A STRUCTURAL MODEL SUGGESTION ABOUT THE EFFECTS OF SUPPLY CHAIN COMPLEXITY ON FIRM PERFORMANCE

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 6, 1 - 12, 15.01.2015

Talha Ustasüleyman , Selçuk Perçin

Öz

Competitiveness is important for every firm in the business world. Today’s supply chains are more complex due to globalization and its effects especially on logistics activities. Supply chain complexity effects firm performance and firm competitiveness. The objective of this paper is to develop a model that explains factors of supply chain complexity and effect of these factors on firm performance. To assess these relationships, it was conducted a questionnaire survey on middle and large firms. For this purpose, firstly, variables were determined with performing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Next, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed to conduct measurement model with AMOS 20 and fit indices were calculated. Later, effect of Supply chain complexity on firm performance has been determined by structural equation modeling. The results have showed that downstream complexity and deficiencies in the decision-making process have positive effects on the negativeness of firm performance. In addition, it is shown that deficiencies in the decision-making process have an effect on upstream complexity

Anahtar Kelimeler

Supply Chain Complexity, Firm Performance, Structural Equation Modeling

TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ KARMAŞIKLIĞININ İŞLETME PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİNE YÖNELİK YAPISAL MODEL ÖNERİSİ

Öz

Rekabet edebilirlik, iş dünyasındaki bütün işletmeler için önemlidir. Günümüzde tedarik zincirleri
küreselleşme ve özellikle onun lojistik faaliyetlere etkisi nedeniyle karmaşıklaşmaktadır. Tedarik zinciri
karmaşıklığı firma performansını ve rekabet edebilirliği etkilemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, tedarik zinciri
karmaşıklık faktörlerini ve bu faktörlerin işletme performansına etkisini açıklayan bir model geliştirmektir.
Bu amaçla oluşturulan anket formu orta ve büyük ölçekli işletmelere uygulanmıştır. Bu amaçla ilk olarak,
açıklayıcı faktör analizi (AFA) ile değişkenler belirlenmiştir. Ardından doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA)
AMOS 20 programı kullanılarak ölçüm modeline uygulanmış ve uyum indeksleri hesaplanmıştır. Daha sonra
ise yapısal eşitlik modeli ile tedarik zinciri karmaşıklığının firma performansı üzerindeki etkisi belirlenmiştir.
Çalışmanın sonucunda aşağı doğru karmaşıklığın ve karar verme sürecindeki yetersizliğin işletme
performansındaki olumsuzluğu pozitif yönde etkilediği, ayrıca karar verme sürecindeki yetersizliğin yukarı
doğru karmaşıklığı etkilediği ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tedarik Zinciri Karmaşıklığı, Firma Performansı, Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli

