Appearance of Critical Infrastructures in Foreign Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis

Yıl 2022, , 615 - 653, 26.12.2022

Kaya Ali Lekesizgöz

https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.1205433

Öz

This study aims to present a projection from a macro perspective to researchers, policymakers, institutions, and organizations by examining how the concept of “critical infrastructure” has developed analytically and systematically over the years. Compared to Turkish literature, academic studies on the concept of critical infrastructure in foreign literature have advanced. This study seeks to answer the following research questions by focusing on this relatively rich literature. How does the distribution vary according to the types of publications, the trend by years, related disciplines, authors, institution, country collaborations, citation, and keyword status related to critical infrastructure? It is aimed to reveal a typology to pave the way for future research in Türkiye. This paper uses Visual and scientific mapping methods based on Bibliographic Matching and Common Citations. 4,227 English articles which time span 1996-2022 (September) were selected from the Web of Science (WoS) database. In light of the obtained data, network and density graphs were created with VOSviewer software.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Critical Infrastructure, Meta-analysis, Bibliometric Analysis, Literature Review

Kritik Altyapıların Yabancı Literatüründeki Görünümü: Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz

Öz

Bu çalışmada “kritik altyapı” kavramının analitik ve sistematik olarak yıllar içerisinde nasıl bir gelişim gösterdiği incelenerek konu üzerinde çalışma yapmak isteyen araştırmacılara, politika belirleyicilere, kurum ve kuruluşlara makro bakış açısıyla bir izdüşümün sunulması amaçlanmıştır. Türkçe literatüre nazaran yabancı literatürde “kritik altyapı” kavramına ilişkin yapılan akademik çalışmalar ilerlemiş durumdadır. Bu çalışma kavrama yönelik yayın türleri, yıllara göre eğilim, ilgili bilim dalları, yazarlar, kurum, ülke iş birlikleri, atıf ve anahtar kelime durumuna göre dağılım nasıl bir değişkenlik göstermektedir? araştırma sorularına cevap aramaktadır. Elde edilen bulgularla bir tipoloji ortaya konması amaçlanmış ve gelecek araştırmalara temel olması hedeflenmiştir. Çalışmada Bibliyografik Eşleştirme ve Ortak Atıflara dayalı görsel ve bilimsel haritalama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Analiz birimi olarak Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanından 1996-2022 (Eylül) dönemini kapsayan 4.227 İngilizce makale seçilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler ışığında VOSviewer yazılımı ile ağ ve yoğunluk grafikleri oluşturularak yorumlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kritik Altyapılar, Meta Analiz, Bibliyometrik Analiz, Literatür Taraması, VOSViewer, Critical Infrastructure, Meta-analysis, Bibliometric Analysis, Literature Review

