edilen bir dönem irdelenmiştir.
Müteakiben günümüzde yaygınlığı açısından öne çıkan dini inanışlar sırasıyla
irdelenmiştir. Bu çerçevede Eksen çağından sonra Hinduizm, Budizm, Yahudilik,
Hıristiyanlık ve İslamiyet açısından girişimcilik irdelenmeye çalışılmıştır.
Günümüzde  mevcut yaygın dinlerin ele
alındığı bu çalışma dini inanışların özerklik, risk alma, yenilikçilik ve
yaratıcılık davranışları üzerindeki etkileri yoluyla girişimcilik
davranışlarını yorumlamaya çalışmıştır. Araştırma Ajzen’in (1991:108)
planlanmış davranışlar kuramı çerçevesinde dizayn edilmiş ve uygulanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Din, Girişimcilik, Eksen Çağı, Budizm, Hinduizm

Kaynakça

• Abrutyn, S. (2014). Religious Autonomy and Religious Entrepreneurship: An Evolutionary- Institutionalist’s Taken on the Axial Age. Comparative Sociology. 13, 105-134.
• Abrutyn, S. ve Van Ness, J. (2015). Institutional Entrepreneurship as Sociocultural Analogy to Biological Mutation: Considering One Source of Institutional Evolution. Thesis Eleven 127: 52-77.
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 50(2):179-211.
• Barro, Robert, and Rachel McCleary. 2003. Religion and Economic Growth across Countries. American Sociological Review, 68 (3), 760-781.
• Baumol, W. (2002). Free Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
• Bekçi, İ., Apalı, A. ve A., Y. (2014). Semavi Dinlerin Görünmeyen Muhasebe Panoraması: Yahudilikte Muhasebe Motifleri. Kapadokya Dergisi, 2014.
• Bellah, R.N. (1967). Civil religion in America. Daedalus 96 (Winter): 1-27.
• Bilmen, Ö. N. (1982). Hukuki İslamiye ve İstilahati Fıkhiyye Kamusu, Bilmen Yayınevi; İstanbul.
• Bruce, S. (1999) Choice and Religion: A Critique of Rational Choice. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.
• Colomy, P. (1998). Neofunctionalism and neoinstitutionalism: Human agency and interest in institutional change. Sociological Forum, 13(2): 265–300.Dana L.P. (2009). Religion as an explanatory variable for entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 10(2): 87–99.Davie, G. (2013). Sociology of Religion. Los Angeles: Sage.Dobbelaere, K. (1981) Secularization: a multidimensional concept. Current Sociology 20(2): 1-216.Drakopoulou-Dodd, S. ve Gotsis, G. (2007) The interrelationships between entrepreneurship and religion. Entrepreneurship and Innovation 8(2): 93-104.
• Döndüren, H. (1996) İslâm Ekonomisinde Sermaye Birikimi ve Kullanılma Yöntemleri, İslam Araştırma Dergisi, 1(2) 53-80.
• Döndüren, H. (2008). Osmanlı tarihinde bazı faizsiz kredi uygulamaları ve modern Türkiye’de Faizsiz bankacılık Tecrübesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 1-24.
• Eisenstadt, S.N. (ed.) (1986) The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations. Albany: State University of New York Press
• Guisa, Luigi, Paolo Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales (2006). Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (2), 23-48.
• Gül, A. R. (2005). Faizsiz bankacılığın dini temeli açısından mudarebe ile selef yöntemlerinin mukayesesi. AÜFD.16, 48-83.
• Hayek, F.A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the Economics of Religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36 (3), 1465–1495.
• Jaspers, K. (1953). The origin and goal of history. Translated by Michael Bullock. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
• Karl J., (1953). The Origin and Goal of History . New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Kihlstrom, Richard E. and Jean Jacques Laffont,(1979) . A General Equilibrium Entrepreneurial Theory of Firm Formation Based on Risk Aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 719–748.
• Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Knight, F.(1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
• Kuran, T.(2011). The Long Divergence: How Islamic Law Held Back the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Lazear, E., (2002). “Entrepreneurship,” Working Paper No. 9109, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. 2002.
• Lechner F.J. (2008). Rational choice and religious economics. In: Beckford JA and Demerath NJ (eds) The Sage Handbook of The Sociology of Religion. London: Sage, 81–97.
• McCleary R.M. ve Barro R.T. (2006). Religion and political economy in an international panel. Journal for the Scientific Study Religion 45(2): 149–175.
• McCelland, D. (1964) The Achieving Society, Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.
• Momigliano, A. (1997) On Pagans, Jews, and Christians. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
• Munshi, K. ve Mark R. (2006). Traditional Institutions Meet the Modern World: Caste, Gender, and Schooling Choice in a Globalizing Economy, American Economic Review, 96 (4), 1225-1252.
• Nel, E. (2006). Do business till I come. Instruction to a new business generation. Yahweh Shammah Publishers. Port Elizabeth.
• Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. (2008). U.S. Religious Landscape Survey: Religious Affiliation: Diverse and Dynamic. (http://religions.pewforum.org/pdf/report-religious-landscape-study-full.pdf ).
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
• Singer, M., (1966). Religion and Social Change in India: The Max Weber Thesis Phase Three. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 14, 497-505.
• Slingerland, E., Henrich, J. ve Norenzayan, A. (2013). The evolution of prosocial religions. In: Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language and religion, ed. P. J. Richerson & M. H. Christiansen, pp. 331–44. MIT Press.
• Sombart, W. (1911). The Jews and Modern Capitalism. Batoche Books.
• Tahsin, Ö. (2003). Osmanlı Para Vakıfları Kanuni Dönemi Üsküdar Örneği, Türk Tarih Kurumu: Ankara.
• Turner, B. S. (1998), Max Weber Classic Monographs Vol.VII:Weber and Islam. Routledge Press, London and New York.
• Uppal, J. S. (2001). Hinduism and Economic Development in South Asia. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2001, 13 (3), 20–33.
• Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. A. (2007). An Institutional Economic Reconstruction of Scientific Management: On the Lost Theoretical Logic of Taylorism. Academy of Management Review 32: 105–117.
• Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. A. (2008). An Economic Reading of the Exodus: On the Institutional Economic Reconstruction of Biblical Cooperation Failures”, Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 22(1): 114-34.
• Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. A. (2010). Out of a Slave Contract: The Analysis of Pre-Hobbesian Anarchists in the Old Testament”, Constitutional Political Economy 21: 288-307.
• Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. A. (2012). Questioning the Weber Thesis: Capitalist Ethics and the Hebrew Bible?”, Sociology Mind 2(1): 1-11.
• Weber, M. (1992). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, London, Routledge, 1992.
• Yener, S., Arslan, A. and Demirtaş, Ö. (2018). The Mediating Role of Temperament and Character on the relationship between Mindfulness and Entrepreneurial Personality. Journal of East European Management Studies,2018.
• Zucker, Lynne G., Micheal R. Darby, and Marilynn B. Brewer, (1998). Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises. American Economic Review, 1998, 88, 290-306.