Kaynakça

• KAYNAKÇA
• AMID, Amin; Morteza MOALAGH ve Ahad Zare RAVASAN (2012), “Identification and classification of ERP critical failure factors in Iranian industries”, Information Systems, 37 (3), 227-237.
• BALLANTYNE, Roy; Jan PACKER ve John FALK, (2011) “Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: Testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experiences using structural equation modelling”, Tourism Management, 32, 1243-1252.
• BLOME, Constantin; Tobias SCHOENHERR ve Dominik ECKSTEIN (2013), “The impact of knowledge transfer and complexity on supply chain flexibility: A knowledge-based view”, International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 307-316.
• BOZARTH, Cecil C.; Donald P. WARSING; Barbara B. FLYNN ve E. James FLYNN (2009), “The impact of Supply Chain Complexity on manufacturing plant performance”, Journal of Operations Management, 27, 1, 78-93.
• DELEN, Dursun; Cemil KUZEY ve Ali UYAR (2013) “Measuring firm performance using financial ratios: A decision tree approach”, Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 10, 3970-3983.
• DICKINGER, Astrid ve Brigitte STANGL (2013), “Website performance and behavioral consequences: A formative measurement approach”, Journal of Business Research, 66, 6, 771–777.
• DOLOI, Hemanta; K.C. IYER ve Anil SAWHNEY (2011), “Structural equation model for assessing impacts of contractor's performance on project success”, International Journal of Project Management, 29, 6, 687–695.
• GENOULAZ, Valerie Botta ve Michel GOURGAND (2008), “Management of complexity and uncertainty in supply chains”, Production Planning& Control, 19, 7, 629–631.
• GERSCHBERGER, Markus; Corinna Engelhardt NOWITZKI ve Sebastian KUMMER (2012), “A model to determine complexity in supply networks”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23, 8, 1015-1037.
• GIMENEZ, Cristina; Taco van der VAART ve Dirk Pieter van DONK (2012), “Supply chain integration and performance: the moderating effect of supply complexity”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32, 5, 583-610.
• HAIR, Joseph F.; Rolph E. ANDERSON; William C. BLACK ve Ronald L. TATHAM (1995), Multivariate data analysis with readings, Prentice-hall International Inc., A Viacom company, New Jersey.
• HAMMAMI, Hajer; Nabil AMARA ve Rejean LANDRY (2013), “Organizational climate and its influence on brokers’ knowledge transfer activities: A structural equation modeling”, International Journal of Information Management, 33, 1, 105– 118.
• ISIK, Filiz (2010), “An entropy-based approach for measuring complexity in supply chains”, International Journal of Production Research, 48, 12, 3681–3696.
• LIAO, Chechen; Pui-Lai TO; Chuang-Chun LIU; Pu-Yuan KUO ve Shu-Hui CHUANG (2011), “Factors influencing the intended use of web portals” Online Information Review, 35, 2, 237-254.
• MAK, Brenda L. ve Hy SOCKEL (2001), “A confirmatory factor analysis of IS employee motivation and retention”, Information & Management, 38, 5, 265-276.
• MANUJ, Ila ve Funda SAHIN (2011), “A model of supply chain and supply chain decision-making complexity”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41, 5, 511-549.
• MILGATE, Michael (2001), “Supply chain complexity and delivery performance: an international exploratory study”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6, 3, 106–118.
• ONG, Tah Fatt ve Ghazali MUSA (2012), “Examining the influences of experience, personality and attitude on SCUBA divers’ underwater behaviour: A structural equation model”, Tourism Management, 33, 6, 1521-1534.
• PERÇİN, Selçuk (2006), “İmalat Işletmelerinin Yeni Ürün Geliştirme Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler: ISO 1000 Firmalarına Yönelik Bir Araştırma” Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi”, 20, 1, 357-377.
• PERONA, Marco ve Giovanni MIRAGLIOTTA (2004), “Complexity management and supply chain performance assessment. A field study and a conceptual framework”, International Journal of Production Economics, 90, 1, 103–115.
• RAMKISSOON, Haywantee; Liam D. G. SMITH ve Betty WEILER (2013), “Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach”, Tourism Management, 36, 552-566.
• REN, Jianfeng; Donglei DU ve Dachuan XU (2013), “The complexity of two supply chain scheduling problems”, Information Processing Letters, 113, 17, 609–612.
• RYAN, James C. ve Syed A. A. TIPU (2013), “Leadership effects on innovation propensity: A two-factor full range leadership model”, Journal of Business Research, 66, 10, 2116-2129.
• SERDARASAN, Seyda (2012), “A review of supply chain complexity drivers” Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering, 792-797.
• SERDARASAN, Seyda (2013), “A review of supply chain complexity drivers” Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66, 3, 533–540.
• SHAH, Rachna ve Susan Meyer GOLDSTEIN (2006), “Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward” Journal of Operations Management, 24, 2, 148-169.
• SOHRABI, Babak; Iman Raeesi VANANI; Kaveh TAHMASEBIPUR ve Safar FAZLI (2012), “An exploratory analysis of hotel selection factors: A comprehensive survey of Tehran hotels”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 1, 96-106.
• SUBRAMANIAN, Gunasekaran Nachiappan; Angappa YU; Jie CHENG ve Jiang Kun NING (2014), “Customer satisfaction and competitiveness in the Chinese E-retailing: Structural equation modeling (SEM) approach to identify the role of quality factors”, Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 1, 69–80.
• SUZUKI, Jun (2011), “Structural modeling of the value of patent”, Research Policy, 40, 7, 986–1000.
• TREIBLMAIER, Horst ve Peter FILZMOSER (2010), “Exploratory factor analysis revisited: How robust methods support the detection of hidden multivariate data structures in IS research”, Information & Management, 47, 4, 197-207.
• VACHON, Stephan ve Robert D. KLASSEN (2002), “An Exploratory Investigation of the Effects of Supply Chain Complexity on Delivery Performance”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49, 3, 218-230.
• VINODH, S. ve Dino JOY (2012), “Structural Equation Modelling of lean manufacturing practices”, International Journal of Production Research, 50, 6, 1598–1607.
• WASTI, S. Arzu (2000), “Meyer ve Allen’in Üç Boyutlu Örgütsel Bağlılık Ölçeğinin Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Analizi”, 8. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Bildiriler Kitabı, 25-27 Mayıs 2000, Nevşehir, 401-410.
• WILDING, Richard (1998), “The Supply Chain Complexity Triangle: Uncertainty Generation in the Supply Chain”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 28, 8, 599-616.