Kaynakça

• BAGHERİ, E., & GHORBANİ, A. A. (2008). “The State of the Art in Critical Infrastructure Protection: A Framework for Convergence”, International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 4:3, 215-244.
• BAKANLAR KURULU. (2013, 06 20). Ulusal Siber Güvenlik Stratejisi ve 2013–2014 Eylem Planı. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/main.aspx?home: http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2013/06/20130620-1.htm, adresinden alındı
• BENNETT Brian T (2007). Understanding, Assessing, and Responding to Terrorism: Protecting Critical Infrastructure and Personnel, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New Jersey.
• BIZAS Konstantinos (2016). “Reinhart Koselleck’s Work on Crisis”, French Journal for Media Research, 5, 1-12.
• BOUCHON Sara (2006). The Vulnerability of interdependent Critical Infrastructures Systems: Epistemological and Conceptual State of the Art, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, Italy.
• ENGELS Jens Ivo. (2018). Key Concepts for Critical Infrastructure Research, Springer, Darmstadt.
• EU. (2006). European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/justice_freedom_security/fight_against_terrorism/l33260_en.ht adresinden alındı
• FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY (2009). National Strategy for CIP Federal Republic of Germany. Berlin.
• GENCO, Abdullah (2020). “Türkiye’de Kritik Altyapı ve Kritik Altyapıya Yönelik Tehditler”, KAYTEK Dergisi, 2:2, 38-46.
• HURST, William, BENNİN Kwabena Ebo, KOTZE Ben ve MANGARA Tonderayi (2022). “Critical Infrastructures: Reliability, Resilience and Wastage”, Infrastructure, 7:3, 1-19.
• KARACA Muhammet ve GÜL Ensar (2021). “Kritik Altyapılara Yönelik Bilişim Suçları, Türkiye ve AB Uygulamaları”, Bilişim Hukuku Dergisi, 3:1, 1-30.
• KOSELLECK Reinhart (1988). Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
• KOSELLECK Reinhart ve RICHTER Michaela W. (2006). “Crisis”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 67:2, 357-400.
• Lİ Jie (2017). Scientometrics and Knowledge Network Analysis, Capital University of Economics and Business Press, Beijing
• Lİ Jie (2018). Principles and Applications of Mapping Knowledge Domains: A Beginner’s Guide to VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer, Higher Education Press, Beijing.
• Lİ Jie, RENİERS Genserik, COZZANİ Valerio ve KHAN Faisal (2017). “A Bibliometric Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Publications on Domino Effects in the Process Industry”, Journal of Loss Prevention Process Industries, 49, 103-110.
• MERİGO Jose M., GİL-LAFUENTE Anna M., ve YAGER Ronald R. (2015). “An Overview of Fuzzy Research with Bibliometric Indicators”, Applied Soft Computing, 27, 420-433.
• MERİGO Jose M., MAS-TUR Alicia, ROİG-TİERNO Norat ve RİBEİRO-SORİANO Domingo (2015). “A Bibliometric Overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014”, Journal of Business Research, 68, 2645-2653.
• MİNGERS John ve LEYDERSDOFF Loet (2015). “A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics”, European Journal of Operational Research, 246:1, 1-19.
• MOTEFF John, COPELAND Claudia ve FİSCHER John (2003). Critical Infrastructures: What Makes an Infrastructure Critical?, Defence Technical Information Center, https://irp.fas.org/crs/RL31556.pdf: https://irp.fas.org/crs/RL31556.pdf, erişim 01.09.2022.
• OTLET Paul (1934). Traité de documentation: le livre sur le livre, theéorie et pratique, Editions Mundeneum, Brussels. PASCUAL Mercedes ve GUİCHARD Frédéric (2005). “Criticality and Disturbance in Spatial Ecological Systems”, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20:2, 88-95.
• PESCH-CRONİN Kelley A. ve MARİON Nancy E. (2016). Critical Infrastructure Protection, Risk Management and Resilience, CRC Press, New York.
• ROSENTHAL Robert ve DİMATTEO M. Robin (2001). “Meta-Analysis: Recent Developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews”, Annual Review of Psychology, 52:1, 59-82.
• SAYĞAN TUNÇAY Sahra ve SÜRGEVİL DALKILIÇ Olcay (2017). “Yönetim ve Organizasyon Bilim Alanında Ortak Yazarlılık”, Journal of Business Research, 9:3, 393-423.
• SİMON Herbert A. (1983). Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.
• TANG Ming, LİAO Huchang ve SU, Shun-Feng (2018). “Bibliometric Overview and Visualization of the International Journal of Fuzzy Systems between 2007 and 2017”, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20, 1403-1422.
• TAO Jing, YANG Fuqiang, QUİ Dongyang ve RENİERS Genserik (2020). “Analysis of Safety Leadership Using a Science Mapping Approach”, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 140, 244-257.
• TEN Chee-Wooi, MANİMARAN Govindarasu, ve LİU Chen-Ching (2010). “Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructures: Attack and Defense Modelling”, IEEE, 40:4, 853-865.
• UK Government (2022, 01 5). National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/ uploads/system/uploads/:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/ government/uploads/system/uploads/ adresinden alındı
• UN (2018). World Urbanization Projects:The 2018 Revision, Key Facts. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-KeyFacts.pdf adresinden alındı
• USA PATRIOT ACT (2001, 10 26). Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required To Intercept and. Public Law 107–56: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ56/pdf/PLAW-107publ56.pdf adresinden alındı
• YANG Lie, CHEN Zhulei, LİU Ting, GONG Ze, YU Yingjian ve WANG Jia (2013). “Global Trends of Solid Waste Research From 1997 to 2011 by Using Bibliometric Analysis”, Scientometrics, 96, 133-146.